This PR makes the connections to other nodes for
`mark_object_distributed` use the same user as
`execute_command_on_remote_nodes_as_user` so they'll use the same
connection.
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for issuing `CREATE`/`DROP` DATABASE commands
from worker nodes
With this commit, we allow issuing CREATE / DROP DATABASE commands from
worker nodes too.
As in #7278, this is not allowed when the coordinator is not added to
metadata because we don't ever sync metadata changes to coordinator
when adding coordinator to the metadata via
`SELECT citus_set_coordinator_host('<hostname>')`, or equivalently, via
`SELECT citus_add_node(<coordinator_node_name>, <coordinator_node_port>, 0)`.
We serialize database management commands by acquiring a Citus specific
advisory lock on the first primary worker node if there are any workers in the
cluster. As opposed to what we've done in https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/7278
for role management commands, we try to avoid from running into distributed deadlocks
as much as possible. This is because, while distributed deadlocks that can happen around
role management commands can be detected by Citus, this is not the case for database
management commands because most of them cannot be run inside in a transaction block.
In that case, Citus cannot even detect the distributed deadlock because the command is not
part of a distributed transaction at all, then the command execution might not return the
control back to the user for an indefinite amount of time.
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for 2PC from non-Citus main databases
This PR only adds support for `CREATE USER` queries, other queries need
to be added. But it should be simple because this PR creates the
underlying structure.
Citus main database is the database where the Citus extension is
created. A non-main database is all the other databases that are in the
same node with a Citus main database.
When a `CREATE USER` query is run on a non-main database we:
1. Run `start_management_transaction` on the main database. This
function saves the outer transaction's xid (the non-main database
query's transaction id) and marks the current query as main db command.
2. Run `execute_command_on_remote_nodes_as_user("CREATE USER
<username>", <username to run the command>)` on the main database. This
function creates the users in the rest of the cluster by running the
query on the other nodes. The user on the current node is created by the
query on the outer, non-main db, query to make sure consequent commands
in the same transaction can see this user.
3. Run `mark_object_distributed` on the main database. This function
adds the user to `pg_dist_object` in all of the nodes, including the
current one.
This PR also implements transaction recovery for the queries from
non-main databases.
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for propagating `CREATE`/`DROP` database
In this PR, create and drop database support is added.
For CREATE DATABASE:
* "oid" option is not supported
* specifying "strategy" to be different than "wal_log" is not supported
* specifying "template" to be different than "template1" is not
supported
The last two are because those are not saved in `pg_database` and when
activating a node, we cannot assume what parameters were provided when
creating the database.
And "oid" is not supported because whether user specified an arbitrary
oid when creating the database is not saved in pg_database and we want
to avoid from oid collisions that might arise from attempting to use an
auto-assigned oid on workers.
Finally, in case of node activation, GRANTs for the database are also
propagated.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <jelte.fennema@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
Add citus_schema_move() that can be used to move tenant tables within a distributed
schema to another node. The function has two variations as simple wrappers around
citus_move_shard_placement() and citus_move_shard_placement_with_nodeid() respectively.
They pick a shard that belongs to the given tenant schema and resolve the source node
that contain the shards under given tenant schema. Hence their signatures are quite
similar to underlying functions:
```sql
-- citus_schema_move(), using target node name and node port
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_catalog.citus_schema_move(
schema_id regnamespace,
target_node_name text,
target_node_port integer,
shard_transfer_mode citus.shard_transfer_mode default 'auto')
RETURNS void
LANGUAGE C STRICT
AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME', $$citus_schema_move$$;
-- citus_schema_move(), using target node id
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_catalog.citus_schema_move(
schema_id regnamespace,
target_node_id integer,
shard_transfer_mode citus.shard_transfer_mode default 'auto')
RETURNS void
LANGUAGE C STRICT
AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME', $$citus_schema_move_with_nodeid$$;
```
DESCRIPTION: Presenting citus_pause_node UDF enabling pausing by
node_id.
citus_pause_node takes a node_id parameter and fetches all the shards in
that node and puts AccessExclusiveLock on all the shards inside that
node. With this lock, insert is disabled, until citus_pause_node
transaction is closed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hanefi Onaldi <Hanefi.Onaldi@microsoft.com>
PG16 compatibility - part 7
Check out part 1 42d956888d
part 2 0d503dd5ac
part 3 907d72e60d
part 4 7c6b4ce103
part 5 6056cb2c29
part 6 b36c431abb
part 7 ee3153fe50
This commit is in the series of PG16 compatibility commits. PG16 introduced a new entry
varnnullingrels to Var, which represents our partkey in pg_dist_partition.
