Sometimes in CI our logical_replication test fails like this:
```diff
+++ /__w/citus/citus/src/test/regress/results/logical_replication.out.modified 2023-11-01 14:15:08.562758546 +0000
@@ -40,21 +40,21 @@
SELECT count(*) from pg_publication;
count
-------
0
(1 row)
SELECT count(*) from pg_replication_slots;
count
-------
- 0
+ 1
(1 row)
SELECT count(*) FROM dist;
count
-------
```
It's hard to understand what is going on here, just based on the wrong
number. So this PR changes the test to show the name of the
subscription, publication and replication slot to make finding the cause
easier.
In passing this also fixes another flaky test in the same file that our
flaky test detection picked up. This is done by waiting for resource
cleanup after the shard move.
Fixes the flaky test that results in following diff:
```diff
--- /__w/citus/citus/src/test/regress/expected/multi_mx_node_metadata.out.modified 2023-11-01 14:22:12.890476575 +0000
+++ /__w/citus/citus/src/test/regress/results/multi_mx_node_metadata.out.modified 2023-11-01 14:22:12.914476657 +0000
@@ -840,24 +840,26 @@
(1 row)
\c :datname - - :master_port
SELECT datname FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE application_name LIKE 'Citus Met%';
datname
------------
db_to_drop
(1 row)
DROP DATABASE db_to_drop;
+ERROR: database "db_to_drop" is being accessed by other users
SELECT datname FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE application_name LIKE 'Citus Met%';
datname
------------
-(0 rows)
+ db_to_drop
+(1 row)
-- cleanup
DROP SEQUENCE sequence CASCADE;
NOTICE: drop cascades to default value for column a of table reference_table
```
Sometimes isolation_metadata_sync_deadlock fails in CI like this:
```diff
diff -dU10 -w /__w/citus/citus/src/test/regress/expected/isolation_metadata_sync_deadlock.out /__w/citus/citus/src/test/regress/results/isolation_metadata_sync_deadlock.out
--- /__w/citus/citus/src/test/regress/expected/isolation_metadata_sync_deadlock.out.modified 2023-11-01 16:03:15.090199229 +0000
+++ /__w/citus/citus/src/test/regress/results/isolation_metadata_sync_deadlock.out.modified 2023-11-01 16:03:15.098199312 +0000
@@ -110,10 +110,14 @@
t
(1 row)
step s2-stop-connection:
SELECT stop_session_level_connection_to_node();
stop_session_level_connection_to_node
-------------------------------------
(1 row)
+
+teardown failed: ERROR: localhost:57638 is a metadata node, but is out of sync
+HINT: If the node is up, wait until metadata gets synced to it and try again.
+CONTEXT: SQL statement "SELECT master_remove_distributed_table_metadata_from_workers(v_obj.objid, v_obj.schema_name, v_obj.object_name)"
```
Source:
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/actions/runs/6721938040/attempts/1#summary-18268946448
To fix this we now wait for the metadata to be fully synced to all
nodes at the start of the teardown steps.
Sometimes in CI citus_non_blocking_split_shard_cleanup failed like this:
```diff
--- /__w/citus/citus/src/test/regress/expected/citus_non_blocking_split_shard_cleanup.out.modified 2023-11-01 15:07:14.280551207 +0000
+++ /__w/citus/citus/src/test/regress/results/citus_non_blocking_split_shard_cleanup.out.modified 2023-11-01 15:07:14.292551358 +0000
@@ -106,21 +106,22 @@
-----------------------------------
(1 row)
\c - - - :worker_2_port
SET search_path TO "citus_split_test_schema";
-- Replication slots should be cleaned up
SELECT slot_name FROM pg_replication_slots;
slot_name
---------------------------------
-(0 rows)
+ citus_shard_split_slot_19_10_17
+(1 row)
-- Publications should be cleanedup
SELECT count(*) FROM pg_publication;
count
```
It's expected that the replication slot is sometimes not cleaned up if
we don't wait until resource cleanup completes. This PR starts doing
that here.
Sometimes failure_split_cleanup failed in CI like this:
```diff
ERROR: server closed the connection unexpectedly
CONTEXT: while executing command on localhost:9060
SELECT operation_id, object_type, object_name, node_group_id, policy_type
FROM pg_dist_cleanup where operation_id = 777 ORDER BY object_name;
operation_id | object_type | object_name | node_group_id | policy_type
--------------+-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------+---------------+-------------
777 | 1 | citus_failure_split_cleanup_schema.table_to_split_8981000 | 1 | 0
- 777 | 1 | citus_failure_split_cleanup_schema.table_to_split_8981002 | 1 | 1
777 | 1 | citus_failure_split_cleanup_schema.table_to_split_8981002 | 2 | 0
+ 777 | 1 | citus_failure_split_cleanup_schema.table_to_split_8981002 | 1 | 1
777 | 1 | citus_failure_split_cleanup_schema.table_to_split_8981003 | 2 | 1
777 | 4 | citus_shard_split_publication_1_10_777 | 2 | 0
(5 rows)
-- we need to allow connection so that we can connect to proxy
```
Source:
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/actions/runs/6717642291/attempts/1#summary-18256014949
It's the common problem where we're missing a column in the ORDER BY
clause. This fixes that by adding an node_group_id to the query in
question.
