Commit Graph

212 Commits (dcfd4f7c594c636d421ac1bd895b398d50c692b9)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mehmet Yilmaz be6e79baea Add compatibility for PostgreSQL 18 in various source files 2025-06-12 11:11:13 +00:00
Naisila Puka dce54db494 PG17 compatibility: Resolve compilation issues (#7699)
This PR provides successful compilation against PG17.0.

- Remove ExecFreeExprContext call
Relevant PG commit
d060e921ea5aa47b6265174c32e1128cebdbc3df
d060e921ea

- PG17 uses streaming IO in analyze, fix scan_analyze_next_block function
Relevant PG commit
041b96802efa33d2bc9456f2ad946976b92b5ae1
041b96802e

- Define ObjectClass for PG17+ only since it's removed
Relevant PG commit:
89e5ef7e21812916c9cf9fcf56e45f0f74034656
89e5ef7e21

- Remove ReorderBufferTupleBuf structure.
Relevant PG commit:
08e6344fd6423210b339e92c069bb979ba4e7cd6
08e6344fd6

- Define colliculocale and daticulocale since they have been renamed
Relevant PG commit:
f696c0cd5f299f1b51e214efc55a22a782cc175d
f696c0cd5f

- makeStringConst defined in PG17
Relevant PG commit:
de3600452b61d1bc3967e9e37e86db8956c8f577
de3600452b

- RangeVarCallbackOwnsTable was replaced by RangeVarCallbackMaintainsTable
Relevant PG commit:
ecb0fd33720fab91df1207e85704f382f55e1eb7
ecb0fd3372

- attstattarget is nullable, define pg compatible functions for it
Relevant PG commit:
4f622503d6de975ac87448aea5cea7de4bc140d5
4f622503d6

- stxstattarget is nullable in PG17, write compat functions for it
Relevant PG commit:
012460ee93c304fbc7220e5b55d9d0577fc766ab
012460ee93

- Use ResourceOwner to track WaitEventSet in PG17
Relevant PG commit:
50c67c2019ab9ade8aa8768bfe604cd802fe8591
50c67c2019

- getIdentitySequence now uses Relation instead of relation_id
Relevant PG commit:
509199587df73f06eda898ae13284292f4ae573a
509199587d

- Remove no-op tuplestore_donestoring function
Relevant PG commit:
75680c3d805e2323cd437ac567f0677fdfc7b680
75680c3d80

- MergeAction can have 3 merge kinds (now enum) in PG17, write compat
Relevant PG commit:
0294df2f1f842dfb0eed79007b21016f486a3c6c
0294df2f1f

- EXPLAIN (MEMORY) is added, make changes to ExplainOnePlan
Relevant PG commit:
5de890e3610d5a12cdaea36413d967cf5c544e20
5de890e361

- LIMIT_OPTION_DEFAULT has been removed as it's useless, use LIMIT_OPTION_COUNT
Relevant PG commit:
a6be0600ac3b71dda8277ab0fcbe59ee101ac1ce
a6be0600ac

- write compat for create_foreignscan_path bcs of more arguments in PG17
Relevant PG commit:
9e9931d2bf40e2fea447d779c2e133c2c1256ef3
9e9931d2bf

- pgprocno and lxid have been combined into a struct in PGPROC
Relevant PG commits:
28f3915b73f75bd1b50ba070f56b34241fe53fd1
28f3915b73

ab355e3a88de745607f6dd4c21f0119b5c68f2ad
ab355e3a88

024c521117579a6d356050ad3d78fdc95e44eefa
024c521117

- Simplify CitusNewNode (#7434)
postgres refactored newNode() in PG 17, the main point for doing this is
the original tricks is no longer neccessary for modern compilers[1].
This does the same for Citus.
This should have no backward compatibility issues since it just replaces
palloc0fast with palloc0.
This is good for forward compatibility since palloc0fast no longer
exists in PG 17.
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b51f1fa7-7e6a-4ecc-936d-90a8a1659e7c@iki.fi
(cherry picked from commit 4b295cc)
2025-03-12 11:01:49 +03:00
Naisila Puka 6bd3474804 Rename foreach_ macros to foreach_declared_ macros (#7700)
This is prep work for successful compilation with PG17

PG17added foreach_ptr, foreach_int and foreach_oid macros
Relevant PG commit
14dd0f27d7cd56ffae9ecdbe324965073d01a9ff

14dd0f27d7

We already have these macros, but they are different with the
PG17 ones because our macros take a DECLARED variable, whereas
the PG16 macros declare a locally-scoped loop variable themselves.

