Commit Graph

121 Commits (aeaa48c197adedf4cd93abbea451f7eaeea85d83)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Onur Tirtir 85745b46d5 Add initial sql support for distributed tables that don't have a shard key (#6773/#6822)
Enable router planner and a limited version of INSERT .. SELECT planner
for the queries that reference colocated null shard key tables.

* SELECT / UPDATE / DELETE / MERGE is supported as long as it's a router
query.
* INSERT .. SELECT is supported as long as it only references colocated
  null shard key tables.

Note that this is not only limited to distributed INSERT .. SELECT but
also
covers a limited set of query types that require pull-to-coordinator,
e.g.,
  due to LIMIT clause, generate_series() etc. ...
(Ideally distributed INSERT .. SELECT could handle such queries too,
e.g.,
when we're only referencing tables that don't have a shard key, but
today
this is not the case. See
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/6773#discussion_r1140130562.
2023-05-03 16:24:20 +03:00
Onur Tirtir 20a5f3af2b
Replace CITUS_TABLE_WITH_NO_DIST_KEY checks with HasDistributionKey() (#6743)
Now that we will soon add another table type having DISTRIBUTE_BY_NONE
as distribution method and that we want the code to interpret such
tables mostly as distributed tables, let's make the definition of those
other two table types more strict by removing
CITUS_TABLE_WITH_NO_DIST_KEY
macro.

And instead, use HasDistributionKey() check in the places where the
logic applies to all table types that have / don't have a distribution
key. In future PRs, we might want to convert some of those
HasDistributionKey() checks if logic only applies to Citus local /
reference tables, not the others.

And adding HasDistributionKey() also allows us to consider having
DISTRIBUTE_BY_NONE as the distribution method as a "table attribute"
that can apply to distributed tables too, rather something that
determines the table type.
2023-03-10 13:55:52 +03:00
naisila 47bea76c6c Revert "Support JSON_TABLE on PG 15 (#6241)"
This reverts commit 1f4fe35512.
2022-09-12 15:20:17 +03:00
Naisila Puka 1f4fe35512
Support JSON_TABLE on PG 15 (#6241)
Postgres supports JSON_TABLE feature on PG 15.

We treat JSON_TABLE the same as correlated functions (e.g., recurring tuples).
In the end, for multi-shard JSON_TABLE commands, we apply the same
restrictions as reference tables (e.g., cannot be in the outer part of
an outer join etc.)

Co-authored-by: Onder Kalaci <onderkalaci@gmail.com>
2022-08-24 19:11:18 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 149771792b Remove useless version compats
most likely leftover from earlier versions
2022-07-29 10:31:55 +02:00
Naisila Puka 7d6410c838
Drop postgres 12 support (#6040)
* Remove if conditions with PG_VERSION_NUM < 13

* Remove server_above_twelve(&eleven) checks from tests

* Fix tests

* Remove pg12 and pg11 alternative test output files

* Remove pg12 specific normalization rules

* Some more if conditions in the code

* Change RemoteCollationIdExpression and some pg12/pg13 comments

* Remove some more normalization rules
2022-07-20 17:49:36 +03:00
Marco Slot 8c8c3b665d Add TABLESAMPLE support 2022-04-01 15:51:40 +02:00
Marco Slot 93e79b9262 Never allow co-located joins of append-distributed tables 2021-10-18 21:11:16 +02:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 4559d02c41
Fix union pushdown issue (#5079)
* Fix UNION not being pushdown

Postgres optimizes column fields that are not needed in the output. We
were relying on these fields to understand if it is safe to push down a
union query.

This fix looks at the parse query, which has the original column fields
to detect if it is safe to push down a union query.

* Add more tests

* Simplify code and make it more robust

* Process varlevelsup > 0 in FindReferencedTableColumn

* Only look for outers vars in union path

* Add more comments

* Remove UNION ALL specific logic for pulling up childvars
2021-07-29 13:52:55 +03:00
Marco Slot 4b49cb112f Fix FROM ONLY queries on partitioned tables 2021-04-27 16:10:07 +02:00
Onder Kalaci 918838e488 Allow constant VALUES clauses in pushdown queries
As long as the VALUES clause contains constant values, we should not
recursively plan the queries/CTEs.

