Commit Graph

57 Commits (7d68e655bc2bed37c967367b0069c21dfb8384e8)

Author SHA1 Message Date
SaitTalhaNisanci dae2c69fd7
Not allow removing a single node with ref tables (#4127)
* Not allow removing a single node with ref tables

We should not allow removing a node if it is the only node in the
cluster and there is a data on it. We have this check for distributed
tables but we didn't have it for reference tables.

* Update src/test/regress/expected/single_node.out

Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>

* Update src/test/regress/sql/single_node.sql

Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
2020-09-18 15:35:59 +03:00
Önder Kalacı 8d3f353746
Add more tests for single node citus - distributetd tables (#4166) 2020-09-17 17:50:35 +02:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 4308d867d9 remove task-tracker in comments, documentation 2020-07-21 16:21:01 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 510535f558 address feedback 2020-07-13 19:45:02 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 41ec76a6ad use ActiveReadableNodeList in JobExecutorType and task tracker
The reason we should use ActiveReadableNodeList instead of ActiveReadableNonCoordinatorNodeList is that if coordinator is added to cluster as a worker, it should be counted as well. Otherwise if there is only coordinator in the cluster, the count will be 0, hence we get a warning.

In MultiTaskTrackerExecute, we should connect to coordinator if it is
added to the cluster because it will also be assigned tasks.
2020-07-13 19:45:02 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci d97d03ec65 use ActivePrimaryNodeList to include coordinator
ActiveReadableWorkerNodeList doesn't include coordinator, however if
coordinator is added as a worker, we should also include that while
planning. The current methods are very easily misusable and this
requires a refactoring to make the distinction between methods that
include coordinator and that don't very explicit as they can introduce
subtle/major bugs pretty easily.
2020-07-13 19:20:15 +03:00
Jelte Fennema ab01571c9e
Fix crash with single node dummy placement (#3993)
Static analysis found an issue where we could dereference `NULL`, because 
`CreateDummyPlacement` could return `NULL` when there were no workers. This
PR changes it so that it never returns `NULL`, which was intended by 
@marcocitus when doing this change: https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/3887/files#r438136433

While adding tests for citus on a single node I also added some more basic
tests and it turns out we error out on repartition joins. This has been
present since `shouldhaveshards` was introduced and is not trivial to fix.
So I created a separate issue for this: https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/3996
2020-07-08 17:11:25 +02:00