The progress monitor wouldn't actually update the size of the shard on
the target node when using "block_writes" as the `shard_transfer_mode`.
The reason for this is that the CREATE TABLE part of the shard creation
would only be committed once all data was moved as well. This caused
our size calculation to always return 0, since the table did not exist
yet in the session that the progress monitor used.
This is fixed by first committing creation of the table, and only then
starting the actual data copy.
The test output changes slightly. Apparently splitting this up in two
transactions instead of one, increases the table size after the copy by
about 40kB. The additional size used doesn't increase when with the
amount of data in the table is larger (it stays ~40kB per shard). So
this small change in test output is not considered an actual problem.
Without this change the rebalancer progress monitor gets the shard sizes
from the `shardlength` column in `pg_dist_placement`. This column needs to
be updated manually by calling `citus_update_table_statistics`.
However, `citus_update_table_statistics` could lead to distributed
deadlocks while database traffic is on-going (see #4752).
To work around this we don't use `shardlength` column anymore. Instead
for every rebalance we now fetch all shard sizes on the fly.
Two additional things this does are:
1. It adds tests for the rebalance progress function.
2. If a shard move cannot be done because a source or target node is
unreachable, then we error in stop the rebalance, instead of showing
a warning and continuing. When using the by_disk_size rebalance
strategy it's not safe to continue with other moves if a specific
move failed. It's possible that the failed move made space for the
next move, and because the failed move never happened this space now
does not exist.
3. Adds two new columns to the result of `get_rebalancer_progress` which
shows the size of the shard on the source and target node.
Fixes#4930
Jelte Fennema
SaitTalhaNisanci