Commit Graph

838 Commits (0d503dd5ac5547ca71cd0147e53236d8d8a22fce)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Önder Kalacı cb5eb73048
Add support for router INSERT .. SELECT commands (#7077)
Tradionally our planner works in the following order:
   router - > pushdown -> repartition -> pull to coordinator

However, for INSERT .. SELECT commands, we did not support "router".

In practice, that is not a big issue, because pushdown planning can
handle router case as well.

However, with PG 16, certain outer joins are converted to JOIN without
any conditions (e.g., JOIN .. ON (true)) and the filters are pushed down
to the tables.

When the filters are pushed down to the tables, router planner can
detect. However, pushdown planner relies on JOIN conditions.

An example query:
```
INSERT INTO agg_events (user_id)
        SELECT raw_events_first.user_id
        FROM raw_events_first LEFT JOIN raw_events_second
        	ON raw_events_first.user_id = raw_events_second.user_id
        WHERE raw_events_first.user_id = 10;
```

As a side effect of this change, now we can also relax certain
limitation that "pushdown" planner emposes, but not "router". So, with
this PR, we also allow those.

Closes https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6772
DESCRIPTION: Prevents unnecessarily pulling the data into coordinator
for some INSERT .. SELECT queries that target a single-shard group
2023-07-28 15:07:20 +03:00
Teja Mupparti 846cbc3a39 In the MERGE join clause, there is a datatype mismatch between target's distribution column
and the expression originating from the source. If the types are different, Citus uses
different hash functions for the two column types, which might lead to incorrect repartitioning
of the result data
2023-07-27 16:06:00 -07:00
Önder Kalacı 862dae823e
Expand EnableNonColocatedRouterQueryPushdown to cover shard colocation (e.g., shard index) (#7076)
Previously, we only checked whether the relations are colocated, but we
ignore the shard indexes. That causes certain queries still to be
accidentally router. We should enforce colocation checks for both shard
index and table colocation id to make the check restrictive enough.

For example, the following query should not be router, and after this
patch, it won't:
```SQL
SELECT
   user_id
 FROM
   ((SELECT user_id FROM raw_events_first WHERE user_id = 15) EXCEPT
    (SELECT user_id FROM raw_events_second where user_id = 17)) as foo;
```

DESCRIPTION: Enforce shard level colocation with
citus.enable_non_colocated_router_query_pushdown
2023-07-25 16:20:13 +03:00
Naisila Puka 42d956888d
PG16 compatibility: Resolve compilation issues (#7005)
This PR provides successful compilation against PG16Beta2. It does some
necessary refactoring to prepare for full support of version 16, in
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6952 .

Change RelFileNode to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator 
Relevant PG commit
b0a55e43299c4ea2a9a8c757f9c26352407d0ccc

new header for varatt.h 
Relevant PG commit:
d952373a987bad331c0e499463159dd142ced1ef

drop support for Abs, use fabs 
Relevant PG commit
357cfefb09115292cfb98d504199e6df8201c957

tuplesort PGcommit: d37aa3d35832afde94e100c4d2a9618b3eb76472 
Relevant PG commit:
d37aa3d35832afde94e100c4d2a9618b3eb76472

Fix vacuum in columnar 
Relevant PG commit:
4ce3afb82ecfbf64d4f6247e725004e1da30f47c
older one:
b6074846cebc33d752f1d9a66e5a9932f21ad177

Add alloc_flags to pg_clean_ascii 
Relevant PG commit:
45b1a67a0fcb3f1588df596431871de4c93cb76f

Merge GetNumConfigOptions() into get_guc_variables() 
Relevant PG commit:
3057465acfbea2f3dd7a914a1478064022c6eecd

Minor PG refactor PG_FUNCNAME_MACRO __func__ 
Relevant PG commit
320f92b744b44f961e5d56f5f21de003e8027a7f

