With citus shard helper view, we can easily see:
- where each shard is, which node, which port
- what kind of table it belongs to
- its size
With such a view, we can see shards that have a size bigger than some
value, which could be useful. Also debugging can be easier in production
as well with this view.
Fetch shards in one go per node
The previous implementation was slow because it would do a lot of round
trips, one per shard to be exact. Hence it is improved so that we fetch
all the shard_name, shard-size pairs per node in one go.
Construct shards_names, sizes query on coordinator
* Replace master_add_node with citus_add_node
* Replace master_activate_node with citus_activate_node
* Replace master_add_inactive_node with citus_add_inactive_node
* Use master udfs in old scripts
* Replace master_add_secondary_node with citus_add_secondary_node
* Replace master_disable_node with citus_disable_node
* Replace master_drain_node with citus_drain_node
* Replace master_remove_node with citus_remove_node
* Replace master_set_node_property with citus_set_node_property
* Replace master_unmark_object_distributed with citus_unmark_object_distributed
* Replace master_update_node with citus_update_node
* Replace master_update_shard_statistics with citus_update_shard_statistics
* Replace master_update_table_statistics with citus_update_table_statistics
* Rename master_conninfo_cache_invalidate to citus_conninfo_cache_invalidate
Rename master_dist_local_group_cache_invalidate to citus_dist_local_group_cache_invalidate
* Replace master_copy_shard_placement with citus_copy_shard_placement
* Replace master_move_shard_placement with citus_move_shard_placement
* Rename master_dist_node_cache_invalidate to citus_dist_node_cache_invalidate
* Rename master_dist_object_cache_invalidate to citus_dist_object_cache_invalidate
* Rename master_dist_partition_cache_invalidate to citus_dist_partition_cache_invalidate
* Rename master_dist_placement_cache_invalidate to citus_dist_placement_cache_invalidate
* Rename master_dist_shard_cache_invalidate to citus_dist_shard_cache_invalidate
* Drop master_modify_multiple_shards
* Rename master_drop_all_shards to citus_drop_all_shards
* Drop master_create_distributed_table
* Drop master_create_worker_shards
* Revert old function definitions
* Add missing revoke statement for citus_disable_node
CREATE TABLE does not invalidate foreign key graph but some other set of
ddl commands do.
Previously, as we run multi_foreign_key & multi_foreign_key_relation_graph
in parallel, it's possible that multi_foreign_key invalidates foreign key
graph via some ddl commands and create table test in
multi_foreign_key_relation_graph becomes flaky.
So we un-parallelize those two tests.
We used to need WarnAboutLeakedPreparedTransaction()
as we didn't have auto 2PC recovery. But, we long have
2PC recovery by https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/1574
So, we don't need anymore.
* Rethrow original concurrent index creation failure message
* Alter test outputs for concurrent index creation
* Detect duplicate table failure in concurrent index creation
* Add test for conc. index creation w/out duplicates
* Prevent deadlock for long named partitioned index creation on single node
* Create IsSingleNodeCluster function
* Use both local and sequential execution
On top of our foreign key graph, implement the infrastructure to get
list of relations that are connected to input relation via a foreign key
graph.
We need this to support cascading create_citus_local_table &
undistribute_table operations.
Also add regression tests to see what our foreign key graph is able to
capture currently.
With this commit, we remove visited flags from ForeignConstraintRelationshipNode
struct since keeping local state in global object is both dangerous and
meaningless.
Also to improve readability, this commit also converts needless recursion to
iterative DFS to avoid passing local hash-map as another parameter to
GetConnectedListHelper function.
Attribute number in a subquery RTE and relation RTE means different
things. In a relation attribute number will point to the column number
in the table definition including the dropped columns as well however in
subquery, it means the index in the target list. When we convert a
relation RTE to subquery RTE we should either correct all the relevant
attribute numbers or we can just add a dummy column for the dropped
columns. We choose the latter in this commit because it is practically
too vulnerable to update all the vars in a query.
Another thing this commit fixes is that in case a join restriction
clause list contains a false clause, we should just returns a false
clause instead of the whole list, because the whole list will contain
restrictions from other RTEs as well and this breaks the query, which
can be seen from the output changes, now it is much simpler.
Also instead of adding single tests for dropped columns, we choose to
run the whole mixed queries with tables with dropped columns, this
revealed some bugs already, which are fixed in this commit.
It seems that there are only very few cases where that is useful, and
for now we prefer not having that check. This means that we might
perform some unnecessary checks, but that should be rare and not
performance critical.
Instead of sending NULL's over a network, we now convert the subqueries
in the form of:
SELECT t.a, NULL, NULL FROM (SELECT a FROM table)t;
And we recursively plan the inner part so that we don't send the NULL's
over network. We still need the NULLs in the outer subquery because we
currently don't have an easy way of updating all the necessary places in
the query.
Add some documentation for how the conversion is done
Baseinfo also has pushed down filters etc, so it makes more sense to use
BaseRestrictInfo to determine what columns have constant equality
filters.
Also RteIdentity is used for removing conversion candidates instead of
rteIndex.
It seems that most of the updates were broken, we weren't aware of it
because there wasn't any data in the tables. They are broken mostly
because local tables do not have a shard id and some code paths should
be updated with that information, currently when there is an invalid
shard id, it is assumed to be pruned.
Consider local tables in router planner
In case there is a local table, the shard id will not be valid and there
are some checks that rely on shard id, we should skip these in case of
local tables, which is handled with a dummy placement.
Add citus local table dist table join tests
add local-dist table mixed joins tests
AllDataLocallyAccessible and ContainsLocalTableSubqueryJoin are removed.
We can possibly remove ModifiesLocalTableWithRemoteCitusLocalTable as
well. Though this removal has a side effect that now when all the data
is locally available, we could still wrap a relation into a subquery, I
guess that should be resolved in the router planner itself.
Add more tests
When we wrap an RTE to subquery we are updating the variables varno's as
1, however we should also update the varno's of vars in quals.
Also some other small code quality improvements are done.
The previous algorithm was not consistent and it could convert different
RTEs based on the table orders in the query. Now we convert local tables
if there is a distributed table which doesn't have a unique index. So if
there are 4 tables, local1, local2, dist1, dist2_with_pkey then we will
convert local1 and local2 in `auto` mode. Converting a distributed table
is not that logical because as there is a distributed table without a
unique index, we will need to convert the local tables anyway. So
converting the distributed table with pkey is redundant.
Remove FillLocalAndDistributedRTECandidates and use
ShouldConvertLocalTableJoinsToSubqueries, which simplifies things as we
rely on a single function to decide whether we should continue
converting RTE to subquery.
We should not recursively plan an already routable plannable query. An
example of this is (SELECT * FROM local JOIN (SELECT * FROM dist) d1
USING(a));
So we let the recursive planner do all of its work and at the end we
convert the final query to to handle unsupported joins. While doing each
conversion, we check if it is router plannable, if so we stop.
Only consider range table entries that are in jointree
If a range table is not in jointree then there is no point in
considering that because we are trying to convert range table entries to
subqueries for join use case.
Check equality in quals
We want to recursively plan distributed tables only if they have an
equality filter on a unique column. So '>' and '<' operators will not
trigger recursive planning of distributed tables in local-distributed
table joins.
Recursively plan distributed table only if the filter is constant
If the filter is not a constant then the join might return multiple rows
and there is a chance that the distributed table will return huge data.
Hence if the filter is not constant we choose to recursively plan the
local table.
When doing local-distributed table joins we convert one of them to
subquery. The current policy is that we convert distributed tables to
subquery if it has a unique index on a column that has unique
index(primary key also has a unique index).
Onur Tirtir
Halil Ozan Akgul
SaitTalhaNisanci
Önder Kalacı
Ahmet Gedemenli
Naisila Puka
Marco Slot
Onder Kalaci
Hadi Moshayedi
naisila
jeff-davis
Hadi Moshayedi
Marco Slot
Nils Dijk