Hence I am renaming our macros to foreach_declared_

I am separating this into its own PR since it touches many files. The
main compilation PR is https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/7699
2025-03-12 11:01:49 +03:00
Nils Dijk 0620c8f9a6
Sort includes (#7326)
This change adds a script to programatically group all includes in a
specific order. The script was used as a one time invocation to group
and sort all includes throught our formatted code. The grouping is as
follows:

 - System includes (eg. `#include<...>`)
 - Postgres.h (eg. `#include "postgres.h"`)
- Toplevel imports from postgres, not contained in a directory (eg.
`#include "miscadmin.h"`)
 - General postgres includes (eg . `#include "nodes/..."`)
- Toplevel citus includes, not contained in a directory (eg. `#include
"citus_verion.h"`)
 - Columnar includes (eg. `#include "columnar/..."`)
 - Distributed includes (eg. `#include "distributed/..."`)

Because it is quite hard to understand the difference between toplevel
citus includes and toplevel postgres includes it hardcodes the list of
toplevel citus includes. In the same manner it assumes anything not
prefixed with `columnar/` or `distributed/` as a postgres include.

The sorting/grouping is enforced by CI. Since we do so with our own
script there are not changes required in our uncrustify configuration.
2023-11-23 18:19:54 +01:00
Nils Dijk 0dac63afc0
move pg_version_constants.h to toplevel include (#7335)
In preparation of sorting and grouping all includes we wanted to move
this file to the toplevel includes for good grouping/sorting.
2023-11-09 15:09:39 +00:00
Nils Dijk ce2ba1d07e
Optimize QueryPushdownSqlTaskList on memory and cpu (#6945)
While going over this piece of code (a long time ago) it was bothering
to me we keep a bool array with the size of shardcount to iterate only
over shards present in the list of non-pruned shards. Especially since
we keep min/max of the set shards to optimize iteration.

Postgres has the bitmapset datastructure which a) takes significantly
less space, b) has iterator functions to only iterate over set bits, c)
can efficiently skip long sequences of unset bits and d) stops quickly
once the last set bit has been reached.

I have been contemplating if it is worth to keep the minShardOffset
because of readability and the efficient skipping of unset bits,
however, I have decided to keep it -although less readable-, as there
are known usecases where 100k+ shards are pruned to single digit shards.
If these would end up at the end of `shardcount` a hotloop of zero
checks on the first iteration _could_ cause a theoretical performance
regression.

All in all, this code is using less memory in all cases where it
matters, and less cpu in most cases, while using more idiomatic
datastructures for the task at hand.
2023-06-16 16:06:22 +02:00
Naisila Puka ba40eb363c
Fix some gucs' initial and boot values, and flag combinations (#6957)
PG16beta1 added some sanity checks for GUCS, find the Relevant PG
commits below:

1- Add check on initial and boot values when loading GUCs

a73952b795
2- Extend check_GUC_init() with checks on flag combinations when loading
GUCs

009f8d1714

I fixed our currently problematic GUCS, we can merge this directly into
main as these make sense for any PG version.

There was a particular NodeConninfo issue:
Previously we would rely on the fact that NodeConninfo initial value
is an empty string. However, with PG16 enforcing same initial and boot
values, we can't use an empty initial value for NodeConninfo anymore.
Therefore we add a new flag to indicate whether we are at boot check.
2023-06-14 11:55:52 +03:00
Onur Tirtir fa8870217d
Enable logical planner for single-shard tables (#6950)
* Enable using logical planner for single-shard tables

* Improve non-colocated table error in physical planner

* Favor distributed tables over reference tables when chosing anchor shard
2023-06-08 10:57:23 +03:00
Naisila Puka c2f117c559
Citus Revise tree-walk APIs to include context (#6975)
Without revising there are Warnings in PG16 build

