We disable bunch of planning options on the workers. This might be
risky if any concurrent test relies on EXPLAIN OUTPUT as well. Still,
we want to keep this test, so we should try to not parallelize this
test with such test.
Before this commit, Citus supported INSERT...SELECT queries with
ON CONFLICT or RETURNING clauses only for pushdownable ones, since
queries supported via coordinator were utilizing COPY infrastructure
of PG to send selected tuples to the target worker nodes.
After this PR, INSERT...SELECT queries with ON CONFLICT or RETURNING
clauses will be performed in two phases via coordinator. In the first
phase selected tuples will be saved to the intermediate table which
is colocated with target table of the INSERT...SELECT query. Note that,
a utility function to save results to the colocated intermediate result
also implemented as a part of this commit. In the second phase, INSERT..
SELECT query is directly run on the worker node using the intermediate
table as the source table.
Description: Support round-robin `task_assignment_policy` for queries to reference tables.
This PR allows users to query multiple placements of shards in a round robin fashion. When `citus.task_assignment_policy` is set to `'round-robin'` the planner will use a round robin scheduling feature when multiple shard placements are available.
The primary use-case is spreading the load of reference table queries to all the nodes in the cluster instead of hammering only the first placement of the reference table. Since reference tables share the same path for selecting the shards with single shard queries that have multiple placements (`citus.shard_replication_factor > 1`) this setting also allows users to spread the query load on these shards.
For modifying queries we do not apply a round-robin strategy. This would be negated by an extra reordering step in the executor for such queries where a `first-replica` strategy is enforced.
In recent postgres builds you cannot set client_min_messages to
values higher then ERROR, if will silently set it to ERROR if so.
During some tests we would set it to fatal to hide random values
(eg. pid's of processes) from the test output. This patch will use
different tactics for hiding these values.
After Fast ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a non-NULL default in PG11, physical heaps might not contain all attributes after a ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN happens. heap_getattr() returns NULL when the physical tuple doesn't contain an attribute. So we should use heap_deform_tuple() in these cases, which fills in the missing attributes.
Our catalog tables evolve over time, and an upgrade might involve some ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN commands.
Note that we don't need to worry about postgres catalog tables and we can use heap_getattr() for them, because they only change between major versions.
This also fixes#2453.
I'm pretty sure a lot of this test functionality may be covered in some
of our existing regression tests, but I've included them to ensure we
put all failure-based tests under our new testing method for that kind
of test.
Didn't include lower replication factor, as (for a single-shard mod.),
it's indistinguishable from modifying a reference table. So these all
test modifications which hit a single, replicated shard.
Fairly straightforward; verified that modifications fail atomically if
a worker is down or fails mid-transaction (i.e. all workers need to ack
modifications to reference tables in order to persist changes).
Including several examples from #1926. I couldn't understand why the
recover_prepared_transactions "should be an error", and EXPLAIN has
changed since the original bug (so that it runs EXPLAINs in txns, I
think for EXPLAIN ANALYZE to not have side effects); other than that,
most of the reported bugs now error out rather than crash or return
an empty result set.
VACUUM runs outside of a transaction, so the failure modes for it are
somewhat straightforward, though ANALYZE runs in a 1pc transaction and
multi-table VACUUM can fail between statements (PG 11 and higher).
Tests various failure points during a multi-shard modification within
a transaction with multiple statements. Verifies three cases:
* Reference tables (single shard, many placements)
* Normal table with replication factor two
* Multi-shard table with no replication
In the replication-factor case, we expect shard health to be affected
in some transactions; most others fail the transaction entirely and
all we need verify is that no effects of the transaction are visible.
Had trouble testing the final PREPARE/COMMIT/ROLLBACK phase of the 2pc,
in particular because the error message produced includes the PID of
the backend, which is unpredictable.
Drop schema command fails in mx mode if there
is a partitioned table with active partitions.
This is due to fact that sql drop trigger receives
all the dropped objects including partitions. When
we call drop table on parent partition, it also drops
the partitions on the mx node. This causes the drop
table command on partitions to fail on mx node because
they are already dropped when the partition parent was
dropped.
With this work we did not require the table to exist on
worker_drop_distributed_table.
Marco Slot
Murat Tuncer
Nils Dijk
velioglu
Onder Kalaci
Hanefi Onaldi
Nils Dijk
Hadi Moshayedi
Jason Petersen
Hadi Moshayedi