DESCRIPTION: Adds comment on database and role propagation.
Example commands are as below
comment on database <db_name> is '<comment_text>'
comment on database <db_name> is NULL
comment on role <role_name> is '<comment_text>'
comment on role <role_name> is NULL
---------
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <jelte.fennema@microsoft.com>
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for issuing `CREATE`/`DROP` DATABASE commands
from worker nodes
With this commit, we allow issuing CREATE / DROP DATABASE commands from
worker nodes too.
As in #7278, this is not allowed when the coordinator is not added to
metadata because we don't ever sync metadata changes to coordinator
when adding coordinator to the metadata via
`SELECT citus_set_coordinator_host('<hostname>')`, or equivalently, via
`SELECT citus_add_node(<coordinator_node_name>, <coordinator_node_port>, 0)`.
We serialize database management commands by acquiring a Citus specific
advisory lock on the first primary worker node if there are any workers in the
cluster. As opposed to what we've done in https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/7278
for role management commands, we try to avoid from running into distributed deadlocks
as much as possible. This is because, while distributed deadlocks that can happen around
role management commands can be detected by Citus, this is not the case for database
management commands because most of them cannot be run inside in a transaction block.
In that case, Citus cannot even detect the distributed deadlock because the command is not
part of a distributed transaction at all, then the command execution might not return the
control back to the user for an indefinite amount of time.
DESCRIPTION: Adds REASSIGN OWNED BY propagation
This pull request introduces the propagation of the "Reassign owned by"
statement. It accommodates both local and distributed roles for both the
old and new assignments. However, when the old role is a local role, it
undergoes filtering and is not propagated. On the other hand, if the new
role is a local role, the process involves first creating the role on
worker nodes before propagating the "Reassign owned" statement.
DESCRIPTION: Adds database connection limit, rename and set tablespace
propagation
In this PR, below statement propagations are added
alter database <database_name> with allow_connections = <boolean_value>;
alter database <database_name> rename to <database_name2>;
alter database <database_name> set TABLESPACE <table_space_name>
---------
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <jelte.fennema@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
This change adds a script to programatically group all includes in a
specific order. The script was used as a one time invocation to group
and sort all includes throught our formatted code. The grouping is as
follows:
- System includes (eg. `#include<...>`)
- Postgres.h (eg. `#include "postgres.h"`)
- Toplevel imports from postgres, not contained in a directory (eg.
`#include "miscadmin.h"`)
- General postgres includes (eg . `#include "nodes/..."`)
- Toplevel citus includes, not contained in a directory (eg. `#include
"citus_verion.h"`)
- Columnar includes (eg. `#include "columnar/..."`)
- Distributed includes (eg. `#include "distributed/..."`)
Because it is quite hard to understand the difference between toplevel
citus includes and toplevel postgres includes it hardcodes the list of
toplevel citus includes. In the same manner it assumes anything not
prefixed with `columnar/` or `distributed/` as a postgres include.
The sorting/grouping is enforced by CI. Since we do so with our own
script there are not changes required in our uncrustify configuration.
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for propagating `CREATE`/`DROP` database
In this PR, create and drop database support is added.
For CREATE DATABASE:
* "oid" option is not supported
* specifying "strategy" to be different than "wal_log" is not supported
* specifying "template" to be different than "template1" is not
supported
The last two are because those are not saved in `pg_database` and when
activating a node, we cannot assume what parameters were provided when
creating the database.
And "oid" is not supported because whether user specified an arbitrary
oid when creating the database is not saved in pg_database and we want
to avoid from oid collisions that might arise from attempting to use an
auto-assigned oid on workers.
Finally, in case of node activation, GRANTs for the database are also
propagated.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <jelte.fennema@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
We propagate `SECURITY LABEL [for provider] ON ROLE rolename IS
labelname` to the worker nodes.
We also make sure to run the relevant `SecLabelStmt` commands on a
newly added node by looking at roles found in `pg_shseclabel`.
See official docs for explanation on how this command works:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-security-label.html
This command stores the role label in the `pg_shseclabel` catalog table.
This commit also fixes the regex string in
`check_gucs_are_alphabetically_sorted.sh` script such that it escapes
the dot. Previously it was looking for all strings starting with "citus"
instead of "citus." as it should.
To test this feature, I currently make use of a special GUC to control
label provider registration in PG_init when creating the Citus extension.