Relevant PG commit

1c27d16e6e
1c27d16e6e5c1f463bbe1e9ece88dda811235165
2023-06-06 14:17:51 +03:00
Naisila Puka 072ae44742
Adjusts query's CoerceViaIO & RelabelType nodes that are improper for deparsing (#6391)
Adjusts query's CoerceViaIO & RelabelType nodes that are
improper for deparsing

The standard planner converts some `::text` casts to `::cstring` and
here we convert back because `cstring` is a pseudotype and it cannot be
casted to most types. This problem occurs in CoerceViaIO nodes.
There was another problem with RelabelType nodes fixed in the following
PR:
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/4580
We undo the changes in that PR, and fix both CoerceViaIO and RelabelType
nodes in the planning phase (not in the deparsing phase in ruleutils)

Fixes https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/5646
Fixes https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/5033
Fixes https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/6061
2023-05-04 16:46:02 +03:00
Onur Tirtir fa467e05e7 Add support for creating distributed tables with a null shard key (#6745)
With this PR, we allow creating distributed tables with without
specifying a shard key via create_distributed_table(). Here are the
the important details about those tables:
* Specifying `shard_count` is not allowed because it is assumed to be 1.
* We mostly call such tables as "null shard-key" table in code /
comments.
* To avoid doing a breaking layout change in create_distributed_table();
instead of throwing an error, it will inform the user that
`distribution_type`
  param is ignored unless it's explicitly set to NULL or  'h'.
* `colocate_with` param allows colocating such null shard-key tables to
  each other.
* We define this table type, i.e., NULL_SHARD_KEY_TABLE, as a subclass
of
  DISTRIBUTED_TABLE because we mostly want to treat them as distributed
  tables in terms of SQL / DDL / operation support.
* Metadata for such tables look like:
  - distribution method => DISTRIBUTE_BY_NONE
  - replication model => REPLICATION_MODEL_STREAMING
- colocation id => **!=** INVALID_COLOCATION_ID (distinguishes from
Citus local tables)
* We assign colocation groups for such tables to different nodes in a
  round-robin fashion based on the modulo of "colocation id".

Note that this PR doesn't care about DDL (except CREATE TABLE) / SQL /
operation (i.e., Citus UDFs) support for such tables but adds a
preliminary
API.
2023-05-03 16:18:27 +03:00
Teja Mupparti 37500806d6 Add appropriate locks for MERGE to run in parallel 2023-03-28 09:45:40 -07:00
Teja Mupparti cf55136281 1) Restrict MERGE command INSERT to the source's distribution column
Fixes #6672

2) Move all MERGE related routines to a new file merge_planner.c

3) Make ConjunctionContainsColumnFilter() static again, and rearrange the code in MergeQuerySupported()
4) Restore the original format in the comments section.
5) Add big serial test. Implement latest set of comments
2023-03-16 13:43:08 -07:00
Teja Mupparti 1e42cd3da0 Support MERGE on distributed tables with restrictions
This implements the phase - II of MERGE sql support

Support routable query where all the tables in the merge-sql are distributed, co-located, and both the source and
target relations are joined on the distribution column with a constant qual. This should be a Citus single-task
query. Below is an example.

SELECT create_distributed_table('t1', 'id');
SELECT create_distributed_table('s1', 'id', colocate_with => ‘t1’);

MERGE INTO t1
USING s1 ON t1.id = s1.id AND t1.id = 100
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET val = s1.val + 10
WHEN MATCHED THEN
DELETE
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT (id, val, src) VALUES (s1.id, s1.val, s1.src)

Basically, MERGE checks to see if

There are a minimum of two distributed tables (source and a target).
All the distributed tables are indeed colocated.
MERGE relations are joined on the distribution column
MERGE .. USING .. ON target.dist_key = source.dist_key
The query should touch only a single shard i.e. JOIN AND with a constant qual
MERGE .. USING .. ON target.dist_key = source.dist_key AND target.dist_key = <>
If any of the conditions are not met, it raises an exception.

