Commit Graph

6 Commits (e0ccd155abc93323cba49b49acf55788f7d84579)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gokhan Gulbiz e0ccd155ab
Make citus_stat_tenants work with schema-based tenants. (#6936)
DESCRIPTION: Enabling citus_stat_tenants to support schema-based
tenants.

This pull request modifies the existing logic to enable tenant
monitoring with schema-based tenants. The changes made are as follows:

- If a query has a partitionKeyValue (which serves as a tenant
key/identifier for distributed tables), Citus annotates the query with
both the partitionKeyValue and colocationId. This allows for accurate
tracking of the query.
- If a query does not have a partitionKeyValue, but its colocationId
belongs to a distributed schema, Citus annotates the query with only the
colocationId. The tenant monitor can then easily look up the schema to
determine if it's a distributed schema and make a decision on whether to
track the query.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <jelte.fennema@microsoft.com>
2023-06-13 14:11:45 +03:00
Marco Slot 72d8fde28b Use intermediate results for re-partition joins 2022-02-23 19:40:21 +01:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 738825cc38
Fix partition column index issue (#4591)
* Fix partition column index issue

We send column names to worker_hash/range_partition_table methods, and
in these methods we check the column name index from tuple descriptor.
Then this index is used to decide the bucket that the current row will
be sent for the repartition.

This becomes a problem when there are the same column names in the
tupleDescriptor. Then we can choose the wrong index. Hence the
partitioned data will be put to wrong workers. Then the result could
miss some data because workers might contain different range of data.

An example:
TupleDescriptor contains "trip_id", "car_id", "car_id" for one table.
It contains only "car_id" for the other table. And assuming that the
tables will be partitioned by car_id, it is not certain what should be
used for deciding the bucket number for the first table. Assuming value
2 goes to bucket 2 and value 3 goes to bucket 3, it is not certain which
bucket "1 2 3" (trip_id, car_id, car_id)  row will go to.

As a solution we send the index of partition column in targetList
instead of the column name.

The old API is kept so that if workers upgrade work, it still works
(though it will have the same bug)

* Use the same method so that backporting is easier
2021-01-29 14:40:40 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci b3af63c8ce
Remove task tracker executor (#3850)
* use adaptive executor even if task-tracker is set

* Update check-multi-mx tests for adaptive executor

Basically repartition joins are enabled where necessary. For parallel
tests max adaptive executor pool size is decresed to 2, otherwise we
would get too many clients error.

* Update limit_intermediate_size test

It seems that when we use adaptive executor instead of task tracker, we
exceed the intermediate result size less in the test. Therefore updated
the tests accordingly.

* Update multi_router_planner

It seems that there is one problem with multi_router_planner when we use
adaptive executor, we should fix the following error:
+ERROR:  relation "authors_range_840010" does not exist
+CONTEXT:  while executing command on localhost:57637

* update repartition join tests for check-multi

* update isolation tests for repartitioning

* Error out if shard_replication_factor > 1 with repartitioning

As we are removing the task tracker, we cannot switch to it if
shard_replication_factor > 1. In that case, we simply error out.

* Remove MULTI_EXECUTOR_TASK_TRACKER

* Remove multi_task_tracker_executor

Some utility methods are moved to task_execution_utils.c.

* Remove task tracker protocol methods

* Remove task_tracker.c methods

* remove unused methods from multi_server_executor

* fix style

* remove task tracker specific tests from worker_schedule

* comment out task tracker udf calls in tests

We were using task tracker udfs to test permissions in
multi_multiuser.sql. We should find some other way to test them, then we
should remove the commented out task tracker calls.

* remove task tracker test from follower schedule

* remove task tracker tests from multi mx schedule

* Remove task-tracker specific functions from worker functions

* remove multi task tracker extra schedule

* Remove unused methods from multi physical planner

* remove task_executor_type related things in tests

* remove LoadTuplesIntoTupleStore

* Do initial cleanup for repartition leftovers

During startup, task tracker would call TrackerCleanupJobDirectories and
TrackerCleanupJobSchemas to clean up leftover directories and job
schemas. With adaptive executor, while doing repartitions it is possible
to leak these things as well. We don't retry cleanups, so it is possible
to have leftover in case of errors.

