Check equality in quals
We want to recursively plan distributed tables only if they have an
equality filter on a unique column. So '>' and '<' operators will not
trigger recursive planning of distributed tables in local-distributed
table joins.
Recursively plan distributed table only if the filter is constant
If the filter is not a constant then the join might return multiple rows
and there is a chance that the distributed table will return huge data.
Hence if the filter is not constant we choose to recursively plan the
local table.
Introduce table entry utility functions
Citus table cache entry utilities are introduced so that we can easily
extend existing functionality with minimum changes, specifically changes
to these functions. For example IsNonDistributedTableCacheEntry can be
extended for citus local tables without the need to scan the whole
codebase and update each relevant part.
* Introduce utility functions to find the type of tables
A table type can be a reference table, a hash/range/append distributed
table. Utility methods are created so that we don't have to worry about
how a table is considered as a reference table etc. This also makes it
easy to extend the table types.
* Add IsCitusTableType utilities
* Rename IsCacheEntryCitusTableType -> IsCitusTableTypeCacheEntry
* Change citus table types in some checks
This copies over fixes from reference counting branch,
all CitusTableCacheEntry data may be freed when a GetCitusTableCacheEntry call occurs for its relationId
This fix is not complete, but reference counting is being deferred until 9.4
CopyShardInterval: remove dest parameter, always return newly allocated object
Semmle reported quite some places where we use a value that could be NULL. Most of these are not actually a real issue, but better to be on the safe side with these things and make the static analysis happy.
Previously a limitation in the shard pruning logic caused multi distribution value queries to always go into all the shards/workers whenever query also used OR conditions in WHERE clause.
Related to https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/2593 and https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/1537
There was no good workaround for this limitation. The limitation caused quite a bit of overhead with simple queries being sent to all workers/shards (especially with setups having lot of workers/shards).
An example of a previous plan which was inadequately pruned:
```
EXPLAIN SELECT count(*) FROM orders_hash_partitioned
WHERE (o_orderkey IN (1,2)) AND (o_custkey = 11 OR o_custkey = 22);
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
-> Custom Scan (Citus Adaptive) (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
Task Count: 4
Tasks Shown: One of 4
-> Task
Node: host=localhost port=xxxxx dbname=regression
-> Aggregate (cost=13.68..13.69 rows=1 width=8)
-> Seq Scan on orders_hash_partitioned_630000 orders_hash_partitioned (cost=0.00..13.68 rows=1 width=0)
Filter: ((o_orderkey = ANY ('{1,2}'::integer[])) AND ((o_custkey = 11) OR (o_custkey = 22)))
(9 rows)
```
After this commit the task count is what one would expect from the query defining multiple distinct values for the distribution column:
```
EXPLAIN SELECT count(*) FROM orders_hash_partitioned
WHERE (o_orderkey IN (1,2)) AND (o_custkey = 11 OR o_custkey = 22);
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
-> Custom Scan (Citus Adaptive) (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
Task Count: 2
Tasks Shown: One of 2
-> Task
Node: host=localhost port=xxxxx dbname=regression
-> Aggregate (cost=13.68..13.69 rows=1 width=8)
-> Seq Scan on orders_hash_partitioned_630000 orders_hash_partitioned (cost=0.00..13.68 rows=1 width=0)
Filter: ((o_orderkey = ANY ('{1,2}'::integer[])) AND ((o_custkey = 11) OR (o_custkey = 22)))
(9 rows)
```
"Core" of the pruning logic works as previously where it uses `PrunableInstances` to queue ORable valid constraints for shard pruning.
The difference is that now we build a compact internal representation of the query expression tree with PruningTreeNodes before actual shard pruning is run.
Pruning tree nodes represent boolean operators and the associated constraints of it. This internal format allows us to have compact representation of the query WHERE clauses which allows "core" pruning logic to work with OR-clauses correctly.
For example query having
`WHERE (o_orderkey IN (1,2)) AND (o_custkey=11 OR (o_shippriority > 1 AND o_shippriority < 10))`
gets transformed into:
1. AND(o_orderkey IN (1,2), OR(X, AND(X, X)))
2. AND(o_orderkey IN (1,2), OR(X, X))
3. AND(o_orderkey IN (1,2), X)
Here X is any set of unknown condition(s) for shard pruning.
This allow the final shard pruning to correctly recognize that shard pruning is done with the valid condition of `o_orderkey IN (1,2)`.
