Commit Graph

230 Commits (b77c52f95bc890ed8d82e5d7c9c4c0c98de98460)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Philip Dubé 0915027389 DistributedPlan: replace operation with modLevel
This causes no behaviorial changes, only organizes better to implement modifying CTEs

Also rename ExtactInsertRangeTableEntry to ExtractResultRelationRTE,
as the source of this function didn't match the documentation

Remove Task's upsertQuery in favor of ROW_MODIFY_NONCOMMUTATIVE

Split up AcquireExecutorShardLock into more internal functions

Tests: Normalize multi_reference_table multi_create_table_constraints
2019-07-16 13:58:18 -07:00
Hadi Moshayedi 91d8a41ecd Don't modify cache entry in RelationShardListForShardCreate() 2019-07-09 12:44:48 -07:00
Önder Kalacı 40da78c6fd
Introduce the adaptive executor (#2798)
With this commit, we're introducing the Adaptive Executor. 


The commit message consists of two distinct sections. The first part explains
how the executor works. The second part consists of the commit messages of
the individual smaller commits that resulted in this commit. The readers
can search for the each of the smaller commit messages on 
https://github.com/citusdata/citus and can learn more about the history
of the change.

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *
 * adaptive_executor.c
 *
 * The adaptive executor executes a list of tasks (queries on shards) over
 * a connection pool per worker node. The results of the queries, if any,
 * are written to a tuple store.
 *
 * The concepts in the executor are modelled in a set of structs:
 *
 * - DistributedExecution:
 *     Execution of a Task list over a set of WorkerPools.
 * - WorkerPool
 *     Pool of WorkerSessions for the same worker which opportunistically
 *     executes "unassigned" tasks from a queue.
 * - WorkerSession:
 *     Connection to a worker that is used to execute "assigned" tasks
 *     from a queue and may execute unasssigned tasks from the WorkerPool.
 * - ShardCommandExecution:
 *     Execution of a Task across a list of placements.
 * - TaskPlacementExecution:
 *     Execution of a Task on a specific placement.
 *     Used in the WorkerPool and WorkerSession queues.
 *
 * Every connection pool (WorkerPool) and every connection (WorkerSession)
 * have a queue of tasks that are ready to execute (readyTaskQueue) and a
 * queue/set of pending tasks that may become ready later in the execution
 * (pendingTaskQueue). The tasks are wrapped in a ShardCommandExecution,
 * which keeps track of the state of execution and is referenced from a
 * TaskPlacementExecution, which is the data structure that is actually
 * added to the queues and describes the state of the execution of a task
 * on a particular worker node.
 *
 * When the task list is part of a bigger distributed transaction, the
 * shards that are accessed or modified by the task may have already been
 * accessed earlier in the transaction. We need to make sure we use the
 * same connection since it may hold relevant locks or have uncommitted
 * writes. In that case we "assign" the task to a connection by adding
 * it to the task queue of specific connection (in
 * AssignTasksToConnections). Otherwise we consider the task unassigned
 * and add it to the task queue of a worker pool, which means that it
 * can be executed over any connection in the pool.
 *
 * A task may be executed on multiple placements in case of a reference
 * table or a replicated distributed table. Depending on the type of
 * task, it may not be ready to be executed on a worker node immediately.
 * For instance, INSERTs on a reference table are executed serially across
 * placements to avoid deadlocks when concurrent INSERTs take conflicting
 * locks. At the beginning, only the "first" placement is ready to execute
 * and therefore added to the readyTaskQueue in the pool or connection.
 * The remaining placements are added to the pendingTaskQueue. Once
 * execution on the first placement is done the second placement moves
 * from pendingTaskQueue to readyTaskQueue. The same approach is used to
 * fail over read-only tasks to another placement.
 *
 * Once all the tasks are added to a queue, the main loop in
 * RunDistributedExecution repeatedly does the following:
 *
 * For each pool:
 * - ManageWorkPool evaluates whether to open additional connections
 *   based on the number unassigned tasks that are ready to execute
 *   and the targetPoolSize of the execution.
 *
 * Poll all connections:
 * - We use a WaitEventSet that contains all (non-failed) connections
 *   and is rebuilt whenever the set of active connections or any of
 *   their wait flags change.
 *
 *   We almost always check for WL_SOCKET_READABLE because a session
 *   can emit notices at any time during execution, but it will only
 *   wake up WaitEventSetWait when there are actual bytes to read.
 *
 *   We check for WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE just after sending bytes in case
 *   there is not enough space in the TCP buffer. Since a socket is
 *   almost always writable we also use WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE as a
 *   mechanism to wake up WaitEventSetWait for non-I/O events, e.g.
 *   when a task moves from pending to ready.
 *
 * For each connection that is ready:
 * - ConnectionStateMachine handles connection establishment and failure
 *   as well as command execution via TransactionStateMachine.
 *
 * When a connection is ready to execute a new task, it first checks its
 * own readyTaskQueue and otherwise takes a task from the worker pool's
 * readyTaskQueue (on a first-come-first-serve basis).
 *
 * In cases where the tasks finish quickly (e.g. <1ms), a single
 * connection will often be sufficient to finish all tasks. It is
 * therefore not necessary that all connections are established
 * successfully or open a transaction (which may be blocked by an
 * intermediate pgbouncer in transaction pooling mode). It is therefore
 * essential that we take a task from the queue only after opening a
 * transaction block.
 *
 * When a command on a worker finishes or the connection is lost, we call
 * PlacementExecutionDone, which then updates the state of the task
 * based on whether we need to run it on other placements. When a
 * connection fails or all connections to a worker fail, we also call
 * PlacementExecutionDone for all queued tasks to try the next placement
 * and, if necessary, mark shard placements as inactive. If a task fails
 * to execute on all placements, the execution fails and the distributed
 * transaction rolls back.
 *
 * For multi-row INSERTs, tasks are executed sequentially by
 * SequentialRunDistributedExecution instead of in parallel, which allows
 * a high degree of concurrency without high risk of deadlocks.
 * Conversely, multi-row UPDATE/DELETE/DDL commands take aggressive locks
 * which forbids concurrency, but allows parallelism without high risk
 * of deadlocks. Note that this is unrelated to SEQUENTIAL_CONNECTION,
 * which indicates that we should use at most one connection per node, but
 * can run tasks in parallel across nodes. This is used when there are
 * writes to a reference table that has foreign keys from a distributed
 * table.
 *
 * Execution finishes when all tasks are done, the query errors out, or
 * the user cancels the query.
 *
 *-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 */



