That's useful when comparing values a hash-partitioned table is
filtered by. The existing shardIntervalCompareFunction is about
comparing hashed values, not unhashed ones.
The added btree opclass function is so we can get a comparator
back. This should be changed much more widely, but is not necessary so
far.
With this commit, we started to send explain queries within a savepoint. After
running explain query, we rollback to savepoint. This saves us from side effects
of EXPLAIN ANALYZE on DML queries.
With this change we add an option to add a node without replicating all reference
tables to that node. If a node is added with this option, we mark the node as
inactive and no queries will sent to that node.
We also added two new UDFs;
- master_activate_node(host, port):
- marks node as active and replicates all reference tables to that node
- master_add_inactive_node(host, port):
- only adds node to pg_dist_node
Before this commit, we were erroring out for queries containing parameterized SQL functions
like 'SELECT parameterized_sql_query(value)' as we should, however we were returning wrong
results for queries like 'SELECT * FROM parameterized_sql_query(value)'. With this commit
we started to error out on such queries too.
In this PR, we aim to deduce whether each of the RTE_RELATION
is joined with at least on another RTE_RELATION on their partition keys. If each
RTE_RELATION follows the above rule, we can conclude that all RTE_RELATIONs are
joined on their partition keys.
In order to do that, we invented a new equivalence class namely:
AttributeEquivalenceClass. In very simple words, a AttributeEquivalenceClass is
identified by an unique id and consists of a list of AttributeEquivalenceMembers.
Each AttributeEquivalenceMember is designed to identify attributes uniquely within the
whole query. The necessity of this arise since varno attributes are defined within
a single level of a query. Instead, here we want to identify each RTE_RELATION uniquely
and try to find equality among each RTE_RELATION's partition key.
Whenever we find an equality clause A = B, where both A and B originates from
relation attributes (i.e., not random expressions), we create an
AttributeEquivalenceClass to record this knowledge. If we later find another
equivalence B = C, we create another AttributeEquivalenceClass. Finally, we can
apply transitity rules and generate a new AttributeEquivalenceClass which includes
A, B and C.
Note that equality among the members are identified by the varattno and rteIdentity.
Each equality among RTE_RELATION is saved using an AttributeEquivalenceClass where
each member attribute is identified by a AttributeEquivalenceMember. In the final
step, we try generate a common attribute equivalence class that holds as much as
AttributeEquivalenceMembers whose attributes are a partition keys.
With this change, we start to error out if loaded citus binaries does not match
the available major version or installed citus extension version. In this case
we force user to restart the server or run ALTER EXTENSION depending on the
situation
Coordinator code marks index as invalid as a base, set it as valid in a
transactional layer atop that base, then proceeds with worker commands.
If a worker command has problems, the rollback results in an index with
isvalid = false. If everything succeeds, the user sees a valid index.
Before this commit, in certain cases router planner allowed pushing
down JOINs that are not on the partition keys.
With @anarazel's suggestion, we change the logic to use uninstantiated
parameter. Previously, the planner was traversing on the restriction
information and once it finds the parameter, it was replacing it with
the shard range. With this commit, instead of traversing the restrict
infos, the planner explicitly checks for the equivalence of the relation
partition key with the uninstantiated parameter. If finds an equivalence,
it adds the restrictions. In this way, we have more control over the
queries that are pushed down.
Some tests relied on worker errors though local commands were invalid.
Fixed those by ensuring preconditions were met to have command work
correctly. Otherwise most test changes are related to slight changes
in local/remote error ordering.
When running under Enterprise, some of the GRANT commands and whatnot
are propagated. Guarding that section with a call to disable DDL prop.
fixes everything.
Custom Scan is a node in the planned statement which helps external providers
to abstract data scan not just for foreign data wrappers but also for regular
relations so you can benefit your version of caching or hardware optimizations.
