Commit Graph

78 Commits (1e42cd3da03584d25aa0ace99574cbca05293189)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teja Mupparti 1e42cd3da0 Support MERGE on distributed tables with restrictions
This implements the phase - II of MERGE sql support

Support routable query where all the tables in the merge-sql are distributed, co-located, and both the source and
target relations are joined on the distribution column with a constant qual. This should be a Citus single-task
query. Below is an example.

SELECT create_distributed_table('t1', 'id');
SELECT create_distributed_table('s1', 'id', colocate_with => ‘t1’);

MERGE INTO t1
USING s1 ON t1.id = s1.id AND t1.id = 100
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET val = s1.val + 10
WHEN MATCHED THEN
DELETE
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT (id, val, src) VALUES (s1.id, s1.val, s1.src)

Basically, MERGE checks to see if

There are a minimum of two distributed tables (source and a target).
All the distributed tables are indeed colocated.
MERGE relations are joined on the distribution column
MERGE .. USING .. ON target.dist_key = source.dist_key
The query should touch only a single shard i.e. JOIN AND with a constant qual
MERGE .. USING .. ON target.dist_key = source.dist_key AND target.dist_key = <>
If any of the conditions are not met, it raises an exception.

(cherry picked from commit 44c387b978)

This implements MERGE phase3

Support pushdown query where all the tables in the merge-sql are Citus-distributed, co-located, and both
the source and target relations are joined on the distribution column. This will generate multiple tasks
which execute independently after pushdown.

SELECT create_distributed_table('t1', 'id');
SELECT create_distributed_table('s1', 'id', colocate_with => ‘t1’);

MERGE INTO t1
USING s1
ON t1.id = s1.id
        WHEN MATCHED THEN
                UPDATE SET val = s1.val + 10
        WHEN MATCHED THEN
                DELETE
        WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
                INSERT (id, val, src) VALUES (s1.id, s1.val, s1.src)

*The only exception for both the phases II and III is, UPDATEs and INSERTs must be done on the same shard-group
as the joined key; for example, below scenarios are NOT supported as the key-value to be inserted/updated is not
guaranteed to be on the same node as the id distribution-column.

MERGE INTO target t
USING source s ON (t.customer_id = s.customer_id)
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN - -
     INSERT(customer_id, …) VALUES (<non-local-constant-key-value>, ……);

OR this scenario where we update the distribution column itself

MERGE INTO target t
USING source s On (t.customer_id = s.customer_id)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
     UPDATE SET customer_id = 100;

(cherry picked from commit fa7b8949a8)
2023-03-16 13:43:08 -07:00
Onur Tirtir 20a5f3af2b
Replace CITUS_TABLE_WITH_NO_DIST_KEY checks with HasDistributionKey() (#6743)
Now that we will soon add another table type having DISTRIBUTE_BY_NONE
as distribution method and that we want the code to interpret such
tables mostly as distributed tables, let's make the definition of those
other two table types more strict by removing
CITUS_TABLE_WITH_NO_DIST_KEY
macro.

And instead, use HasDistributionKey() check in the places where the
logic applies to all table types that have / don't have a distribution
key. In future PRs, we might want to convert some of those
HasDistributionKey() checks if logic only applies to Citus local /
reference tables, not the others.

And adding HasDistributionKey() also allows us to consider having
DISTRIBUTE_BY_NONE as the distribution method as a "table attribute"
that can apply to distributed tables too, rather something that
determines the table type.
2023-03-10 13:55:52 +03:00
Marco Slot a482b36760
Revert "Support MERGE on distributed tables with restrictions" (#6675)
Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
2023-01-30 15:01:59 +01:00
aykut-bozkurt ab71cd01ee
fix multi level recursive plan (#6650)
Recursive planner should handle all the tree from bottom to top at
single pass. i.e. It should have already recursively planned all
required parts in its first pass. Otherwise, this means we have bug at
recursive planner, which needs to be handled. We add a check here and
return error.

DESCRIPTION: Fixes wrong results by throwing error in case recursive
planner multipass the query.