All the commits involved here:
* Initial unified executor prototype

* Latest changes

* Fix rebase conflicts to master branch

* Add missing variable for assertion

* Ensure that master_modify_multiple_shards() returns the affectedTupleCount

* Adjust intermediate result sizes

The real-time executor uses COPY command to get the results
from the worker nodes. Unified executor avoids that which
results in less data transfer. Simply adjust the tests to lower
sizes.

* Force one connection per placement (or co-located placements) when requested

The existing executors (real-time and router) always open 1 connection per
placement when parallel execution is requested.

That might be useful under certain circumstances:

(a) User wants to utilize as much as CPUs on the workers per
distributed query
(b) User has a transaction block which involves COPY command

Also, lots of regression tests rely on this execution semantics.
So, we'd enable few of the tests with this change as well.

* For parameters to be resolved before using them

For the details, see PostgreSQL's copyParamList()

* Unified executor sorts the returning output

* Ensure that unified executor doesn't ignore sequential execution of DDLJob's

Certain DDL commands, mainly creating foreign keys to reference tables,
should be executed sequentially. Otherwise, we'd end up with a self
distributed deadlock.

To overcome this situaiton, we set a flag `DDLJob->executeSequentially`
and execute it sequentially. Note that we have to do this because
the command might not be called within a transaction block, and
we cannot call `SetLocalMultiShardModifyModeToSequential()`.

This fixes at least two test: multi_insert_select_on_conflit.sql and
multi_foreign_key.sql

Also, I wouldn't mind scattering local `targetPoolSize` variables within
the code. The reason is that we'll soon have a GUC (or a global
variable based on a GUC) that'd set the pool size. In that case, we'd
simply replace `targetPoolSize` with the global variables.

* Fix 2PC conditions for DDL tasks

* Improve closing connections that are not fully established in unified execution

* Support foreign keys to reference tables in unified executor

The idea for supporting foreign keys to reference tables is simple:
Keep track of the relation accesses within a transaction block.
    - If a parallel access happens on a distributed table which
      has a foreign key to a reference table, one cannot modify
      the reference table in the same transaction. Otherwise,
      we're very likely to end-up with a self-distributed deadlock.
    - If an access to a reference table happens, and then a parallel
      access to a distributed table (which has a fkey to the reference
      table) happens, we switch to sequential mode.