This commit does the necessary changes in Citus to support this.
Relevant PG commit:
2489d76c49
2489d76c4906f4461a364ca8ad7e0751ead8aa0d
More PG16 compatibility commits are coming soon ...
PG16 compatibility - Part 2
Part 1 provided successful compilation against pg16beta2.
42d956888d
This PR provides ruleutils changes with pg16beta2 and successful CREATE EXTENSION command.
Note that more changes are needed in order to have successful regression tests.
More commits are coming soon ...
For any_value changes, I referred to this commit
8ef94dc1f5
where we did something similar for PG14 support.
DESCRIPTION: Adds citus_schemas view
The citus_schemas view will be created in public schema if it exists, if
not the view will be created in pg_catalog.
Need to:
- [x] Add tests
- [x] Fix tests
DESCRIPTION: Enabling citus_stat_tenants to support schema-based
tenants.
This pull request modifies the existing logic to enable tenant
monitoring with schema-based tenants. The changes made are as follows:
- If a query has a partitionKeyValue (which serves as a tenant
key/identifier for distributed tables), Citus annotates the query with
both the partitionKeyValue and colocationId. This allows for accurate
tracking of the query.
- If a query does not have a partitionKeyValue, but its colocationId
belongs to a distributed schema, Citus annotates the query with only the
colocationId. The tenant monitor can then easily look up the schema to
determine if it's a distributed schema and make a decision on whether to
track the query.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <jelte.fennema@microsoft.com>
* Currently we do not allow any Citus tables other than Citus local
tables inside a regular schema before executing
`citus_schema_distribute`.
* `citus_schema_undistribute` expects only single shard distributed
tables inside a tenant schema.
DESCRIPTION: Adds the udf `citus_schema_distribute` to convert a regular
schema into a tenant schema.
DESCRIPTION: Adds the udf `citus_schema_undistribute` to convert a
tenant schema back to a regular schema.
---------
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
DESCRIPTION: Adds citus.enable_schema_based_sharding GUC that allows
sharding the database based on schemas when enabled.
* Refactor the logic that automatically creates Citus managed tables
* Refactor CreateSingleShardTable() to allow specifying colocation id
instead
* Add support for schema-based-sharding via a GUC
### What this PR is about:
Add **citus.enable_schema_based_sharding GUC** to enable schema-based
sharding. Each schema created while this GUC is ON will be considered
as a tenant schema. Later on, regardless of whether the GUC is ON or
OFF, any table created in a tenant schema will be converted to a
single shard distributed table (without a shard key). All the tenant
tables that belong to a particular schema will be co-located with each
other and will have a shard count of 1.
We introduce a new metadata table --pg_dist_tenant_schema-- to do the
bookkeeping for tenant schemas:
```sql
psql> \d pg_dist_tenant_schema
Table "pg_catalog.pg_dist_tenant_schema"
┌───────────────┬─────────┬───────────┬──────────┬─────────┐
│ Column │ Type │ Collation │ Nullable │ Default │
├───────────────┼─────────┼───────────┼──────────┼─────────┤
│ schemaid │ oid │ │ not null │ │
│ colocationid │ integer │ │ not null │ │
└───────────────┴─────────┴───────────┴──────────┴─────────┘
Indexes:
"pg_dist_tenant_schema_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (schemaid)
"pg_dist_tenant_schema_unique_colocationid_index" UNIQUE, btree (colocationid)
psql> table pg_dist_tenant_schema;
┌───────────┬───────────────┐
│ schemaid │ colocationid │
├───────────┼───────────────┤
│ 41963 │ 91 │
│ 41962 │ 90 │
└───────────┴───────────────┘
(2 rows)
```
Colocation id column of pg_dist_tenant_schema can never be NULL even
for the tenant schemas that don't have a tenant table yet. This is
because, we assign colocation ids to tenant schemas as soon as they
are created. That way, we can keep associating tenant schemas with
particular colocation groups even if all the tenant tables of a tenant
schema are dropped and recreated later on.