This is a follow-up work of #1805. So, we can easily apply OUTER join
checks as if VALUES clause is a reference table/immutable function.
2021-04-21 14:28:08 +02:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 03832f353c Drop postgres 11 support 2021-03-25 09:20:28 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 5618f3a3fc Use BaseRestrictInfo for finding equality columns
Baseinfo also has pushed down filters etc, so it makes more sense to use
BaseRestrictInfo to determine what columns have constant equality
filters.

Also RteIdentity is used for removing conversion candidates instead of
rteIndex.
2020-12-15 18:18:36 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 2a44029aaf Simplify ContainsTableToBeConvertedToSubquery
AllDataLocallyAccessible and ContainsLocalTableSubqueryJoin are removed.
We can possibly remove ModifiesLocalTableWithRemoteCitusLocalTable as
well. Though this removal has a side effect that now when all the data
is locally available, we could still wrap a relation into a subquery, I
guess that should be resolved in the router planner itself.

Add more tests
2020-12-15 18:17:10 +03:00
Marco Slot f2538a456f Support co-located/recurring sublinks in the target list 2020-12-13 15:45:24 +01:00
Onur Tirtir cc8be422ce
Fix relkind checks in planner for relkinds other than RELKIND_RELATION (#4294)
We were qualifying relations with relkind != RELKIND_RELATION as
non-relations due to the strict checks around RangeTblEntry->relkind
in planner.
2020-11-05 14:21:02 +03:00
Onur Tirtir f80f4839ad Remove unused functions that cppcheck found 2020-10-19 13:50:52 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul e2736c25bd Adds support for WITH TIES option 2020-10-12 19:34:18 +03:00
Onur Tirtir 3a73fba810 Apply planner changes for citus local tables 2020-09-09 11:51:18 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 366461ccdb
Introduce cache entry/table utilities (#4132)
Introduce table entry utility functions

Citus table cache entry utilities are introduced so that we can easily
extend existing functionality with minimum changes, specifically changes
to these functions. For example IsNonDistributedTableCacheEntry can be
extended for citus local tables without the need to scan the whole
codebase and update each relevant part.

* Introduce utility functions to find the type of tables

A table type can be a reference table, a hash/range/append distributed
table. Utility methods are created so that we don't have to worry about
how a table is considered as a reference table etc. This also makes it
easy to extend the table types.

* Add IsCitusTableType utilities

* Rename IsCacheEntryCitusTableType -> IsCitusTableTypeCacheEntry

* Change citus table types in some checks
2020-09-02 22:26:05 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 20c39fae9a
Loosen the requirement to pushdown a subquery with ref tables (#4110)
AllTargetExpressionsAreColumnReferences would return false if a query
had an entry that is referencing the outer query. It seems safe to not
have this for non-distributed tables, such as reference tables. We
already have separate checks for other cases such as having limits.
2020-08-14 12:11:15 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 679bf0d2b2
Create CanPushdownSubqery wrapper for better readability (#4108) 2020-08-12 17:28:20 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 73ef40886b
Rename FindNodeCheckXXX functions (#4106)
FindNodeCheck is not clear about what the function is doing. They are
renamed to FindNodeMatchingCheckFunctionXXX. Also for choosing elements in these
functions, CheckNodeFunc type is introduced.
2020-08-11 15:01:23 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci b3af63c8ce
Remove task tracker executor (#3850)
* use adaptive executor even if task-tracker is set

* Update check-multi-mx tests for adaptive executor

Basically repartition joins are enabled where necessary. For parallel
tests max adaptive executor pool size is decresed to 2, otherwise we
would get too many clients error.

* Update limit_intermediate_size test

It seems that when we use adaptive executor instead of task tracker, we
exceed the intermediate result size less in the test. Therefore updated
the tests accordingly.