Unified executor misses the function calls that marks the relation
accesses during the execution. Thus, simply add the necessary calls
and let the logic kick in.

* Make sure to close the failed connections after the execution

* Improve comments

* Fix savepoints in unified executor.

* Rebuild the WaitEventSet only when necessary

* Unclaim connections on all errors.

* Improve failure handling for unified executor

   - Implement the notion of errorOnAnyFailure. This is similar to
     Critical Connections that the connection managament APIs provide
   - If the nodes inside a modifying transaction expand, activate 2PC
   - Fix few bugs related to wait event sets
   - Mark placement INACTIVE during the execution as much as possible
     as opposed to we do in the COMMIT handler
   - Fix few bugs related to scheduling next placement executions
   - Improve decision on when to use 2PC

Improve the logic to start a transaction block for distributed transactions

- Make sure that only reference table modifications are always
  executed with distributed transactions
- Make sure that stored procedures and functions are executed
  with distributed transactions

* Move waitEventSet to DistributedExecution

This could also be local to RunDistributedExecution(), but in that case
we had to mark it as "volatile" to avoid PG_TRY()/PG_CATCH() issues, and
cast it to non-volatile when doing WaitEventSetFree(). We thought that
would make code a bit harder to read than making this non-local, so we
move it here. See comments for PG_TRY() in postgres/src/include/elog.h
and "man 3 siglongjmp" for more context.

* Fix multi_insert_select test outputs

Two things:
   1) One complex transaction block is now supported. Simply update
      the test output
   2) Due to dynamic nature of the unified executor, the orders of
      the errors coming from the shards might change (e.g., all of
      the queries on the shards would fail, but which one appears
      on the error message?). To fix that, we simply added it to
      our shardId normalization tool which happens just before diff.

* Fix subeury_and_cte test

The error message is updated from:
	failed to execute task
To:
        more than one row returned by a subquery or an expression

which is a lot clearer to the user.

* Fix intermediate_results test outputs

Simply update the error message from:
	could not receive query results
to
	result "squares" does not exist

which makes a lot more sense.

* Fix multi_function_in_join test

The error messages update from:
     Failed to execute task XXX
To:
     function f(..) does not exist

* Fix multi_query_directory_cleanup test

The unified executor does not create any intermediate files.

* Fix with_transactions test

A test case that just started to work fine

* Fix multi_router_planner test outputs

The error message is update from:
	Could not receive query results
To:
	Relation does not exists

which is a lot more clearer for the users

* Fix multi_router_planner_fast_path test

The error message is update from:
	Could not receive query results
To:
	Relation does not exists

which is a lot more clearer for the users

* Fix isolation_copy_placement_vs_modification by disabling select_opens_transaction_block

* Fix ordering in isolation_multi_shard_modify_vs_all

* Add executor locks to unified executor

* Make sure to allocate enought WaitEvents

The previous code was missing the waitEvents for the latch and
postmaster death.

* Fix rebase conflicts for master rebase

* Make sure that TRUNCATE relies on unified executor

* Implement true sequential execution for multi-row INSERTS

Execute the individual tasks executed one by one. Note that this is different than
MultiShardConnectionType == SEQUENTIAL_CONNECTION case (e.g., sequential execution
mode). In that case, running the tasks across the nodes in parallel is acceptable
and implemented in that way.

However, the executions that are qualified here would perform poorly if the
tasks across the workers are executed in parallel. We currently qualify only
one class of distributed queries here, multi-row INSERTs. If we do not enforce
true sequential execution, concurrent multi-row upserts could easily form
a distributed deadlock when the upserts touch the same rows.

* Remove SESSION_LIFESPAN flag in unified_executor

* Apply failure test updates

We've changed the failure behaviour a bit, and also the error messages
that show up to the user. This PR covers majority of the updates.

* Unified executor honors citus.node_connection_timeout

With this commit, unified executor errors out if even
a single connection cannot be established within
citus.node_connection_timeout.

And, as a side effect this fixes failure_connection_establishment
test.

* Properly increment/decrement pool size variables

Before this commit, the idle and active connection
counts were not properly calculated.

* insert_select_executor goes through unified executor.

* Add missing file for task tracker

* Modify ExecuteTaskListExtended()'s signature

* Sort output of INSERT ... SELECT ... RETURNING

* Take partition locks correctly in unified executor

* Alternative implementation for force_max_query_parallelization

* Fix compile warnings in unified executor

* Fix style issues

* Decrement idleConnectionCount when idle connection is lost

* Always rebuild the wait event sets

In the previous implementation, on waitFlag changes, we were only
modifying the wait events. However, we've realized that it might
be an over optimization since (a) we couldn't see any performance
benefits (b) we see some errors on failures and because of (a)
we prefer to disable it now.