We found 3 different cases which causes recursive planner passes the
query multiple times.
1. Sublink in WHERE clause is planned at second pass after we
recursively planned a distributed table at the first pass. Fixed by PR
#6657.
2. Local-distributed joins are recursively planned at both the first and
the second pass. Issue #6659.
3. Some parts of the query is considered to be noncolocated at the
second pass as we do not generate attribute equivalances between
nondistributed and distributed tables. Issue #6653
2023-01-27 21:25:04 +03:00
Teja Mupparti 44c387b978 Support MERGE on distributed tables with restrictions
This implements the phase - II of MERGE sql support

Support routable query where all the tables in the merge-sql are distributed, co-located, and both the source and
target relations are joined on the distribution column with a constant qual. This should be a Citus single-task
query. Below is an example.

SELECT create_distributed_table('t1', 'id');
SELECT create_distributed_table('s1', 'id', colocate_with => ‘t1’);

MERGE INTO t1
USING s1 ON t1.id = s1.id AND t1.id = 100
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET val = s1.val + 10
WHEN MATCHED THEN
DELETE
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT (id, val, src) VALUES (s1.id, s1.val, s1.src)

Basically, MERGE checks to see if

There are a minimum of two distributed tables (source and a target).
All the distributed tables are indeed colocated.
MERGE relations are joined on the distribution column
MERGE .. USING .. ON target.dist_key = source.dist_key
The query should touch only a single shard i.e. JOIN AND with a constant qual
MERGE .. USING .. ON target.dist_key = source.dist_key AND target.dist_key = <>
If any of the conditions are not met, it raises an exception.
2023-01-18 11:05:27 -08:00
Onur Tirtir f339450a9d Phase - I: recursively plan non-recurring relations 2022-12-07 18:27:50 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 766f340ce0 Prevent failures on partitioned distributed tables with statistics objects on PG 15
Comment from the code is clear on this:
/*
 * The statistics objects of the distributed table are not relevant
 * for the distributed planning, so we can override it.
 *
 * Normally, we should not need this. However, the combination of
 * Postgres commit 269b532aef55a579ae02a3e8e8df14101570dfd9 and
 * Citus function AdjustPartitioningForDistributedPlanning()
 * forces us to do this. The commit expects statistics objects
 * of partitions to have "inh" flag set properly. Whereas, the
 * function overrides "inh" flag. To avoid Postgres to throw error,
 * we override statlist such that Postgres does not try to process
 * any statistics objects during the standard_planner() on the
 * coordinator. In the end, we do not need the standard_planner()
 * on the coordinator to generate an optimized plan. We call
 * into standard_planner() for other purposes, such as generating the
 * relationRestrictionContext here.
 *
 * AdjustPartitioningForDistributedPlanning() is a hack that we use
 * to prevent Postgres' standard_planner() to expand all the partitions
 * for the distributed planning when a distributed partitioned table
 * is queried. It is required for both correctness and performance
 * reasons. Although we can eliminate the use of the function for
 * the correctness (e.g., make sure that rest of the planner can handle
 * partitions), it's performance implication is hard to avoid. Certain
 * planning logic of Citus (such as router or query pushdown) relies
 * heavily on the relationRestrictionList. If
 * AdjustPartitioningForDistributedPlanning() is removed, all the
 * partitions show up in the, causing high planning times for
 * such queries.
 */
2022-09-15 14:36:05 +03:00
Naisila Puka 7d6410c838
Drop postgres 12 support (#6040)
* Remove if conditions with PG_VERSION_NUM < 13

* Remove server_above_twelve(&eleven) checks from tests

* Fix tests

* Remove pg12 and pg11 alternative test output files

* Remove pg12 specific normalization rules

* Some more if conditions in the code

* Change RemoteCollationIdExpression and some pg12/pg13 comments

* Remove some more normalization rules
2022-07-20 17:49:36 +03:00
Talha Nisanci e196d23854
Refactor AttributeEquivalenceId (#5006) 2021-12-23 13:19:02 +03:00
Marco Slot 93e79b9262 Never allow co-located joins of append-distributed tables 2021-10-18 21:11:16 +02:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 0b67fcf81d Fix style 2021-09-03 16:09:59 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul b01e7e884c Pass NULL for plannerInfo as we don't generate PlaceHolderVars 2021-09-03 15:27:25 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 4559d02c41
Fix union pushdown issue (#5079)
* Fix UNION not being pushdown

Postgres optimizes column fields that are not needed in the output. We
were relying on these fields to understand if it is safe to push down a
union query.