(cherry picked from commit 44c387b978)

This implements MERGE phase3

Support pushdown query where all the tables in the merge-sql are Citus-distributed, co-located, and both
the source and target relations are joined on the distribution column. This will generate multiple tasks
which execute independently after pushdown.

SELECT create_distributed_table('t1', 'id');
SELECT create_distributed_table('s1', 'id', colocate_with => ‘t1’);

MERGE INTO t1
USING s1
ON t1.id = s1.id
        WHEN MATCHED THEN
                UPDATE SET val = s1.val + 10
        WHEN MATCHED THEN
                DELETE
        WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
                INSERT (id, val, src) VALUES (s1.id, s1.val, s1.src)

*The only exception for both the phases II and III is, UPDATEs and INSERTs must be done on the same shard-group
as the joined key; for example, below scenarios are NOT supported as the key-value to be inserted/updated is not
guaranteed to be on the same node as the id distribution-column.

MERGE INTO target t
USING source s ON (t.customer_id = s.customer_id)
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN - -
     INSERT(customer_id, …) VALUES (<non-local-constant-key-value>, ……);

OR this scenario where we update the distribution column itself

MERGE INTO target t
USING source s On (t.customer_id = s.customer_id)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
     UPDATE SET customer_id = 100;

(cherry picked from commit fa7b8949a8)
2023-03-16 13:43:08 -07:00
Onur Tirtir 20a5f3af2b
Replace CITUS_TABLE_WITH_NO_DIST_KEY checks with HasDistributionKey() (#6743)
Now that we will soon add another table type having DISTRIBUTE_BY_NONE
as distribution method and that we want the code to interpret such
tables mostly as distributed tables, let's make the definition of those
other two table types more strict by removing
CITUS_TABLE_WITH_NO_DIST_KEY
macro.

And instead, use HasDistributionKey() check in the places where the
logic applies to all table types that have / don't have a distribution
key. In future PRs, we might want to convert some of those
HasDistributionKey() checks if logic only applies to Citus local /
reference tables, not the others.

And adding HasDistributionKey() also allows us to consider having
DISTRIBUTE_BY_NONE as the distribution method as a "table attribute"
that can apply to distributed tables too, rather something that
determines the table type.
2023-03-10 13:55:52 +03:00
Onur Tirtir e3cf7ace7c
Stabilize single_node.sql and others that report illegal node removal (#6751)
See
https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/citusdata/citus/30859/workflows/223d61db-8c1d-4909-9aea-d8e470f0368b/jobs/1009243.
2023-03-08 15:25:36 +03:00
Teja Mupparti 0824d9c1fb Miscellaneous cleanup 2023-02-09 13:05:59 -08:00
Marco Slot a482b36760
Revert "Support MERGE on distributed tables with restrictions" (#6675)
Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
2023-01-30 15:01:59 +01:00
Teja Mupparti 44c387b978 Support MERGE on distributed tables with restrictions
This implements the phase - II of MERGE sql support

Support routable query where all the tables in the merge-sql are distributed, co-located, and both the source and
target relations are joined on the distribution column with a constant qual. This should be a Citus single-task
query. Below is an example.

SELECT create_distributed_table('t1', 'id');
SELECT create_distributed_table('s1', 'id', colocate_with => ‘t1’);

MERGE INTO t1
USING s1 ON t1.id = s1.id AND t1.id = 100
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET val = s1.val + 10
WHEN MATCHED THEN
DELETE
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT (id, val, src) VALUES (s1.id, s1.val, s1.src)

Basically, MERGE checks to see if

There are a minimum of two distributed tables (source and a target).
All the distributed tables are indeed colocated.
MERGE relations are joined on the distribution column
MERGE .. USING .. ON target.dist_key = source.dist_key
The query should touch only a single shard i.e. JOIN AND with a constant qual
MERGE .. USING .. ON target.dist_key = source.dist_key AND target.dist_key = <>
If any of the conditions are not met, it raises an exception.
2023-01-18 11:05:27 -08:00
Teja Mupparti 9a9989fc15 Support MERGE Phase – I
All the tables (target, source or any CTE present) in the SQL statement are local i.e. a merge-sql with a combination of Citus local and
Non-Citus tables (regular Postgres tables) should work and give the same result as Postgres MERGE on regular tables. Catch and throw an
exception (not-yet-supported) for all other scenarios during Citus-planning phase.
2022-12-18 20:32:15 -08:00
aykut-bozkurt 9c0073ba57
remove unused boundary type (#6563)
Removes unused job boundary tag `SUBQUERY_MAP_MERGE_JOB`.

