This commit also has to do with renaming of
daticulocale to datlocale
Relevant PG commit:
f696c0cd5f299f1b51e214efc55a22a782cc175d
f696c0cd5f
Keeping this commit separate from the previous one because
these changes will be different once we drop PG15 support.
For now I renamed pg_ge_15_options to pg_ge_15_17_options
and together with it I changed the meaning of the variable.
However when we drop PG14 support, we will use pg_ge_17_options
and delete pg_ge_15_options altogether
PG 17 added support for DEFAULT in ALTER TABLE .. SET ACCESS METHOD
Relevant PG commit:
d61a6cad6418f643a5773352038d0dfe5d3535b8
d61a6cad64
In that case, name in AlterTableCmd would be null.
Add a null check here to avoid crash.
In PG17, the outer loop in acquire_sample_rows() changed
from
while (BlockSampler_HasMore(&bs))
to
while (table_scan_analyze_next_block(scan, stream))
Relevant PG commit:
041b96802efa33d2bc9456f2ad946976b92b5ae1
041b96802e
It is expected that the scan_analyze_next_block function will
check if there are any blocks left. So we add that check in
columnar_scan_analyze_next_block
PG17 added foreach_ptr, foreach_int and foreach_oid macros
Relevant PG commit
14dd0f27d7cd56ffae9ecdbe324965073d01a9ff
14dd0f27d7
We already have these macros, but they are different with the
PG17 ones because our macros take a DECLARED variable, whereas
the PG16 macros declare a locally-scoped loop variable themselves.
Hence I am renaming our macros to foreach_declared_
We move the CI images to the github container registry.
Given we mostly (if not solely) run these containers on github actions
infra it makes sense to have them hosted closer to where they are
needed.
Image changes: https://github.com/citusdata/the-process/pull/157
The sections about the rebalancer algorithm and the backround tasks were
empty.
---------
Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven Sheehy <17552371+steven-sheehy@users.noreply.github.com>
Related to issue #7619, #7620
Merge command fails when source query is single sharded and source and
target are co-located and insert is not using distribution key of
source.
Example
```
CREATE TABLE source (id integer);
CREATE TABLE target (id integer );
-- let's distribute both table on id field
SELECT create_distributed_table('source', 'id');
SELECT create_distributed_table('target', 'id');
MERGE INTO target t
USING ( SELECT 1 AS somekey
FROM source
WHERE source.id = 1) s
ON t.id = s.somekey
WHEN NOT MATCHED
THEN INSERT (id)
VALUES (s.somekey)
ERROR: MERGE INSERT must use the source table distribution column value
HINT: MERGE INSERT must use the source table distribution column value
```
Author's Opinion: If join is not between source and target distributed
column, we should not force user to use source distributed column while
inserting value of target distributed column.
Fix: If user is not using distributed key of source for insertion let's
not push down query to workers and don't force user to use source
distributed column if it is not part of join.
This reverts commit fa4fc0b372.
Co-authored-by: paragjain <paragjain@microsoft.com>
Mehmet YILMAZ
naisila
Parag Jain
Nils Dijk
Jelte Fennema-Nio