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for ALTER DATABASE <db_name> SET .. statement
propagation
SET statements in Postgres has a common structure which is already being
used in Alter Function
statement.
In this PR, I added a util file; citus_setutils and made it usable for
both for
alter database<db_name>set .. and alter function ... set ... statements.
With this PR, below statements will be propagated
```sql
ALTER DATABASE name SET configuration_parameter { TO | = } { value | DEFAULT }
ALTER DATABASE name SET configuration_parameter FROM CURRENT
ALTER DATABASE name RESET configuration_parameter
ALTER DATABASE name RESET ALL
```
Additionally, there was a bug in processing float values in the common
code block.
I fixed this one as well
Previous
```C
case T_Float:
{
appendStringInfo(buf, " %s", strVal(value));
break;
}
```
Now
```C
case T_Float:
{
appendStringInfo(buf, " %s", nodeToString(value));
break;
}
```
DESCRIPTION: Adds ALTER DATABASE WITH ... and REFRESH COLLATION VERSION
support
This PR adds supports for basic ALTER DATABASE statements propagation
support. Below statements are supported:
ALTER DATABASE <database_name> with IS_TEMPLATE <true/false>;
ALTER DATABASE <database_name> with CONNECTION LIMIT <integer_value>;
ALTER DATABASE <database_name> REFRESH COLLATION VERSION;
---------
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <jelte.fennema@microsoft.com>
Add citus_schema_move() that can be used to move tenant tables within a distributed
schema to another node. The function has two variations as simple wrappers around
citus_move_shard_placement() and citus_move_shard_placement_with_nodeid() respectively.
They pick a shard that belongs to the given tenant schema and resolve the source node
that contain the shards under given tenant schema. Hence their signatures are quite
similar to underlying functions:
```sql
-- citus_schema_move(), using target node name and node port
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_catalog.citus_schema_move(
schema_id regnamespace,
target_node_name text,
target_node_port integer,
shard_transfer_mode citus.shard_transfer_mode default 'auto')
RETURNS void
LANGUAGE C STRICT
AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME', $$citus_schema_move$$;
-- citus_schema_move(), using target node id
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_catalog.citus_schema_move(
schema_id regnamespace,
target_node_id integer,
shard_transfer_mode citus.shard_transfer_mode default 'auto')
RETURNS void
LANGUAGE C STRICT
AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME', $$citus_schema_move_with_nodeid$$;
```
DESCRIPTION: Adds grant/revoke propagation support for database
privileges
Following the implementation of support for granting and revoking
database privileges, certain tests that issued grants for worker nodes
experienced failures. These ones are fixed in this PR as well.
Adds support for altering schema of single shard tables. We do that in 2
steps.
1. Undistribute the tenant table at `preprocess` step,
2. Distribute new schema if it is a distributed schema after DDLs are
propagated.
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for altering a table's schema to/from
distributed schemas.
Allow using generated identity column based on int/smallint when
creating a distributed table so that applications that rely on
those data types don't break.
Inserting into / modifying such columns from workers is not allowed
but it's better than not allowing such columns altogether.
* Currently we do not allow any Citus tables other than Citus local
tables inside a regular schema before executing
`citus_schema_distribute`.
* `citus_schema_undistribute` expects only single shard distributed
tables inside a tenant schema.
DESCRIPTION: Adds the udf `citus_schema_distribute` to convert a regular
schema into a tenant schema.
DESCRIPTION: Adds the udf `citus_schema_undistribute` to convert a
tenant schema back to a regular schema.
---------
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
DESCRIPTION: Adds citus.enable_schema_based_sharding GUC that allows
sharding the database based on schemas when enabled.
* Refactor the logic that automatically creates Citus managed tables
* Refactor CreateSingleShardTable() to allow specifying colocation id
instead
* Add support for schema-based-sharding via a GUC
### What this PR is about:
Add **citus.enable_schema_based_sharding GUC** to enable schema-based
sharding. Each schema created while this GUC is ON will be considered
as a tenant schema. Later on, regardless of whether the GUC is ON or
OFF, any table created in a tenant schema will be converted to a
single shard distributed table (without a shard key). All the tenant
tables that belong to a particular schema will be co-located with each
other and will have a shard count of 1.
