Commit Graph

76 Commits (ee0cd756485c32bf630a32a38c9e465d95aecabc)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marco Slot fba93df4b0 Remove copy into new append shard logic 2021-11-07 21:01:40 +01:00
Halil Ozan Akgul a8f3f712cc Turns mx on in isolations tests 2021-11-04 17:12:30 +03:00
Marco Slot 096660d61d Remove master_apply_delete_command 2021-10-18 22:29:37 +02:00
Halil Ozan Akgul 9c9d4b5eeb Turn MX on by default 2021-10-08 18:17:21 +03:00
Naisila Puka d0390af72d
Add fix_partition_shard_index_names udf to fix currently broken names (#5291)
* Add udf to include shardId in broken partition shard index names

* Address reviews: rename index such that operations can be done on it

* More comprehensive index tests

* Final touches and formatting
2021-10-07 19:34:52 +03:00
Naisila Puka e5b32b2c3c
Acquire AccessShareLock before updating table statistics (#5155) 2021-08-12 13:58:15 +03:00
Jelte Fennema 10f06ad753 Fetch shard size on the fly for the rebalance monitor
Without this change the rebalancer progress monitor gets the shard sizes
from the `shardlength` column in `pg_dist_placement`. This column needs to
be updated manually by calling `citus_update_table_statistics`.
However, `citus_update_table_statistics` could lead to distributed
deadlocks while database traffic is on-going (see #4752).

To work around this we don't use `shardlength` column anymore. Instead
for every rebalance we now fetch all shard sizes on the fly.

Two additional things this does are:
1. It adds tests for the rebalance progress function.
2. If a shard move cannot be done because a source or target node is
   unreachable, then we error in stop the rebalance, instead of showing
   a warning and continuing. When using the by_disk_size rebalance
   strategy it's not safe to continue with other moves if a specific
   move failed. It's possible that the failed move made space for the
   next move, and because the failed move never happened this space now
   does not exist.
3. Adds two new columns to the result of `get_rebalancer_progress` which
   shows the size of the shard on the source and target node.

Fixes #4930
2021-05-20 16:38:17 +02:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 93c2dcf3d2
Fix data-race with concurrent calls of DropMarkedShards (#4909)
* Fix problews with concurrent calls of DropMarkedShards

When trying to enable `citus.defer_drop_after_shard_move` by default it
turned out that DropMarkedShards was not safe to call concurrently.
This could especially cause big problems when also moving shards at the
same time. During tests it was possible to trigger a state where a shard
that was moved would not be available on any of the nodes anymore after
the move.

Currently DropMarkedShards is only called in production by the
maintenaince deamon. Since this is only a single process triggering such
a race is currently impossible in production settings. In future changes
we will want to call DropMarkedShards from other places too though.

* Add some isolation tests

Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
2021-04-21 10:59:48 +03:00
Hadi Moshayedi bc01c795a2 Reland #4419 2021-01-19 07:48:47 -08:00
Marco Slot 011283122b Add the shard rebalancer implementation 2021-01-07 16:51:55 +01:00
Marco Slot 47c1b19174 Revert "Do metadata sync in a separate background worker."
This reverts commit 4df723cf9b.
2021-01-07 10:30:04 +01:00
Hadi Moshayedi 4df723cf9b Do metadata sync in a separate background worker. 2020-12-24 08:25:55 -08:00
Onur Tirtir 17cc810372 Implement "citus local table" creation logic 2020-09-09 11:50:48 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul 375310b7f1 Adds support for table undistribution 2020-08-05 14:36:03 +03:00
Jelte Fennema 8ab47f4f37
Add a CI check to see if all tests are part of a schedule (#3959)
I recently forgot to add tests to a schedule in two of my PRs. One of
these was caught by review, but the other one was not. This adds a
script to causes CI to ensure that each test in the repo is included in
at least one schedule.

Three tests were found that were currently not part of a schedule. This PR
adds those three tests to a schedule as well and it also fixes some small
issues with these tests.
2020-07-03 11:34:55 +02:00
Nils Dijk 1d6ba1d09e
Refactor alter role to work on distributed roles (#3739)
DESCRIPTION: Alter role only works for citus managed roles

Alter role was implemented before we implemented good role management that hooks into the object propagation framework. This is a refactor of all alter role commands that have been implemented to
 - be on by default
 - only work for supported roles
 - make the citus extension owner a supported role

Instead of distributing the alter role commands for roles at the beginning of the node activation role it now _only_ executes the alter role commands for all users in all databases and in the current database.