This fix looks at the parse query, which has the original column fields
to detect if it is safe to push down a union query.

* Add more tests

* Simplify code and make it more robust

* Process varlevelsup > 0 in FindReferencedTableColumn

* Only look for outers vars in union path

* Add more comments

* Remove UNION ALL specific logic for pulling up childvars
2021-07-29 13:52:55 +03:00
Ahmet Gedemenli 2e0bb5c0c8 Fix nested select query with union bug 2021-05-05 20:35:00 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 03832f353c Drop postgres 11 support 2021-03-25 09:20:28 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 54ee96470e Pass pointer of AttributeEquivalenceClass instead of pointer of pointer
AttributeEquivalenceClass seems to be unnecessarily used with multiple
pointers. Just use a single pointer for ease of read.
2021-03-03 12:27:26 +01:00
Onder Kalaci d1cd198655 Prevent infinite recursion for queries that involve UNION ALL and JOIN
With this commit, we make sure to prevent infinite recursion for queries
in the format: [subquery with a UNION ALL] JOIN [table or subquery]

Also, fixes a bug where we pushdown UNION ALL below a JOIN even if the
UNION ALL is not safe to pushdown.
2021-03-03 12:27:26 +01:00
SaitTalhaNisanci feee25dfbd
Use translated vars in postgres 13 as well (#4746)
* Use translated vars in postgres 13 as well

Postgres 13 removed translated vars with pg 13 so we had a special logic
for pg 13. However it had some bug, so now we copy the translated vars
before postgres deletes it. This also simplifies the logic.

* fix rtoffset with pg >= 13
2021-02-26 19:41:29 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci bcbd24f8de
Only consider pseudo constants for shortcuts (#4712)
It seems that we need to consider only pseudo constants while doing some
shortcuts in planning. For example there could be a false clause but it
can contribute to the result in which case it will not be a pseudo
constant.
2021-02-15 18:39:37 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 847b79078f
Not consider subplans in restriction list (#4679)
* Not consider subplans in restriction list

* Not consider sublink, alternative subplan in restrictions
2021-02-11 15:04:07 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 145112f3a0
Fix attribute numbers in subquery conversions (#4426)
Attribute number in a subquery RTE and relation RTE means different
things. In a relation attribute number will point to the column number
in the table definition including the dropped columns as well however in
subquery, it means the index in the target list. When we convert a
relation RTE to subquery RTE we should either correct all the relevant
attribute numbers or we can just add a dummy column for the dropped
columns. We choose the latter in this commit because it is practically
too vulnerable to update all the vars in a query.

Another thing this commit fixes is that in case a join restriction
clause list contains a false clause, we should just returns a false
clause instead of the whole list, because the whole list will contain
restrictions from other RTEs as well and this breaks the query, which
can be seen from the output changes, now it is much simpler.

Also instead of adding single tests for dropped columns, we choose to
run the whole mixed queries with tables with dropped columns, this
revealed some bugs already, which are fixed in this commit.
2020-12-18 20:25:41 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 5618f3a3fc Use BaseRestrictInfo for finding equality columns
Baseinfo also has pushed down filters etc, so it makes more sense to use
BaseRestrictInfo to determine what columns have constant equality
filters.