Sometimes in CI isolation_master_update_node fails like this:
```diff
------------------
(1 row)
step s2-abort: ABORT;
step s1-abort: ABORT;
FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command
FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command
SSL connection has been closed unexpectedly
+server closed the connection unexpectedly
master_remove_node
------------------
```
This just seesm like a random error line. The only way to reasonably fix
this is by adding an extra output file. So that's what this PR does.
One of our most flaky and most anoying tests is
multi_cluster_management. It usually fails like this:
```diff
SELECT citus_disable_node('localhost', :worker_2_port);
citus_disable_node
--------------------
(1 row)
SELECT public.wait_until_metadata_sync(60000);
+WARNING: waiting for metadata sync timed out
wait_until_metadata_sync
--------------------------
(1 row)
```
This tries to address that by hardening wait_until_metadata_sync. I
believe the reason for this warning is that there is a race condition in
wait_until_metadata_sync. It's possible for the pre-check to fail, then
have the maintenance daemon send a notification. And only then have the
backend start to listen. I tried to fix it in two ways:
1. First run LISTEN, and only then read do the pre-check.
2. If we time out, check again just to make sure that we did not miss
the notification somehow. And don't show a warning if all metadata is
synced after the timeout.
It's hard to know for sure that this fixes it because the test is not
repeatable and I could not reproduce it locally. Let's just hope for the
best.
---------
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
Sometimes multi_reference_table failed in CI like this:
```diff
\c - - - :master_port
DROP INDEX reference_schema.reference_index_2;
\c - - - :worker_1_port
SELECT "Column", "Type", "Modifiers" FROM table_desc WHERE relid='reference_schema.reference_table_ddl_1250019'::regclass;
- Column | Type | Modifiers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- value_2 | double precision | default 25.0
- value_3 | text | not null
- value_4 | timestamp without time zone |
- value_5 | double precision |
-(4 rows)
-
+ERROR: schema "citus_local_table_queries" does not exist
\di reference_schema.reference_index_2*
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner | Table
```
Source:
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/actions/runs/6707535961/attempts/2#summary-18226879513
Reading from table_desc apparantly has an issue that if the schema gets
deleted from one of the items, while it is being read that we get such
an error.
This change fixes that by not running multi_reference_table in parallel
with citus_local_tables_queries anymore.
I just enhanced the existing code to check if the relation is an index
belonging to a distributed table.
If so the shardId is appended to relation (index) name and the *_size
function are executed as before.
There is a change in an extern function:
`extern StringInfo GenerateSizeQueryOnMultiplePlacements(...)`
It's possible to create a new function and deprecate this one later if
compatibility is an issue.
Fixes https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/6496.
DESCRIPTION: Allows using Citus size functions on distributed tables
indexes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
Sometimes validate constraint would fail like this:
```diff
validatable_constraint_8000016 | t
(10 rows)
DROP TABLE constrained_table;
+ERROR: deadlock detected
+DETAIL: Process 16602 waits for ShareRowExclusiveLock on relation 56258 of database 16384; blocked by process 16601.
+Process 16601 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 56120 of database 16384; blocked by process 16602.
+HINT: See server log for query details.
DROP TABLE referenced_table CASCADE;
DROP TABLE referencing_table;
DROP SCHEMA validate_constraint CASCADE;
-NOTICE: drop cascades to 3 other objects
+NOTICE: drop cascades to 4 other objects
DETAIL: drop cascades to type constraint_validity
drop cascades to view constraint_validations_in_workers
drop cascades to view constraint_validations
+drop cascades to table constrained_table
SET search_path TO DEFAULT;
```
Source:
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/actions/runs/6708383699?pr=7291
This change fixes that by not running together with the
foreign_key_to_reference_table test anymore. In passing it also
simplifies dropping of the test its resources.
DESCRIPTION: This change starts a maintenance deamon at the time of
server start if there is a designated main database.
This is the code flow:
1. User designates a main database:
`ALTER SYSTEM SET citus.main_db = "myadmindb";`
2. When postmaster starts, in _PG_Init, citus calls
`InitializeMaintenanceDaemonForMainDb`
This function registers a background worker to run
`CitusMaintenanceDaemonMain `with `databaseOid = 0 `
3. `CitusMaintenanceDaemonMain ` takes some special actions when
databaseOid is 0:
- Gets the citus.main_db value.
- Connects to the citus.main_db
- Now the `MyDatabaseId `is available, creates a hash entry for it.
- Then follows the same control flow as for a regular db,
There was a bug reported for previous versions of Citus where
shard\_size was returning NULL for tables with spaces in them. It works
fine on the main branch though, but I'm still adding a test for this to
the main branch because it seems a good test to have.
Jelte Fennema-Nio
Onur Tirtir
Gürkan İndibay
Cédric Villemain
Emel Şimşek
Benjamin O