TrackerCleanupJobDirectories is renamed as
RepartitionCleanupJobDirectories since it is repartition specific now,
however TrackerCleanupJobSchemas cannot be used currently because it is
task tracker specific. The thing is that this function is a no-op
currently.

We should add cleaning up intermediate schemas to DoInitialCleanup
method when that problem is solved(We might want to solve it in this PR
as well)

* Revert "remove task tracker tests from multi mx schedule"

This reverts commit 03ecc0a681.

* update multi mx repartition parallel tests

* not error with task_tracker_conninfo_cache_invalidate

* not run 4 repartition queries in parallel

It seems that when we run 4 repartition queries in parallel we get too
many clients error on CI even though we don't get it locally. Our guess
is that, it is because we open/close many connections without doing some
work and postgres has some delay to close the connections. Hence even
though connections are removed from the pg_stat_activity, they might
still not be closed. If the above assumption is correct, it is unlikely
for it to happen in practice because:
- There is some network latency in clusters, so this leaves some times
for connections to be able to close
- Repartition joins return some data and that also leaves some time for
connections to be fully closed.

As we don't get this error in our local, we currently assume that it is
not a bug. Ideally this wouldn't happen when we get rid of the
task-tracker repartition methods because they don't do any pruning and
might be opening more connections than necessary.

If this still gives us "too many clients" error, we can try to increase
the max_connections in our test suite(which is 100 by default).

Also there are different places where this error is given in postgres,
but adding some backtrace it seems that we get this from
ProcessStartupPacket. The backtraces can be found in this link:
https://circleci.com/gh/citusdata/citus/138702

* Set distributePlan->relationIdList when it is needed

It seems that we were setting the distributedPlan->relationIdList after
JobExecutorType is called, which would choose task-tracker if
replication factor > 1 and there is a repartition query. However, it
uses relationIdList to decide if the query has a repartition query, and
since it was not set yet, it would always think it is not a repartition
query and would choose adaptive executor when it should choose
task-tracker.

* use adaptive executor even with shard_replication_factor > 1

It seems that we were already using adaptive executor when
replication_factor > 1. So this commit removes the check.

* remove multi_resowner.c and deprecate some settings

* remove TaskExecution related leftovers

* change deprecated API error message

* not recursively plan single relatition repartition subquery

* recursively plan single relation repartition subquery

* test depreceated task tracker functions

* fix overlapping shard intervals in range-distributed test

* fix error message for citus_metadata_container

* drop task-tracker deprecated functions

* put the implemantation back to worker_cleanup_job_schema_cachesince citus cloud uses it

* drop some functions, add downgrade script

Some deprecated functions are dropped.
Downgrade script is added.
Some gucs are deprecated.
A new guc for repartition joins bucket size is added.

* order by a test to fix flappiness
2020-07-18 13:11:36 +03:00
Nils Dijk a77ed9cd23
Refactor master query to be planned by postgres' planner (#3326)
DESCRIPTION: Replace the query planner for the coordinator part with the postgres planner

Closes #2761 

Citus had a simple rule based planner for the query executed on the query coordinator. This planner grew over time with the addigion of SQL support till it was getting close to the functionality of the postgres planner. Except the code was brittle and its complexity rose which made it hard to add new SQL support.

Given its resemblance with the postgres planner it was a long outstanding wish to replace our hand crafted planner with the well supported postgres planner. This patch replaces our planner with a call to postgres' planner.

Due to the functionality of the postgres planner we needed to support both projections and filters/quals on the citus custom scan node. When a sort operation is planned above the custom scan it might require fields to be reordered in the custom scan before returning the tuple (projection). The postgres planner assumes every custom scan node implements projections. Because we controlled the plan that was created we prevented reordering in the custom scan and never had implemented it before.

