feat: introduce archify skill for generating architecture diagrams

- Added a new Archify skill, enabling users to create polished architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle diagrams. - Implemented comprehensive functionality including rendering, validation, and delivery of diagrams in various formats. - Integrated a user-friendly command-line interface for generating and previewing diagrams. - Developed supporting files including package.json, LICENSE, and SKILL.md for documentation and licensing. - Added unit tests to ensure reliability and functionality of the new skill. These changes enhance the application by providing a structured approach to visualizing system architecture and workflows, improving user experience and data representation.
2026-08-31 11:31:29 +07:00
parent 050fafd731
commit 166e0d40ac
221 changed files with 191228 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+import { throwDiagnosticError } from './diagnostics.mjs';
+
+const DEPLOYMENT_PROFILE = 'deployment-ownership';
+const DEPLOYMENT_BOUNDARY_KINDS = new Set(['region', 'security-group']);
+const PRIVATE_STATE_TYPES = new Set(['database']);
+
+function subject(collection, index, item = {}) {
+  return {
+    diagramType: 'architecture',
+    profile: DEPLOYMENT_PROFILE,
+    collection,
+    index,
+    ...(item.id ? { id: item.id } : {}),
+  };
+}
+
+function membership(boundaries, componentId, kind) {
+  return boundaries
+    .map((boundary, index) => ({ boundary, index }))
+    .filter(({ boundary }) => boundary.kind === kind && boundary.wraps.includes(componentId));
+}
+
+export function deploymentOwnershipDiagnostics(diagram) {
+  const components = Array.isArray(diagram.components) ? diagram.components : [];
+  const boundaries = (Array.isArray(diagram.boundaries) ? diagram.boundaries : [])
+    .map((boundary) => ({ ...boundary, wraps: Array.isArray(boundary.wraps) ? boundary.wraps : [] }));
+  const connections = Array.isArray(diagram.connections) ? diagram.connections : [];
+  const diagnostics = [];
+
+  for (const kind of DEPLOYMENT_BOUNDARY_KINDS) {
+    const count = boundaries.filter((boundary) => boundary.kind === kind).length;
+    if (count > 0) continue;
+    diagnostics.push({
+      code: 'engineering/deployment-boundary-kind',
+      severity: 'error',
+      message: `Deployment ownership requires at least one ${kind} boundary.`,
+      subject: subject('boundaries', -1),
+      evidence: { requiredKind: kind, found: count },
+      supportedFixes: [`add one ${kind} boundary with an explicit wraps list`],
+    });
+  }
+
+  components.forEach((component, index) => {
+    if (component.type === 'external') return;
+    if (typeof component.tag !== 'string' || component.tag.trim() === '') {
+      diagnostics.push({
+        code: 'engineering/deployment-owner-missing',
+        severity: 'error',
+        message: `Deployment component ${JSON.stringify(component.id)} does not name its owner in tag.`,
+        subject: subject('components', index, component),
+        evidence: { componentType: component.type, ownerField: 'tag' },
+        supportedFixes: [`set /components/${index}/tag to the responsible team or owner`],
+      });
+    }
+
+    const regions = membership(boundaries, component.id, 'region');
+    if (regions.length === 0) {
+      diagnostics.push({
+        code: 'engineering/deployment-region-scope',
+        severity: 'error',
+        message: `Deployment component ${JSON.stringify(component.id)} is not assigned to a region boundary.`,
+        subject: subject('components', index, component),
+        evidence: { componentType: component.type, regionMemberships: 0 },
+        supportedFixes: ['add the component id to the real region boundary wraps list'],
+      });
+    } else if (regions.length > 1) {
+      diagnostics.push({
+        code: 'engineering/deployment-region-ambiguous',
+        severity: 'error',
+        message: `Deployment component ${JSON.stringify(component.id)} belongs to more than one region boundary.`,