Pass NULL context to stringToQualifiedNameList, typeStringToTypeName 
The pre-PG16 error behaviour for the following
stringToQualifiedNameList & typeStringToTypeName
was ereport(ERROR, ...)
Now with PG16 we have this context input. We preserve the same behaviour
by passing a NULL context, because of the following:
(copy paste comment from PG16)
If "context" isn't an ErrorSaveContext node, this behaves as
errstart(ERROR, domain), and the errsave() macro ends up acting
exactly like ereport(ERROR, ...).
Relevant PG commit
858e776c84f48841e7e16fba7b690b76e54f3675

Use RangeVarCallbackMaintainsTable instead of RangeVarCallbackOwnsTable 
Relevant PG commit:
60684dd834a222fefedd49b19d1f0a6189c1632e

FIX THIS: Not implemented grant-level control of role inheritance 
see PG commit
e3ce2de09d814f8770b2e3b3c152b7671bcdb83f

Make Scan node abstract 
PG commit:
8c73c11a0d39049de2c1f400d8765a0eb21f5228

Change in Var representations, get_relids_in_jointree 
PG commit
2489d76c4906f4461a364ca8ad7e0751ead8aa0d

Deadlock detection changes because SHM_QUEUE is removed 
Relevant PG Commit:
d137cb52cb7fd44a3f24f3c750fbf7924a4e9532

TU_UpdateIndexes 
Relevant PG commit
19d8e2308bc51ec4ab993ce90077342c915dd116

Use object_ownercheck and object_aclcheck functions 
Relevant PG commits:
afbfc02983f86c4d71825efa6befd547fe81a926
c727f511bd7bf3c58063737bcf7a8f331346f253

Rework Permission Info for successful compilation 
Relevant PG commits:
postgres/postgres@a61b1f7
postgres/postgres@b803b7d
---------

Co-authored-by: onderkalaci <onderkalaci@gmail.com>
2023-07-21 14:32:37 +03:00
Teja Mupparti 87dc88f837 Isolate schema sharding/MERGE tests into a new file, and
use the new GUC parameter
2023-07-19 12:23:45 -07:00
Teja Mupparti 387b5f80f9 Fixes the bug#6785 2023-06-22 10:44:45 -07:00
Naisila Puka 69af3e8509
Drop PG13 Support Phase 2 - Remove PG13 specific paths/tests (#7007)
This commit is the second and last phase of dropping PG13 support.

It consists of the following:

- Removes all PG_VERSION_13 & PG_VERSION_14 from codepaths
- Removes pg_version_compat entries and columnar_version_compat entries
specific for PG13
- Removes alternative pg13 test outputs 
- Removes PG13 normalize lines and fix the test outputs based on that

It is a continuation of 5bf163a27d
2023-06-21 14:18:23 +03:00
Teja Mupparti 58da8771aa This pull request introduces support for nonroutable merge commands in the following scenarios:
1) For distributed tables that are not colocated.
2) When joining on a non-distribution column for colocated tables.
3) When merging into a distributed table using reference or citus-local tables as the data source.

This is accomplished primarily through the implementation of the following two strategies.

Repartition: Plan the source query independently,
execute the results into intermediate files, and repartition the files to
co-locate them with the merge-target table. Subsequently, compile a final
merge query on the target table using the intermediate results as the data
source.

Pull-to-coordinator: Execute the plan that requires evaluation at the coordinator,
run the query on the coordinator, and redistribute the resulting rows to ensure
colocation with the target shards. Direct the MERGE SQL operation to the worker
nodes' target shards, using the intermediate files colocated with the data as the
data source.
2023-06-19 12:23:40 -07:00
Nils Dijk ce2ba1d07e
Optimize QueryPushdownSqlTaskList on memory and cpu (#6945)
While going over this piece of code (a long time ago) it was bothering
to me we keep a bool array with the size of shardcount to iterate only
over shards present in the list of non-pruned shards. Especially since
we keep min/max of the set shards to optimize iteration.

Postgres has the bitmapset datastructure which a) takes significantly
less space, b) has iterator functions to only iterate over set bits, c)
can efficiently skip long sequences of unset bits and d) stops quickly
once the last set bit has been reached.

I have been contemplating if it is worth to keep the minShardOffset
because of readability and the efficient skipping of unset bits,
however, I have decided to keep it -although less readable-, as there
are known usecases where 100k+ shards are pruned to single digit shards.
If these would end up at the end of `shardcount` a hotloop of zero
checks on the first iteration _could_ cause a theoretical performance
regression.

