PG17 added foreach_ptr, foreach_int and foreach_oid macros
Relevant PG commit
14dd0f27d7cd56ffae9ecdbe324965073d01a9ff
14dd0f27d7
We already have these macros, but they are different with the
PG17 ones because our macros take a DECLARED variable, whereas
the PG16 macros declare a locally-scoped loop variable themselves.
Hence I am renaming our macros to foreach_declared_
This change adds a script to programatically group all includes in a
specific order. The script was used as a one time invocation to group
and sort all includes throught our formatted code. The grouping is as
follows:
- System includes (eg. `#include<...>`)
- Postgres.h (eg. `#include "postgres.h"`)
- Toplevel imports from postgres, not contained in a directory (eg.
`#include "miscadmin.h"`)
- General postgres includes (eg . `#include "nodes/..."`)
- Toplevel citus includes, not contained in a directory (eg. `#include
"citus_verion.h"`)
- Columnar includes (eg. `#include "columnar/..."`)
- Distributed includes (eg. `#include "distributed/..."`)
Because it is quite hard to understand the difference between toplevel
citus includes and toplevel postgres includes it hardcodes the list of
toplevel citus includes. In the same manner it assumes anything not
prefixed with `columnar/` or `distributed/` as a postgres include.
The sorting/grouping is enforced by CI. Since we do so with our own
script there are not changes required in our uncrustify configuration.
DESCRIPTION: Send keepalive messages during the logical replication
phase of large shard splits to avoid timeouts.
During the logical replication part of the shard split process, split
decoder filters out the wal records produced by the initial copy. If the
number of wal records is big, then split decoder ends up processing for
a long time before sending out any wal records through pgoutput. Hence
the wal receiver may time out and restarts repeatedly causing our split
driver code catch up logic to fail.
Notes:
1. If the wal_receiver_timeout is set to a very small number e.g. 600ms,
it may time out before receiving the keepalives. My tests show that this
code works best when the` wal_receiver_timeout `is set to 1minute, which
is the default value.
2. Once a logical replication worker time outs, a new one gets launched.
The new logical replication worker sets the pg_stat_subscription columns
to initial values. E.g. the latest_end_lsn is set to 0. Our driver logic
in `WaitForGroupedLogicalRepTargetsToCatchUp` can not handle LSN value
to go back. This is the main reason for it to get stuck in the infinite
loop.
DESCRIPTION:
- The CDC decoder is refacroted into a seperate extension that can be used loaded dynamically without having to reload citus.
- CDC decoder code can be compiled using DECODER flag to work with different decoders like pgoutput and wal2json.
by default the base decode is "pgoutput".
- the dynamic_library_path config is adjusted dynamically to prefer the decoders in cdc_decoders directory in citus init
so that the users can use the replication subscription commands without having to make any config changes.
Description:
Implementing CDC changes using Logical Replication to avoid
re-publishing events multiple times by setting up replication origin
session, which will add "DoNotReplicateId" to every WAL entry.
- shard splits
- shard moves
- create distributed table
- undistribute table
- alter distributed tables (for some cases)
- reference table operations
The citus decoder which will be decoding WAL events for CDC clients,
ignores any WAL entry with replication origin that is not zero.
It also maps the shard names to distributed table names.
The PR introduces code changes to fix Issue
[6303](https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/6303)
`create_distributed_table_concurrently` following drop column, creates a
buggy situation in split decoder.
* Consider the below scenario:
* Session1 : Drop column followed by
create_distributed_table_concurrently
* Session2 : Concurrent insert workload
The child shards created by `create_distributed_table_concurrently` will
have less columns than the source shard because some column were
dropped. The incoming tuple from session2 will have more columns as the
writes happened on source shard. But now the tuple needs to be applied
on child shard. So we need to format existing tuple according to child
schema and skip dropped column values.
The PR fixes this by reformatting the tuple according the target child
schema.
Test:
1) isolation_create_distributed_concurrently_after_drop_column - Repros
the issue and tests on the same.
Added create_distributed_table_concurrently which is nonblocking variant of create_distributed_table.
It bases on the split API which takes advantage of logical replication to support nonblocking split operations.
Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: aykutbozkurt <aykut.bozkurt1995@gmail.com>
naisila
Nils Dijk
Emel Şimşek
rajeshkt78
Sameer Awasekar
Marco Slot
Sameer Awasekar