w

src/test/regress/expected/isolation_logical_replication_single_shard_commands.out

@@ -594,16 +594,11 @@ step s2-move-placement:
 	SELECT master_move_shard_placement(
 		get_shard_id_for_distribution_column('logical_replicate_placement', 4),
 		'localhost', 57637, 'localhost', 57638);
- <waiting ...>
+
+ERROR:  could not acquire the lock required to move placement public.logical_replicate_placement
 step s1-end:
 	COMMIT;
 
-step s2-move-placement: <... completed>
-master_move_shard_placement
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-(1 row)
-
 step s2-end:
 	  COMMIT;
 

src/test/regress/expected/isolation_move_placement_vs_move_placement.out

@@ -17,12 +17,11 @@ master_move_shard_placement
 
 step s1-move-placement:
 	SELECT master_move_shard_placement((SELECT * FROM selected_shard_for_test_table), 'localhost', 57637, 'localhost', 57638, 'force_logical');
- <waiting ...>
+
+ERROR:  could not acquire the lock required to move placement public.test_move_table
 step s2-commit:
 	COMMIT;
 
-step s1-move-placement: <... completed>
-ERROR:  source placement must be in active state
 step s2-print-placements:
 	SELECT
 		nodename, nodeport, count(*)
@@ -55,12 +54,11 @@ master_move_shard_placement
 
 step s1-move-placement:
 	SELECT master_move_shard_placement((SELECT * FROM selected_shard_for_test_table), 'localhost', 57637, 'localhost', 57638, 'force_logical');
- <waiting ...>
+
+ERROR:  could not acquire the lock required to move placement public.test_move_table
 step s2-commit:
 	COMMIT;
 
-step s1-move-placement: <... completed>
-ERROR:  source placement must be in active state
 step s2-print-placements:
 	SELECT
 		nodename, nodeport, count(*)

src/test/regress/spec/isolation_logical_replication_single_shard_commands.spec

@@ -139,5 +139,5 @@ permutation "s1-insert" "s1-begin" "s2-begin" "s2-select" "s1-move-placement" "s
 permutation "s1-insert" "s1-begin" "s2-begin" "s2-select-for-update" "s1-move-placement" "s2-end" "s1-end" "s1-get-shard-distribution"
 
 
-// This test actually blocks because we don't want two non blocking shard moves at the same time
+// This test fails because we don't want two non blocking shard moves at the same time
 permutation "s1-begin" "s2-begin" "s1-move-placement" "s2-move-placement" "s1-end" "s2-end"