PG16 compatibility - part 9
Check out part 1 42d956888d
part 2 0d503dd5ac
part 3 907d72e60d
part 4 7c6b4ce103
part 5 6056cb2c29
part 6 b36c431abb
part 7 ee3153fe50
part 8 2c50b5f7ff
This commit is in the series of PG16 compatibility commits. It makes some changes
to our tests in order to be compatible with the following in PG16:
- Fix multi_subquery_in_where_reference_clause test
somehow PG got rid of the outer join
(e.g., explain doesn't show outer joins),
hence we can pushdown the subquery.
Changing to users_reference_table
- Fix unqualified column names for views in PG16
Relevant PG commit:
47bb9db759
47bb9db75996232ea71fc1e1888ffb0e70579b54
- Fix global_cancel test
Error wording and detail changed
Relevant PG commit:
2631ebab7b
2631ebab7b18bdc079fd86107c47d6104a6b3c6e
- Fix local_table_join_test with lateral subquery
Possible relevant PG commit:
ae89129aa3
ae89129aa3555c263b8c3ccc4c0f1ef7e46201aa
I removed the where clause and the limit count error was hit again.
With the where clause the query unexpectedly works.
- Fix test outputs
Relevant PG commits:
-- 1349d2790b
-- f4c7c410ee
For multi_explain and multi_complex_count_distinct there were too many places
touched so I just added an alternative test output.
For the other tests I modified the problematic parts.
More PG16 compatibility commits are coming soon ...
Adds support for propagating create/drop view commands and views to
worker node while scaling out the cluster. Since views are dropped while
converting the table type, metadata connection will be used while
propagating view commands to not switch to sequential mode.
Attribute number in a subquery RTE and relation RTE means different
things. In a relation attribute number will point to the column number
in the table definition including the dropped columns as well however in
subquery, it means the index in the target list. When we convert a
relation RTE to subquery RTE we should either correct all the relevant
attribute numbers or we can just add a dummy column for the dropped
columns. We choose the latter in this commit because it is practically
too vulnerable to update all the vars in a query.
Another thing this commit fixes is that in case a join restriction
clause list contains a false clause, we should just returns a false
clause instead of the whole list, because the whole list will contain
restrictions from other RTEs as well and this breaks the query, which
can be seen from the output changes, now it is much simpler.
Also instead of adding single tests for dropped columns, we choose to
run the whole mixed queries with tables with dropped columns, this
revealed some bugs already, which are fixed in this commit.
Baseinfo also has pushed down filters etc, so it makes more sense to use
BaseRestrictInfo to determine what columns have constant equality
filters.
Also RteIdentity is used for removing conversion candidates instead of
rteIndex.
It seems that most of the updates were broken, we weren't aware of it
because there wasn't any data in the tables. They are broken mostly
because local tables do not have a shard id and some code paths should
be updated with that information, currently when there is an invalid
shard id, it is assumed to be pruned.
Consider local tables in router planner
In case there is a local table, the shard id will not be valid and there
are some checks that rely on shard id, we should skip these in case of
local tables, which is handled with a dummy placement.
Add citus local table dist table join tests
add local-dist table mixed joins tests
Naisila Puka
Burak Velioglu
SaitTalhaNisanci