All in all, this code is using less memory in all cases where it
matters, and less cpu in most cases, while using more idiomatic
datastructures for the task at hand.
2023-06-16 16:06:22 +02:00
Naisila Puka ba40eb363c
Fix some gucs' initial and boot values, and flag combinations (#6957)
PG16beta1 added some sanity checks for GUCS, find the Relevant PG
commits below:

1- Add check on initial and boot values when loading GUCs

a73952b795
2- Extend check_GUC_init() with checks on flag combinations when loading
GUCs

009f8d1714

I fixed our currently problematic GUCS, we can merge this directly into
main as these make sense for any PG version.

There was a particular NodeConninfo issue:
Previously we would rely on the fact that NodeConninfo initial value
is an empty string. However, with PG16 enforcing same initial and boot
values, we can't use an empty initial value for NodeConninfo anymore.
Therefore we add a new flag to indicate whether we are at boot check.
2023-06-14 11:55:52 +03:00
Onur Tirtir fa8870217d
Enable logical planner for single-shard tables (#6950)
* Enable using logical planner for single-shard tables

* Improve non-colocated table error in physical planner

* Favor distributed tables over reference tables when chosing anchor shard
2023-06-08 10:57:23 +03:00
Naisila Puka c2f117c559
Citus Revise tree-walk APIs to include context (#6975)
Without revising there are Warnings in PG16 build

Relevant PG commit

1c27d16e6e
1c27d16e6e5c1f463bbe1e9ece88dda811235165
2023-06-06 14:17:51 +03:00
Teja Mupparti f6a516dab5 Refactor repartitioning code into generic format 2023-06-05 09:06:05 -07:00
Naisila Puka 48f068d08e
Remove AssertArg and AssertState (#6970)
PG16 removed them. They were already identical to Assert. We can merge
this directly to main branch

Relevant PG commit:

b1099eca8f
b1099eca8f38ff5cfaf0901bb91cb6a22f909bc6

Co-authored-by: onderkalaci <onderkalaci@gmail.com>
2023-06-05 13:25:21 +03:00
Teja Mupparti ff2062e8c3 Rename insert-select redistribute code base to generic purpose 2023-06-01 09:43:43 -07:00
Teja Mupparti f9dbe7784b This commit adds a safety-net to the issue seen in #6785. The fix for the underlying issue will be in the PR#6943 2023-05-30 10:53:05 -07:00
Ahmet Gedemenli 1ca80813f6
Citus UDFs support for single shard tables (#6916)
Verify Citus UDFs work well with single shard tables

SUPPORTED
* citus_table_size
* citus_total_relation_size
* citus_relation_size
* citus_shard_sizes
* truncate_local_data_after_distributing_table
* create_distributed_function // test function colocated with a single
shard table
* undistribute_table
* alter_table_set_access_method

UNSUPPORTED - error out for single shard tables
* master_create_empty_shard
* create_distributed_table_concurrently
* create_distributed_table
* create_reference_table
* citus_add_local_table_to_metadata
* citus_split_shard_by_split_points
* alter_distributed_table
2023-05-26 17:30:05 +03:00
Onur Tirtir 8ff9dde4b3
Prevent pushing down INSERT .. SELECT queries that we shouldn't (and allow some more) (#6752)
Previously INSERT .. SELECT planner were pushing down some queries that should not be pushed down due to wrong colocation checks. It was checking whether one of the table in SELECT part and target table are colocated. But now, we check colocation for all tables in SELECT part and the target table.

Another problem with INSERT .. SELECT planner was that some queries, which is valid to be pushed down, were not pushed down due to unnecessary checks which are currently supported. e.g. UNION check. As solution, we reused the pushdown planner checks for INSERT .. SELECT planner.


DESCRIPTION: Fixes a bug that causes incorrectly pushing down some
INSERT .. SELECT queries that we shouldn't
DESCRIPTION: Prevents unnecessarily pulling the data into coordinator
for some INSERT .. SELECT queries
DESCRIPTION: Drops support for pushing down INSERT .. SELECT with append
table as target

Fixes #6749.
Fixes #1428.
Fixes #6920.

