* Prevent deadlock for long named partitioned index creation on single node
* Create IsSingleNodeCluster function
* Use both local and sequential execution
When Citus needs to parallelize queries on the local node (e.g., the node
executing the distributed query and the shards are the same), we need to
be mindful about the connection management. The reason is that the client
backends that are running distributed queries are competing with the client
backends that Citus initiates to parallelize the queries in order to get
a slot on the max_connections.
In that regard, we implemented a "failover" mechanism where if the distributed
queries cannot get a connection, the execution failovers the tasks to the local
execution.
The failover logic is follows:
- As the connection manager if it is OK to get a connection
- If yes, we are good.
- If no, we fail the workerPool and the failure triggers
the failover of the tasks to local execution queue
The decision of getting a connection is follows:
/*
* For local nodes, solely relying on citus.max_shared_pool_size or
* max_connections might not be sufficient. The former gives us
* a preview of the future (e.g., we let the new connections to establish,
* but they are not established yet). The latter gives us the close to
* precise view of the past (e.g., the active number of client backends).
*
* Overall, we want to limit both of the metrics. The former limit typically
* kics in under regular loads, where the load of the database increases in
* a reasonable pace. The latter limit typically kicks in when the database
* is issued lots of concurrent sessions at the same time, such as benchmarks.
*/
Considering the adaptive connection management
improvements that we plan to roll soon, it makes it
very helpful to know the number of active client
backends.
We are doing this addition to simplify yhe adaptive connection
management for single node Citus. In single node Citus, both the
client backends and Citus parallel queries would compete to get
slots on Postgres' `max_connections` on the same Citus database.
With adaptive connection management, we have the counters for
Citus parallel queries. That helps us to adaptively decide
on the remote executions pool size (e.g., throttle connections
if necessary).
However, we do not have any counters for the total number of
client backends on the database. For single node Citus, we
should consider all the client backends, not only the remote
connections that Citus does.
Of course Postgres internally knows how many client
backends are active. However, to get that number Postgres
iterates over all the backends. For examaple, see [pg_stat_get_db_numbackends](8e90ec5580/src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c (L1240))
where Postgres iterates over all the backends.
For our purpuses, we need this information on every connection
establishment. That's why we cannot affort to do this kind of
iterattion.
With this commit, we make sure that local execution adds the
intermediate result size as the distributed execution adds. Plus,
it enforces the citus.max_intermediate_result_size value.
With postgres 13, there is a global lock that prevents multiple VACUUMs
happening in the current database. This global lock is taken for a short
time but this creates a problem because of the following:
- We execute the VACUUM for the shell table through the standard process
utility. In this step the global lock is taken for the current database.
- If the current node has shard placements then it tries to execute
VACUUM over a connection to localhost with ExecuteUtilityTaskList.
- the VACUUM on shard placements cannot proceed because it is waiting
for the global lock for the current database to be released.
- The acquired lock from the VACUUM for shell table will not be released
until the transaction is committed.
- So there is a deadlock.
As a solution, we commit the current transaction in case of VACUUM after
the VACUUM is executed for the shell table. Executing the VACUUM on a
shell table is not important because the data there will probably be
truncated. PostprocessVacuumStmt takes the necessary locks on the shell
table so we don't need to take any extra locks after we commit the
current transaction.
Pushing down the CALLs to the node that the CALL is executed is
dangerous and could lead to infinite recursion.
When the coordinator added as worker, Citus was by chance preventing
this. The coordinator was marked as "not metadatasynced" node
in pg_dist_node, which prevented CALL/function delegation to happen.
With this commit, we do the following:
- Fix metadatasynced column for the coordinator on pg_dist_node
- Prevent pushdown of function/procedure to the same node that
the function/procedure is being executed. Today, we do not sync
pg_dist_object (e.g., distributed functions metadata) to the
worker nodes. But, even if we do it now, the function call delegation
would prevent the infinite recursion.
* Not allow removing a single node with ref tables
We should not allow removing a node if it is the only node in the
cluster and there is a data on it. We have this check for distributed
tables but we didn't have it for reference tables.
* Update src/test/regress/expected/single_node.out
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
* Update src/test/regress/sql/single_node.sql
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
The reason we should use ActiveReadableNodeList instead of ActiveReadableNonCoordinatorNodeList is that if coordinator is added to cluster as a worker, it should be counted as well. Otherwise if there is only coordinator in the cluster, the count will be 0, hence we get a warning.
In MultiTaskTrackerExecute, we should connect to coordinator if it is
added to the cluster because it will also be assigned tasks.
ActiveReadableWorkerNodeList doesn't include coordinator, however if
coordinator is added as a worker, we should also include that while
planning. The current methods are very easily misusable and this
requires a refactoring to make the distinction between methods that
include coordinator and that don't very explicit as they can introduce
subtle/major bugs pretty easily.
Static analysis found an issue where we could dereference `NULL`, because
`CreateDummyPlacement` could return `NULL` when there were no workers. This
PR changes it so that it never returns `NULL`, which was intended by
@marcocitus when doing this change: https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/3887/files#r438136433
While adding tests for citus on a single node I also added some more basic
tests and it turns out we error out on repartition joins. This has been
present since `shouldhaveshards` was introduced and is not trivial to fix.
So I created a separate issue for this: https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/3996
Marco Slot
Halil Ozan Akgul
Onur Tirtir
Ahmet Gedemenli
Onder Kalaci
Sait Talha Nisanci
Önder Kalacı
Jelte Fennema