Commit Graph

5 Commits (6bb31c5d75a042856e998da2cbee0922047f06ed)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marco Slot 6bb31c5d75
Add non-blocking variant of create_distributed_table (#6087)
Added create_distributed_table_concurrently which is nonblocking variant of create_distributed_table.

It bases on the split API which takes advantage of logical replication to support nonblocking split operations.

Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: aykutbozkurt <aykut.bozkurt1995@gmail.com>
2022-08-30 15:35:40 +03:00
aykut-bozkurt be06d65721
Nonblocking tenant isolation is supported by using split api. (#6167) 2022-08-17 11:13:07 +03:00
Jelte Fennema dd548ee3c7
Use faster custom copy logic for non-blocking shard moves (#6119)
DESCRIPTION: Use faster custom copy logic for non-blocking shard moves

Non-blocking shard moves consist of two main phases:
1. Initial data copy
2. Catchup phase

This changes the first of these phases significantly. Previously we used the
copy logic provided by postgres subscriptions. This meant we didn't have
to implement it ourselves, but it came with the downside of little control.
When implementing shard splits we needed more control to even make it
work, so we implemented our own logic for copying data between nodes.

This PR starts using that logic for non-blocking shard moves. Doing so
has four main advantages:
1. It uses COPY in binary format when possible, which is cheaper to encode 
    and decode. Furthermore it very often results in less data that needs to 
    be sent over the network.
2. It allows us to create the primary key (or other replica identity) after doing
    the initial data copy. This should give some speed up over the total run,
    because creating an index is bulk is much faster than incrementally building it.
3. It doesn't require a replication slot per parallel copy. Increasing the maximum
    number of replication slots uses resources in postgres, even if they are not used.
    So reducing the number of replication slots that shard moves need is nice.
4. Logical replication table_sync workers are slow to start up, so if lots of shards
    need to be copied that can make it quite slow. This can happen easily when
    combining Postgres partitioning with Citus.
2022-08-08 17:09:43 +02:00
Jelte Fennema d1d386a904
Only allow moves of shards of distributed tables (#5072)
Moving shards of reference tables was possible in at least one case:
```sql
select citus_disable_node('localhost', 9702);
create table r(x int);
select create_reference_table('r');
set citus.replicate_reference_tables_on_activate = off;
select citus_activate_node('localhost', 9702);
select citus_move_shard_placement(102008, 'localhost', 9701, 'localhost', 9702);
```

This would then remove the reference table shard on the source, causing
all kinds of issues. This fixes that by disallowing all shard moves
except for shards of distributed tables.

Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
2021-06-23 16:25:46 +02:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 6b1904d37a
When moving a shard to a new node ensure there is enough space (#4929)
* When moving a shard to a new node ensure there is enough space

* Add WairForMiliseconds time utility

* Add more tests and increase readability

* Remove the retry loop and use a single udf for disk stats

* Address review

* address review

Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
2021-05-06 17:28:02 +03:00