---------

Co-authored-by: aykutbozkurt <aykut.bozkurt1995@gmail.com>
2023-05-17 15:05:08 +03:00
Onur Tirtir 56d217b108
Mark objects as distributed even when pg_dist_node is empty (#6900)
We mark objects as distributed objects in Citus metadata only if we need
to propagate given the command that creates it to worker nodes. For this
reason, we were not doing this for the objects that are created while
pg_dist_node is empty.

One implication of doing so is that we defer the schema propagation to
the time when user creates the first distributed table in the schema.
However, this doesn't help for schema-based sharding (#6866) because we
want to sync pg_dist_tenant_schema to the worker nodes even for empty
schemas too.

* Support test dependencies for isolation tests without a schedule

* Comment out a test due to a known issue (#6901)

* Also, reduce the verbosity for some log messages and make some
   tests compatible with run_test.py.
2023-05-16 11:45:42 +03:00
Teja Mupparti b58665773b Move all pre-15-defined routines to the bottom of the file 2023-05-04 10:07:08 -07:00
Naisila Puka 072ae44742
Adjusts query's CoerceViaIO & RelabelType nodes that are improper for deparsing (#6391)
Adjusts query's CoerceViaIO & RelabelType nodes that are
improper for deparsing

The standard planner converts some `::text` casts to `::cstring` and
here we convert back because `cstring` is a pseudotype and it cannot be
casted to most types. This problem occurs in CoerceViaIO nodes.
There was another problem with RelabelType nodes fixed in the following
PR:
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/4580
We undo the changes in that PR, and fix both CoerceViaIO and RelabelType
nodes in the planning phase (not in the deparsing phase in ruleutils)

Fixes https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/5646
Fixes https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/5033
Fixes https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/6061
2023-05-04 16:46:02 +03:00
Onur Tirtir db2514ef78 Call null-shard-key tables as single-shard distributed tables in code 2023-05-03 17:02:43 +03:00
Onur Tirtir 39b7711527 Add support for more pushable / non-pushable insert .. select queries with null-shard-key tables (#6823)
* Add support for dist insert select by selecting from a reference
table.
  
  This was the only pushable insert .. select case that
  #6773 didn't cover.

* For the cases where we insert into a Citus table but the INSERT ..
SELECT
  query cannot be pushed down, allow pull-to-coordinator when possible.

  Remove the checks that we had at the very beginning of
  CreateInsertSelectPlanInternal so that we can try insert .. select via
  pull-to-coordinator for the cases where we cannot push-down the insert
  .. select query. What we support via pull-to-coordinator is still
  limited due to lacking of logical planner support for SELECT queries,
but this commit at least allows using pull-to-coordinator for the cases
  where the select query can be planned via router planner, without
  limiting ourselves to restrictive top-level checks.

  Also introduce some additional restrictions into
CreateDistributedInsertSelectPlan for the cases it was missing to check
  for null-shard-key tables. Indeed, it would make more sense to have
those checks for distributed tables in general, via separate PRs against
  main branch. See https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6817.

* Add support for inserting into a Postgres table.
2023-05-03 16:24:20 +03:00
Onur Tirtir 85745b46d5 Add initial sql support for distributed tables that don't have a shard key (#6773/#6822)
Enable router planner and a limited version of INSERT .. SELECT planner
for the queries that reference colocated null shard key tables.

* SELECT / UPDATE / DELETE / MERGE is supported as long as it's a router
query.
* INSERT .. SELECT is supported as long as it only references colocated
  null shard key tables.

