This is prep work for successful compilation with PG17
PG17added foreach_ptr, foreach_int and foreach_oid macros
Relevant PG commit
14dd0f27d7cd56ffae9ecdbe324965073d01a9ff
14dd0f27d7
We already have these macros, but they are different with the
PG17 ones because our macros take a DECLARED variable, whereas
the PG16 macros declare a locally-scoped loop variable themselves.
Hence I am renaming our macros to foreach_declared_
I am separating this into its own PR since it touches many files. The
main compilation PR is https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/7699
This change adds a script to programatically group all includes in a
specific order. The script was used as a one time invocation to group
and sort all includes throught our formatted code. The grouping is as
follows:
- System includes (eg. `#include<...>`)
- Postgres.h (eg. `#include "postgres.h"`)
- Toplevel imports from postgres, not contained in a directory (eg.
`#include "miscadmin.h"`)
- General postgres includes (eg . `#include "nodes/..."`)
- Toplevel citus includes, not contained in a directory (eg. `#include
"citus_verion.h"`)
- Columnar includes (eg. `#include "columnar/..."`)
- Distributed includes (eg. `#include "distributed/..."`)
Because it is quite hard to understand the difference between toplevel
citus includes and toplevel postgres includes it hardcodes the list of
toplevel citus includes. In the same manner it assumes anything not
prefixed with `columnar/` or `distributed/` as a postgres include.
The sorting/grouping is enforced by CI. Since we do so with our own
script there are not changes required in our uncrustify configuration.
Add citus_schema_move() that can be used to move tenant tables within a distributed
schema to another node. The function has two variations as simple wrappers around
citus_move_shard_placement() and citus_move_shard_placement_with_nodeid() respectively.
They pick a shard that belongs to the given tenant schema and resolve the source node
that contain the shards under given tenant schema. Hence their signatures are quite
similar to underlying functions:
```sql
-- citus_schema_move(), using target node name and node port
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_catalog.citus_schema_move(
schema_id regnamespace,
target_node_name text,
target_node_port integer,
shard_transfer_mode citus.shard_transfer_mode default 'auto')
RETURNS void
LANGUAGE C STRICT
AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME', $$citus_schema_move$$;
-- citus_schema_move(), using target node id
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_catalog.citus_schema_move(
schema_id regnamespace,
target_node_id integer,
shard_transfer_mode citus.shard_transfer_mode default 'auto')
RETURNS void
LANGUAGE C STRICT
AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME', $$citus_schema_move_with_nodeid$$;
```
Adds support for altering schema of single shard tables. We do that in 2
steps.
1. Undistribute the tenant table at `preprocess` step,
2. Distribute new schema if it is a distributed schema after DDLs are
propagated.
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for altering a table's schema to/from
distributed schemas.
* Currently we do not allow any Citus tables other than Citus local
tables inside a regular schema before executing
`citus_schema_distribute`.
* `citus_schema_undistribute` expects only single shard distributed
tables inside a tenant schema.
DESCRIPTION: Adds the udf `citus_schema_distribute` to convert a regular
schema into a tenant schema.
DESCRIPTION: Adds the udf `citus_schema_undistribute` to convert a
tenant schema back to a regular schema.
---------
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
DESCRIPTION: Adds citus.enable_schema_based_sharding GUC that allows
sharding the database based on schemas when enabled.
* Refactor the logic that automatically creates Citus managed tables
* Refactor CreateSingleShardTable() to allow specifying colocation id
instead
* Add support for schema-based-sharding via a GUC
### What this PR is about:
Add **citus.enable_schema_based_sharding GUC** to enable schema-based
sharding. Each schema created while this GUC is ON will be considered
as a tenant schema. Later on, regardless of whether the GUC is ON or
OFF, any table created in a tenant schema will be converted to a
single shard distributed table (without a shard key). All the tenant
tables that belong to a particular schema will be co-located with each
other and will have a shard count of 1.
We introduce a new metadata table --pg_dist_tenant_schema-- to do the
bookkeeping for tenant schemas:
```sql
psql> \d pg_dist_tenant_schema
Table "pg_catalog.pg_dist_tenant_schema"
┌───────────────┬─────────┬───────────┬──────────┬─────────┐
│ Column │ Type │ Collation │ Nullable │ Default │
├───────────────┼─────────┼───────────┼──────────┼─────────┤
│ schemaid │ oid │ │ not null │ │
│ colocationid │ integer │ │ not null │ │
└───────────────┴─────────┴───────────┴──────────┴─────────┘
Indexes:
"pg_dist_tenant_schema_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (schemaid)
"pg_dist_tenant_schema_unique_colocationid_index" UNIQUE, btree (colocationid)
psql> table pg_dist_tenant_schema;
┌───────────┬───────────────┐
│ schemaid │ colocationid │
├───────────┼───────────────┤
│ 41963 │ 91 │
│ 41962 │ 90 │
└───────────┴───────────────┘
(2 rows)
```
Colocation id column of pg_dist_tenant_schema can never be NULL even
for the tenant schemas that don't have a tenant table yet. This is
because, we assign colocation ids to tenant schemas as soon as they
are created. That way, we can keep associating tenant schemas with
particular colocation groups even if all the tenant tables of a tenant
schema are dropped and recreated later on.
When a tenant schema is dropped, we delete the corresponding row from
pg_dist_tenant_schema. In that case, we delete the corresponding
colocation group from pg_dist_colocation as well.
### Future work for 12.0 release:
We're building schema-based sharding on top of the infrastructure that
adds support for creating distributed tables without a shard key
(https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6867).
However, not all the operations that can be done on distributed tables
without a shard key necessarily make sense (in the same way) in the
context of schema-based sharding. For example, we need to think about
what happens if user attempts altering schema of a tenant table. We
will tackle such scenarios in a future PR.
We will also add a new UDF --citus.schema_tenant_set() or such-- to
allow users to use an existing schema as a tenant schema, and another
one --citus.schema_tenant_unset() or such-- to stop using a schema as
a tenant schema in future PRs.
Naisila Puka
Nils Dijk
Onur Tirtir
aykut-bozkurt
Ahmet Gedemenli