Commit Graph

6 Commits (d1cf7c5104d411f6897ce0ff911dd2632feeea95)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jelte Fennema-Nio 48c62095ff Actually sort includes after cherry-pick 2024-04-17 10:26:50 +02:00
Ahmet Gedemenli 96912d9ba1
Add status column to get_rebalance_progress() (#6403)
DESCRIPTION: Adds status column to get_rebalance_progress()

Introduces a new column named `status` for the function
`get_rebalance_progress()`. For each ongoing shard move, this column
will reveal information about that shard move operation's current
status.

For now, candidate status messages could be one of the below.

* Not Started
* Setting Up
* Copying Data
* Catching Up
* Creating Constraints
* Final Catchup
* Creating Foreign Keys
* Completing
* Completed
2022-10-17 16:55:31 +03:00
Jelte Fennema ca00b63272
Avoid two race conditions in the rebalance progress monitor (#5050)
The first and main issue was that we were putting absolute pointers into
shared memory for the `steps` field of the `ProgressMonitorData`. This
pointer was being overwritten every time a process requested the monitor
steps, which is the only reason why this even worked in the first place.

To quote a part of a relevant stack overflow answer:

> First of all, putting absolute pointers in shared memory segments is
> terrible terible idea - those pointers would only be valid in the
> process that filled in their values. Shared memory segments are not
> guaranteed to attach at the same virtual address in every process.
> On the contrary - they attach where the system deems it possible when
> `shmaddr == NULL` is specified on call to `shmat()`

Source: https://stackoverflow.com/a/10781921/2570866

In this case a race condition occurred when a second process overwrote
the pointer in between the first process its write and read of the steps
field.

This issue is fixed by not storing the pointer in shared memory anymore.
Instead we now calculate it's position every time we need it.

The second race condition I have not been able to trigger, but I found
it while investigating this. This issue was that we published the handle
of the shared memory segment, before we initialized the data in the
steps. This means that during initialization of the data, a call to
`get_rebalance_progress()` could read partial data in an unsynchronized
manner.
2021-06-21 14:03:42 +00:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 94a7e6475c
Remove copyright years (#2918)
* Update year as 2012-2019

* Remove copyright years
2019-10-15 17:44:30 +03:00
Jason Petersen 339e6e661e
Remove 9.6 (#2554)
Removes support and code for PostgreSQL 9.6

cr: @velioglu
2019-01-16 13:11:24 -07:00
Eren Başak a12f1980de Add Progress Tracking Infrastructure
This change adds a general purpose infrastructure to log and monitor
process about long running progresses. It uses
`pg_stat_get_progress_info` infrastructure, introduced with PostgreSQL
9.6 and used for tracking `VACUUM` commands.

This patch only handles the creation of a memory space in dynamic shared
memory, putting its info in `pg_stat_get_progress_info`, fetching the
progress monitors on demand and finalizing the progress tracking.
2017-07-26 14:12:15 +03:00