Commit Graph

61 Commits (28796894416680fe386711344462cca510f03aa0)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Philip Dubé befd0caddd Tests: normalize sql_procedure and custom_aggregate_support
Also fix typo in multi_insert_select
2019-07-10 14:36:17 +00:00
Önder Kalacı 40da78c6fd
Introduce the adaptive executor (#2798)
With this commit, we're introducing the Adaptive Executor. 


The commit message consists of two distinct sections. The first part explains
how the executor works. The second part consists of the commit messages of
the individual smaller commits that resulted in this commit. The readers
can search for the each of the smaller commit messages on 
https://github.com/citusdata/citus and can learn more about the history
of the change.

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *
 * adaptive_executor.c
 *
 * The adaptive executor executes a list of tasks (queries on shards) over
 * a connection pool per worker node. The results of the queries, if any,
 * are written to a tuple store.
 *
 * The concepts in the executor are modelled in a set of structs:
 *
 * - DistributedExecution:
 *     Execution of a Task list over a set of WorkerPools.
 * - WorkerPool
 *     Pool of WorkerSessions for the same worker which opportunistically
 *     executes "unassigned" tasks from a queue.
 * - WorkerSession:
 *     Connection to a worker that is used to execute "assigned" tasks
 *     from a queue and may execute unasssigned tasks from the WorkerPool.
 * - ShardCommandExecution:
 *     Execution of a Task across a list of placements.
 * - TaskPlacementExecution:
 *     Execution of a Task on a specific placement.
 *     Used in the WorkerPool and WorkerSession queues.
 *
 * Every connection pool (WorkerPool) and every connection (WorkerSession)
 * have a queue of tasks that are ready to execute (readyTaskQueue) and a
 * queue/set of pending tasks that may become ready later in the execution
 * (pendingTaskQueue). The tasks are wrapped in a ShardCommandExecution,
 * which keeps track of the state of execution and is referenced from a
 * TaskPlacementExecution, which is the data structure that is actually
 * added to the queues and describes the state of the execution of a task
 * on a particular worker node.
 *
 * When the task list is part of a bigger distributed transaction, the
 * shards that are accessed or modified by the task may have already been
 * accessed earlier in the transaction. We need to make sure we use the
 * same connection since it may hold relevant locks or have uncommitted
 * writes. In that case we "assign" the task to a connection by adding
 * it to the task queue of specific connection (in
 * AssignTasksToConnections). Otherwise we consider the task unassigned
 * and add it to the task queue of a worker pool, which means that it
 * can be executed over any connection in the pool.
 *
 * A task may be executed on multiple placements in case of a reference
 * table or a replicated distributed table. Depending on the type of
 * task, it may not be ready to be executed on a worker node immediately.
 * For instance, INSERTs on a reference table are executed serially across
 * placements to avoid deadlocks when concurrent INSERTs take conflicting
 * locks. At the beginning, only the "first" placement is ready to execute
 * and therefore added to the readyTaskQueue in the pool or connection.
 * The remaining placements are added to the pendingTaskQueue. Once
 * execution on the first placement is done the second placement moves
 * from pendingTaskQueue to readyTaskQueue. The same approach is used to
 * fail over read-only tasks to another placement.
 *
 * Once all the tasks are added to a queue, the main loop in
 * RunDistributedExecution repeatedly does the following:
 *
 * For each pool:
 * - ManageWorkPool evaluates whether to open additional connections
 *   based on the number unassigned tasks that are ready to execute
 *   and the targetPoolSize of the execution.
 *
 * Poll all connections:
 * - We use a WaitEventSet that contains all (non-failed) connections
 *   and is rebuilt whenever the set of active connections or any of
 *   their wait flags change.
 *
 *   We almost always check for WL_SOCKET_READABLE because a session
 *   can emit notices at any time during execution, but it will only
 *   wake up WaitEventSetWait when there are actual bytes to read.
 *
 *   We check for WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE just after sending bytes in case
 *   there is not enough space in the TCP buffer. Since a socket is
 *   almost always writable we also use WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE as a
 *   mechanism to wake up WaitEventSetWait for non-I/O events, e.g.
 *   when a task moves from pending to ready.
 *
 * For each connection that is ready:
 * - ConnectionStateMachine handles connection establishment and failure
 *   as well as command execution via TransactionStateMachine.
 *
 * When a connection is ready to execute a new task, it first checks its
 * own readyTaskQueue and otherwise takes a task from the worker pool's
 * readyTaskQueue (on a first-come-first-serve basis).
 *
 * In cases where the tasks finish quickly (e.g. <1ms), a single
 * connection will often be sufficient to finish all tasks. It is
 * therefore not necessary that all connections are established
 * successfully or open a transaction (which may be blocked by an
 * intermediate pgbouncer in transaction pooling mode). It is therefore
 * essential that we take a task from the queue only after opening a
 * transaction block.
 *
 * When a command on a worker finishes or the connection is lost, we call
 * PlacementExecutionDone, which then updates the state of the task
 * based on whether we need to run it on other placements. When a
 * connection fails or all connections to a worker fail, we also call
 * PlacementExecutionDone for all queued tasks to try the next placement
 * and, if necessary, mark shard placements as inactive. If a task fails
 * to execute on all placements, the execution fails and the distributed
 * transaction rolls back.
 *
 * For multi-row INSERTs, tasks are executed sequentially by
 * SequentialRunDistributedExecution instead of in parallel, which allows
 * a high degree of concurrency without high risk of deadlocks.
 * Conversely, multi-row UPDATE/DELETE/DDL commands take aggressive locks
 * which forbids concurrency, but allows parallelism without high risk
 * of deadlocks. Note that this is unrelated to SEQUENTIAL_CONNECTION,
 * which indicates that we should use at most one connection per node, but
 * can run tasks in parallel across nodes. This is used when there are
 * writes to a reference table that has foreign keys from a distributed
 * table.
 *
 * Execution finishes when all tasks are done, the query errors out, or
 * the user cancels the query.
 *
 *-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 */



