Commit Graph

10 Commits (1a21c524b772d475c11620fb6702aa6834655443)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Halil Ozan Akgul 56e814a333 Adds public host to only hyperscale tests 2020-04-10 15:54:47 +03:00
Nils Dijk a77ed9cd23
Refactor master query to be planned by postgres' planner (#3326)
DESCRIPTION: Replace the query planner for the coordinator part with the postgres planner

Closes #2761 

Citus had a simple rule based planner for the query executed on the query coordinator. This planner grew over time with the addigion of SQL support till it was getting close to the functionality of the postgres planner. Except the code was brittle and its complexity rose which made it hard to add new SQL support.

Given its resemblance with the postgres planner it was a long outstanding wish to replace our hand crafted planner with the well supported postgres planner. This patch replaces our planner with a call to postgres' planner.

Due to the functionality of the postgres planner we needed to support both projections and filters/quals on the citus custom scan node. When a sort operation is planned above the custom scan it might require fields to be reordered in the custom scan before returning the tuple (projection). The postgres planner assumes every custom scan node implements projections. Because we controlled the plan that was created we prevented reordering in the custom scan and never had implemented it before.

A same optimisation applies to having clauses that could have been where clauses. Instead of applying the filter as a having on the aggregate it will push it down into the plan which could reach a custom scan node.

For both filters and projections we have implemented them when tuples are read from the tuple store. If no projections or filters are required it will directly return the tuple from the tuple store. Otherwise it will loop tuples from the tuple store through the filter and projection until a tuple is found and returned.

Besides filters being pushed down a side effect of having quals that could have been a where clause is that a call to read intermediate result could be called before the first tuple is fetched from the custom scan. This failed because the intermediate result would only be pulled to the coordinator on the first tuple fetch. To overcome this problem we do run the distributed subplans now before we run the postgres executor. This ensures the intermediate result is present on the coordinator in time. We do account for total time instrumentation by removing the instrumentation before handing control to the psotgres executor and update the timings our self.

For future SQL support it is enough to create a valid query structure for the part of the query to be executed on the query coordinating node. As a utility we do serialise and print the query at debug level4 for engineers to inspect what kind of query is being planned on the query coordinator.
2020-02-25 14:39:56 +01:00
Philip Dubé c563e0825c Strip trailing whitespace and add final newline (#3186)
This brings files in line with our editorconfig file
2019-11-21 14:25:37 +01:00
Nils Dijk 2879689441
Distribute Types to worker nodes (#2893)
DESCRIPTION: Distribute Types to worker nodes

When to propagate
==============

There are two logical moments that types could be distributed to the worker nodes
 - When they get used ( just in time distribution )
 - When they get created ( proactive distribution )

The just in time distribution follows the model used by how schema's get created right before we are going to create a table in that schema, for types this would be when the table uses a type as its column.

The proactive distribution is suitable for situations where it is benificial to have the type on the worker nodes directly. They can later on be used in queries where an intermediate result gets created with a cast to this type.

Just in time creation is always the last resort, you cannot create a distributed table before the type gets created. A good example use case is; you have an existing postgres server that needs to scale out. By adding the citus extension, add some nodes to the cluster, and distribute the table. The type got created before citus existed. There was no moment where citus could have propagated the creation of a type.

Proactive is almost always a good option. Types are not resource intensive objects, there is no performance overhead of having 100's of types. If you want to use them in a query to represent an intermediate result (which happens in our test suite) they just work.

There is however a moment when proactive type distribution is not beneficial; in transactions where the type is used in a distributed table.

Lets assume the following transaction:

```sql
BEGIN;
CREATE TYPE tt1 AS (a int, b int);
CREATE TABLE t1 AS (a int PRIMARY KEY, b tt1);
SELECT create_distributed_table('t1', 'a');
\copy t1 FROM bigdata.csv
```

Types are node scoped objects; meaning the type exists once per worker. Shards however have best performance when they are created over their own connection. For the type to be visible on all connections it needs to be created and committed before we try to create the shards. Here the just in time situation is most beneficial and follows how we create schema's on the workers. Outside of a transaction block we will just use 1 connection to propagate the creation.

How propagation works
=================

Just in time
-----------

Just in time propagation hooks into the infrastructure introduced in #2882. It adds types as a supported object in `SupportedDependencyByCitus`. This will make sure that any object being distributed by citus that depends on types will now cascade into types. When types are depending them self on other objects they will get created first.

Creation later works by getting the ddl commands to create the object by its `ObjectAddress` in `GetDependencyCreateDDLCommands` which will dispatch types to `CreateTypeDDLCommandsIdempotent`.

For the correct walking of the graph we follow array types, when later asked for the ddl commands for array types we return `NIL` (empty list) which makes that the object will not be recorded as distributed, (its an internal type, dependant on the user type).

Proactive distribution
---------------------

When the user creates a type (composite or enum) we will have a hook running in `multi_ProcessUtility` after the command has been applied locally. Running after running locally makes that we already have an `ObjectAddress` for the type. This is required to mark the type as being distributed.

Keeping the type up to date
====================

For types that are recorded in `pg_dist_object` (eg. `IsObjectDistributed` returns true for the `ObjectAddress`) we will intercept the utility commands that alter the type.
 - `AlterTableStmt` with `relkind` set to `OBJECT_TYPE` encapsulate changes to the fields of a composite type.
 - `DropStmt` with removeType set to `OBJECT_TYPE` encapsulate `DROP TYPE`.
 - `AlterEnumStmt` encapsulates changes to enum values.
    Enum types can not be changed transactionally. When the execution on a worker fails a warning will be shown to the user the propagation was incomplete due to worker communication failure. An idempotent command is shown for the user to re-execute when the worker communication is fixed.

Keeping types up to date is done via the executor. Before the statement is executed locally we create a plan on how to apply it on the workers. This plan is executed after we have applied the statement locally.

All changes to types need to be done in the same transaction for types that have already been distributed and will fail with an error if parallel queries have already been executed in the same transaction. Much like foreign keys to reference tables.
2019-09-13 17:46:07 +02:00
mehmet furkan şahin 785a86ed0a Tests are updated to use create_distributed_table 2018-05-10 11:18:59 +03:00
velioglu 121ff39b26 Removes large_table_shard_count GUC 2018-04-29 10:34:50 +02:00
velioglu 698d585fb5 Remove broadcast join logic
After this change all the logic related to shard data fetch logic
will be removed. Planner won't plan any ShardFetchTask anymore.
Shard fetch related steps in real time executor and task-tracker
executor have been removed.
2018-03-30 11:45:19 +03:00
Marco Slot 89eb833375 Use citus.next_shard_id where practical in regression tests 2017-11-15 10:12:05 +01:00
Marco Slot 40829c2ba9 Set citus.enable_unique_job_ids in tests with job ID in output 2017-04-18 11:42:32 +02:00
Robin Thomas c507a0df1c During repartitions, the partitionColumnType argument sent to workers
is now a `::regtype` using the qualified name of the column type,
not the column type OID which may differ between master/worker nodes.
Test coverage of a hash reparitition using a UDT as the join column.

Note that the UDFs `worker_hash_partition_table` and `worker_range_partition_table`
are unchanged, and rightly expect an OID for the column type; but the
planner code building the commands now allows for `::regtype` casting
to do its magic.

Fixes citusdata/citus#111.
2016-10-03 13:41:20 -04:00