* Update multi_router_planner

It seems that there is one problem with multi_router_planner when we use
adaptive executor, we should fix the following error:
+ERROR:  relation "authors_range_840010" does not exist
+CONTEXT:  while executing command on localhost:57637

* update repartition join tests for check-multi

* update isolation tests for repartitioning

* Error out if shard_replication_factor > 1 with repartitioning

As we are removing the task tracker, we cannot switch to it if
shard_replication_factor > 1. In that case, we simply error out.

* Remove MULTI_EXECUTOR_TASK_TRACKER

* Remove multi_task_tracker_executor

Some utility methods are moved to task_execution_utils.c.

* Remove task tracker protocol methods

* Remove task_tracker.c methods

* remove unused methods from multi_server_executor

* fix style

* remove task tracker specific tests from worker_schedule

* comment out task tracker udf calls in tests

We were using task tracker udfs to test permissions in
multi_multiuser.sql. We should find some other way to test them, then we
should remove the commented out task tracker calls.

* remove task tracker test from follower schedule

* remove task tracker tests from multi mx schedule

* Remove task-tracker specific functions from worker functions

* remove multi task tracker extra schedule

* Remove unused methods from multi physical planner

* remove task_executor_type related things in tests

* remove LoadTuplesIntoTupleStore

* Do initial cleanup for repartition leftovers

During startup, task tracker would call TrackerCleanupJobDirectories and
TrackerCleanupJobSchemas to clean up leftover directories and job
schemas. With adaptive executor, while doing repartitions it is possible
to leak these things as well. We don't retry cleanups, so it is possible
to have leftover in case of errors.

TrackerCleanupJobDirectories is renamed as
RepartitionCleanupJobDirectories since it is repartition specific now,
however TrackerCleanupJobSchemas cannot be used currently because it is
task tracker specific. The thing is that this function is a no-op
currently.

We should add cleaning up intermediate schemas to DoInitialCleanup
method when that problem is solved(We might want to solve it in this PR
as well)

* Revert "remove task tracker tests from multi mx schedule"

This reverts commit 03ecc0a681.

* update multi mx repartition parallel tests

* not error with task_tracker_conninfo_cache_invalidate

* not run 4 repartition queries in parallel

It seems that when we run 4 repartition queries in parallel we get too
many clients error on CI even though we don't get it locally. Our guess
is that, it is because we open/close many connections without doing some
work and postgres has some delay to close the connections. Hence even
though connections are removed from the pg_stat_activity, they might
still not be closed. If the above assumption is correct, it is unlikely
for it to happen in practice because:
- There is some network latency in clusters, so this leaves some times
for connections to be able to close
- Repartition joins return some data and that also leaves some time for
connections to be fully closed.

As we don't get this error in our local, we currently assume that it is
not a bug. Ideally this wouldn't happen when we get rid of the
task-tracker repartition methods because they don't do any pruning and
might be opening more connections than necessary.

If this still gives us "too many clients" error, we can try to increase
the max_connections in our test suite(which is 100 by default).

Also there are different places where this error is given in postgres,
but adding some backtrace it seems that we get this from
ProcessStartupPacket. The backtraces can be found in this link:
https://circleci.com/gh/citusdata/citus/138702

* Set distributePlan->relationIdList when it is needed

It seems that we were setting the distributedPlan->relationIdList after
JobExecutorType is called, which would choose task-tracker if
replication factor > 1 and there is a repartition query. However, it
uses relationIdList to decide if the query has a repartition query, and
since it was not set yet, it would always think it is not a repartition
query and would choose adaptive executor when it should choose
task-tracker.

* use adaptive executor even with shard_replication_factor > 1

It seems that we were already using adaptive executor when
replication_factor > 1. So this commit removes the check.

* remove multi_resowner.c and deprecate some settings

* remove TaskExecution related leftovers

* change deprecated API error message

* not recursively plan single relatition repartition subquery

* recursively plan single relation repartition subquery

* test depreceated task tracker functions

* fix overlapping shard intervals in range-distributed test

* fix error message for citus_metadata_container

* drop task-tracker deprecated functions

* put the implemantation back to worker_cleanup_job_schema_cachesince citus cloud uses it

* drop some functions, add downgrade script

Some deprecated functions are dropped.
Downgrade script is added.
Some gucs are deprecated.
A new guc for repartition joins bucket size is added.

* order by a test to fix flappiness
2020-07-18 13:11:36 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci bc011a6286
Add IsCitusTable check to citus table utilities (#4028) 2020-07-14 18:29:33 +03:00
Philip Dubé 8faaaee6a5 IsReferenceTable, ShardIntervalCount: remove misleading isCitusTable check
GetCitusTableCacheEntry raises an error if relationId is not distributed
2020-06-11 15:35:02 +00:00
Philip Dubé 1722d8ac8b Allow routing modifying CTEs
We still recursively plan some cases, eg:
- INSERTs
- SELECT FOR UPDATE when reference tables in query
- Everything must be same single shard & replication model
2020-06-11 15:14:06 +00:00
Philip Dubé 30f10984e1 Defer get_agg_clause_costs, it happens later & avoids errors 2020-04-10 13:26:05 +00:00
Marco Slot a4b2197450 Correctly handle non-constant LIMIT/OFFSET clauses 2020-04-09 19:59:50 +00:00
SaitTalhaNisanci ba01f3457a
use macros for pg versions instead of hardcoded values (#3694)
3 Macros are defined for removing the hardcoded pg versions.
PG_VERSION_11, PG_VERSION_12 and PG_VERSION_13.
2020-04-01 17:01:52 +03:00
Philip Dubé 917cb6ae93 Don't segfault on queries using GROUPING
GROUPING will always return 0 outside of GROUPING SETS, CUBE, or ROLLUP
Since we don't support those, it makes sense to reject GROUPING in queries
2020-03-25 15:46:43 +00:00
Philip Dubé 720525cfda Add support for window functions on coordinator
Some refactoring:
Consolidate expression which decides whether GROUP BY/HAVING are pushed down
Rename early pullUpIntermediateRows to hasNonDistributableAggregates
Create WorkerColumnName to handle formatting WORKER_COLUMN_FORMAT
Ignore NULL StringInfo pointers to SafeToPushdownWindowFunction
Fix bug where SubqueryPushdownMultiNodeTree mutates supplied Query,
	SafeToPushdownWindowFunction requires the original query as it relies on rtable
2020-03-25 15:31:20 +00:00
Philip Dubé 81cfa05d3d First phase of addressing HAVING subquery issues
Add failing tests, make changes to avoid crashes at least

Fix HAVING subquery pushdown ignoring reference table only subqueries,
also include HAVING in recursive planning

Given that we have a function IsDistributedTable which includes reference tables,
it seems best to have IsDistributedTableRTE & QueryContainsDistributedTableRTE
reflect that they do not include reference tables in their check

Similarly SublinkList's name should reflect that it only scans WHERE

contain_agg_clause asserts that we don't have SubLinks,
use contain_aggs_of_level as suggested by pg sourcecode
2020-03-09 17:58:30 +00:00
Philip Dubé bec58000d6 Given IsDistributedTableRTE, there's ambiguity in what DistributedTable means
Elsewhere we used DistributedTable to include reference tables
Marco suggested we use CitusTable for distributed & reference tables

So renaming:
- IsDistributedTable -> IsCitusTable
- IsDistributedTableViaCatalog -> IsCitusTableViaCatalog
- DistributedTableCacheEntry -> CitusTableCacheEntry
- DistributedTableList -> CitusTableList
- isDistributedTable -> isCitusTable
- InsertSelectIntoDistributedTable -> InsertSelectIntoCitusTable
- ExtractFirstDistributedTableId -> ExtractFirstCitusTableId
2020-03-06 18:57:55 +00:00
Nils Dijk a77ed9cd23
Refactor master query to be planned by postgres' planner (#3326)
DESCRIPTION: Replace the query planner for the coordinator part with the postgres planner

Closes #2761 

Citus had a simple rule based planner for the query executed on the query coordinator. This planner grew over time with the addigion of SQL support till it was getting close to the functionality of the postgres planner. Except the code was brittle and its complexity rose which made it hard to add new SQL support.

Given its resemblance with the postgres planner it was a long outstanding wish to replace our hand crafted planner with the well supported postgres planner. This patch replaces our planner with a call to postgres' planner.

Due to the functionality of the postgres planner we needed to support both projections and filters/quals on the citus custom scan node. When a sort operation is planned above the custom scan it might require fields to be reordered in the custom scan before returning the tuple (projection). The postgres planner assumes every custom scan node implements projections. Because we controlled the plan that was created we prevented reordering in the custom scan and never had implemented it before.

A same optimisation applies to having clauses that could have been where clauses. Instead of applying the filter as a having on the aggregate it will push it down into the plan which could reach a custom scan node.

For both filters and projections we have implemented them when tuples are read from the tuple store. If no projections or filters are required it will directly return the tuple from the tuple store. Otherwise it will loop tuples from the tuple store through the filter and projection until a tuple is found and returned.

Besides filters being pushed down a side effect of having quals that could have been a where clause is that a call to read intermediate result could be called before the first tuple is fetched from the custom scan. This failed because the intermediate result would only be pulled to the coordinator on the first tuple fetch. To overcome this problem we do run the distributed subplans now before we run the postgres executor. This ensures the intermediate result is present on the coordinator in time. We do account for total time instrumentation by removing the instrumentation before handing control to the psotgres executor and update the timings our self.

For future SQL support it is enough to create a valid query structure for the part of the query to be executed on the query coordinating node. As a utility we do serialise and print the query at debug level4 for engineers to inspect what kind of query is being planned on the query coordinator.
2020-02-25 14:39:56 +01:00
Philip Dubé 3a906b8210 Fix typos noticed while reading through code trying to understand HAVING 2020-02-11 19:55:10 +00:00
Nils Dijk d5433400f9
Fix: Unnecessary repartition on joins with more than 4 tables (#3473)
DESCRIPTION: Fix unnecessary repartition on joins with more than 4 tables

In 9.1 we have introduced support for all CH-benCHmark queries by widening our definitions of joins to include joins with expressions in them. This had the undesired side effect of Q5 regressing on its plan by implementing a repartition join.

It turned out this regression was not directly related to widening of the join clause, nor the schema employed by CH-benCHmark. Instead it had to do with 4 or more tables being joined in a chain. A chain meaning:

```sql
SELECT * FROM a,b,c,d WHERE a.part = b.part AND b.part = c.part AND ....
```

Due to how our join order planner was implemented it would only keep track of 1 of the partition columns when comparing if the join could be executed locally. This manifested in a join chain of 4 tables to _always_ be executed as a repartition join. 3 tables joined in a chain would have the middle table shared by the two outer tables causing the local join possibility to be found.

With this patch we keep a  unique list (or set) of all partition columns participating in the join. When a candidate table is checked for a possibility to execute a local join it will check if there is any partition column in that set that matches an equality join clause on the partition column of the candidate table.

By taking into account all partition columns in the left relation it will now find the local join path on >= 4 tables joined in a chain. 

fixes: #3276
2020-02-06 15:07:07 +01:00
Jelte Fennema 3a042e4611 Allow cartesian products on reference tables 2019-12-27 15:05:51 +01:00
Jelte Fennema 61e2501645 Make any expression with two or more tables a join expression 2019-12-27 15:05:51 +01:00
Jelte Fennema 4233cd0d9d Allow non equi joins on reference tables 2019-12-27 15:05:51 +01:00
Hadi Moshayedi 249508d267 Estimate cost of read_intermediate_results() 2019-12-17 13:51:51 -08:00
Jelte Fennema 1d8dde232f
Automatically convert useless declarations using regex replace (#3181)
* Add declaration removal to CI

* Convert declarations
2019-11-21 13:47:29 +01:00
Hanefi Onaldi d82f3e9406
Introduce intermediate result broadcasting
In plain words, each distributed plan pulls the necessary intermediate
results to the worker nodes that the plan hits. This is primarily useful
in three ways. 

(i) If the distributed plan that uses intermediate
result(s) is a router query, then the intermediate results are only
broadcasted to a single node.

(ii) If a distributed plan consists of only intermediate results, which
is not uncommon, the intermediate results are broadcasted to a single
node only.