All the commits involved here:
* Initial unified executor prototype

* Latest changes

* Fix rebase conflicts to master branch

* Add missing variable for assertion

* Ensure that master_modify_multiple_shards() returns the affectedTupleCount

* Adjust intermediate result sizes

The real-time executor uses COPY command to get the results
from the worker nodes. Unified executor avoids that which
results in less data transfer. Simply adjust the tests to lower
sizes.

* Force one connection per placement (or co-located placements) when requested

The existing executors (real-time and router) always open 1 connection per
placement when parallel execution is requested.

That might be useful under certain circumstances:

(a) User wants to utilize as much as CPUs on the workers per
distributed query
(b) User has a transaction block which involves COPY command

Also, lots of regression tests rely on this execution semantics.
So, we'd enable few of the tests with this change as well.

* For parameters to be resolved before using them

For the details, see PostgreSQL's copyParamList()

* Unified executor sorts the returning output

* Ensure that unified executor doesn't ignore sequential execution of DDLJob's

Certain DDL commands, mainly creating foreign keys to reference tables,
should be executed sequentially. Otherwise, we'd end up with a self
distributed deadlock.

To overcome this situaiton, we set a flag `DDLJob->executeSequentially`
and execute it sequentially. Note that we have to do this because
the command might not be called within a transaction block, and
we cannot call `SetLocalMultiShardModifyModeToSequential()`.

This fixes at least two test: multi_insert_select_on_conflit.sql and
multi_foreign_key.sql

Also, I wouldn't mind scattering local `targetPoolSize` variables within
the code. The reason is that we'll soon have a GUC (or a global
variable based on a GUC) that'd set the pool size. In that case, we'd
simply replace `targetPoolSize` with the global variables.

* Fix 2PC conditions for DDL tasks

* Improve closing connections that are not fully established in unified execution

* Support foreign keys to reference tables in unified executor

The idea for supporting foreign keys to reference tables is simple:
Keep track of the relation accesses within a transaction block.
    - If a parallel access happens on a distributed table which
      has a foreign key to a reference table, one cannot modify
      the reference table in the same transaction. Otherwise,
      we're very likely to end-up with a self-distributed deadlock.
    - If an access to a reference table happens, and then a parallel
      access to a distributed table (which has a fkey to the reference
      table) happens, we switch to sequential mode.

Unified executor misses the function calls that marks the relation
accesses during the execution. Thus, simply add the necessary calls
and let the logic kick in.

* Make sure to close the failed connections after the execution

* Improve comments

* Fix savepoints in unified executor.

* Rebuild the WaitEventSet only when necessary

* Unclaim connections on all errors.

* Improve failure handling for unified executor

   - Implement the notion of errorOnAnyFailure. This is similar to
     Critical Connections that the connection managament APIs provide
   - If the nodes inside a modifying transaction expand, activate 2PC
   - Fix few bugs related to wait event sets
   - Mark placement INACTIVE during the execution as much as possible
     as opposed to we do in the COMMIT handler
   - Fix few bugs related to scheduling next placement executions
   - Improve decision on when to use 2PC

Improve the logic to start a transaction block for distributed transactions

- Make sure that only reference table modifications are always
  executed with distributed transactions
- Make sure that stored procedures and functions are executed
  with distributed transactions

* Move waitEventSet to DistributedExecution

This could also be local to RunDistributedExecution(), but in that case
we had to mark it as "volatile" to avoid PG_TRY()/PG_CATCH() issues, and
cast it to non-volatile when doing WaitEventSetFree(). We thought that
would make code a bit harder to read than making this non-local, so we
move it here. See comments for PG_TRY() in postgres/src/include/elog.h
and "man 3 siglongjmp" for more context.