A same optimisation applies to having clauses that could have been where clauses. Instead of applying the filter as a having on the aggregate it will push it down into the plan which could reach a custom scan node.

For both filters and projections we have implemented them when tuples are read from the tuple store. If no projections or filters are required it will directly return the tuple from the tuple store. Otherwise it will loop tuples from the tuple store through the filter and projection until a tuple is found and returned.

Besides filters being pushed down a side effect of having quals that could have been a where clause is that a call to read intermediate result could be called before the first tuple is fetched from the custom scan. This failed because the intermediate result would only be pulled to the coordinator on the first tuple fetch. To overcome this problem we do run the distributed subplans now before we run the postgres executor. This ensures the intermediate result is present on the coordinator in time. We do account for total time instrumentation by removing the instrumentation before handing control to the psotgres executor and update the timings our self.

For future SQL support it is enough to create a valid query structure for the part of the query to be executed on the query coordinating node. As a utility we do serialise and print the query at debug level4 for engineers to inspect what kind of query is being planned on the query coordinator.
2020-02-25 14:39:56 +01:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 7ff4ce2169
Add adaptive executor support for repartition joins (#3169)
* WIP

* wip

* add basic logic to run a single job with repartioning joins with adaptive executor

* fix some warnings and return in ExecuteDependedTasks if there is none

* Add the logic to run depended jobs in adaptive executor

The execution of depended tasks logic is changed. With the current
logic:
- All tasks are created from the top level task list.
- At one iteration:
	- CurTasks whose dependencies are executed are found.
	- CurTasks are executed in parallel with adapter executor main
logic.
- The iteration is repeated until all tasks are completed.

* Separate adaptive executor repartioning logic

* Remove duplicate parts

* cleanup directories and schemas

* add basic repartion tests for adaptive executor

* Use the first placement to fetch data

In task tracker, when there are replicas, we try to fetch from a replica
for which a map task is succeeded. TaskExecution is used for this,
however TaskExecution is not used in adaptive executor. So we cannot use
the same thing as task tracker.

Since adaptive executor fails when a map task fails (There is no retry
logic yet). We know that if we try to execute a fetch task, all of its
map tasks already succeeded, so we can just use the first one to fetch
from.

* fix clean directories logic

* do not change the search path while creating a udf

* Enable repartition joins with adaptive executor with only enable_reparitition_joins guc

* Add comments to adaptive_executor_repartition

* dont run adaptive executor repartition test in paralle with other tests

* execute cleanup only in the top level execution

* do cleanup only in the top level ezecution

* not begin a transaction if repartition query is used

* use new connections for repartititon specific queries

New connections are opened to send repartition specific queries. The
opened connections will be closed at the FinishDistributedExecution.

While sending repartition queries no transaction is begun so that
we can see all changes.

* error if a modification was done prior to repartition execution

* not start a transaction if a repartition query and sql task, and clean temporary files and schemas at each subplan level

* fix cleanup logic

* update tests

* add missing function comments

* add test for transaction with DDL before repartition query

* do not close repartition connections in adaptive executor

* rollback instead of commit in repartition join test

* use close connection instead of shutdown connection

* remove unnecesary connection list, ensure schema owner before removing directory

* rename ExecuteTaskListRepartition

* put fetch query string in planner not executor as we currently support only replication factor = 1 with adaptive executor and repartition query and we know the query string in the planner phase in that case

* split adaptive executor repartition to DAG execution logic and repartition logic

* apply review items

* apply review items

* use an enum for remote transaction state and fix cleanup for repartition

* add outside transaction flag to find connections that are unclaimed instead of always opening a new transaction

* fix style

* wip

* rename removejobdir to partition cleanup

* do not close connections at the end of repartition queries

* do repartition cleanup in pg catch

* apply review items

* decide whether to use transaction or not at execution creation

* rename isOutsideTransaction and add missing comment

* not error in pg catch while doing cleanup

* use replication factor of the creation time, not current time to decide if task tracker should be chosen

* apply review items

* apply review items

* apply review item
2019-12-17 19:09:45 +03:00