Fix wrong comments around HasDistributionKey() (#7223)

HasDistributionKey & HasDistributionKeyCacheEntry returns true when the
corresponding table has a distribution key, the comments state the
opposite,
which should be fixed.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Junwang <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
pull/7262/head
zhjwpku 2023-10-18 16:53:00 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent db13afaa7b
commit 2d1444188c
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 3 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -521,8 +521,7 @@ IsCitusTableTypeCacheEntry(CitusTableCacheEntry *tableEntry, CitusTableType tabl
/*
* HasDistributionKey returs true if given Citus table doesn't have a
* distribution key.
* HasDistributionKey returns true if given Citus table has a distribution key.
*/
bool
HasDistributionKey(Oid relationId)
@ -538,8 +537,8 @@ HasDistributionKey(Oid relationId)
/*
* HasDistributionKey returs true if given cache entry identifies a Citus
* table that doesn't have a distribution key.
* HasDistributionKeyCacheEntry returns true if given cache entry identifies a
* Citus table that has a distribution key.
*/
bool
HasDistributionKeyCacheEntry(CitusTableCacheEntry *tableEntry)