* Fix multi_insert_select test outputs

Two things:
   1) One complex transaction block is now supported. Simply update
      the test output
   2) Due to dynamic nature of the unified executor, the orders of
      the errors coming from the shards might change (e.g., all of
      the queries on the shards would fail, but which one appears
      on the error message?). To fix that, we simply added it to
      our shardId normalization tool which happens just before diff.

* Fix subeury_and_cte test

The error message is updated from:
	failed to execute task
To:
        more than one row returned by a subquery or an expression

which is a lot clearer to the user.

* Fix intermediate_results test outputs

Simply update the error message from:
	could not receive query results
to
	result "squares" does not exist

which makes a lot more sense.

* Fix multi_function_in_join test

The error messages update from:
     Failed to execute task XXX
To:
     function f(..) does not exist

* Fix multi_query_directory_cleanup test

The unified executor does not create any intermediate files.

* Fix with_transactions test

A test case that just started to work fine

* Fix multi_router_planner test outputs

The error message is update from:
	Could not receive query results
To:
	Relation does not exists

which is a lot more clearer for the users

* Fix multi_router_planner_fast_path test

The error message is update from:
	Could not receive query results
To:
	Relation does not exists

which is a lot more clearer for the users

* Fix isolation_copy_placement_vs_modification by disabling select_opens_transaction_block

* Fix ordering in isolation_multi_shard_modify_vs_all

* Add executor locks to unified executor

* Make sure to allocate enought WaitEvents

The previous code was missing the waitEvents for the latch and
postmaster death.

* Fix rebase conflicts for master rebase

* Make sure that TRUNCATE relies on unified executor

* Implement true sequential execution for multi-row INSERTS

Execute the individual tasks executed one by one. Note that this is different than
MultiShardConnectionType == SEQUENTIAL_CONNECTION case (e.g., sequential execution
mode). In that case, running the tasks across the nodes in parallel is acceptable
and implemented in that way.

However, the executions that are qualified here would perform poorly if the
tasks across the workers are executed in parallel. We currently qualify only
one class of distributed queries here, multi-row INSERTs. If we do not enforce
true sequential execution, concurrent multi-row upserts could easily form
a distributed deadlock when the upserts touch the same rows.

* Remove SESSION_LIFESPAN flag in unified_executor

* Apply failure test updates

We've changed the failure behaviour a bit, and also the error messages
that show up to the user. This PR covers majority of the updates.

* Unified executor honors citus.node_connection_timeout

With this commit, unified executor errors out if even
a single connection cannot be established within
citus.node_connection_timeout.

And, as a side effect this fixes failure_connection_establishment
test.

* Properly increment/decrement pool size variables

Before this commit, the idle and active connection
counts were not properly calculated.

* insert_select_executor goes through unified executor.

* Add missing file for task tracker

* Modify ExecuteTaskListExtended()'s signature

* Sort output of INSERT ... SELECT ... RETURNING

* Take partition locks correctly in unified executor

* Alternative implementation for force_max_query_parallelization

* Fix compile warnings in unified executor

* Fix style issues

* Decrement idleConnectionCount when idle connection is lost

* Always rebuild the wait event sets

In the previous implementation, on waitFlag changes, we were only
modifying the wait events. However, we've realized that it might
be an over optimization since (a) we couldn't see any performance
benefits (b) we see some errors on failures and because of (a)
we prefer to disable it now.

* Make sure to allocate enough sized waitEventSet

With multi-row INSERTs, we might have more sessions than
task*workerCount after few calls of RunDistributedExecution()
because the previous sessions would also be alive.

Instead, re-allocate events when the connectino set changes.

* Implement SELECT FOR UPDATE on reference tables

On master branch, we do two extra things on SELECT FOR UPDATE
queries on reference tables:
   - Acquire executor locks
   - Execute the query on all replicas

With this commit, we're implementing the same logic on the
new executor.

* SELECT FOR UPDATE opens transaction block even if SelectOpensTransactionBlock disabled

Otherwise, users would be very confused and their logic is very likely
to break.

* Fix build error

* Fix the newConnectionCount calculation in ManageWorkerPool

* Fix rebase conflicts

* Fix minor test output differences

* Fix citus indent

* Remove duplicate sorts that is added with rebase

* Create distributed table via executor

* Fix wait flags in CheckConnectionReady

* failure_savepoints output for unified executor.

