mirror of https://github.com/citusdata/citus.git
Prevent RF>1 on streaming replicated tables on `master_create_worker_shards`
Prior to this change, `master_create_worker_shards` command was not checking the replication model of the target table, thus allowing RF>1 with streaming replicated tables. With this change, `master_create_worker_shards` errors out on the case.pull/1195/head
parent
e6e5f63d9d
commit
e96e50746f
|
@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ CreateShardsWithRoundRobinPolicy(Oid distributedTableId, int32 shardCount,
|
|||
uint64 hashTokenIncrement = 0;
|
||||
List *existingShardList = NIL;
|
||||
int64 shardIndex = 0;
|
||||
DistTableCacheEntry *cacheEntry = DistributedTableCacheEntry(distributedTableId);
|
||||
|
||||
/* make sure table is hash partitioned */
|
||||
CheckHashPartitionedTable(distributedTableId);
|
||||
|
@ -138,6 +139,24 @@ CreateShardsWithRoundRobinPolicy(Oid distributedTableId, int32 shardCount,
|
|||
errmsg("replication_factor must be positive")));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* make sure that RF=1 if the table is streaming replicated */
|
||||
if (cacheEntry->replicationModel == REPLICATION_MODEL_STREAMING &&
|
||||
replicationFactor > 1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
|
||||
errmsg("using replication factor %d with streaming "
|
||||
"replicated tables are not supported",
|
||||
replicationFactor),
|
||||
errdetail("When master_create_distributed_table is called with "
|
||||
"citus.replication_model streaming, then the table is "
|
||||
"marked for streaming replication and the shard "
|
||||
"replication factor of streaming replicated tables "
|
||||
"must be 1."),
|
||||
errhint("Use replication factor 1 or set "
|
||||
"citus.replication_model to streaming and recreate the "
|
||||
"table")));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* calculate the split of the hash space */
|
||||
hashTokenIncrement = HASH_TOKEN_COUNT / shardCount;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -160,6 +160,26 @@ SELECT repmodel FROM pg_dist_partition WHERE logicalrelid='mx_table_test'::regcl
|
|||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
DROP TABLE mx_table_test;
|
||||
-- Show that master_create_distributed_table honors citus.replication_model GUC
|
||||
CREATE TABLE s_table(a int);
|
||||
SELECT master_create_distributed_table('s_table', 'a', 'hash');
|
||||
master_create_distributed_table
|
||||
---------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
SELECT repmodel FROM pg_dist_partition WHERE logicalrelid='s_table'::regclass;
|
||||
repmodel
|
||||
----------
|
||||
s
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Show that master_create_worker_shards complains when RF>1 and replication model is streaming
|
||||
SELECT master_create_worker_shards('s_table', 4, 2);
|
||||
ERROR: using replication factor 2 with streaming replicated tables are not supported
|
||||
DETAIL: When master_create_distributed_table is called with citus.replication_model streaming, then the table is marked for streaming replication and the shard replication factor of streaming replicated tables must be 1.
|
||||
HINT: Use replication factor 1 or set citus.replication_model to streaming and recreate the table
|
||||
DROP TABLE s_table;
|
||||
RESET citus.replication_model;
|
||||
-- Show that it is not possible to create an mx table with the old
|
||||
-- master_create_distributed_table function
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -126,6 +126,16 @@ SELECT create_distributed_table('mx_table_test', 'col1');
|
|||
SELECT repmodel FROM pg_dist_partition WHERE logicalrelid='mx_table_test'::regclass;
|
||||
DROP TABLE mx_table_test;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Show that master_create_distributed_table honors citus.replication_model GUC
|
||||
CREATE TABLE s_table(a int);
|
||||
SELECT master_create_distributed_table('s_table', 'a', 'hash');
|
||||
SELECT repmodel FROM pg_dist_partition WHERE logicalrelid='s_table'::regclass;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Show that master_create_worker_shards complains when RF>1 and replication model is streaming
|
||||
SELECT master_create_worker_shards('s_table', 4, 2);
|
||||
|
||||
DROP TABLE s_table;
|
||||
|
||||
RESET citus.replication_model;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Show that it is not possible to create an mx table with the old
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue