First of all, this commit sets next_shard_id for
single_node_truncate.sql because shard ids in the test output were
changing whenever we modify a prior test file.
Then the flaky test detector started complaining about
single_node_truncate.sql. We fix that by specifying the correct
test dependency for it in run_test.py.
DESCRIPTION: Prevent Citus table functions from being called on shards
The operations that guard against using shards are:
* Create Local Table
* Create distributed table (which affects reference table creation as well).
* I used a `ErrorIfRaltionIsKnownShard` instead of `ErrorIfIllegallyChangingKnownShard`.
`ErrorIfIllegallyChangingKnownShard` allows the operation if `citus.enable_manual_changes_to_shards`,
but I am not sure if it ever makes sense to create a distributed, reference, or citus local table out of a shard.
I tried to go over the code to identify other UDF-s where shards could be illegaly changed, but I could not find any other.
My knowledge of the codebase is not solid enough for me to say for sure.
Fixes#5610
We have a slightly different behavior when using truncate_local_data_after_distributing_table UDF on metadata synced clusters. This PR aims to add tests to cover such cases.
We allow distributing tables with data that have foreign keys to reference tables only on metadata synced clusters. This is the reason why some of my earlier tests failed when run on a single node Citus cluster.