Only usage is at `BuildMapMergeJob`, which is only called when the
boundary = `JOIN_MAP_MERGE_JOB`. Hence, it should be safe to remove.
2022-12-16 18:19:22 +03:00
Marco Slot ac07d33a29
Remove unused reduceQuery from physical planning (#6221)
Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
2022-08-24 17:24:27 +00:00
Marco Slot 639588bee0
Remove unused functions (#6220)
Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
2022-08-22 11:53:25 +03:00
Naisila Puka 7d6410c838
Drop postgres 12 support (#6040)
* Remove if conditions with PG_VERSION_NUM < 13

* Remove server_above_twelve(&eleven) checks from tests

* Fix tests

* Remove pg12 and pg11 alternative test output files

* Remove pg12 specific normalization rules

* Some more if conditions in the code

* Change RemoteCollationIdExpression and some pg12/pg13 comments

* Remove some more normalization rules
2022-07-20 17:49:36 +03:00
Jeff Davis 3799f95742 PG15: Value -> String, Integer, Float.
Handle PG commit 639a86e36a.
2022-05-02 10:12:03 -07:00
Marco Slot 8c8c3b665d Add TABLESAMPLE support 2022-04-01 15:51:40 +02:00
Jelte Fennema 3a44fa827a
Add versions of forboth that don't need ListCell (#5856)
We've had custom versions of Postgres its `foreach` macro which with a
hidden ListCell for quite some time now. People like these custom
macros, because they are easier to use and require less boilerplate.
This adds similar custom versions of Postgres its `forboth` macro. Now
you don't need ListCells anymore when looping over two lists at the same
time.
2022-03-23 14:50:36 +03:00
Marco Slot ef1ceb3953 Only use a single placement for map tasks 2022-02-23 19:40:21 +01:00
Marco Slot 3cd9aa655a Stop using citus.binary_worker_copy_format 2022-02-23 19:40:21 +01:00
Marco Slot 5ac0d31e8b Fix re-partition hash range generation 2022-02-23 19:40:21 +01:00
Marco Slot 72d8fde28b Use intermediate results for re-partition joins 2022-02-23 19:40:21 +01:00
Onder Kalaci 121f5c4271 Active placements can only be on active nodes
We re-define the meaning of active shard placement. It used
to only be defined via shardstate == SHARD_STATE_ACTIVE.

Now, we also add one more check. The worker node that the
placement is on should be active as well.

This is a preparation for supporting citus_disable_node()
for MX with multiple failures at the same time.

With this change, the maintanince daemon only needs to
sync the "node metadata" (e.g., pg_dist_node), not the
shard metadata.
2021-11-26 09:14:33 +01:00
Marco Slot 93e79b9262 Never allow co-located joins of append-distributed tables 2021-10-18 21:11:16 +02:00
Marco Slot b97e5081c7 Disable co-located joins for append-distributed tables 2021-10-18 21:11:16 +02:00
Onder Kalaci 2c349e6dfd Use current user to sync metadata
Before this commit, we always synced the metadata with superuser.
However, that creates various edge cases such as visibility errors
or self distributed deadlocks or complicates user access checks.

Instead, with this commit, we use the current user to sync the metadata.
Note that, `start_metadata_sync_to_node` still requires super user
because accessing certain metadata (like pg_dist_node) always require
superuser (e.g., the current user should be a superuser).