This sounds like only an abstraction on the data scan layer, but we can use it
as an abstraction for our distributed queries. The only thing we need to do is
to find distributable parts of the query, plan for them and replace them with
a Citus Custom Scan. Then, whenever PostgreSQL hits this custom scan node in
its Vulcano style execution, it will call our callback functions which run
distributed plan and provides tuples to the upper node as it scans a regular
relation. This means fewer code changes, fewer bugs and more supported features
for us!
First, in the distributed query planner phase, we create a Custom Scan which
wraps the distributed plan. For real-time and task-tracker executors, we add
this custom plan under the master query plan. For router executor, we directly
pass the custom plan because there is not any master query. Then, we simply let
the PostgreSQL executor run this plan. When it hits the custom scan node, we
call the related executor parts for distributed plan, fill the tuple store in
the custom scan and return results to PostgreSQL executor in Vulcano style,
a tuple per XXX_ExecScan() call.
* Modify planner to utilize Custom Scan node.
* Create different scan methods for different executors.
* Use native PostgreSQL Explain for master part of queries.
During later work the transaction debug output will change (as it will
in postgres 10), which makes it hard to see actual changes in the
INSERT ... SELECT ... test. Reduce to DEBUG2 after changing a debug
message to that log level.
This change ignores `citus.replication_model` setting and uses the
statement based replication in
- Tables distributed via the old `master_create_distributed_table` function
- Append and range partitioned tables, even if created via
`create_distributed_table` function
This seems like the easiest solution to #1191, without changing the existing
behavior and harming existing users with custom scripts.
This change also prevents RF>1 on streaming replicated tables on `master_create_worker_shards`
Prior to this change, `master_create_worker_shards` command was not checking
the replication model of the target table, thus allowing RF>1 with streaming
replicated tables. With this change, `master_create_worker_shards` errors
out on the case.
This change allows users to drop sequences on MX workers. Previously, Citus didn't allow dropping
sequences on MX workers because it could cause shards to be dropped if `DROP SEQUENCE ... CASCADE`
is used. We now allow that since allowing sequence creation but not dropping hurts user experience
and also may cause problems with custom Citus solutions.
- Break CheckShardPlacements into multiple functions (The most important
is MarkFailedShardPlacements), so that we can get rid of the global
CoordinatedTransactionUses2PC.
- Call MarkFailedShardPlacements in the router executor, so we mark
shards as invalid and stop using them while inside transaction blocks.
With this change DropShards function started to use new connection API. DropShards
function is used by DROP TABLE, master_drop_all_shards and master_apply_delete_command,
therefore all of these functions now support transactional operations. In DropShards
function, if we cannot reach a node, we mark shard state of related placements as
FILE_TO_DELETE and continue to drop remaining shards; however if any error occurs after
establishing the connection, we ROLLBACK whole operation.
All router, real-time, task-tracker plannable queries should now have
full prepared statement support (and even use router when possible),
unless they don't go through the custom plan interface (which
basically just affects LANGUAGE SQL (not plpgsql) functions).
This is achieved by forcing postgres' planner to always choose a
custom plan, by assigning very low costs to plans with bound
parameters (i.e. ones were the postgres planner replanned the query
upon EXECUTE with all parameter values provided), instead of the
generic one.
This requires some trickery, because for custom plans to work the
costs for a non-custom plan have to be known, which means we can't
error out when planning the generic plan. Instead we have to return a
"faux" plan, that'd trigger an error message if executed. But due to
the custom plan logic that plan will likely (unless called by an SQL
function, or because we can't support that query for some reason) not
be executed; instead the custom plan will be chosen.
This adds a replication_model GUC which is used as the replication
model for any new distributed table that is not a reference table.
With this change, tables with replication factor 1 are no longer
implicitly MX tables.
The GUC is similarly respected during empty shard creation for e.g.
existing append-partitioned tables. If the model is set to streaming
while replication factor is greater than one, table and shard creation
routines will error until this invalid combination is corrected.
Changing this parameter requires superuser permissions.
Andres Freund
Metin Doslu
Burak Yucesoy
Marco Slot
velioglu
Onder Kalaci
Jason Petersen
Murat Tuncer
Brian Cloutier
Eren Basak