* failure_vacuum output (pg 10) for unified executor.

* Fix WaitEventSetWait timeout in unified executor

* Stabilize failure_truncate test output

* Add an ORDER BY to multi_upsert

* Fix regression test outputs after rebase to master

* Add executor.c comment

* Rename executor.c to adaptive_executor.c

* Do not schedule tasks if the failed placement is not ready to execute

Before the commit, we were blindly scheduling the next placement executions
even if the failed placement is not on the ready queue. Now, we're ensuring
that if failed placement execution is on a failed pool or session where the
execution is on the pendingQueue, we do not schedule the next task. Because
the other placement execution should be already running.

* Implement a proper custom scan node for adaptive executor

- Switch between the executors, add GUC to set the pool size
- Add non-adaptive regression test suites
- Enable CIRCLE CI for non-adaptive tests
- Adjust test output files

* Add slow start interval to the executor

* Expose max_cached_connection_per_worker to user

* Do not start slow when there are cached connections

* Consider ExecutorSlowStartInterval in NextEventTimeout

* Fix memory issues with ReceiveResults().

* Disable executor via TaskExecutorType

* Make sure to execute the tests with the other executor

* Use task_executor_type to enable-disable adaptive executor

* Remove useless code

* Adjust the regression tests

* Add slow start regression test

* Rebase to master

* Fix test failures in adaptive executor.

* Rebase to master - 2

* Improve comments & debug messages

* Set force_max_query_parallelization in isolation_citus_dist_activity

* Force max parallelization for creating shards when asked to use exclusive connection.

* Adjust the default pool size

* Expand description of max_adaptive_executor_pool_size GUC

* Update warnings in FinishRemoteTransactionCommit()

* Improve session clean up at the end of execution

Explicitly list all the states that the execution might end,
otherwise warn.

* Remove MULTI_CONNECTION_WAIT_RETRY which is not used at all

* Add more ORDER BYs to multi_mx_partitioning
2019-06-28 14:04:40 +02:00
Philip Dubé 84fe626378 multi_router_planner: refactor error propagation 2019-06-26 10:32:01 +02:00
Hadi Moshayedi 4bbae02778 Make COPY compatible with unified executor. 2019-06-20 19:53:40 +02:00
Onder Kalaci 6a8e2c260a Add order by multi_insert_select 2019-04-09 12:28:57 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 92e87738dd Make sure that the regression test output is durable to different execution orders
Mostly add order bys and suppress worker node ports in the test
outputs.
2019-04-08 11:48:08 +03:00
Onder Kalaci f144bb4911 Introduce fast path router planning
In this context, we define "Fast Path Planning for SELECT" as trivial
queries where Citus can skip relying on the standard_planner() and
handle all the planning.

For router planner, standard_planner() is mostly important to generate
the necessary restriction information. Later, the restriction information
generated by the standard_planner is used to decide whether all the shards
that a distributed query touches reside on a single worker node. However,
standard_planner() does a lot of extra things such as cost estimation and
execution path generations which are completely unnecessary in the context
of distributed planning.

There are certain types of queries where Citus could skip relying on
standard_planner() to generate the restriction information. For queries
in the following format, Citus does not need any information that the
standard_planner() generates:

  SELECT ... FROM single_table WHERE distribution_key = X;  or
  DELETE FROM single_table WHERE distribution_key = X; or
  UPDATE single_table SET value_1 = value_2 + 1 WHERE distribution_key = X;

Note that the queries might not be as simple as the above such that
GROUP BY, WINDOW FUNCIONS, ORDER BY or HAVING etc. are all acceptable. The
only rule is that the query is on a single distributed (or reference) table
and there is a "distribution_key = X;" in the WHERE clause. With that, we
could use to decide the shard that a distributed query touches reside on
a worker node.
2019-02-21 13:27:01 +03:00
Marco Slot 8893cc141d Support INSERT...SELECT with ON CONFLICT or RETURNING via coordinator
Before this commit, Citus supported INSERT...SELECT queries with
ON CONFLICT or RETURNING clauses only for pushdownable ones, since
queries supported via coordinator were utilizing COPY infrastructure
of PG to send selected tuples to the target worker nodes.