However, metadata syncing operations regarding the distributed
tables can now be done with regular users, as long as the user
is the owner of the table. A table owner can still insert non-sense
metadata, however it'd only affect its own table. So, we cannot do
anything about that.
2021-07-16 13:25:27 +02:00
Sait Talha Nisanci e7ed16c296 Not include to-be-deleted shards while finding shard placements
Ignore orphaned shards in more places

Only use active shard placements in RouterInsertTaskList

Use IncludingOrphanedPlacements in some more places

Fix comment

Add tests
2021-06-28 13:05:31 +03:00
Marco Slot 4b49cb112f Fix FROM ONLY queries on partitioned tables 2021-04-27 16:10:07 +02:00
Ahmet Gedemenli 840c879572 Remove redundant if statement for schema name 2021-04-06 10:29:17 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 03832f353c Drop postgres 11 support 2021-03-25 09:20:28 +03:00
Önder Kalacı 0fe26a216c
Prevent cross join without any target list entries (#4750)
/*
 * The physical planner assumes that all worker queries would have
 * target list entries based on the fact that at least the column
 * on the JOINs have to be on the target list. However, there is
 * an exception to that if there is a cartesian product join and
 * there is no additional target list entries belong to one side
 * of the JOIN. Once we support cartesian product join, we should
 * remove this error.
 */
2021-02-26 11:04:21 +01:00
Ahmet Gedemenli 5dd2a3da03 Convert RelabelTypes into CollateExprs in get_rule_expr function 2021-02-05 12:06:46 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 738825cc38
Fix partition column index issue (#4591)
* Fix partition column index issue

We send column names to worker_hash/range_partition_table methods, and
in these methods we check the column name index from tuple descriptor.
Then this index is used to decide the bucket that the current row will
be sent for the repartition.

This becomes a problem when there are the same column names in the
tupleDescriptor. Then we can choose the wrong index. Hence the
partitioned data will be put to wrong workers. Then the result could
miss some data because workers might contain different range of data.

An example:
TupleDescriptor contains "trip_id", "car_id", "car_id" for one table.
It contains only "car_id" for the other table. And assuming that the
tables will be partitioned by car_id, it is not certain what should be
used for deciding the bucket number for the first table. Assuming value
2 goes to bucket 2 and value 3 goes to bucket 3, it is not certain which
bucket "1 2 3" (trip_id, car_id, car_id)  row will go to.

As a solution we send the index of partition column in targetList
instead of the column name.

The old API is kept so that if workers upgrade work, it still works
(though it will have the same bug)

* Use the same method so that backporting is easier
2021-01-29 14:40:40 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 0e53aa5d3b Add more tests 2020-12-15 18:18:36 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci f5dd5379b2 Add more tests 2020-12-15 18:18:36 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 3aed6c3ad0 Rename containsOnlyLocalTable as isLocalTableModification
Update error message in Modify View
2020-12-15 18:18:36 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 13c43d5744 Improve table conversion logic in dist-local joins 2020-12-15 18:18:36 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 5618f3a3fc Use BaseRestrictInfo for finding equality columns
Baseinfo also has pushed down filters etc, so it makes more sense to use
BaseRestrictInfo to determine what columns have constant equality
filters.

Also RteIdentity is used for removing conversion candidates instead of
rteIndex.
2020-12-15 18:18:36 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 28c5b6a425 Convert some hard coded errors to deferred errors in router planner 2020-12-15 18:18:36 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 5693cabc41 Not convert an already routable plannable query
We should not recursively plan an already routable plannable query. An
example of this is (SELECT * FROM local JOIN (SELECT * FROM dist) d1
USING(a));

So we let the recursive planner do all of its work and at the end we
convert the final query to to handle unsupported joins. While doing each
conversion, we check if it is router plannable, if so we stop.

Only consider range table entries that are in jointree

If a range table is not in jointree then there is no point in
considering that because we are trying to convert range table entries to
subqueries for join use case.
2020-12-15 18:17:10 +03:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 44953579cf Enable citus-local distributed table joins
Check equality in quals

We want to recursively plan distributed tables only if they have an
equality filter on a unique column. So '>' and '<' operators will not
trigger recursive planning of distributed tables in local-distributed
table joins.

Recursively plan distributed table only if the filter is constant

If the filter is not a constant then the join might return multiple rows
and there is a chance that the distributed table will return huge data.
Hence if the filter is not constant we choose to recursively plan the
local table.
2020-12-15 18:17:10 +03:00