In preparation of full role support small refactors have been done in the deparser.

Earlier tests targeting other roles than the citus extension owner have been either slightly changed or removed to be put back where we have full role support.

Fixes #2549
2020-04-16 12:23:27 +02:00
Onder Kalaci aa6b641828 Throttle connections to the worker nodes
With this commit, we're introducing a new infrastructure to throttle
connections to the worker nodes. This infrastructure is useful for
multi-shard queries, router queries are have not been affected by this.

The goal is to prevent establishing more than citus.max_shared_pool_size
number of connections per worker node in total, across sessions.

To do that, we've introduced a new connection flag OPTIONAL_CONNECTION.
The idea is that some connections are optional such as the second
(and further connections) for the adaptive executor. A single connection
is enough to finish the distributed execution, the others are useful to
execute the query faster. Thus, they can be consider as optional connections.
When an optional connection is not allowed to the adaptive executor, it
simply skips it and continues the execution with the already established
connections. However, it'll keep retrying to establish optional
connections, in case some slots are open again.
2020-04-14 10:27:48 +02:00
Hadi Moshayedi 3258d87f3e Isolation tests for INSERT/SELECT repartition 2020-01-16 23:24:52 -08:00
SaitTalhaNisanci 8e5041885d Refactor isolation tests (#3062)
Currently in mx isolation tests the setup is the same except the creation of tables. Isolation framework lets us define multiple `setup` stages, therefore I thought that we can put the `mx_setup` to one file and prepend this prior to running tests. 

How the structure works:
- cpp is used before running isolation tests to preprocess spec files. This way we can include any file we want to. Currently this is used to include mx common part.
- spec files are put to `/build/specs` for clear separation between generated files and template files
- a symbolic link is created for `/expected` in `build/expected/`.
- when running isolation tests, as the `inputdir`, `build` is passed so it runs the spec files from `build/specs` and checks the expected output from `build/expected`.

`/specs` is renamed as `/spec` because postgres first look at the `specs` file under current directory, so this is renamed to avoid that since we are running the isolation tests from `build/specs` now.

Note: now we use `//` instead of `#` in comments in spec files, because cpp interprets `#` as a directive and it ignores `//`.
2019-12-10 16:12:54 +01:00
Onur TIRTIR 26c306d188
Add extensions to distributed object propagation infrastructure (#3185) 2019-11-19 17:56:28 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul 5ae7b219ff Create the ALTER ROLE propagation 2019-11-18 18:31:28 +03:00
Hadi Moshayedi 15af1637aa Replicate reference tables to coordinator. 2019-11-15 05:50:19 -08:00
Jelte Fennema 78e495e030
Add shouldhaveshards to pg_dist_node (#2960)
This is an improvement over #2512.

This adds the boolean shouldhaveshards column to pg_dist_node. When it's false, create_distributed_table for new collocation groups will not create shards on that node. Reference tables will still be created on nodes where it is false.
2019-10-22 16:47:16 +02:00
Philip Dubé 7ffd78b6e0 isolation_multiuser_locking
Introduce a test which checks that locks are only acquired when a user has necessary permissions
Currently tests REINDEX, CREATE INDEX, TRUNCATE
2019-10-10 16:58:41 +00:00
Halil Ozan Akgul bda8f6f87b Created tests for distribution to reference table foreign keys on mx 2019-10-03 09:31:13 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul e5906bead2 Created isolation tests for update, delete, upsert on reference tables with MX. 2019-10-02 10:11:21 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul 1d7030a651 Created isolation tests for select for update on reference tables with MX. 2019-10-01 16:29:15 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul 824a69587c Created isolation tests for insert select on MX 2019-09-26 17:40:36 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul d56ab6274c Created isolation tests for drop, alter, index and select for update on MX. 2019-09-26 10:47:14 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul d426fb2159 Created isolation tests for truncate on MX. 2019-09-25 16:51:20 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul 62b6852923 Created isolation tests for copy on MX. 2019-09-25 15:36:05 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul b55b275a30 Created isolation tests for update, delete and upsert on MX 2019-09-23 14:13:29 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul 5333296a54 Created isolation tests for select on MX 2019-09-17 12:44:45 +03:00
Halil Ozan Akgul 7cde785031 Added the MX isolation tests for insert 2019-09-16 15:49:43 +03:00
Nils Dijk 936d546a3c
Refactor Ensure Schema Exists to Ensure Dependecies Exists (#2882)
DESCRIPTION: Refactor ensure schema exists to dependency exists

Historically we only supported schema's as table dependencies to be created on the workers before a table gets distributed. This PR puts infrastructure in place to walk pg_depend to figure out which dependencies to create on the workers. Currently only schema's are supported as objects to create before creating a table.

We also keep track of dependencies that have been created in the cluster. When we add a new node to the cluster we use this catalog to know which objects need to be created on the worker.

Side effect of knowing which objects are already distributed is that we don't have debug messages anymore when creating schema's that are already created on the workers.
2019-09-04 14:10:20 +02:00
Hadi Moshayedi a5b087c89b Support FKs between reference tables 2019-08-21 16:11:27 -07:00
Önder Kalacı 40da78c6fd
Introduce the adaptive executor (#2798)
With this commit, we're introducing the Adaptive Executor. 


The commit message consists of two distinct sections. The first part explains
how the executor works. The second part consists of the commit messages of
the individual smaller commits that resulted in this commit. The readers
can search for the each of the smaller commit messages on 
https://github.com/citusdata/citus and can learn more about the history
of the change.

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *
 * adaptive_executor.c
 *
 * The adaptive executor executes a list of tasks (queries on shards) over
 * a connection pool per worker node. The results of the queries, if any,
 * are written to a tuple store.
 *
 * The concepts in the executor are modelled in a set of structs:
 *
 * - DistributedExecution:
 *     Execution of a Task list over a set of WorkerPools.
 * - WorkerPool
 *     Pool of WorkerSessions for the same worker which opportunistically
 *     executes "unassigned" tasks from a queue.
 * - WorkerSession:
 *     Connection to a worker that is used to execute "assigned" tasks
 *     from a queue and may execute unasssigned tasks from the WorkerPool.
 * - ShardCommandExecution:
 *     Execution of a Task across a list of placements.
 * - TaskPlacementExecution:
 *     Execution of a Task on a specific placement.
 *     Used in the WorkerPool and WorkerSession queues.
 *
 * Every connection pool (WorkerPool) and every connection (WorkerSession)
 * have a queue of tasks that are ready to execute (readyTaskQueue) and a
 * queue/set of pending tasks that may become ready later in the execution
 * (pendingTaskQueue). The tasks are wrapped in a ShardCommandExecution,
 * which keeps track of the state of execution and is referenced from a
 * TaskPlacementExecution, which is the data structure that is actually
 * added to the queues and describes the state of the execution of a task
 * on a particular worker node.
 *
 * When the task list is part of a bigger distributed transaction, the
 * shards that are accessed or modified by the task may have already been
 * accessed earlier in the transaction. We need to make sure we use the
 * same connection since it may hold relevant locks or have uncommitted
 * writes. In that case we "assign" the task to a connection by adding
 * it to the task queue of specific connection (in
 * AssignTasksToConnections). Otherwise we consider the task unassigned
 * and add it to the task queue of a worker pool, which means that it
 * can be executed over any connection in the pool.
 *
 * A task may be executed on multiple placements in case of a reference
 * table or a replicated distributed table. Depending on the type of
 * task, it may not be ready to be executed on a worker node immediately.
 * For instance, INSERTs on a reference table are executed serially across
 * placements to avoid deadlocks when concurrent INSERTs take conflicting
 * locks. At the beginning, only the "first" placement is ready to execute
 * and therefore added to the readyTaskQueue in the pool or connection.
 * The remaining placements are added to the pendingTaskQueue. Once
 * execution on the first placement is done the second placement moves
 * from pendingTaskQueue to readyTaskQueue. The same approach is used to
 * fail over read-only tasks to another placement.
 *
 * Once all the tasks are added to a queue, the main loop in
 * RunDistributedExecution repeatedly does the following:
 *
 * For each pool:
 * - ManageWorkPool evaluates whether to open additional connections
 *   based on the number unassigned tasks that are ready to execute
 *   and the targetPoolSize of the execution.
 *
 * Poll all connections:
 * - We use a WaitEventSet that contains all (non-failed) connections
 *   and is rebuilt whenever the set of active connections or any of
 *   their wait flags change.
 *
 *   We almost always check for WL_SOCKET_READABLE because a session
 *   can emit notices at any time during execution, but it will only
 *   wake up WaitEventSetWait when there are actual bytes to read.
 *
 *   We check for WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE just after sending bytes in case
 *   there is not enough space in the TCP buffer. Since a socket is
 *   almost always writable we also use WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE as a
 *   mechanism to wake up WaitEventSetWait for non-I/O events, e.g.
 *   when a task moves from pending to ready.
 *
 * For each connection that is ready:
 * - ConnectionStateMachine handles connection establishment and failure
 *   as well as command execution via TransactionStateMachine.
 *
 * When a connection is ready to execute a new task, it first checks its
 * own readyTaskQueue and otherwise takes a task from the worker pool's
 * readyTaskQueue (on a first-come-first-serve basis).
 *
 * In cases where the tasks finish quickly (e.g. <1ms), a single
 * connection will often be sufficient to finish all tasks. It is
 * therefore not necessary that all connections are established
 * successfully or open a transaction (which may be blocked by an
 * intermediate pgbouncer in transaction pooling mode). It is therefore
 * essential that we take a task from the queue only after opening a
 * transaction block.
 *
 * When a command on a worker finishes or the connection is lost, we call
 * PlacementExecutionDone, which then updates the state of the task
 * based on whether we need to run it on other placements. When a
 * connection fails or all connections to a worker fail, we also call
 * PlacementExecutionDone for all queued tasks to try the next placement
 * and, if necessary, mark shard placements as inactive. If a task fails
 * to execute on all placements, the execution fails and the distributed
 * transaction rolls back.
 *
 * For multi-row INSERTs, tasks are executed sequentially by
 * SequentialRunDistributedExecution instead of in parallel, which allows
 * a high degree of concurrency without high risk of deadlocks.
 * Conversely, multi-row UPDATE/DELETE/DDL commands take aggressive locks
 * which forbids concurrency, but allows parallelism without high risk
 * of deadlocks. Note that this is unrelated to SEQUENTIAL_CONNECTION,
 * which indicates that we should use at most one connection per node, but
 * can run tasks in parallel across nodes. This is used when there are
 * writes to a reference table that has foreign keys from a distributed
 * table.
 *
 * Execution finishes when all tasks are done, the query errors out, or
 * the user cancels the query.
 *
 *-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 */



All the commits involved here:
* Initial unified executor prototype

* Latest changes

* Fix rebase conflicts to master branch

* Add missing variable for assertion

* Ensure that master_modify_multiple_shards() returns the affectedTupleCount

* Adjust intermediate result sizes

The real-time executor uses COPY command to get the results
from the worker nodes. Unified executor avoids that which
results in less data transfer. Simply adjust the tests to lower
sizes.

* Force one connection per placement (or co-located placements) when requested

The existing executors (real-time and router) always open 1 connection per
placement when parallel execution is requested.

That might be useful under certain circumstances:

(a) User wants to utilize as much as CPUs on the workers per
distributed query
(b) User has a transaction block which involves COPY command

Also, lots of regression tests rely on this execution semantics.
So, we'd enable few of the tests with this change as well.

* For parameters to be resolved before using them

For the details, see PostgreSQL's copyParamList()

* Unified executor sorts the returning output

* Ensure that unified executor doesn't ignore sequential execution of DDLJob's

Certain DDL commands, mainly creating foreign keys to reference tables,
should be executed sequentially. Otherwise, we'd end up with a self
distributed deadlock.

To overcome this situaiton, we set a flag `DDLJob->executeSequentially`
and execute it sequentially. Note that we have to do this because
the command might not be called within a transaction block, and
we cannot call `SetLocalMultiShardModifyModeToSequential()`.