Note that this is not only limited to distributed INSERT .. SELECT but
also
covers a limited set of query types that require pull-to-coordinator,
e.g.,
  due to LIMIT clause, generate_series() etc. ...
(Ideally distributed INSERT .. SELECT could handle such queries too,
e.g.,
when we're only referencing tables that don't have a shard key, but
today
this is not the case. See
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6773#discussion_r1140130562.
2023-05-03 16:24:20 +03:00
Ahmet Gedemenli cdf54ff4b1 Add DDL support null-shard-key tables(#6778/#6784/#6787/#6859)
Add tests for ddl coverage:
* indexes
* partitioned tables + indexes with long names
* triggers
* foreign keys
* statistics
* grant & revoke statements
* truncate & vacuum
* create/test/drop view that depends on a dist table with no shard key
* policy & rls test

* alter table add/drop/alter_type column (using sequences/different data
  types/identity columns)
* alter table add constraint (not null, check, exclusion constraint)
* alter table add column with a default value / set default / drop
  default
* alter table set option (autovacuum)

* indexes / constraints without names
* multiple subcommands

Adds support for
* Creating new partitions after distributing (with null key) the parent
table
* Attaching partitions to a distributed table with null distribution key
(and automatically distribute the new partition with null key as well)
* Detaching partitions from it
2023-05-03 16:18:27 +03:00
Onur Tirtir fa467e05e7 Add support for creating distributed tables with a null shard key (#6745)
With this PR, we allow creating distributed tables with without
specifying a shard key via create_distributed_table(). Here are the
the important details about those tables:
* Specifying `shard_count` is not allowed because it is assumed to be 1.
* We mostly call such tables as "null shard-key" table in code /
comments.
* To avoid doing a breaking layout change in create_distributed_table();
instead of throwing an error, it will inform the user that
`distribution_type`
  param is ignored unless it's explicitly set to NULL or  'h'.
* `colocate_with` param allows colocating such null shard-key tables to
  each other.
* We define this table type, i.e., NULL_SHARD_KEY_TABLE, as a subclass
of
  DISTRIBUTED_TABLE because we mostly want to treat them as distributed
  tables in terms of SQL / DDL / operation support.
* Metadata for such tables look like:
  - distribution method => DISTRIBUTE_BY_NONE
  - replication model => REPLICATION_MODEL_STREAMING
- colocation id => **!=** INVALID_COLOCATION_ID (distinguishes from
Citus local tables)
* We assign colocation groups for such tables to different nodes in a
  round-robin fashion based on the modulo of "colocation id".

Note that this PR doesn't care about DDL (except CREATE TABLE) / SQL /
operation (i.e., Citus UDFs) support for such tables but adds a
preliminary
API.
2023-05-03 16:18:27 +03:00
Teja Mupparti e444dd4f3f MERGE: Support reference table as source with local table as target 2023-05-02 11:37:29 -07:00
aykut-bozkurt 08e2820c67
skip restriction clause if it contains placeholdervar (#6857)
`PlaceHolderVar` is not relevant to be processed inside a restriction
clause. Otherwise, `pull_var_clause_default` would throw error. PG would
create the restriction to physical `Var` that `PlaceHolderVar` points to
anyway, so it is safe to skip this restriction.

DESCRIPTION: Fixes a bug related to WHERE clause list which contains
placeholder.

Fixes https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/6758
2023-04-17 18:14:01 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgül 52ad2d08c7
Multi tenant monitoring (#6725)
DESCRIPTION: Adds views that monitor statistics on tenant usages

This PR adds `citus_stats_tenants` view that monitors the tenants on the
cluster.

`citus_stats_tenants` shows the node id, colocation id, tenant
attribute, read count in this period and last period, and query count in
this period and last period of the tenant.
Tenant attribute currently is the tenant's distribution column value,
later when schema based sharding is introduced, this meaning might
change.
A period is a time bucket the queries are counted by. Read and query
counts for this period can increase until the current period ends. After
that those counts are moved to last period's counts, which cannot
change. The period length can be set using 'citus.stats_tenants_period'.

`SELECT` queries are counted as _read_ queries, `INSERT`, `UPDATE` and
`DELETE` queries are counted as _write_ queries. So in the view read
counts are `SELECT` counts and query counts are `SELECT`, `INSERT`,
`UPDATE` and `DELETE` count.

The data is stored in shared memory, in a struct named
`MultiTenantMonitor`.

`citus_stats_tenants` shows the data from local tenants.