Also RteIdentity is used for removing conversion candidates instead of
rteIndex.
2020-12-15 18:18:36 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 2a44029aaf Simplify ContainsTableToBeConvertedToSubquery
AllDataLocallyAccessible and ContainsLocalTableSubqueryJoin are removed.
We can possibly remove ModifiesLocalTableWithRemoteCitusLocalTable as
well. Though this removal has a side effect that now when all the data
is locally available, we could still wrap a relation into a subquery, I
guess that should be resolved in the router planner itself.

Add more tests
2020-12-15 18:17:10 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 26d9f0b457 Use auto mode in tests and fix debug message 2020-12-15 18:17:10 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci eebcd995b3 Add some more tests 2020-12-15 18:17:10 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 5693cabc41 Not convert an already routable plannable query
We should not recursively plan an already routable plannable query. An
example of this is (SELECT * FROM local JOIN (SELECT * FROM dist) d1
USING(a));

So we let the recursive planner do all of its work and at the end we
convert the final query to to handle unsupported joins. While doing each
conversion, we check if it is router plannable, if so we stop.

Only consider range table entries that are in jointree

If a range table is not in jointree then there is no point in
considering that because we are trying to convert range table entries to
subqueries for join use case.
2020-12-15 18:17:10 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 594e001f3b Add filter pushdown regression tests
Also handle WHERE false
2020-12-15 18:17:10 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 82a4830c7d Adjust the existing regression tests 2020-12-15 18:17:10 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 8f8390ed6e Recursively plan local table joins
The logical planner cannot handle joins between local and distributed table.
Instead, we can recursively plan one side of the join and let the logical
planner handle the rest.

Our algorithm is a little smart, trying not to recursively plan distributed
tables, but favors local tables.
2020-12-15 18:17:10 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 7cc25c9125 Add ability to fetch the restrictions per relation
With this commit, we add the ability to add restrictions
per relation. We simply rely on the restrictions that Postgres
keeps per relation.
2020-12-15 18:17:10 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 83020f444e
Initialize fast planner restriction context (#4349)
We initialize fast planner restriction context so that code paths that
rely on this being not NULL will operate without a problem.
2020-11-26 13:45:27 +03:00
Onder Kalaci e0d2ac7620 Do not rely on set_rel_pathlist_hook for finding local relations
When a relation is used on an OUTER JOIN with FALSE filters,
set_rel_pathlist_hook may not be called for the table.

There might be other cases as well, so do not rely on the hook
for classification of the tables.
2020-11-06 11:14:30 +01:00
Onder Kalaci 5c4c9304ba Remove RemoveDuplicateJoinRestrictions() function
RemoveDuplicateJoinRestrictions() function was introduced with the aim of decrasing the overall planning times by eliminating the duplicate JOIN restriction entries (#1989). However, it turns out that the function itself is so CPU intensive with a very high algorithmic complexity, it hurts a lot more than it helps. The function is a clear example of premature optimization.

The table below shows the difference clearly:

"distributed query planning
 time master"	RemoveDuplicateJoinRestrictions() execution time on master	"Remove the function RemoveDuplicateJoinRestrictions()
this PR"
5 table INNER JOIN	9 msec	2msec	7 msec
10 table INNER JOIN	227 msec	194 msec	29  msec
20 table INNER JOIN	1 sec 235 msec	1  sec 139  msec	90 msecs
50 table INNER JOIN	24 seconds	21 seconds	1.5 seconds
100 table INNER JOIN	2 minutes 16 secods	1 minute 53 seconds	23 seconds
250 table INNER JOIN	Bottleneck on JoinClauseList	18 minutes 52 seconds	Bottleneck on JoinClauseList

5 table INNER JOIN in subquery	9 msec	0 msec	6 msec
10 table INNER JOIN subquery	33 msec	10 msec	32 msec
20 table INNER JOIN subquery	132 msec	67 msec	123 msec
50 table INNER JOIN subquery	1.2  seconds	900 msec	500 msec
100 table INNER JOIN subquery	6 seconds	5  seconds	2 seconds
250 table INNER JOIN subquery	54 seconds	37 seconds	20  seconds