After this PR, INSERT...SELECT queries with ON CONFLICT or RETURNING
clauses will be performed in two phases via coordinator. In the first
phase selected tuples will be saved to the intermediate table which
is colocated with target table of the INSERT...SELECT query. Note that,
a utility function to save results to the colocated intermediate result
also implemented as a part of this commit. In the second phase, INSERT..
SELECT query is directly run on the worker node using the intermediate
table as the source table.
2018-11-30 15:29:12 +03:00
Jason Petersen 9fb951c312
Fix user-facing typos
Lintian found these (presumably by looking in the text section and
running them through e.g. aspell).
2018-10-09 16:54:03 -07:00
Nils Dijk 2d13900230
error on unsupported changing of distirbution column in ON CONFLICT for INSERT ... SELECT 2018-07-23 15:18:21 +02:00
Marco Slot f3f2805978
Fix use-after-free that may occur for INSERT..SELECT in prepared statements 2018-06-18 22:55:06 -06:00
Onder Kalaci d918556dca INSERT .. SELECT pushdown honors multi_shard_modification_mode 2018-06-06 12:42:23 +03:00
mehmet furkan şahin 785a86ed0a Tests are updated to use create_distributed_table 2018-05-10 11:18:59 +03:00
Hadi Moshayedi 86b12bc2d0
Always prefix operators with their namespace. (#2147)
Previously we checked if an operator is in pg_catalog, and if it wasn't we prefixed it with namespace in worker queries. This can have a huge impact on performance of physical planner when using custom data types.

This happened regardless of current search_path config, because Citus overrides the search path in get_query_def_extended(). When we do so, the check for existence of the operator in current search path in generate_operator_name() fails for any operators outside pg_catalog. This means that nothing gets cached, and in the following calls we will again recheck the system tables for existence of the operators, which took an additional 40-50ms for some of the usecases we were seeing.

In this change we skip the pg_catalog check, and always prefix the operator with its namespace.
2018-05-05 13:27:26 -04:00
Marco Slot f8cfe07fd1 Support intermediate results in distributed INSERT..SELECT 2018-05-03 14:42:28 +02:00
Marco Slot 90cdfff602 Implement recursive planning for DML statements 2018-05-03 14:42:28 +02:00
Brian Cloutier 42ddfa176d Fix crash on Windows where there is no detail 2018-04-13 12:54:22 -07:00
Marco Slot 09c09f650f Recursively plan set operations when leaf nodes recur 2017-12-26 13:46:55 +02:00
mehmet furkan şahin 57bc86e23d new debug output for subplans 2017-12-25 09:50:51 +03:00
Onder Kalaci e2a5124830 Add regression tests for recursive subquery planning 2017-12-21 08:37:40 +02:00
Onder Kalaci 0d5a4b9c72 Recursively plan subqueries that are not safe to pushdown
With this commit, Citus recursively plans subqueries that
are not safe to pushdown, in other words, requires a merge
step.

The algorithm is simple: Recursively traverse the query from bottom
up (i.e., bottom meaning the leaf queries). On each level, check
whether the query is safe to pushdown (or a single repartition
subquery). If the answer is yes, do not touch that subquery. If the
answer is no, plan the subquery seperately (i.e., create a subPlan
for it) and replace the subquery with a call to
`read_intermediate_results(planId, subPlanId)`. During the the
execution, run the subPlans first, and make them avaliable to the
next query executions.

Some of the queries hat this change allows us:

   * Subqueries with LIMIT
   * Subqueries with GROUP BY/DISTINCT on non-partition keys
   * Subqueries involving re-partition joins, router queries
   * Mixed usage of subqueries and CTEs (i.e., use CTEs in
     subqueries as well). Nested subqueries as long as we
     support the subquery inside the nested subquery.
   * Subqueries with local tables (i.e., those subqueries
     has the limitation that they have to be leaf subqueries)

   * VIEWs on the distributed tables just works (i.e., the
     limitations mentioned below still applies to views)

Some of the queries that is still NOT supported:

  * Corrolated subqueries that are not safe to pushdown
  * Window function on non-partition keys
  * Recursively planned subqueries or CTEs on the outer
    side of an outer join
  * Only recursively planned subqueries and CTEs in the FROM
    (i.e., not any distributed tables in the FROM) and subqueries
    in WHERE clause
  * Subquery joins that are not on the partition columns (i.e., each
    subquery is individually joined on partition keys but not the upper
    level subquery.)
  * Any limitation that logical planner applies such as aggregate
    distincts (except for count) when GROUP BY is on non-partition key,
    or array_agg with ORDER BY
2017-12-21 08:37:40 +02:00
Marco Slot fa73abe6d4 Regression test output changes after CTE support 2017-12-14 09:32:55 +01:00
Marco Slot a9933deac6 Make real time executor work in transactions 2017-11-30 09:59:32 +03:00
Marco Slot f4ceea5a3d Enable 2PC by default 2017-11-22 11:26:58 +01:00
Marco Slot ea306c6cfe Use citus.next_placement_id where practical in regression tests 2017-11-15 10:12:06 +01:00
Marco Slot 89eb833375 Use citus.next_shard_id where practical in regression tests 2017-11-15 10:12:05 +01:00
Brian Cloutier 7be1545843 Support implicit casts during INSERT/SELECT
It's possible to build INSERT SELECT queries which include implicit
casts, currently we attempt to support these by adding explicit casts to
the SELECT query, but this sometimes crashes because we don't update all
nodes with the new types. (SortClauses, for instance)