When a tenant schema is dropped, we delete the corresponding row from
pg_dist_tenant_schema. In that case, we delete the corresponding
colocation group from pg_dist_colocation as well.
### Future work for 12.0 release:
We're building schema-based sharding on top of the infrastructure that
adds support for creating distributed tables without a shard key
(https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6867).
However, not all the operations that can be done on distributed tables
without a shard key necessarily make sense (in the same way) in the
context of schema-based sharding. For example, we need to think about
what happens if user attempts altering schema of a tenant table. We
will tackle such scenarios in a future PR.
We will also add a new UDF --citus.schema_tenant_set() or such-- to
allow users to use an existing schema as a tenant schema, and another
one --citus.schema_tenant_unset() or such-- to stop using a schema as
a tenant schema in future PRs.
With this PR, we allow creating distributed tables with without
specifying a shard key via create_distributed_table(). Here are the
the important details about those tables:
* Specifying `shard_count` is not allowed because it is assumed to be 1.
* We mostly call such tables as "null shard-key" table in code /
comments.
* To avoid doing a breaking layout change in create_distributed_table();
instead of throwing an error, it will inform the user that
`distribution_type`
param is ignored unless it's explicitly set to NULL or 'h'.
* `colocate_with` param allows colocating such null shard-key tables to
each other.
* We define this table type, i.e., NULL_SHARD_KEY_TABLE, as a subclass
of
DISTRIBUTED_TABLE because we mostly want to treat them as distributed
tables in terms of SQL / DDL / operation support.
* Metadata for such tables look like:
- distribution method => DISTRIBUTE_BY_NONE
- replication model => REPLICATION_MODEL_STREAMING
- colocation id => **!=** INVALID_COLOCATION_ID (distinguishes from
Citus local tables)
* We assign colocation groups for such tables to different nodes in a
round-robin fashion based on the modulo of "colocation id".
Note that this PR doesn't care about DDL (except CREATE TABLE) / SQL /
operation (i.e., Citus UDFs) support for such tables but adds a
preliminary
API.
DESCRIPTION: PR description that will go into the change log, up to 78
characters
---------
Co-authored-by: Hanefi Onaldi <Hanefi.Onaldi@microsoft.com>
DESCRIPTION: Adds views that monitor statistics on tenant usages
This PR adds `citus_stats_tenants` view that monitors the tenants on the
cluster.
`citus_stats_tenants` shows the node id, colocation id, tenant
attribute, read count in this period and last period, and query count in
this period and last period of the tenant.
Tenant attribute currently is the tenant's distribution column value,
later when schema based sharding is introduced, this meaning might
change.
A period is a time bucket the queries are counted by. Read and query
counts for this period can increase until the current period ends. After
that those counts are moved to last period's counts, which cannot
change. The period length can be set using 'citus.stats_tenants_period'.
`SELECT` queries are counted as _read_ queries, `INSERT`, `UPDATE` and
`DELETE` queries are counted as _write_ queries. So in the view read
counts are `SELECT` counts and query counts are `SELECT`, `INSERT`,
`UPDATE` and `DELETE` count.
The data is stored in shared memory, in a struct named
`MultiTenantMonitor`.
`citus_stats_tenants` shows the data from local tenants.
`citus_stats_tenants` show up to `citus.stats_tenant_limit` number of
tenants.
The tenants are scored based on the number of queries they run and the
recency of those queries. Every query ran increases the score of tenant
by `ONE_QUERY_SCORE`, and after every period ends the scores are halved.