+        subject: subject('components', index, component),
+        evidence: {
+          componentType: component.type,
+          regions: regions.map(({ boundary, index: boundaryIndex }) => ({ boundaryIndex, label: boundary.label })),
+        },
+        supportedFixes: ['keep the component id in exactly one real region boundary wraps list'],
+      });
+    }
+
+    if (PRIVATE_STATE_TYPES.has(component.type)) {
+      const privateScopes = membership(boundaries, component.id, 'security-group');
+      if (privateScopes.length === 0) {
+        diagnostics.push({
+          code: 'engineering/deployment-private-state',
+          severity: 'error',
+          message: `Stateful component ${JSON.stringify(component.id)} is not assigned to a private security-group boundary.`,
+          subject: subject('components', index, component),
+          evidence: { componentType: component.type, privateMemberships: 0 },
+          supportedFixes: ['add the component id to the real private security-group boundary wraps list'],
+        });
+      }
+    }
+  });
+
+  boundaries.forEach((boundary, index) => {
+    if (boundary.kind !== 'security-group') return;
+    const members = boundary.wraps.map((id) => ({
+      id,
+      regions: membership(boundaries, id, 'region').map(({ boundary: region, index: boundaryIndex }) => ({
+        boundaryIndex,
+        label: region.label,
+      })),
+    }));
+    const regionIndexes = new Set(members.flatMap((member) => member.regions.map((region) => region.boundaryIndex)));
+    const consistent = members.length > 0
+      && members.every((member) => member.regions.length === 1)
+      && regionIndexes.size === 1;
+    if (consistent) return;
+    diagnostics.push({
+      code: 'engineering/deployment-private-region-consistency',
+      severity: 'error',
+      message: `Private boundary ${JSON.stringify(boundary.label)} must contain components from exactly one shared region.`,
+      subject: subject('boundaries', index, boundary),
+      evidence: { boundaryKind: boundary.kind, members },
+      supportedFixes: ['assign every private-boundary component to exactly one shared region boundary'],
+    });
+  });
+
+  connections.forEach((connection, index) => {
+    const crossedBoundaries = boundaries
+      .map((boundary, boundaryIndex) => ({
+        boundaryIndex,
+        kind: boundary.kind,
+        label: boundary.label,
+        fromInside: boundary.wraps.includes(connection.from),
+        toInside: boundary.wraps.includes(connection.to),
+      }))
+      .filter((boundary) => DEPLOYMENT_BOUNDARY_KINDS.has(boundary.kind) && boundary.fromInside !== boundary.toInside);
+    if (crossedBoundaries.length === 0 || (typeof connection.label === 'string' && connection.label.trim() !== '')) return;
+    diagnostics.push({
+      code: 'engineering/deployment-crossing-mechanism',
+      severity: 'error',
+      message: `Cross-boundary connection ${JSON.stringify(connection.id || `${connection.from}->${connection.to}`)} does not name its mechanism.`,
+      subject: subject('connections', index, connection),
+      evidence: {
+        from: connection.from,
+        to: connection.to,
+        crossedBoundaries: crossedBoundaries.map(({ boundaryIndex, kind, label }) => ({ boundaryIndex, kind, label })),
+      },
+      supportedFixes: [`set /connections/${index}/label to the real cross-boundary mechanism`],
+    });
+  });
+
+  return diagnostics;
+}
+
+export function validateEngineeringProfile(diagramType, diagram) {
+  const profile = diagram.meta?.engineering_profile;
+  if (!profile) return;
+  if (diagramType !== 'architecture' || profile !== DEPLOYMENT_PROFILE) return;
+  const diagnostics = deploymentOwnershipDiagnostics(diagram);
+  if (!diagnostics.length) return;
+  throwDiagnosticError(
+    `Engineering profile ${JSON.stringify(profile)} failed:\n${diagnostics.map((entry) => `- ${entry.message}`).join('\n')}`,
+    diagnostics,
+  );
+}