During pg upgrades, we have seen that it is not guaranteed that a
columnar table will be created after metadata objects got created.
Prior to changes done in this commit, we had such a dependency
relationship in `pg_depend`:
```
columnar_table ----> columnarAM ----> citus extension
^ ^
| |
columnar.storage_id_seq -------------------- |
|
columnar.stripe -------------------------------
```
Since `pg_upgrade` just knows to follow topological sort of the objects
when creating database dump, above dependency graph doesn't imply that
`columnar_table` should be created before metadata objects such as
`columnar.storage_id_seq` and `columnar.stripe` are created.
For this reason, with this commit we add new records to `pg_depend` to
make columnarAM depending on all rel objects living in `columnar`
schema. That way, `pg_upgrade` will know it needs to create those before
creating `columnarAM`, and similarly, before creating any tables using
`columnarAM`.
Note that in addition to inserting those records via installation script,
we also do the same in `citus_finish_pg_upgrade()`. This is because,
`pg_upgrade` rebuilds catalog tables in the new cluster and that means,
we must insert them in the new cluster too.
- [x] Add some more regression test coverage
- [x] Make sure returning works fine in case of
local execution + remote execution
(task->partiallyLocalOrRemote works as expected, already added tests)
- [x] Implement locking properly (and add isolation tests)
- [x] We do #shardcount round-trips on `SerializeNonCommutativeWrites`.
We made it a single round-trip.
- [x] Acquire locks for subselects on the workers & add isolation tests
- [x] Add a GUC to prevent modification from the workers, hence increase the
coordinator-only throughput
- The performance slightly drops (~%15), unless
`citus.allow_modifications_from_workers_to_replicated_tables`
is set to false
We recently introduced a set of patches to 10.2, and introduced 10.2-4
migration version. This migration version only resides on `release-10.2`
branch, and is missing on our default branch. This creates a problem
because we do not have a valid migration path from 10.2 to latest 11.0.
To remedy this issue, I copied the relevant migration files from
`release-10.2` branch, and renamed some of our migration files on
default branch to make sure we have a linear upgrade path.
Before this commit, we required the user to be owner of the shard/table
in order to call lock_shard_resources.
However, that is too restrictive. We can have users with GRANTS
to the table who are not owners of the tables/shards.
With this commit, we allow such patterns.
This change creates a slightly higher abstraction of the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` where it decouples the partitioning from writing it to a file. This allows for easier reuse for other `DestReceiver`'s that would like to route different tuples to different `DestReceiver`'s.
Originally there was a lot of state kept in `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` to be able to lazily create `FileDestReceivers` when the first tuple arrived for that target. This convoluted the implementation of the processing of tuples with where they should go.
This refactor changes that where it makes the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` completely agnostic of what kind of Receivers it is writing to. When constructed you pass it a list of `DestReceiver` compatible pointers with the length of `partitionCount`. Internally the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` keeps track of which `DestReceiver`'s have been started or not, and start them when they first receive a tuple.
Alternatively, if the instantiating code of the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` wants, the startup can be turned from lazily to eagerly. When the startup is eager (not lazy) all `rStartup` functions on the list of `DestReceiver`'s are called during the startup of the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` and marked as such.
A downside of this approach is the following. On highly partitioned destinations we now need to allocate a `FileDestReceiver` for every target, _always_. When the data passed into the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` is highly skewed to a small set of `FileDestReceiver`'s this will waste some memory. Given the small size of a `FileDestReceiver`, and the fact that actual file handles are only created during the processing of the startup of the `FileDestReceiver` I think this memory waste is not a problem. If this would become a problem we could refactor the source list into some kind of generator object which can generate the `DestReceiver`'s on the fly.
* Refactor some checks in citus local tables
* all existing citus local tables are auto converted after upgrade
* Update warning messages in CreateCitusLocalTable
* Hide notice msg for auto converting local tables
* Hide hint msg
Co-authored-by: Ahmet Gedemenli <afgedemenli@gmail.com>
Clang 13 complains about a suspicious string concatenation. It thinks we
might have missed a comma. This adds parentheses to make it clear that
concatenation is indeed what we meant.
It seems like the decision for 2PC is more complicated than
it should be.
With this change, we do one behavioral change. In essense,
before this commit, when a SELECT task with replication factor > 1
is executed, the executor was triggering 2PC. And, in fact,
the transaction manager (`ConnectionModifiedPlacement()`) was
able to understand not to trigger 2PC when no modification happens.
However, for transaction blocks like:
BEGIN;
-- a command that triggers 2PC
-- A SELECT command on replication > 1
..
COMMIT;
The SELECT was used to be qualified as required 2PC. And, as a side-effect
the executor was setting `xactProperties.errorOnAnyFailure = true;`
So, the commands was failing at the time of execution. Now, they fail at
the end of the transaction.
In the past, we allowed users to manually switch to 1PC
(e.g., one phase commit). However, with this commit, we
don't. All multi-shard modifications are done via 2PC.
With Citus 9.0, we introduced `citus.single_shard_commit_protocol` which
defaults to 2PC.
With this commit, we prevent any user to set it to 1PC and drop support
for `citus.single_shard_commit_protocol`.
Although this might add some overhead for users, it is already the default
behaviour (so less likely) and marking placements as INVALID is much
worse.
- citus_get_all_dependencies_for_object: emulate what Citus
would qualify as
dependency when adding
a new node
- citus_get_dependencies_for_object: emulate what Citus would qualify
as dependency when creating an
object
Example use:
```SQL
-- find all the depedencies of table test
SELECT
pg_identify_object(t.classid, t.objid, t.objsubid)
FROM
(SELECT * FROM pg_get_object_address('table', '{test}', '{}')) as addr
JOIN LATERAL
citus_get_all_dependencies_for_object(addr.classid, addr.objid, addr.objsubid) as t(classid oid, objid oid, objsubid int)
ON TRUE
ORDER BY 1;
```
Onur Tirtir
Burak Velioglu
Burak Velioglu
Marco Slot
Hanefi Onaldi
Önder Kalacı
Ahmet Gedemenli
Onder Kalaci
naisila
Nils Dijk
Sait Talha Nisanci
Halil Ozan Akgul
Jelte Fennema
Philip Dubé
Teja Mupparti