* Make sure to allocate enough sized waitEventSet

With multi-row INSERTs, we might have more sessions than
task*workerCount after few calls of RunDistributedExecution()
because the previous sessions would also be alive.

Instead, re-allocate events when the connectino set changes.

* Implement SELECT FOR UPDATE on reference tables

On master branch, we do two extra things on SELECT FOR UPDATE
queries on reference tables:
   - Acquire executor locks
   - Execute the query on all replicas

With this commit, we're implementing the same logic on the
new executor.

* SELECT FOR UPDATE opens transaction block even if SelectOpensTransactionBlock disabled

Otherwise, users would be very confused and their logic is very likely
to break.

* Fix build error

* Fix the newConnectionCount calculation in ManageWorkerPool

* Fix rebase conflicts

* Fix minor test output differences

* Fix citus indent

* Remove duplicate sorts that is added with rebase

* Create distributed table via executor

* Fix wait flags in CheckConnectionReady

* failure_savepoints output for unified executor.

* failure_vacuum output (pg 10) for unified executor.

* Fix WaitEventSetWait timeout in unified executor

* Stabilize failure_truncate test output

* Add an ORDER BY to multi_upsert

* Fix regression test outputs after rebase to master

* Add executor.c comment

* Rename executor.c to adaptive_executor.c

* Do not schedule tasks if the failed placement is not ready to execute

Before the commit, we were blindly scheduling the next placement executions
even if the failed placement is not on the ready queue. Now, we're ensuring
that if failed placement execution is on a failed pool or session where the
execution is on the pendingQueue, we do not schedule the next task. Because
the other placement execution should be already running.

* Implement a proper custom scan node for adaptive executor

- Switch between the executors, add GUC to set the pool size
- Add non-adaptive regression test suites
- Enable CIRCLE CI for non-adaptive tests
- Adjust test output files

* Add slow start interval to the executor

* Expose max_cached_connection_per_worker to user

* Do not start slow when there are cached connections

* Consider ExecutorSlowStartInterval in NextEventTimeout

* Fix memory issues with ReceiveResults().

* Disable executor via TaskExecutorType

* Make sure to execute the tests with the other executor

* Use task_executor_type to enable-disable adaptive executor

* Remove useless code

* Adjust the regression tests

* Add slow start regression test

* Rebase to master

* Fix test failures in adaptive executor.

* Rebase to master - 2

* Improve comments & debug messages

* Set force_max_query_parallelization in isolation_citus_dist_activity

* Force max parallelization for creating shards when asked to use exclusive connection.

* Adjust the default pool size

* Expand description of max_adaptive_executor_pool_size GUC

* Update warnings in FinishRemoteTransactionCommit()

* Improve session clean up at the end of execution

Explicitly list all the states that the execution might end,
otherwise warn.

* Remove MULTI_CONNECTION_WAIT_RETRY which is not used at all

* Add more ORDER BYs to multi_mx_partitioning
2019-06-28 14:04:40 +02:00
Hanefi Onaldi 7e8fd49b94 Create Schemas as superuser on all shard/table creation UDFs
- All the schema creations on the workers will now be  via superuser connections
- If a shard is being repaired or a shard is replicated, we will create the
  schema only in the relevant worker; and in all the other cases where a schema
  creation is needed, we will block operations until we ensure the schema exists
  in all the workers
2019-06-26 17:12:28 +02:00
Onder Kalaci 2b0c4accda Apply feedback 2019-06-19 10:03:58 +02:00
Onder Kalaci 3a04374a9e Refactor relation shard list creation during placement creation
This change is to make further refactoring even simpler such as
using the executor for shard creation.
2019-06-19 10:03:58 +02:00
Onder Kalaci 4fd1fcbbef Refactor shard creation logic
This is a preperation for the new executor, where creating shards
would go through the executor. So, explicitly generate the commands
for further processing.
2019-06-19 10:03:58 +02:00
Marco Slot b3fcf2a48f Deprecate master_modify_multiple_shards 2019-05-24 15:22:06 +02:00
Marco Slot 7fa5d36057 Stop using master_modify_multiple_shards in TRUNCATE 2019-05-24 14:35:46 +02:00
Jason Petersen 71d5d1c865 Enable variable shadowing warnings; fix all
Rather than wait for another place like the previous commit to bite us,
I think we should turn on this warning.
2019-04-30 13:24:25 -06:00
Hadi Moshayedi f4d3b94e22
Fix some of the casts for groupId (#2609)
A small change which partially addresses #2608.
2019-03-05 12:06:44 -08:00
Onder Kalaci 26f569abd8 Make sure to clear PGresult on few places
This leads to a memory leak otherwise.
2019-02-28 13:44:34 +03:00
Jason Petersen 339e6e661e
Remove 9.6 (#2554)
Removes support and code for PostgreSQL 9.6

