DESCRIPTION: Fixes a problem when adding a new node due to tables referenced in a functions body
Fixes#3378
It was reported that `master_add_node` would fail if a distributed function has a table name referenced in its declare section of the body. By default postgres validates the body of a function on creation. This is not a problem in the normal case as tables are replicated to the workers when we distribute functions.
However when a new node is added we first create dependencies on the workers before we try to create any tables, and the original tables get created out of bound when the metadata gets synced to the new node. This causes the function body validator to raise an error the table is not on the worker.
To mitigate this issue we set `check_function_bodies` to `off` right before we are creating the function.
The added test shows this does resolve the issue. (issue can be reproduced on the commit without the fix)
In two places I've made code more straight forward by using ROUTINE in our own codegen
Two changes which may seem extraneous:
AppendFunctionName was updated to not use pg_get_function_identity_arguments.
This is because that function includes ORDER BY when printing an aggregate like my_rank.
While ALTER AGGREGATE my_rank(x "any" ORDER BY y "any") is accepted by postgres,
ALTER ROUTINE my_rank(x "any" ORDER BY y "any") is not.
Tests were updated to use macaddr over integer. Using integer is flaky, our logic
could sometimes end up on tables like users_table. I originally wanted to use money,
but money isn't hashable.
Use partition column's collation for range distributed tables
Don't allow non deterministic collations for hash distributed tables
CoPartitionedTables: don't compare unequal types
Objectives:
(a) both super user and regular user should have the correct owner for the function on the worker
(b) The transactional semantics would work fine for both super user and regular user
(c) non-super-user and non-function owner would get a reasonable error message if tries to distribute the function
Co-authored-by: @serprex
DESCRIPTION: Disallow distributed functions for functions depending on an extension
Functions depending on an extension cannot (yet) be distributed by citus. If we would allow this it would cause issues with our dependency following mechanism as we stop following objects depending on an extension.
By not allowing functions to be distributed when they depend on an extension as well as not allowing to make distributed functions depend on an extension we won't break the ability to add new nodes. Allowing functions depending on extensions to be distributed at the moment could cause problems in that area.
DESCRIPTION: Propagate CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
Distributed functions could be replaced, which should be propagated to the workers to keep the function in sync between all nodes.
Due to the complexity of deparsing the `CreateFunctionStmt` we actually produce the plan during the processing phase of our utilityhook. Since the changes have already been made in the catalog tables we can reuse `pg_get_functiondef` to get us the generated `CREATE OR REPLACE` sql.
DESCRIPTION: Propagate ALTER FUNCTION statements for distributed functions
Using the implemented deparser for function statements to propagate changes to both functions and procedures that are previously distributed.
Since the distributed functions are useful when the workers have
metadata, we automatically sync it.
Also, after master_add_node(). We do it lazily and let the deamon
sync it. That's mainly because the metadata syncing cannot be done
in transaction blocks, and we don't want to add lots of transactional
limitations to master_add_node() and create_distributed_function().
With this commit, we're changing the API for create_distributed_function()
such that users can provide the distribution argument and the colocation
information.
This PR aims to add the minimal set of changes required to start
distributing functions. You can use create_distributed_function(regproc)
UDF to distribute a function.
SELECT create_distributed_function('add(int,int)');
The function definition should include the param types to properly
identify the correct function that we wish to distribute
Jelte Fennema
Philip Dubé
Nils Dijk
SaitTalhaNisanci
Hadi Moshayedi
Marco Slot
Onder Kalaci
Hanefi Onaldi