After the connection timeout, we fail the session/pool. However, the
underlying connection can still be trying to connect. That is dangerous
because the new placement executions have already been in place. The
executor cannot handle the situation where multiple of
EXECUTION_ORDER_ANY task executions succeeds.
Adding a regression test doesn't seem easily doable. To reproduce the issue
- Add 2 worker nodes
- create a reference table
- set citus.node_connection_timeout to 1ms (requires code change)
- Continiously execute `SELECT count(*) FROM ref_table`
- Sometime later, you hit an out-of-array access in
`ScheduleNextPlacementExecution()` hence crashing.
- The reason for that is sometimes the first connection
successfully established while the executor is already
trying to execute the query on the second node.
We currently do not support volatile functions in update/delete statements
because the function evaluation logic does not know how to distinguish
volatile functions (that need to be evaluated per row) from stable functions
(that need to be evaluated per query), and it is also not safe to push the
volatile functions down on replicated tables.
Add sort method parameter for regression tests
Fix check-style
Change sorting method parameters to enum
Polish
Add task fields to OutTask
Add test into multi_explain
Fix isolation test
As the previous versions of Citus don't know how to handle citus local
tables, we should prevent downgrading from 9.5 to older versions if any
citus local tables exists.
* Merge enterprise branch if it exists
We should merge the enterprise branch if it exists in the check
enterpise merge job, otherwise the following can happen:
- there is some change on community that breaks the compilation on
enterprise without creating any conflicts
- we fix the compilation issue by opening a branch on enterprise
- the job doesn't see the enterprise specific fix because it doesn't try
to merge enterprise branch if there are no conflicts
* Update ci/check_enterprise_merge.sh
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
* Simplify the steps
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
Pushing down the CALLs to the node that the CALL is executed is
dangerous and could lead to infinite recursion.
When the coordinator added as worker, Citus was by chance preventing
this. The coordinator was marked as "not metadatasynced" node
in pg_dist_node, which prevented CALL/function delegation to happen.
With this commit, we do the following:
- Fix metadatasynced column for the coordinator on pg_dist_node
- Prevent pushdown of function/procedure to the same node that
the function/procedure is being executed. Today, we do not sync
pg_dist_object (e.g., distributed functions metadata) to the
worker nodes. But, even if we do it now, the function call delegation
would prevent the infinite recursion.
* Not take ShareUpdateExlusiveLock on pg_dist_transaction
We were taking ShareUpdateExlusiveLock on pg_dist_transaction during
recovery to prevent multiple recoveries happening concurrenly. VACUUM(
not FULL) also takes ShareUpdateExclusiveLock, and they can conflict. It
seems that VACUUM will skip the table if there is a conflicting lock
already taken unless it is doing the vacuum to prevent id wraparound, in
which case there can be a deadlock. I guess the deadlock happens if:
- VACUUM takes a lock on pg_dist_transaction and is done for id
wraparound problem
- The transaction in the maintenance tries to take a lock but
cannot as that conflicts with the lock acquired by VACUUM
- The transaction in the maintenance daemon has a very old xid hence
VACUUM cannot proceed.
If we take a row exclusive lock in transaction recovery then it wouldn't
conflict with VACUUM hence it could proceed so the deadlock would be
resolved. To prevent concurrent transaction recoveries happening, an
advisory lock is taken with ShareUpdateExlusiveLock as before.
* Use CITUS_OPERATIONS tag
* Not allow removing a single node with ref tables
We should not allow removing a node if it is the only node in the
cluster and there is a data on it. We have this check for distributed
tables but we didn't have it for reference tables.
* Update src/test/regress/expected/single_node.out
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
* Update src/test/regress/sql/single_node.sql
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
Önder Kalacı
Onder Kalaci
Hanefi Onaldi
Onur Tirtir
Marco Slot
Hadi Moshayedi
Hadi Moshayedi
Marco Slot
Ahmet Gedemenli
Jeff Davis
jeff-davis
SaitTalhaNisanci