This commit removes those explicit casts and passes an unmodified SELECT
query to the COPY executor (how we implement INSERT SELECT under the
scenes). In lieu of those cases, COPY has been given some extra logic to
inspect queries, notice that the types don't line up with the table it's
supposed to be inserting into, and "manually" casting every tuple before
sending them to workers.
2017-11-03 22:27:15 -07:00
metdos 8c356b2bc8 Don't try to add restrictions for reference tables in insert into select 2017-10-31 19:44:10 +02:00
Marco Slot 4bde83e1d2 Relay error message if DML fails on worker 2017-10-25 14:23:21 +02:00
Murat Tuncer f7ab901766 Add select distinct, and distinct on support
Distinct, and distinct on() clauses are supported
in simple selects, joins, subqueries, and insert into select
queries.
2017-10-13 14:59:48 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 498ac80d8b Add window function support for SUBQUERY PUSHDOWN and INSERT INTO SELECT
This commit provides the support for window functions in subquery and insert
into select queries. Note that our support for window functions is still limited
because it must have a partition by clause on the distribution key. This commit
makes changes in the files insert_select_planner and multi_logical_planner. The
required tests are also added with files multi_subquery_window_functions.out
and multi_insert_select_window.out.
2017-10-04 15:33:07 +03:00
Marco Slot cf375d6a66 Consider dropped columns that precede the partition column in COPY 2017-08-22 13:02:35 +02:00
Jason Petersen 6a35c2937c
Enable multi-row INSERTs
This is a pretty substantial refactoring of the existing modify path
within the router executor and planner. In particular, we now hunt for
all VALUES range table entries in INSERT statements and group the rows
contained therein by shard identifier. These rows are stashed away for
later in "ModifyRoute" elements. During deparse, the appropriate RTE
is extracted from the Query and its values list is replaced by these
rows before any SQL is generated.

In this way, we can create multiple Tasks, but only one per shard, to
piecemeal execute a multi-row INSERT. The execution of jobs containing
such tasks now exclusively go through the "multi-router executor" which
was previously used for e.g. INSERT INTO ... SELECT.

By piggybacking onto that executor, we participate in ongoing trans-
actions, get rollback-ability, etc. In short order, the only remaining
use of the "single modify" router executor will be for bare single-
row INSERT statements (i.e. those not in a transaction).

This change appropriately handles deferred pruning as well as master-
evaluated functions.
2017-08-10 00:32:46 -07:00
Andres Freund e8b793c454 Support for IN (const, list) and = ANY(const, b, c) pruning. 2017-08-10 08:56:36 +03:00
Marco Slot d3e9746236 Avoid connections that accessed non-colocated placements in multi-shard commands 2017-08-08 18:32:34 +02:00
Marco Slot fd72cca6c8 Use predictable placement IDs in regression test output 2017-07-17 13:44:29 +03:00
Marco Slot 9f7e4769e2 Clarify placement connection error messages 2017-07-12 11:59:19 +02:00
Marco Slot d3785b97c0 Remove XactModificationLevel distinction between DML and multi-shard 2017-07-12 11:59:19 +02:00
Marco Slot a6f42e4948 Clarify error message when copying NULL value into table 2017-06-22 15:48:24 +02:00
Marco Slot 2f8ac82660 Execute INSERT..SELECT via coordinator if it cannot be pushed down
Add a second implementation of INSERT INTO distributed_table SELECT ... that is used if
the query cannot be pushed down. The basic idea is to execute the SELECT query separately
and pass the results into the distributed table using a CopyDestReceiver, which is also
used for COPY and create_distributed_table. When planning the SELECT, we go through
planner hooks again, which means the SELECT can also be a distributed query.

EXPLAIN is supported, but EXPLAIN ANALYZE is not because preventing double execution was
a lot more complicated in this case.
2017-06-22 15:46:30 +02:00
Marco Slot 70abfd29d2 Allow COPY after a multi-shard command
This change removes the XactModificationLevel check at the start of COPY
that was made redundant by consistently using GetPlacementConnection.
2017-06-09 13:54:58 +02:00
Jason Petersen db11324ac7
Add unambiguous ORDER BY clauses to many tests
Queries which do not specify an order may arbitrarily change output
across PostgreSQL versions.
2017-05-16 11:05:34 -06:00
Önder Kalacı b74ed3c8e1 Subqueries in where -- updated (#1372)
* Support for subqueries in WHERE clause

This commit enables subqueries in WHERE clause to be pushed down
by the subquery pushdown logic.