5 table LEFT JOIN	5 msec	0 msec	5 msec
10 table LEFT JOIN	11 msec	0 msec	13 msec
20 table LEFT JOIN	26 msec	2 msec	30 msec
50 table LEFT JOIN	150 msec	15 msec	193 msec
100 table LEFT JOIN	757 msec	71 msec	722 msec
250 table LEFT JOIN	8 seconds	600 msec	8 seconds

5 JOINs among 2 table JOINs 	37 msec	11 msec	25 msec
10 JOINs among 2 table JOINs 	536 msec	306 msec	352 msec
20 JOINs among 2 table JOINs 	794 msec	181 msec	640 msec
50 JOINs among 2 table JOINs 	25 seconds	2 seconds	22 seconds
100 JOINs among 2 table JOINs 	Bottleneck on JoinClauseList	9 seconds	Bottleneck on JoinClauseList
150 JOINs among 2 table JOINs 	Bottleneck on JoinClauseList	46 seconds	Bottleneck on JoinClauseList

On top of the performance penalty, the function had a critical bug #4255, and with #4254 we hit one more important bug. It should be fixed by adding the followig check to the ContextCoversJoinRestriction():
```
static bool
JoinRelIdsSame(JoinRestriction *leftRestriction, JoinRestriction *rightRestriction)
{
	Relids leftInnerRelIds = leftRestriction->innerrel->relids;
	Relids rightInnerRelIds = rightRestriction->innerrel->relids;
	if (!bms_equal(leftInnerRelIds, rightInnerRelIds))
	{
		return false;
	}

	Relids leftOuterRelIds = leftRestriction->outerrel->relids;
	Relids rightOuterRelIds = rightRestriction->outerrel->relids;
	if (!bms_equal(leftOuterRelIds, rightOuterRelIds))
	{
		return false;
	}

	return true;
}
```

However, adding this eliminates all the benefits tha RemoveDuplicateJoinRestrictions() brings.

I've used the commands here to generate the JOINs mentioned in the PR: https://gist.github.com/onderkalaci/fe8654f9df5916c7af4c7c5eb892561e#file-gistfile1-txt

Inner and outer JOINs behave roughly the same, to simplify the table only added INNER joins.
2020-10-21 10:29:39 +02:00
Onur Tirtir c49077d594
Disallow outer joins `ON TRUE` with ref & dist tables when ref table is outer relation (#4255)
Disallow `ON TRUE` outer joins with reference & distributed tables
when reference table is outer relation by fixing the logic bug made
when calling `LeftListIsSubset` function.

Also, be more defensive when removing duplicate join restrictions
when join clause is empty for non-inner joins as they might still
contain useful information for non-inner joins.
2020-10-19 16:58:11 +03:00
Onder Kalaci bbedfca761 Improve the relation restriction counters
It seems like Postgres could call set_rel_pathlist() for
the same relation multiple times. This breaks the logic
where we assume relationCount eqauls to the number of
entries in relationRestrictionList.

In summary, relationRestrictionList may contain duplicate
entries.
2020-10-19 08:51:16 +02:00
Onur Tirtir 7cb07c70fa
Move hasSemiJoin to JoinRestrictionContext (#4256) 2020-10-16 18:37:39 +03:00
Onur Tirtir de6f2d3f42
Refactor JoinRestrictionListExistsInContext to improve readability (#4249) 2020-10-16 12:24:56 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 366461ccdb
Introduce cache entry/table utilities (#4132)
Introduce table entry utility functions

Citus table cache entry utilities are introduced so that we can easily
extend existing functionality with minimum changes, specifically changes
to these functions. For example IsNonDistributedTableCacheEntry can be
extended for citus local tables without the need to scan the whole
codebase and update each relevant part.

* Introduce utility functions to find the type of tables

A table type can be a reference table, a hash/range/append distributed
table. Utility methods are created so that we don't have to worry about
how a table is considered as a reference table etc. This also makes it
easy to extend the table types.