Another example with unprunable condition in query
`WHERE (o_orderkey IN (1,2)) OR (o_custkey=11 AND o_custkey=22)`
gets transformed into:
1. OR(o_orderkey IN (1,2), AND(X, X))
2. OR(o_orderkey IN (1,2), X)
Which is recognized as unprunable due to the OR condition between distribution column and unknown constraint -> goes to all shards.
Issue https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/1537 originally suggested transforming the query conditions into a full disjunctive normal form (DNF),
but this process of transforming into DNF is quite a heavy operation. It may "blow up" into a really large DNF form with complex queries having non trivial `WHERE` clauses.
I think the logic for shard pruning could be simplified further but I decided to leave the "core" of the shard pruning untouched.
The root of the problem is that, standard_planner() converts the following qual
```
{OPEXPR
:opno 98
:opfuncid 67
:opresulttype 16
:opretset false
:opcollid 0
:inputcollid 100
:args (
{VAR
:varno 1
:varattno 1
:vartype 25
:vartypmod -1
:varcollid 100
:varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1
:varoattno 1
:location 45
}
{CONST
:consttype 25
:consttypmod -1
:constcollid 100
:constlen -1
:constbyval false
:constisnull true
:location 51
:constvalue <>
}
)
:location 49
}
```
To
```
(
{CONST
:consttype 16
:consttypmod -1
:constcollid 0
:constlen 1
:constbyval true
:constisnull true
:location -1
:constvalue <>
}
)
```
So, Citus doesn't deal with NULL values in real-time or non-fast path router queries.
And, in the FastPathRouter planner, we check constisnull in DistKeyInSimpleOpExpression().
However, in deferred pruning case, we do not check for isnull for const.
Thus, the fix consists of two parts:
- Let PruneShards() not crash when NULL parameter is passed
- For deferred shard pruning in fast-path queries, explicitly check that we have CONST which is not NULL
Use partition column's collation for range distributed tables
Don't allow non deterministic collations for hash distributed tables
CoPartitionedTables: don't compare unequal types
See a9c35cf85c
clang raises a warning due to FunctionCall2InfoData technically being variable sized
This is fine, as the struct is the size we want it to be. So silence the warning
Our assumption that strip_implicit_coercions would leave us with a bi-
nary-compatible type to that of the partition key was wrong. Instead,
we should ensure the RHS of the comparison we perform is proactively
coerced into a compatible type (at least binary compatible).
Uncrustify 0.65 appears to have changed some defaults, resulting in
breakages for those of us who have already upgraded; Travis still uses
Uncrustify 0.64, but these changes work with both versions (assuming
appropriately updated config), so this should permit use of either
version for the time being.
We previously dismissed this as unimportant, but it turns out to be
very useful for the upcoming subquery pushdown, where a user might
specify an equality constraint in a subquery, and the subquery
pushdown machinery adds >= and <= restrictions on the shard boundary.
Previously the latter restriction was ignored.
So far citus used postgres' predicate proofing logic for shard
pruning, except for INSERT and COPY which were already optimized for
speed. That turns out to be too slow:
* Shard pruning for SELECTs is currently O(#shards), because
PruneShardList calls predicate_refuted_by() for every
shard. Obviously using an O(N) type algorithm for general pruning
isn't good.
* predicate_refuted_by() is quite expensive on its own right. That's
primarily because it's optimized for doing a single refutation
proof, rather than performing the same proof over and over.
* predicate_refuted_by() does not keep persistent state (see 2.) for
function calls, which means that a lot of syscache lookups will be
performed. That's particularly bad if the partitioning key is a
composite key, because without a persistent FunctionCallInfo
record_cmp() has to repeatedly look-up the type definition of the
composite key. That's quite expensive.
Thus replace this with custom-code that works in two phases:
1) Search restrictions for constraints that can be pruned upon
2) Use those restrictions to search for matching shards in the most
efficient manner available:
a) Binary search / Hash Lookup in case of hash partitioned tables
b) Binary search for equal clauses in case of range or append
tables without overlapping shards.
c) Binary search for inequality clauses, searching for both lower
and upper boundaries, again in case of range or append
tables without overlapping shards.
d) exhaustive search testing each ShardInterval
My measurements suggest that we are considerably, often orders of
magnitude, faster than the previous solution, even if we have to fall
back to exhaustive pruning.
SaitTalhaNisanci
Onder Kalaci
Philip Dubé
Jelte Fennema
Hadi Moshayedi
Markus Sintonen
Marco Slot
Jason Petersen
Metin Doslu
velioglu
Andres Freund
Jason Petersen