cr: @velioglu
2019-01-16 13:11:24 -07:00
Hadi Moshayedi 38579d52d0
Speed-up run_command_on_shards(). (#2564)
We were establishing connections synchronously. Establishing
connections asynchronously results in some parallelization, saving
hundreds of milliseconds.

In a test I did, this decreased the query time from 150ms to 40ms.
2018-12-24 08:47:01 -05:00
Nils Dijk 9309e63156
create_distributed_table as user, change table ownership during create 2018-11-29 14:20:42 +01:00
Marco Slot e9a7295ead Add multi-user tests for task-tracker protocol functions 2018-11-23 11:05:09 +01:00
Marco Slot 8e93fe5870 Check schema owner in task_tracker_assign_task 2018-11-23 11:05:09 +01:00
Onder Kalaci 052ba21b19 Make sure to prevent unauthorized users to drop sequences in Citus MX 2018-11-15 18:08:04 +03:00
Marco Slot f383e4f307
Description: Refactor code that handles DDL commands from one file into a module
The file handling the utility functions (DDL) for citus organically grew over time and became unreasonably large. This refactor takes that file and refactored the functionality into separate files per command. Initially modeled after the directory and file layout that can be found in postgres.

Although the size of the change is quite big there are barely any code changes. Only one two functions have been added for readability purposes:

- PostProcessIndexStmt which is extracted from PostProcessUtility
- PostProcessAlterTableStmt which is extracted from multi_ProcessUtility

A README.md has been added to `src/backend/distributed/commands` describing the contents of the module and every file in the module.
We need more documentation around the overloading of the COPY command, for now the boilerplate has been added for people with better knowledge to fill out.
2018-11-14 13:36:27 +01:00
Hadi Moshayedi d3e284dcd6
Use heap_deform_tuple() instead of calling heap_getattr(). (#2464)
After Fast ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a non-NULL default in PG11, physical heaps might not contain all attributes after a ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN happens. heap_getattr() returns NULL when the physical tuple doesn't contain an attribute. So we should use heap_deform_tuple() in these cases, which fills in the missing attributes.

Our catalog tables evolve over time, and an upgrade might involve some ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN commands.

Note that we don't need to worry about postgres catalog tables and we can use heap_getattr() for them, because they only change between major versions.

This also fixes #2453.
2018-11-05 15:11:01 -05:00
Onder Kalaci cdc0d1491c Make sure to use correct execution mode for TRUNCATE
We used to set the execution mode in the truncate trigger. However,
when multiple tables are truncated with a single command, we could
set the execution mode very late. Instead, now set the execution mode
on the utility hook.
2018-09-25 15:35:27 +03:00
Onder Kalaci abc443d7fa Make sure that shard repair considers replication factor 2018-09-21 15:24:49 +03:00
Onder Kalaci c1b5a04f6e Allow partitioned tables with replication factor > 1
With this commit, we all partitioned distributed tables with
replication factor > 1. However, we also have many restrictions.

In summary, we disallow all kinds of modifications (including DDLs)
on the partition tables. Instead, the user is allowed to run the
modifications over the parent table.

The necessity for such a restriction have two aspects:
   - We need to acquire shard resource locks appropriately
   - We need to handle marking partitions INVALID in case
     of any failures. Note that, in theory, the parent table
     should also become INVALID, which is too aggressive.
2018-09-21 14:40:41 +03:00
Murat Tuncer b6930e3db9 Add distributed locking to truncated mx tables
We acquire distributed lock on all mx nodes for truncated
tables before actually doing truncate operation.