We introduce a new metadata table --pg_dist_tenant_schema-- to do the
bookkeeping for tenant schemas:
```sql
psql> \d pg_dist_tenant_schema
Table "pg_catalog.pg_dist_tenant_schema"
┌───────────────┬─────────┬───────────┬──────────┬─────────┐
│ Column │ Type │ Collation │ Nullable │ Default │
├───────────────┼─────────┼───────────┼──────────┼─────────┤
│ schemaid │ oid │ │ not null │ │
│ colocationid │ integer │ │ not null │ │
└───────────────┴─────────┴───────────┴──────────┴─────────┘
Indexes:
"pg_dist_tenant_schema_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (schemaid)
"pg_dist_tenant_schema_unique_colocationid_index" UNIQUE, btree (colocationid)
psql> table pg_dist_tenant_schema;
┌───────────┬───────────────┐
│ schemaid │ colocationid │
├───────────┼───────────────┤
│ 41963 │ 91 │
│ 41962 │ 90 │
└───────────┴───────────────┘
(2 rows)
```
Colocation id column of pg_dist_tenant_schema can never be NULL even
for the tenant schemas that don't have a tenant table yet. This is
because, we assign colocation ids to tenant schemas as soon as they
are created. That way, we can keep associating tenant schemas with
particular colocation groups even if all the tenant tables of a tenant
schema are dropped and recreated later on.
When a tenant schema is dropped, we delete the corresponding row from
pg_dist_tenant_schema. In that case, we delete the corresponding
colocation group from pg_dist_colocation as well.
### Future work for 12.0 release:
We're building schema-based sharding on top of the infrastructure that
adds support for creating distributed tables without a shard key
(https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6867).
However, not all the operations that can be done on distributed tables
without a shard key necessarily make sense (in the same way) in the
context of schema-based sharding. For example, we need to think about
what happens if user attempts altering schema of a tenant table. We
will tackle such scenarios in a future PR.
We will also add a new UDF --citus.schema_tenant_set() or such-- to
allow users to use an existing schema as a tenant schema, and another
one --citus.schema_tenant_unset() or such-- to stop using a schema as
a tenant schema in future PRs.
This pull request proposes a change to the logic used for propagating
identity columns to worker nodes in citus. Instead of creating a
dependent sequence for each identity column and changing its default
value to `nextval(seq)/worker_nextval(seq)`, this update will pass the
identity columns as-is to the worker nodes.
Please note that there are a few limitations to this change.
1. Only bigint identity columns will be allowed in distributed tables to
ensure compatibility with the DDL from any node functionality. Our
current distributed sequence implementation only allows insert
statements from all nodes for bigint sequences.
2. `alter_distributed_table` and `undistribute_table` operations will
not be allowed for tables with identity columns. This is because we do
not have a proper way of keeping sequence states consistent across the
cluster.
DESCRIPTION: Prevents using identity columns on data types other than
`bigint` on distributed tables
DESCRIPTION: Prevents using `alter_distributed_table` and
`undistribute_table` UDFs when a table has identity columns
DESCRIPTION: Fixes a bug that prevents enforcing identity column
restrictions on worker nodes
Depends on #6740Fixes#6694
DESCRIPTION: Fix foreign key validation skip at the end of shard move
In eadc88a we started completely skipping foreign key constraint
validation at the end of a non blocking shard move, instead of only for
foreign keys to reference tables. However, it turns out that this didn't
work at all because of a hard to notice bug: By resetting the
SkipConstraintValidation flag at the end of our utility hook, we
actually make the SET command that sets it a no-op.
This fixes that bug by removing the code that resets it. This is fine
because #6543 removed the only place where we set the flag in C code. So
the resetting of the flag has no purpose anymore. This PR also adds a
regression test, because it turned out we didn't have any otherwise we
would have caught that the feature was completely broken.
It also moves the constraint validation skipping to the utility hook.
The reason is that #6550 showed us that this is the better place to skip
it, because it will also skip the planning phase and not just the
execution.
DESCRIPTION: Fix regression in allowed foreign keys on distributed
tables
In commit eadc88a we changed how we skip foreign key validation. The
goal was to skip it in more cases. However, one change had the
unintended regression of introducing failures when trying to create
certain foreign keys. This reverts that part of the change.
The way of skipping validation of foreign keys that was introduced in
eadc88a was skipping validation during execution. The reason that
this caused this regression was because some foreign key validation
queries already fail during planning. In those cases it never gets to
the execution step where it would later be skipped.
Fixes#6543
DESCRIPTION: Enable adding CHECK constraints on distributed tables
without the client having to provide a constraint name.
