use RecurseObjectDependencies api to find if an object is citus depended
make vanilla tests runnable to see if citus_depended function is working correctly
* Remove if conditions with PG_VERSION_NUM < 13
* Remove server_above_twelve(&eleven) checks from tests
* Fix tests
* Remove pg12 and pg11 alternative test output files
* Remove pg12 specific normalization rules
* Some more if conditions in the code
* Change RemoteCollationIdExpression and some pg12/pg13 comments
* Remove some more normalization rules
This PR makes all of the features open source that were previously only
available in Citus Enterprise.
Features that this adds:
1. Non blocking shard moves/shard rebalancer
(`citus.logical_replication_timeout`)
2. Propagation of CREATE/DROP/ALTER ROLE statements
3. Propagation of GRANT statements
4. Propagation of CLUSTER statements
5. Propagation of ALTER DATABASE ... OWNER TO ...
6. Optimization for COPY when loading JSON to avoid double parsing of
the JSON object (`citus.skip_jsonb_validation_in_copy`)
7. Support for row level security
8. Support for `pg_dist_authinfo`, which allows storing different
authentication options for different users, e.g. you can store
passwords or certificates here.
9. Support for `pg_dist_poolinfo`, which allows using connection poolers
in between coordinator and workers
10. Tracking distributed query execution times using
citus_stat_statements (`citus.stat_statements_max`,
`citus.stat_statements_purge_interval`,
`citus.stat_statements_track`). This is disabled by default.
11. Blocking tenant_isolation
12. Support for `sslkey` and `sslcert` in `citus.node_conninfo`
The error comes due to the datum jsonb in pg_dist_metadata_node.metadata being 0 in some scenarios. This is likely due to not copying the data when receiving a datum from a tuple and pg deciding to deallocate that memory when the table that the tuple was from is closed.
Also fix another place in the code that might have been susceptible to this issue.
I tested on both multi-vg and multi-1-vg and the test were successful.
We've had custom versions of Postgres its `foreach` macro which with a
hidden ListCell for quite some time now. People like these custom
macros, because they are easier to use and require less boilerplate.
This adds similar custom versions of Postgres its `forboth` macro. Now
you don't need ListCells anymore when looping over two lists at the same
time.
With the introduction of #4385 we inadvertently started allowing and
pushing down certain lateral subqueries that were unsafe to push down.
To be precise the type of LATERAL subqueries that is unsafe to push down
has all of the following properties:
1. The lateral subquery contains some non recurring tuples
2. The lateral subquery references a recurring tuple from
outside of the subquery (recurringRelids)
3. The lateral subquery requires a merge step (e.g. a LIMIT)
4. The reference to the recurring tuple should be something else than an
equality check on the distribution column, e.g. equality on a non
distribution column.
Property number four is considered both hard to detect and probably not
used very often. Thus this PR ignores property number four and causes
query planning to error out if the first three properties hold.
Fixes#5327
If a worker node is being added, a command is sent to get the server_id of the worker from the pg_dist_node_metadata table. If the worker's id is the same as the node executing the code, we will know the node is trying to add itself. If the node tries to add itself without specifying `groupid:=0` the operation will result in an error.
If the expression is simple, such as, SELECT function() or PEFORM function()
in PL/PgSQL code, PL engine does a simple expression evaluation which can't
interpret the Citus CustomScan Node. Code checks for simple expressions when
executing an UDF but missed the DO-Block scenario, this commit fixes it.
Previously, we were wrapping targetlist nodes with Vars that reference
to the result of the worker query, if the node itself is not `Const` or
not a `Param`. Indeed, we should not do that unless the node itself is
a `Var` node or contains a `Var` within it (e.g.: `OpExpr(Var(column_a) > 2)`).
Otherwise, when worker query returns empty result set, then combine
query exec would crash since the `Var` would be pointing to an empty
tuple slot, which is not desirable for the node-executor methods.
With this commit, rebalancer backends are identified by application_name = citus_rebalancer
and the regular internal backends are identified by application_name = citus_internal
BEGIN/COMMIT transaction block or in a UDF calling another UDF.
(2) Prohibit/Limit the delegated function not to do a 2PC (or any work on a
remote connection).
(3) Have a safety net to ensure the (2) i.e. we should block the connections
from the delegated procedure or make sure that no 2PC happens on the node.
(4) Such delegated functions are restricted to use only the distributed argument
value.
Note: To limit the scope of the project we are considering only Functions(not
procedures) for the initial work.
DESCRIPTION: Introduce a new flag "force_delegation" in create_distributed_function(),
which will allow a function to be delegated in an explicit transaction block.
Fixes#3265
Once the function is delegated to the worker, on that node during the planning
distributed_planner()
TryToDelegateFunctionCall()
CheckDelegatedFunctionExecution()
EnableInForceDelegatedFuncExecution()
Save the distribution argument (Constant)
ExecutorStart()
CitusBeginScan()
IsShardKeyValueAllowed()
Ensure to not use non-distribution argument.
ExecutorRun()
AdaptiveExecutor()
StartDistributedExecution()
EnsureNoRemoteExecutionFromWorkers()
Ensure all the shards are local to the node in the remoteTaskList.
NonPushableInsertSelectExecScan()
InitializeCopyShardState()
EnsureNoRemoteExecutionFromWorkers()
Ensure all the shards are local to the node in the placementList.
This also fixes a minor issue: Properly handle expressions+parameters in distribution arguments
PostgreSQL does not need calling this function since 7.4 release, and it
is a NOOP.
For more details, check PostgreSQL commit below :
commit dd04e958c8b03c0f0512497651678c7816af3198
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sun Mar 9 03:34:10 2003 +0000
tuplestore_donestoring() isn't needed anymore, but provide a no-op
macro definition so as not to create compatibility problems.
diff --git a/src/include/utils/tuplestore.h b/src/include/utils/tuplestore.h
index b46babacd1..76fe9fb428 100644
--- a/src/include/utils/tuplestore.h
+++ b/src/include/utils/tuplestore.h
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2002, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
- * $Id: tuplestore.h,v 1.8 2003/03/09 02:19:13 tgl Exp $
+ * $Id: tuplestore.h,v 1.9 2003/03/09 03:34:10 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ extern Tuplestorestate *tuplestore_begin_heap(bool randomAccess,
extern void tuplestore_puttuple(Tuplestorestate *state, void *tuple);
+/* tuplestore_donestoring() used to be required, but is no longer used */
+#define tuplestore_donestoring(state) ((void) 0)
+
/* backwards scan is only allowed if randomAccess was specified 'true' */
extern void *tuplestore_gettuple(Tuplestorestate *state, bool forward,
bool *should_free);
We've both allowed delegating functions and procedures from worker nodes
and also prevented delegation if a function/procedure has already been
propagated from another node.
We re-define the meaning of active shard placement. It used
to only be defined via shardstate == SHARD_STATE_ACTIVE.
Now, we also add one more check. The worker node that the
placement is on should be active as well.
This is a preparation for supporting citus_disable_node()
for MX with multiple failures at the same time.
With this change, the maintanince daemon only needs to
sync the "node metadata" (e.g., pg_dist_node), not the
shard metadata.
With Citus 9.0, we introduced `citus.single_shard_commit_protocol` which
defaults to 2PC.
With this commit, we prevent any user to set it to 1PC and drop support
for `citus.single_shard_commit_protocol`.
Although this might add some overhead for users, it is already the default
behaviour (so less likely) and marking placements as INVALID is much
worse.