This fixes at least two test: multi_insert_select_on_conflit.sql and
multi_foreign_key.sql

Also, I wouldn't mind scattering local `targetPoolSize` variables within
the code. The reason is that we'll soon have a GUC (or a global
variable based on a GUC) that'd set the pool size. In that case, we'd
simply replace `targetPoolSize` with the global variables.

* Fix 2PC conditions for DDL tasks

* Improve closing connections that are not fully established in unified execution

* Support foreign keys to reference tables in unified executor

The idea for supporting foreign keys to reference tables is simple:
Keep track of the relation accesses within a transaction block.
    - If a parallel access happens on a distributed table which
      has a foreign key to a reference table, one cannot modify
      the reference table in the same transaction. Otherwise,
      we're very likely to end-up with a self-distributed deadlock.
    - If an access to a reference table happens, and then a parallel
      access to a distributed table (which has a fkey to the reference
      table) happens, we switch to sequential mode.

Unified executor misses the function calls that marks the relation
accesses during the execution. Thus, simply add the necessary calls
and let the logic kick in.

* Make sure to close the failed connections after the execution

* Improve comments

* Fix savepoints in unified executor.

* Rebuild the WaitEventSet only when necessary

* Unclaim connections on all errors.

* Improve failure handling for unified executor

   - Implement the notion of errorOnAnyFailure. This is similar to
     Critical Connections that the connection managament APIs provide
   - If the nodes inside a modifying transaction expand, activate 2PC
   - Fix few bugs related to wait event sets
   - Mark placement INACTIVE during the execution as much as possible
     as opposed to we do in the COMMIT handler
   - Fix few bugs related to scheduling next placement executions
   - Improve decision on when to use 2PC

Improve the logic to start a transaction block for distributed transactions

- Make sure that only reference table modifications are always
  executed with distributed transactions
- Make sure that stored procedures and functions are executed
  with distributed transactions

* Move waitEventSet to DistributedExecution

This could also be local to RunDistributedExecution(), but in that case
we had to mark it as "volatile" to avoid PG_TRY()/PG_CATCH() issues, and
cast it to non-volatile when doing WaitEventSetFree(). We thought that
would make code a bit harder to read than making this non-local, so we
move it here. See comments for PG_TRY() in postgres/src/include/elog.h
and "man 3 siglongjmp" for more context.

* Fix multi_insert_select test outputs

Two things:
   1) One complex transaction block is now supported. Simply update
      the test output
   2) Due to dynamic nature of the unified executor, the orders of
      the errors coming from the shards might change (e.g., all of
      the queries on the shards would fail, but which one appears
      on the error message?). To fix that, we simply added it to
      our shardId normalization tool which happens just before diff.

* Fix subeury_and_cte test

The error message is updated from:
	failed to execute task
To:
        more than one row returned by a subquery or an expression

which is a lot clearer to the user.

* Fix intermediate_results test outputs

Simply update the error message from:
	could not receive query results
to
	result "squares" does not exist

which makes a lot more sense.

* Fix multi_function_in_join test

The error messages update from:
     Failed to execute task XXX
To:
     function f(..) does not exist

* Fix multi_query_directory_cleanup test

The unified executor does not create any intermediate files.

* Fix with_transactions test

A test case that just started to work fine

* Fix multi_router_planner test outputs

The error message is update from:
	Could not receive query results
To:
	Relation does not exists

which is a lot more clearer for the users

* Fix multi_router_planner_fast_path test

The error message is update from:
	Could not receive query results
To:
	Relation does not exists

which is a lot more clearer for the users

* Fix isolation_copy_placement_vs_modification by disabling select_opens_transaction_block

* Fix ordering in isolation_multi_shard_modify_vs_all

* Add executor locks to unified executor

* Make sure to allocate enought WaitEvents

The previous code was missing the waitEvents for the latch and
postmaster death.

* Fix rebase conflicts for master rebase

* Make sure that TRUNCATE relies on unified executor

* Implement true sequential execution for multi-row INSERTS

Execute the individual tasks executed one by one. Note that this is different than
MultiShardConnectionType == SEQUENTIAL_CONNECTION case (e.g., sequential execution
mode). In that case, running the tasks across the nodes in parallel is acceptable
and implemented in that way.

