Commit Graph

11 Commits (87c6f306f130fe20e62b80459a9c8d2dfcc31a73)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Murat Tuncer 87c6f306f1
Fix join clause eq restrictions (#1884)
We used to error out if the join clause includes filters like
t1.a < t2.a even if other filter like t1.key = t2.key exists.

Recently we lifted that restriction in subquery planning by
not lifting that restriction and focusing on equivalance classes
provided by postgres.

This checkin forwards previously erroring out real-time queries
due to join clauses to subquery planner and let it handle the
join even if the query does not have a subquery.

We are now pushing down queries that do not have any
subqueries in it. Error message looked misleading, changed to a more descriptive one.
2017-12-22 12:16:14 +03:00
Onder Kalaci e2a5124830 Add regression tests for recursive subquery planning 2017-12-21 08:37:40 +02:00
Onder Kalaci 0d5a4b9c72 Recursively plan subqueries that are not safe to pushdown
With this commit, Citus recursively plans subqueries that
are not safe to pushdown, in other words, requires a merge
step.

The algorithm is simple: Recursively traverse the query from bottom
up (i.e., bottom meaning the leaf queries). On each level, check
whether the query is safe to pushdown (or a single repartition
subquery). If the answer is yes, do not touch that subquery. If the
answer is no, plan the subquery seperately (i.e., create a subPlan
for it) and replace the subquery with a call to
`read_intermediate_results(planId, subPlanId)`. During the the
execution, run the subPlans first, and make them avaliable to the
next query executions.

Some of the queries hat this change allows us:

   * Subqueries with LIMIT
   * Subqueries with GROUP BY/DISTINCT on non-partition keys
   * Subqueries involving re-partition joins, router queries
   * Mixed usage of subqueries and CTEs (i.e., use CTEs in
     subqueries as well). Nested subqueries as long as we
     support the subquery inside the nested subquery.
   * Subqueries with local tables (i.e., those subqueries
     has the limitation that they have to be leaf subqueries)

   * VIEWs on the distributed tables just works (i.e., the
     limitations mentioned below still applies to views)

Some of the queries that is still NOT supported:

  * Corrolated subqueries that are not safe to pushdown
  * Window function on non-partition keys
  * Recursively planned subqueries or CTEs on the outer
    side of an outer join
  * Only recursively planned subqueries and CTEs in the FROM
    (i.e., not any distributed tables in the FROM) and subqueries
    in WHERE clause
  * Subquery joins that are not on the partition columns (i.e., each
    subquery is individually joined on partition keys but not the upper
    level subquery.)
  * Any limitation that logical planner applies such as aggregate
    distincts (except for count) when GROUP BY is on non-partition key,
    or array_agg with ORDER BY
2017-12-21 08:37:40 +02:00
Marco Slot ea6b98fda4 Allow count(distinct) in queries with a subquery 2017-12-15 15:24:26 +01:00
mehmet furkan şahin 3c941aedf1 adds citus.enable_repartition_joins GUC
The new GUC allows Citus to switch between task executors
when necessary
2017-12-11 09:36:37 +03:00
Marco Slot 3a4d5f8182 Remove filter checks on leaf queries 2017-11-30 12:25:14 +01:00
Marco Slot 3f03cb6a6a Support UNION with joins in the subqueries 2017-11-30 10:37:56 +01:00
Marco Slot 0ad39b36fe Treat immutable table functions and constant subqueries as reference tables 2017-11-21 14:15:22 +01:00
Marco Slot 89eb833375 Use citus.next_shard_id where practical in regression tests 2017-11-15 10:12:05 +01:00
Jason Petersen 50501227e9
Add ORDER clause to subquery test missing it 2017-06-08 18:30:14 -06:00
Onder Kalaci df494c0403 Improve subquery pushdown regression tests
- Use native postgres function for composite key btree functions
  - Move explain tests to multi_explain.sql (get rid of .out _0.out files)
  - Get rid of input/output files for multi_subquery.sql by moving table creations
  - Update some comments
2017-05-30 14:05:15 +03:00