* Add IsCitusTableType utilities

* Rename IsCacheEntryCitusTableType -> IsCitusTableTypeCacheEntry

* Change citus table types in some checks
2020-09-02 22:26:05 +03:00
Jelte Fennema 451ea04508 Rename ForceXxx functions to to XxxOrError
This clearer naming was suggested in https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/4001
2020-09-01 11:19:17 +02:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 1070828465 update cte inline output for pg13
Make some macros in version_compat more robust
Remove commented code in ruleutils
Remove unnecessary variable assignments
2020-08-04 15:18:27 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 1112b254a7 adapt recently added code for pg13
This commit mostly adds pg_get_triggerdef_command to our ruleutils_13.
This doesn't add anything extra for ruleutils 13 so it is basically a copy
of the change on ruleutils_12
2020-08-04 15:18:27 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 6ad708642e Fix rte index with pg >=13
Rte index is increased by range table index offset in pg >= 13. The
offset is removed with the pg >= 13.

Currently pushdown for union all is disabled because translatedVars is
set to nil on postgres side, and we were using translatedVars to
figure out if partition key has the same index in both sides of union
all. This should be fixed.

Commit on postgres side:
6ef77cf46e81f45716ec981cb08781d426181378

fix union all pushdown logic for pg13

Before pg 13, there was a field, translatedVars, and we were using that
to understand if the partition key has the same index on both sides of
the union all. With pg13 there is a parent_colnos field in appendRelInfo
and we can use that to get the attribute numbers(varattnos) in union all
vars. We make use of parent_colnos instead of translatedVars in pg >=13.
2020-08-04 15:18:27 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci ba01f3457a
use macros for pg versions instead of hardcoded values (#3694)
3 Macros are defined for removing the hardcoded pg versions.
PG_VERSION_11, PG_VERSION_12 and PG_VERSION_13.
2020-04-01 17:01:52 +03:00
Philip Dubé 720525cfda Add support for window functions on coordinator
Some refactoring:
Consolidate expression which decides whether GROUP BY/HAVING are pushed down
Rename early pullUpIntermediateRows to hasNonDistributableAggregates
Create WorkerColumnName to handle formatting WORKER_COLUMN_FORMAT
Ignore NULL StringInfo pointers to SafeToPushdownWindowFunction
Fix bug where SubqueryPushdownMultiNodeTree mutates supplied Query,
	SafeToPushdownWindowFunction requires the original query as it relies on rtable
2020-03-25 15:31:20 +00:00
Philip Dubé bec58000d6 Given IsDistributedTableRTE, there's ambiguity in what DistributedTable means
Elsewhere we used DistributedTable to include reference tables
Marco suggested we use CitusTable for distributed & reference tables

So renaming:
- IsDistributedTable -> IsCitusTable
- IsDistributedTableViaCatalog -> IsCitusTableViaCatalog
- DistributedTableCacheEntry -> CitusTableCacheEntry
- DistributedTableList -> CitusTableList
- isDistributedTable -> isCitusTable
- InsertSelectIntoDistributedTable -> InsertSelectIntoCitusTable
- ExtractFirstDistributedTableId -> ExtractFirstCitusTableId
2020-03-06 18:57:55 +00:00
Jelte Fennema 685b54b3de
Semmle: Check for NULL in some places where it might occur (#3509)
Semmle reported quite some places where we use a value that could be NULL. Most of these are not actually a real issue, but better to be on the safe side with these things and make the static analysis happy.
2020-02-27 10:45:29 +01:00
Philip Dubé 08f6842d50 Fix typos
Equivalance -> Equivalence
utillity -> utility
shorted lived one -> shortly lived one
elegible -> eligible
2020-02-18 17:14:40 +00:00
Philip Dubé 3a906b8210 Fix typos noticed while reading through code trying to understand HAVING 2020-02-11 19:55:10 +00:00
Marco Slot ba39d72fe1 Fix incorrect union all pushdown issue 2020-01-01 09:03:50 +01:00
Jelte Fennema 1d8dde232f
Automatically convert useless declarations using regex replace (#3181)
* Add declaration removal to CI

* Convert declarations
2019-11-21 13:47:29 +01:00