The support covers:
  - Correlated subqueries with IN, NOT IN, EXISTS, NOT EXISTS,
    operator expressions such as (>, <, =, ALL, ANY etc.)
  - Non-correlated subqueries with (partition_key) IN (SELECT partition_key ..)
    (partition_key) =ANY (SELECT partition_key ...)

Note that this commit heavily utilizes the attribute equivalence logic introduced
in the 1cb6a34ba8. In general, this commit mostly
adjusts the logical planner not to error out on the subqueries in WHERE clause.

* Improve error checks for subquery pushdown and INSERT ... SELECT

Since we allow subqueries in WHERE clause with the previous commit,
we should apply the same limitations to those subqueries.

With this commit, we do not iterate on each subquery one by one.
Instead, we extract all the subqueries and apply the checks directly
on those subqueries. The aim of this change is to (i) Simplify the
code (ii) Make it close to the checks on INSERT .. SELECT code base.

* Extend checks for unresolved paramaters to include SubLinks

With the presence of subqueries in where clause (i.e., SubPlans on the
query) the existing way for checking unresolved parameters fail. The
reason is that the parameters for SubPlans are kept on the parent plan not
on the query itself (see primnodes.h for the details).

With this commit, instead of checking SubPlans on the modified plans
we start to use originalQuery, where SubLinks represent the subqueries
in where clause. The unresolved parameters can be found on the SubLinks.

* Apply code-review feedback

* Remove unnecessary copying of shard interval list

This commit removes unnecessary copying of shard interval list. Note
that there are no copyObject function implemented for shard intervals.
2017-05-01 17:20:21 +03:00
Önder Kalacı ad5cd326a4 Subquery pushdown - main branch (#1323)
* Enabling physical planner for subquery pushdown changes

This commit applies the logic that exists in INSERT .. SELECT
planning to the subquery pushdown changes.

The main algorithm is followed as :
   - pick an anchor relation (i.e., target relation)
   - per each target shard interval
       - add the target shard interval's shard range
         as a restriction to the relations (if all relations
         joined on the partition keys)
        - Check whether the query is router plannable per
          target shard interval.
        - If router plannable, create a task

* Add union support within the JOINS

This commit adds support for UNION/UNION ALL subqueries that are
in the following form:

     .... (Q1 UNION Q2 UNION ...) as union_query JOIN (QN) ...

In other words, we currently do NOT support the queries that are
in the following form where union query is not JOINed with
other relations/subqueries :

     .... (Q1 UNION Q2 UNION ...) as union_query ....

* Subquery pushdown planner uses original query

With this commit, we change the input to the logical planner for
subquery pushdown. Before this commit, the planner was relying
on the query tree that is transformed by the postgresql planner.
After this commit, the planner uses the original query. The main
motivation behind this change is the simplify deparsing of
subqueries.

* Enable top level subquery join queries

This work enables
- Top level subquery joins
- Joins between subqueries and relations
- Joins involving more than 2 range table entries

A new regression test file is added to reflect enabled test cases

* Add top level union support

This commit adds support for UNION/UNION ALL subqueries that are
in the following form:

     .... (Q1 UNION Q2 UNION ...) as union_query ....

In other words, Citus supports allow top level
unions being wrapped into aggregations queries
and/or simple projection queries that only selects
some fields from the lower level queries.

* Disallow subqueries without a relation in the range table list for subquery pushdown

This commit disallows subqueries without relation in the range table
list. This commit is only applied for subquery pushdown. In other words,
we do not add this limitation for single table re-partition subqueries.

The reasoning behind this limitation is that if we allow pushing down
such queries, the result would include (shardCount * expectedResults)
where in a non distributed world the result would be (expectedResult)
only.

* Disallow subqueries without a relation in the range table list for INSERT .. SELECT

This commit disallows subqueries without relation in the range table
list. This commit is only applied for INSERT.. SELECT queries.

The reasoning behind this limitation is that if we allow pushing down
such queries, the result would include (shardCount * expectedResults)
where in a non distributed world the result would be (expectedResult)
only.

* Change behaviour of subquery pushdown flag (#1315)

This commit changes the behaviour of the citus.subquery_pushdown flag.
Before this commit, the flag is used to enable subquery pushdown logic. But,
with this commit, that behaviour is enabled by default. In other words, the
flag is now useless. We prefer to keep the flag since we don't want to break
the backward compatibility. Also, we may consider using that flag for other
purposes in the next commits.