`citus_stats_tenants` show up to `citus.stats_tenant_limit` number of
tenants.
The tenants are scored based on the number of queries they run and the
recency of those queries. Every query ran increases the score of tenant
by `ONE_QUERY_SCORE`, and after every period ends the scores are halved.
Halving is done lazily.
To retain information a longer the monitor keeps up to 3 times
`citus.stats_tenant_limit` tenants. When the tenant count hits `3 *
citus.stats_tenant_limit`, last `citus.stats_tenant_limit` tenants are
removed. To see all stored tenants you can use
`citus_stats_tenants(return_all_tenants := true)`

- [x] Create collector view that gets data from all nodes. #6761 
- [x] Add monitoring log #6762 
- [x] Create enable/disable GUC #6769 
- [x] Parse the annotation string correctly #6796 
- [x] Add local queries and prepared statements #6797
- [x] Rename to citus_stat_statements #6821 
- [x] Run pgbench
- [x] Fix role permissions #6812

---------

Co-authored-by: Gokhan Gulbiz <ggulbiz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
2023-04-05 17:44:17 +03:00
Onur Tirtir d4f9de7875
Explicitly disallow local rels when inserting into dist table (#6817) 2023-04-04 17:46:43 +02:00
Marco Slot 7c0589abb8
Do not override combinefunc of custom aggregates with common names (#6805)
DESCRIPTION: Fix an issue that caused some queries with custom
aggregates to fail

While playing around with https://github.com/pgvector/pgvector I noticed
that the AVG query was broken. That's because we treat it as any other
AVG by breaking it down in SUM and COUNT, but there are no SUM/COUNT
functions in this case, but there is a perfectly usable combinefunc.
This PR changes our aggregate logic to prefer custom aggregates with a
combinefunc even if they have a common name.

Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
2023-04-03 19:43:09 +02:00
Marco Slot 343d1c5072
Refactor executor utility functions into multiple files (#6593)
Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
2023-03-31 13:07:48 +02:00
Teja Mupparti 01ea5f58a9 Fix the incorrect value passed to pointer-to-bool parameter, pass a NULL as the value is not used for this invocation. 2023-03-30 10:45:32 -07:00
Teja Mupparti 37500806d6 Add appropriate locks for MERGE to run in parallel 2023-03-28 09:45:40 -07:00
Onur Tirtir 616b5018a0
Add a GUC to disallow planning the queries that reference non-colocated tables via router planner (#6793)
Today we allow planning the queries that reference non-colocated tables
if the shards that query targets are placed on the same node. However,
this may not be the case, e.g., after rebalancing shards because it's
not guaranteed to have those shards on the same node anymore.
This commit adds citus.enable_non_colocated_router_query_pushdown GUC
that can be used to disallow  planning such queries via router planner,
when it's set to false. Note that the default value for this GUC will be
"true" for 11.3, but we will alter it to "false" on 12.0 to not
introduce
a breaking change in a minor release.

Closes #692.

Even more, allowing such queries to go through router planner also
causes
generating an incorrect plan for the DML queries that reference
distributed
tables that are sharded based on different replication factor settings.
For
this reason, #6779 can be closed after altering the default value for
this
GUC to "false", hence not now.

DESCRIPTION: Adds `citus.enable_non_colocated_router_query_pushdown` GUC
to ensure generating a consistent distributed plan for the queries that
reference non-colocated distributed tables (when set to "false", the
default is "true").
2023-03-28 13:10:29 +03:00
Teja Mupparti 9bab819f26 Disentangle MERGE planning code from the modify-planning code path 2023-03-27 10:41:46 -07:00
Teja Mupparti da7db53c87 Refactor some of the planning code to accomodate a new planning path for MERGE SQL 2023-03-22 11:29:24 -07:00
Onur Tirtir e1f1d63050
Rename AllRelations.. functions to AllDistributedRelations.. (#6789)
Because they're only interested in distributed tables. Even more,
this replaces HasDistributionKey() check with
IsCitusTableType(DISTRIBUTED_TABLE) because this doesn't make a
difference on main and sounds slightly more intuitive. Plus, this
would also allow safely using this function in
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6773.
2023-03-22 15:15:23 +03:00
Onur Tirtir aa465b6de1
Decide what to do with router planner error at one place (#6781) 2023-03-21 14:04:07 +03:00
Teja Mupparti cf55136281 1) Restrict MERGE command INSERT to the source's distribution column
Fixes #6672