This is needed for distributed serialization of the truncate
command without causing a deadlock.
2018-09-21 14:23:19 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 76aa6951c2 Properly send commands to other nodes
We previously implemented OTHER_WORKERS_WITH_METADATA tag. However,
that was wrong. See the related discussion:
     https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/2320

Instead, we switched using OTHER_WORKER_NODES and make the command
that we're running optional such that even if the node is not a
metadata node, we won't be in trouble.
2018-09-10 16:01:30 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 5cf8fbe7b6 Add infrastructure to relation if exists 2018-09-07 14:49:36 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 26e308bf2a Support TRUNCATE from the MX worker nodes
This commit enables support for TRUNCATE on both
distributed table and reference tables.

The basic idea is to acquire lock on the relation by sending
the TRUNCATE command to all metedata worker nodes. We only
skip sending the TRUNCATE command to the node that actually
executus the command to prevent a self-distributed-deadlock.
2018-09-03 14:06:31 +03:00
velioglu 2639149bd8 Enterprise functions about metadata/resource locks 2018-08-27 16:32:20 +03:00
mehmet furkan şahin ef9f38b68d ApplyLogRedaction noop func is added 2018-08-17 14:48:54 -07:00
Onder Kalaci 7fb529aab9 Some stylistic improvements in the foreign keys to reference table
changes.
2018-07-05 23:23:34 +03:00
Nils Dijk c1c8c38dc9 create placeholder for policy ddl 2018-07-05 11:07:01 +02:00
mehmet furkan şahin f7b901e3fd CopyShardForeignConstraintCommandList API change for grouped constraints 2018-07-03 17:05:55 +03:00
mehmet furkan şahin 35eac2318d lock referenced reference table metadata is added
For certain operations in enterprise, we need to lock the
referenced reference table shard distribution metadata
2018-07-03 17:05:55 +03:00
mehmet furkan şahin 4db72c99f6 Specific DDLs are sequentialized when there is FK
-[x] drop constraint
-[x] drop column
-[x] alter column type
-[x] truncate

are sequentialized if there is a foreign constraint from
a distributed table to a reference table on the affected relations
by the above commands.
2018-07-03 17:05:55 +03:00
mehmet furkan şahin 2c5d59f3a8 create_distributed_table in transaction is fixed 2018-07-03 17:05:01 +03:00
mehmet furkan şahin 45f8017f42 create_distributed_table with fk to ref table is implemented 2018-07-03 17:05:01 +03:00
Murat Tuncer 3fc7cdfe6d Apply master_stage_protocol refactoring changes 2018-06-28 11:24:57 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 8ccb8b679e Real-time executor marks multi shard relation accesses before opening connections 2018-06-25 18:40:31 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 2890154420 Make sure that TRUNCATE always opens a DDL access 2018-06-25 18:40:31 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 21038f0d0e Make sure that inter-shard DDL commands are always covers both tables 2018-06-25 18:40:30 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 2f01894589 Track relation accesses using the connection management infrastructure 2018-06-25 18:40:30 +03:00
mehmet furkan şahin d1a3b20115 foreign_constraint_utils is created 2018-06-07 18:19:24 +03:00
Onder Kalaci 336044f2a8 master_modify_multiple_shards() and TRUNCATE honors multi_shard_modification_mode 2018-06-06 12:29:05 +03:00
Marco Slot fd4ff29f2f Add a debug message with distribution column value 2018-06-05 15:09:17 +03:00
Dimitri Fontaine 8b258cbdb0 Lock reads and writes only to the node being updated in master_update_node
Rather than locking out all the writes in the cluster, the function now only
locks out writes that target shards hosted by the node we're updating.
2018-05-09 15:14:20 +02:00
velioglu 32bcd610c1 Support modify queries with multiple tables
With this commit we begin to support modify queries with multiple
tables if these queries are pushdownable.
2018-05-02 16:22:26 +03:00
Marco Slot 2559b84049 Drop shards as current user instead of super user 2018-05-01 09:57:20 +02:00
Murat Tuncer a6fe5ca183 PG11 compatibility update
- changes in ruleutils_11.c is reflected
- vacuum statement api change is handled. We now allow
  multi-table vacuum commands.
- some other function header changes are reflected
- api conflicts between PG11 and earlier versions
  are handled by adding shims in version_compat.h
- various regression tests are fixed due output and
  functionality in PG1
- no change is made to support new features in PG11
  they need to be handled by new commit
2018-04-26 11:29:43 +03:00
Marco Slot 9318aeee6b Allow multiple size function calls per query 2018-04-12 14:16:17 +02:00
Marco Slot ee132c5ead Prune shards once per relation in subquery pushdown 2018-04-10 20:33:07 +02:00