Commit Graph

5 Commits (8e7575354408efecf9d9a9023f1db862e23a7148)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Onder Kalaci 8e75753544 Recursively plan inner parts of recurring tuple joins
With this commit, we're enabling recursive planning for the
queries that used to fail due to recurring tuples.

We're simply returning the inner relations/subqueries to the caller
of the error check, which is then able to recursively plan them.
2019-03-11 13:38:11 +03:00
Marco Slot 8893cc141d Support INSERT...SELECT with ON CONFLICT or RETURNING via coordinator
Before this commit, Citus supported INSERT...SELECT queries with
ON CONFLICT or RETURNING clauses only for pushdownable ones, since
queries supported via coordinator were utilizing COPY infrastructure
of PG to send selected tuples to the target worker nodes.

After this PR, INSERT...SELECT queries with ON CONFLICT or RETURNING
clauses will be performed in two phases via coordinator. In the first
phase selected tuples will be saved to the intermediate table which
is colocated with target table of the INSERT...SELECT query. Note that,
a utility function to save results to the colocated intermediate result
also implemented as a part of this commit. In the second phase, INSERT..
SELECT query is directly run on the worker node using the intermediate
table as the source table.
2018-11-30 15:29:12 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 0d5a4b9c72 Recursively plan subqueries that are not safe to pushdown
With this commit, Citus recursively plans subqueries that
are not safe to pushdown, in other words, requires a merge
step.

The algorithm is simple: Recursively traverse the query from bottom
up (i.e., bottom meaning the leaf queries). On each level, check
whether the query is safe to pushdown (or a single repartition
subquery). If the answer is yes, do not touch that subquery. If the
answer is no, plan the subquery seperately (i.e., create a subPlan
for it) and replace the subquery with a call to
`read_intermediate_results(planId, subPlanId)`. During the the
execution, run the subPlans first, and make them avaliable to the
next query executions.

Some of the queries hat this change allows us:

   * Subqueries with LIMIT
   * Subqueries with GROUP BY/DISTINCT on non-partition keys
   * Subqueries involving re-partition joins, router queries
   * Mixed usage of subqueries and CTEs (i.e., use CTEs in
     subqueries as well). Nested subqueries as long as we
     support the subquery inside the nested subquery.
   * Subqueries with local tables (i.e., those subqueries
     has the limitation that they have to be leaf subqueries)

   * VIEWs on the distributed tables just works (i.e., the
     limitations mentioned below still applies to views)

Some of the queries that is still NOT supported:

  * Corrolated subqueries that are not safe to pushdown
  * Window function on non-partition keys
  * Recursively planned subqueries or CTEs on the outer
    side of an outer join
  * Only recursively planned subqueries and CTEs in the FROM
    (i.e., not any distributed tables in the FROM) and subqueries
    in WHERE clause
  * Subquery joins that are not on the partition columns (i.e., each
    subquery is individually joined on partition keys but not the upper
    level subquery.)
  * Any limitation that logical planner applies such as aggregate
    distincts (except for count) when GROUP BY is on non-partition key,
    or array_agg with ORDER BY
2017-12-21 08:37:40 +02:00
Onder Kalaci 71ce42b936 Refactor RecursivelyPlanSubqueriesAndCTEs() to make it ready
to work with subqueries
2017-12-20 09:03:47 +02:00
Marco Slot 2e2b4e81fa Add support for CTEs in distributed queries 2017-12-14 09:32:55 +01:00