2) Move all MERGE related routines to a new file merge_planner.c

3) Make ConjunctionContainsColumnFilter() static again, and rearrange the code in MergeQuerySupported()
4) Restore the original format in the comments section.
5) Add big serial test. Implement latest set of comments
2023-03-16 13:43:08 -07:00
Teja Mupparti 1e42cd3da0 Support MERGE on distributed tables with restrictions
This implements the phase - II of MERGE sql support

Support routable query where all the tables in the merge-sql are distributed, co-located, and both the source and
target relations are joined on the distribution column with a constant qual. This should be a Citus single-task
query. Below is an example.

SELECT create_distributed_table('t1', 'id');
SELECT create_distributed_table('s1', 'id', colocate_with => ‘t1’);

MERGE INTO t1
USING s1 ON t1.id = s1.id AND t1.id = 100
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET val = s1.val + 10
WHEN MATCHED THEN
DELETE
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT (id, val, src) VALUES (s1.id, s1.val, s1.src)

Basically, MERGE checks to see if

There are a minimum of two distributed tables (source and a target).
All the distributed tables are indeed colocated.
MERGE relations are joined on the distribution column
MERGE .. USING .. ON target.dist_key = source.dist_key
The query should touch only a single shard i.e. JOIN AND with a constant qual
MERGE .. USING .. ON target.dist_key = source.dist_key AND target.dist_key = <>
If any of the conditions are not met, it raises an exception.

(cherry picked from commit 44c387b978)

This implements MERGE phase3

Support pushdown query where all the tables in the merge-sql are Citus-distributed, co-located, and both
the source and target relations are joined on the distribution column. This will generate multiple tasks
which execute independently after pushdown.

SELECT create_distributed_table('t1', 'id');
SELECT create_distributed_table('s1', 'id', colocate_with => ‘t1’);

MERGE INTO t1
USING s1
ON t1.id = s1.id
        WHEN MATCHED THEN
                UPDATE SET val = s1.val + 10
        WHEN MATCHED THEN
                DELETE
        WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
                INSERT (id, val, src) VALUES (s1.id, s1.val, s1.src)

*The only exception for both the phases II and III is, UPDATEs and INSERTs must be done on the same shard-group
as the joined key; for example, below scenarios are NOT supported as the key-value to be inserted/updated is not
guaranteed to be on the same node as the id distribution-column.

MERGE INTO target t
USING source s ON (t.customer_id = s.customer_id)
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN - -
     INSERT(customer_id, …) VALUES (<non-local-constant-key-value>, ……);

OR this scenario where we update the distribution column itself

MERGE INTO target t
USING source s On (t.customer_id = s.customer_id)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
     UPDATE SET customer_id = 100;

(cherry picked from commit fa7b8949a8)
2023-03-16 13:43:08 -07:00
Onur Tirtir 20a5f3af2b
Replace CITUS_TABLE_WITH_NO_DIST_KEY checks with HasDistributionKey() (#6743)
Now that we will soon add another table type having DISTRIBUTE_BY_NONE
as distribution method and that we want the code to interpret such
tables mostly as distributed tables, let's make the definition of those
other two table types more strict by removing
CITUS_TABLE_WITH_NO_DIST_KEY
macro.

And instead, use HasDistributionKey() check in the places where the
logic applies to all table types that have / don't have a distribution
key. In future PRs, we might want to convert some of those
HasDistributionKey() checks if logic only applies to Citus local /
reference tables, not the others.

And adding HasDistributionKey() also allows us to consider having
DISTRIBUTE_BY_NONE as the distribution method as a "table attribute"
that can apply to distributed tables too, rather something that
determines the table type.
2023-03-10 13:55:52 +03:00
Onur Tirtir e3cf7ace7c
Stabilize single_node.sql and others that report illegal node removal (#6751)
See
https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/citusdata/citus/30859/workflows/223d61db-8c1d-4909-9aea-d8e470f0368b/jobs/1009243.
2023-03-08 15:25:36 +03:00
Teja Mupparti d7b499929c Rearrange the common code into a newfunction to facilitate the multiple checks of the same conditions in a multi-modify MERGE statement 2023-02-24 12:55:11 -08:00
Emel Şimşek 756c1d3f5d
Remove auto_explain workaround in citus explain hook for ALTER TABLE (#6714)
When auto_explain module is loaded and configured, EXPLAIN will be
implicitly run for all the supported commands. Postgres does not support
`EXPLAIN` for `ALTER` command. However, auto_explain will try to
`EXPLAIN` other supported commands internally triggered by `ALTER`.