(iii) If a distributed query hits a sub-set of the shards in multiple
workers, the intermediate results will be broadcasted to the relevant
node(s).

The final item (iii) becomes crucial for append/range distributed
tables where typically the distributed queries hit a small subset of
shards/workers.

To do this, for each query that Citus creates a distributed plan, we keep
track of the subPlans used in the queryTree, and save it in the distributed
plan. Just before Citus executes each subPlan, Citus first keeps track of
every worker node that the distributed plan hits, and marks every subPlan
should be broadcasted to these nodes. Later, for each subPlan which is a
distributed plan, Citus does this operation recursively since these
distributed plans may access to different subPlans, and those have to be
recorded as well.
2019-11-20 15:26:36 +03:00
Nils Dijk 217890af5f
Feature: Expression in reference join (#3180)
DESCRIPTION: Expression in reference join

Fixed: #2582

This patch allows arbitrary expressions in the join clause when joining to a reference table. An example of such joins could be found in CHbenCHmark queries 7, 8, 9 and 11; `mod((s_w_id * s_i_id),10000) = su_suppkey` and `ascii(substr(c_state,1,1)) = n2.n_nationkey`. Since the join is on a reference table these queries are able to be pushed down to the workers.

To implement these queries we will widen the `IsJoinClause` predicate to not check if the expressions are a type `Var` after stripping the implicit coerciens. Instead we define a join clause when the `Var`'s in a clause come from more than 1 table.

This allows more clauses to pass into the logical planner's `MultiNodeTree(...)` planning function. To compensate for this we tighten down the `LocalJoin`, `SinglePartitionJoin` and `DualPartitionJoin` to check for direct column references when planning. This allows the planner to work with arbitrary join expressions on reference tables.
2019-11-18 16:25:46 +01:00
Jelte Fennema 1b2c438e69
Rename variables to not shadow globals in RHEL6 (#3194)
Fixes #2839
2019-11-15 12:12:24 +01:00
Philip Dubé edc7a2ee38 Improve RECORD support 2019-11-14 18:32:22 +00:00
Jelte Fennema adc6ca6100
Make simple in queries on unique columns work with repartion join (#3171)
This is necassery to support Q20 of the CHbenCHmark: #2582.

To summarize the fix: The subquery is converted into an INNER JOIN on a
table. This fixes the issue, since an INNER JOIN on a table is already
supported by the repartion planner.

The way this replacement is happening.:
1. Postgres replaces `col in (subquery)` with a SEMI JOIN (subquery) on col = subquery_result
2. If this subquery is simple enough Postgres will replace it with a
   regular read from a table
3. If the subquery returns unique results (e.g. a primary key) Postgres
   will convert the SEMI JOIN into an INNER JOIN during the planning. It
   will not change this in the rewritten query though.
4. We check if Postgres sends us any SEMI JOINs during its join order
   planning, if it doesn't we replace all SEMI JOINs in the rewritten
   query with INNER JOIN (which we already support).
2019-11-11 13:44:28 +01:00
Önder Kalacı ffd89e4e01
Include all relevant relations in the ExtractRangeTableRelationWalker (#3135)
We've changed the logic for pulling RTE_RELATIONs in #3109 and
non-colocated subquery joins and partitioned tables.
@onurctirtir found this steps where I traced back and found the issues.

While looking into it in more detail, we decided to expand the list in a
way that the callers get all the relevant RTE_RELATIONs RELKIND_RELATION,
RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE, RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE and RELKIND_MATVIEW.
These are all relation kinds that Citus planner is aware of.
2019-11-01 16:06:58 +01:00
Jelte Fennema 7abedc38b0
Support subqueries in HAVING (#3098)
Areas for further optimization:
- Don't save subquery results to a local file on the coordinator when the subquery is not in the having clause
- Push the the HAVING with subquery to the workers if there's a group by on the distribution column
- Don't push down the results to the workers when we don't push down the HAVING clause, only the coordinator needs it

Fixes #520
Fixes #756
Closes #2047
2019-10-16 16:40:14 +02:00
Onur TIRTIR d5f83dc110
Refactor range table walkers (#3109) 2019-10-16 01:20:49 +03:00