Halving is done lazily.
To retain information a longer the monitor keeps up to 3 times
`citus.stats_tenant_limit` tenants. When the tenant count hits `3 *
citus.stats_tenant_limit`, last `citus.stats_tenant_limit` tenants are
removed. To see all stored tenants you can use
`citus_stats_tenants(return_all_tenants := true)`
- [x] Create collector view that gets data from all nodes. #6761
- [x] Add monitoring log #6762
- [x] Create enable/disable GUC #6769
- [x] Parse the annotation string correctly #6796
- [x] Add local queries and prepared statements #6797
- [x] Rename to citus_stat_statements #6821
- [x] Run pgbench
- [x] Fix role permissions #6812
---------
Co-authored-by: Gokhan Gulbiz <ggulbiz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
This pull request proposes a change to the logic used for propagating
identity columns to worker nodes in citus. Instead of creating a
dependent sequence for each identity column and changing its default
value to `nextval(seq)/worker_nextval(seq)`, this update will pass the
identity columns as-is to the worker nodes.
Please note that there are a few limitations to this change.
1. Only bigint identity columns will be allowed in distributed tables to
ensure compatibility with the DDL from any node functionality. Our
current distributed sequence implementation only allows insert
statements from all nodes for bigint sequences.
2. `alter_distributed_table` and `undistribute_table` operations will
not be allowed for tables with identity columns. This is because we do
not have a proper way of keeping sequence states consistent across the
cluster.
DESCRIPTION: Prevents using identity columns on data types other than
`bigint` on distributed tables
DESCRIPTION: Prevents using `alter_distributed_table` and
`undistribute_table` UDFs when a table has identity columns
DESCRIPTION: Fixes a bug that prevents enforcing identity column
restrictions on worker nodes
Depends on #6740Fixes#6694
Description:
Implementing CDC changes using Logical Replication to avoid
re-publishing events multiple times by setting up replication origin
session, which will add "DoNotReplicateId" to every WAL entry.
- shard splits
- shard moves
- create distributed table
- undistribute table
- alter distributed tables (for some cases)
- reference table operations
The citus decoder which will be decoding WAL events for CDC clients,
ignores any WAL entry with replication origin that is not zero.
It also maps the shard names to distributed table names.
In the past, having columnar tables in the cluster was causing pg
upgrades to fail when attempting to access columnar metadata. This is
because, pg_dump doesn't see objects that we use for columnar-am related
booking as the dependencies of the tables using columnar-am.
To fix that; in #5456, we inserted some "normal dependency" edges (from
those objects to columnar-am) into pg_depend.
This helped us ensuring the existency of a class of metadata objects
--such as columnar.storageid_seq-- and helped fixing #5437.
However, the normal-dependency edges that we added for indexes on
columnar metadata tables --such columnar.stripe_pkey-- didn't help at
all because they were indeed causing dependency loops (#5510) and
pg_dump was not able to take those dependency edges into the account.
For this reason, this commit deletes those dependency edges so that
pg_dump stops complaining about them. Note that it's not critical to
delete those edges from pg_depend since they're not breaking pg upgrades
but were triggering some warning messages. And given that backporting
a sql change into older versions is hard a lot, we skip backporting
this.
citus_job_list() lists all background jobs by simply showing the records
in pg_dist_background_job.
citus_job_status(job_id bigint, raw boolean default false) shows the
status of a single background job by appending a jsonb details column to
the associated row from pg_dist_background_job. If the raw argument is
set, machine readable sizes are used instead of human readable
alternatives.
citus_rebalance_status(raw boolean default false) shows the status of
the last rebalance operation. If the raw argument is set, machine
readable sizes are used instead of human readable alternatives.
DESCRIPTION: Drop `SHARD_STATE_TO_DELETE` and use the cleanup records
instead
Drops the shard state that is used to mark shards as orphaned. Now we
insert cleanup records into `pg_dist_cleanup` so "orphaned" shards will
be dropped either by maintenance daemon or internal cleanup calls. With
this PR, we make the "cleanup orphaned shards" functions to be no-op, as
they would not be needed anymore.