 For instance, 
`ALTER TABLE target_table ADD CONSTRAINT fkey_167 FOREIGN KEY (col_1)
REFERENCES ref_table(key) ... `

command may trigger a SELECT command in the following form for foreign
key validation purpose:
`SELECT fk.col_1 FROM ONLY target_table fk LEFT OUTER JOIN ONLY
ref_table pk ON ( pk.key OPERATOR(pg_catalog.=) fk.col_1) WHERE pk.key
IS NULL AND (fk.col_1 IS NOT NULL) `

For Citus tables, the Citus utility hook should ensure that constraint
validation is skipped for shell tables but they are done for shard
tables. The reason behind this design choice can be summed up as:

- An ALTER TABLE command via coordinator node is run in a distributed
transaction.
- Citus does not support nested distributed transactions. 
- A SELECT query on a distributed table (aka shell table) is also run in
a distributed transaction.
- Therefore, Citus does not support running a SELECT query on a shell
table while an ALTER TABLE command is running.

With
eadc88a800
a bug is introduced breaking the skip constraint validation behaviour of
Citus. With this change, we see that validation queries on distributed
tables are triggered within `ALTER` command adding constraints with
validation check. This regression did not cause an issue for regular use
cases since the citus executor hook blocks those queries heuristically
when there is an ALTER TABLE command in progress.

The issue is surfaced as a crash (#6424 Workers, when configured to use
auto_explain, crash during distributed transactions.) when auto_explain
is enabled. This is due to auto_explain trying to execute the SELECT
queries in a nested distributed transaction.

Now since the regression with constraint validation is fixed in
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/6543, we should be able to
remove the workaround.
2023-02-17 17:47:03 +03:00
Teja Mupparti 0824d9c1fb Miscellaneous cleanup 2023-02-09 13:05:59 -08:00
Marco Slot a482b36760
Revert "Support MERGE on distributed tables with restrictions" (#6675)
Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
2023-01-30 15:01:59 +01:00
aykut-bozkurt ab71cd01ee
fix multi level recursive plan (#6650)
Recursive planner should handle all the tree from bottom to top at
single pass. i.e. It should have already recursively planned all
required parts in its first pass. Otherwise, this means we have bug at
recursive planner, which needs to be handled. We add a check here and
return error.

DESCRIPTION: Fixes wrong results by throwing error in case recursive
planner multipass the query.

We found 3 different cases which causes recursive planner passes the
query multiple times.
1. Sublink in WHERE clause is planned at second pass after we
recursively planned a distributed table at the first pass. Fixed by PR
#6657.
2. Local-distributed joins are recursively planned at both the first and
the second pass. Issue #6659.
3. Some parts of the query is considered to be noncolocated at the
second pass as we do not generate attribute equivalances between
nondistributed and distributed tables. Issue #6653
2023-01-27 21:25:04 +03:00
aykut-bozkurt 8870f0f90b
fix order of recursive sublink planning (#6657)
We should do the sublink conversations at the end of the recursive
planning because earlier steps might have transformed the query into a
shape that needs recursively planning the sublinks.

DESCRIPTION: Fixes early sublink check at recursive planner.

Related to PR https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6650
2023-01-27 14:35:16 +03:00
Hanefi Onaldi 94b63f35a5
Prevent crashes on update with returning clauses (#6643)
If an update query on a reference table has a returns clause with a
subquery that accesses some other local table, we end-up with an crash.

This commit prevents the crash, but does not prevent other error
messages from happening due to Citus not being able to pushdown the
results of that subquery in a valid SQL command.

Related: #6634
2023-01-24 20:07:43 +03:00