* Require subquery_pushdown when limit is used in subquery

Using limit in subqueries may cause returning incorrect
results. Therefore we allow limits in subqueries only
if user explicitly set subquery_pushdown flag.

* Evaluate expressions on the LIMIT clause (#1333)

Subquery pushdown uses orignal query, the LIMIT and OFFSET clauses
are not evaluated. However, logical optimizer expects these expressions
are already evaluated by the standard planner. This commit manually
evaluates the functions on the logical planner for subquery pushdown.

* Better format subquery regression tests (#1340)

* Style fix for subquery pushdown regression tests

With this commit we intented a more consistent style for the
regression tests we've added in the
  - multi_subquery_union.sql
  - multi_subquery_complex_queries.sql
  - multi_subquery_behavioral_analytics.sql

* Enable the tests that are temporarily commented

This commit enables some of the regression tests that were commented
out until all the development is done.

* Fix merge conflicts (#1347)

 - Update regression tests to meet the changes in the regression
   test output.
 - Replace Ifs with Asserts given that the check is already done
 - Update shard pruning outputs

* Add view regression tests for increased subquery coverage (#1348)

- joins between views and tables
- joins between views
- union/union all queries involving views
- views with limit
- explain queries with view

* Improve btree operators for the subquery tests

This commit adds the missing comprasion for subquery composite key
btree comparator.
2017-04-29 04:09:48 +03:00
Andres Freund b7dfeb0bec Boring regression test output adjustments.
Soon shard pruning will be optimized not to generally work linearly
anymore.  Thus we can't print the pruned shard intervals as currently
done anymore.

The current printing of shard ids also prevents us from running tests
in parallel, as otherwise shard ids aren't linearly numbered.
2017-04-26 11:33:56 -07:00
velioglu 2327b63291 Change native hash function with worker_hash 2017-04-19 22:16:55 +03:00
Marco Slot f838c83809 Remove redundant pg_dist_jobid_seq restarts in tests 2017-04-18 11:42:32 +02:00
Onder Kalaci 1cb6a34ba8 Remove uninstantiated qual logic, use attribute equivalences
In this PR, we aim to deduce whether each of the RTE_RELATION
is joined with at least on another RTE_RELATION on their partition keys. If each
RTE_RELATION follows the above rule, we can conclude that all RTE_RELATIONs are
joined on their partition keys.

In order to do that, we invented a new equivalence class namely:
AttributeEquivalenceClass. In very simple words, a AttributeEquivalenceClass is
identified by an unique id and consists of a list of AttributeEquivalenceMembers.

Each AttributeEquivalenceMember is designed to identify attributes uniquely within the
whole query. The necessity of this arise since varno attributes are defined within
a single level of a query. Instead, here we want to identify each RTE_RELATION uniquely
and try to find equality among each RTE_RELATION's partition key.

Whenever we find an equality clause A = B, where both A and B originates from
relation attributes (i.e., not random expressions), we create an
AttributeEquivalenceClass to record this knowledge. If we later find another
equivalence B = C, we create another AttributeEquivalenceClass. Finally, we can
apply transitity rules and generate a new AttributeEquivalenceClass which includes
A, B and C.

Note that equality among the members are identified by the varattno and rteIdentity.

Each equality among RTE_RELATION is saved using an AttributeEquivalenceClass where
each member attribute is identified by a AttributeEquivalenceMember. In the final
step, we try generate a common attribute equivalence class that holds as much as
AttributeEquivalenceMembers whose attributes are a partition keys.
2017-04-13 11:51:26 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 11665dbe3c Fix pushing down wrong queries for INSERT ... SELECT queries
Before this commit, in certain cases router planner allowed pushing
down JOINs that are not on the partition keys.

With @anarazel's suggestion, we change the logic to use uninstantiated
parameter. Previously, the planner was traversing on the restriction
information and once it finds the parameter, it was replacing it with
the shard range. With this commit, instead of traversing the restrict
infos, the planner explicitly checks for the equivalence of the relation
partition key with the uninstantiated parameter. If finds an equivalence,
it adds the restrictions. In this way, we have more control over the
queries that are pushed down.
2017-03-24 11:37:35 +02:00
Andres Freund 9721e80901 Use DEBUG2 instead of DEBUG4 in INSERT SELECT tests & debug message.
During later work the transaction debug output will change (as it will
in postgres 10), which makes it hard to see actual changes in the
INSERT ... SELECT ... test.  Reduce to DEBUG2 after changing a debug
message to that log level.
2017-02-20 12:56:16 +02:00