This PR includes some naming changes about placement functions. We don't
need functions that filter orphaned shards, as there will be no orphaned
shards anymore.
We will also be introducing a small script with this PR, for users with
orphaned shards. We'll basically delete the orphaned shard entries from
`pg_dist_placement` and insert cleanup records into `pg_dist_cleanup`
for each one of them, during Citus upgrade.
We also have a lot of flakiness fixes in this PR.
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
We already have citus_job_wait to wait until the job reaches the desired
state. That PR adds waiting on task state to allow more granular
waiting. It can be used for Citus operations. Moreover, it is also
useful for testing purposes. (wait until a task reaches specified state)
Related to #6459.
DESCRIPTION: Create replication artifacts with unique names
We're creating replication objects with generic names. This disallows us
to enable parallel shard moves, as two operations might use the same
objects. With this PR, we'll create below objects with operation
specific names, by appending OparationId to the names.
* Subscriptions
* Publications
* Replication Slots
* Users created for subscriptions
increasing logical clock. Clock guarantees to never go back in value after restarts,
and makes best attempt to keep the value close to unix epoch time in milliseconds.
Also, introduces a new GUC "citus.enable_cluster_clock", when true, every
distributed transaction is stamped with logical causal clock and persisted
in a catalog pg_dist_commit_transaction.
DESCRIPTION: Drops GUC defer_drop_after_shard_split
DESCRIPTION: Drops GUC defer_drop_after_shard_move
Drop GUCs and related parts from the code.
Delete tests that specifically added for the GUCs.
Keep tests that can be used without the GUCs.
Update test output changes.
The motivation for this PR is to have an "always deferring" mechanism.
These two GUCs provide an option to not deferring dropping objects
during a shard move/split, and dropping them immediately. With this PR,
we will be always deferring dropping orphaned shards and other types of
objects.
We will have a separate PR to extend the deferred cleanup operation, so
that we would create records for deferred drop, for Subscriptions,
Publications, Replication Slots etc. This will make us be able to keep
track of created objects that needs to be dropped, during a shard
move/split. We will have objects created specifically for the current
operation; and those objects will be dropped at the end.
We have an issue (a draft roadmap) for enabling parallel shard moves.
For details please see: https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/6437
DESCRIPTION: Adds status column to get_rebalance_progress()
Introduces a new column named `status` for the function
`get_rebalance_progress()`. For each ongoing shard move, this column
will reveal information about that shard move operation's current
status.
For now, candidate status messages could be one of the below.
* Not Started
* Setting Up
* Copying Data
* Catching Up
* Creating Constraints
* Final Catchup
* Creating Foreign Keys
* Completing
* Completed
DESCRIPTION: Adds source_lsn and target_lsn fields into
get_rebalance_progress
Adding two fields named `source_lsn` and `target_lsn` to the function
`get_rebalance_progress`.
Target lsn data is fetched in `GetShardStatistics`, by expanding the
query sent to workers (joining with pg_subscription_rel and
pg_stat_subscription). Then put into the hashmap, for each shard.
Source lsn data is fetched in `BuildWorkerShardStatististicsHash`, in
the loop that iterate each node, by sending a pg_current_wal_lsn query
to each node. Then put into the hashmap, for each node.
DESCRIPTION: Show citus_copy_shard_placement progress in
get_rebalance_progress
When rebalancing to a new node that does not have reference tables yet
the rebalancer will first copy the reference tables to the nodes.
Depending on the size of the reference tables, this might take a long
time. However, there's no indication of what's happening at this stage
of the rebalance.
This PR improves this situation by also showing the progress of any
citus_copy_shard_placement calls when calling get_rebalance_progress.
Halil Ozan Akgül
Onur Tirtir
Gürkan İndibay
aykut-bozkurt
Naisila Puka
Ahmet Gedemenli
Gokhan Gulbiz
aykutbozkurt
rajeshkt78
Hanefi Onaldi
Marco Slot
Teja Mupparti
Jelte Fennema