This PR enables the following command syntax for adding check
constraints to distributed tables.
ALTER TABLE ... ADD CHECK ...
by creating a default constraint name and transforming the command into
the below syntax before sending it to workers.
ALTER TABLE ... ADD CONSTRAINT \<conname> CHECK ...
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for creating table constraints UNIQUE and
EXCLUDE via ALTER TABLE command without client having to specify a name.
ALTER TABLE ... ADD CONSTRAINT <conname> UNIQUE ...
ALTER TABLE ... ADD CONSTRAINT <conname> EXCLUDE ...
commands require the client to provide an explicit constraint name.
However, in postgres it is possible for clients not to provide a name
and let the postgres generate it using the following commands
ALTER TABLE ... ADD UNIQUE ...
ALTER TABLE ... ADD EXCLUDE ...
This PR enables the same functionality for citus tables.
DESCRIPTION: Makes sure to disallow triggers that depend on extensions
We were already doing so for `ALTER trigger DEPENDS ON EXTENSION`
commands. However, we also need to disallow creating Citus tables
having such triggers already, so this PR fixes that.
We can now do the following:
- Distribute sequence with logged/unlogged option
- ALTER TABLE my_sequence SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED
- ALTER SEQUENCE my_sequence SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED
Relevant PG commit
344d62fb9a
Introduces a new GUC named citus.skip_constraint_validation, which basically skips constraint validation when set to on.
For some several places that we hack to skip the foreign key validation phase, now we use this GUC.
Pre PG15, renaming child triggers on partitions is allowed. When
creating a trigger in a distributed parent partitioned table, the
triggers on the shards of the partitions have the same name with
the triggers on the corresponding parent shards of the parent
table. Therefore, they don't have the same appended shard id as
the shard id of the partition. Hence, when trying to rename a
child trigger on a partition of a distributed table, we can't
correctly find the triggers on the shards of the partition in
order to rename them since we append a different shard id to the
name of the trigger. Since we can't find the trigger we get a
misleading error of inexistent trigger.
In this commit we prohibit renaming child triggers on distributed
partitions altogether.
Added create_distributed_table_concurrently which is nonblocking variant of create_distributed_table.
It bases on the split API which takes advantage of logical replication to support nonblocking split operations.
Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: aykutbozkurt <aykut.bozkurt1995@gmail.com>
* Support upgrade and downgrade and separate columnar as citus_columnar extension
Co-authored-by: Yanwen Jin <yanwjin@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff Davis <jeff@j-davis.com>
This PR makes all of the features open source that were previously only
available in Citus Enterprise.
Features that this adds:
1. Non blocking shard moves/shard rebalancer
(`citus.logical_replication_timeout`)
2. Propagation of CREATE/DROP/ALTER ROLE statements
3. Propagation of GRANT statements
4. Propagation of CLUSTER statements
5. Propagation of ALTER DATABASE ... OWNER TO ...
6. Optimization for COPY when loading JSON to avoid double parsing of
the JSON object (`citus.skip_jsonb_validation_in_copy`)
7. Support for row level security
8. Support for `pg_dist_authinfo`, which allows storing different
authentication options for different users, e.g. you can store
passwords or certificates here.
9. Support for `pg_dist_poolinfo`, which allows using connection poolers
in between coordinator and workers
10. Tracking distributed query execution times using
citus_stat_statements (`citus.stat_statements_max`,
`citus.stat_statements_purge_interval`,
`citus.stat_statements_track`). This is disabled by default.
11. Blocking tenant_isolation
12. Support for `sslkey` and `sslcert` in `citus.node_conninfo`
Over time we have added significantly improved the support for objects to be propagated by Citus as to make scaling out the database more seamless. It became evident that there was a lot of code duplication that got into the codebase to implement the propagation.
This PR tries to reduce the amount of repeated code that is at most only slightly different. To make things worse, most of the differences were actually oversights instead of correct.
This Patch introduces 3 reusable sets of pre/post processing steps for respectively
- create
- alter
- drop
With the use of the common functionality we should have more coherent behaviour between different supported object by Citus.
Some steps either omit the Pre or Post processing step if they would not make sense to include.
All tests pass, only 1 test needed changing, foreign servers, as the dropping of foreign servers didn't implement support for dropping multiple foreign servers at once. Given the common approach correctly supports dropping of multiple objects, either distributed or not, the test that assumed it wouldn't work was now obsolete.