However, the executions that are qualified here would perform poorly if the
tasks across the workers are executed in parallel. We currently qualify only
one class of distributed queries here, multi-row INSERTs. If we do not enforce
true sequential execution, concurrent multi-row upserts could easily form
a distributed deadlock when the upserts touch the same rows.

* Remove SESSION_LIFESPAN flag in unified_executor

* Apply failure test updates

We've changed the failure behaviour a bit, and also the error messages
that show up to the user. This PR covers majority of the updates.

* Unified executor honors citus.node_connection_timeout

With this commit, unified executor errors out if even
a single connection cannot be established within
citus.node_connection_timeout.

And, as a side effect this fixes failure_connection_establishment
test.

* Properly increment/decrement pool size variables

Before this commit, the idle and active connection
counts were not properly calculated.

* insert_select_executor goes through unified executor.

* Add missing file for task tracker

* Modify ExecuteTaskListExtended()'s signature

* Sort output of INSERT ... SELECT ... RETURNING

* Take partition locks correctly in unified executor

* Alternative implementation for force_max_query_parallelization

* Fix compile warnings in unified executor

* Fix style issues

* Decrement idleConnectionCount when idle connection is lost

* Always rebuild the wait event sets

In the previous implementation, on waitFlag changes, we were only
modifying the wait events. However, we've realized that it might
be an over optimization since (a) we couldn't see any performance
benefits (b) we see some errors on failures and because of (a)
we prefer to disable it now.

* Make sure to allocate enough sized waitEventSet

With multi-row INSERTs, we might have more sessions than
task*workerCount after few calls of RunDistributedExecution()
because the previous sessions would also be alive.

Instead, re-allocate events when the connectino set changes.

* Implement SELECT FOR UPDATE on reference tables

On master branch, we do two extra things on SELECT FOR UPDATE
queries on reference tables:
   - Acquire executor locks
   - Execute the query on all replicas

With this commit, we're implementing the same logic on the
new executor.

* SELECT FOR UPDATE opens transaction block even if SelectOpensTransactionBlock disabled

Otherwise, users would be very confused and their logic is very likely
to break.

* Fix build error

* Fix the newConnectionCount calculation in ManageWorkerPool

* Fix rebase conflicts

* Fix minor test output differences

* Fix citus indent

* Remove duplicate sorts that is added with rebase

* Create distributed table via executor

* Fix wait flags in CheckConnectionReady

* failure_savepoints output for unified executor.

* failure_vacuum output (pg 10) for unified executor.

* Fix WaitEventSetWait timeout in unified executor

* Stabilize failure_truncate test output

* Add an ORDER BY to multi_upsert

* Fix regression test outputs after rebase to master

* Add executor.c comment

* Rename executor.c to adaptive_executor.c

* Do not schedule tasks if the failed placement is not ready to execute

Before the commit, we were blindly scheduling the next placement executions
even if the failed placement is not on the ready queue. Now, we're ensuring
that if failed placement execution is on a failed pool or session where the
execution is on the pendingQueue, we do not schedule the next task. Because
the other placement execution should be already running.

* Implement a proper custom scan node for adaptive executor

- Switch between the executors, add GUC to set the pool size
- Add non-adaptive regression test suites
- Enable CIRCLE CI for non-adaptive tests
- Adjust test output files

* Add slow start interval to the executor

* Expose max_cached_connection_per_worker to user

* Do not start slow when there are cached connections

* Consider ExecutorSlowStartInterval in NextEventTimeout

* Fix memory issues with ReceiveResults().

* Disable executor via TaskExecutorType

* Make sure to execute the tests with the other executor

* Use task_executor_type to enable-disable adaptive executor

* Remove useless code

* Adjust the regression tests

* Add slow start regression test

* Rebase to master

* Fix test failures in adaptive executor.

* Rebase to master - 2

* Improve comments & debug messages

* Set force_max_query_parallelization in isolation_citus_dist_activity

* Force max parallelization for creating shards when asked to use exclusive connection.

* Adjust the default pool size

* Expand description of max_adaptive_executor_pool_size GUC

* Update warnings in FinishRemoteTransactionCommit()

* Improve session clean up at the end of execution

Explicitly list all the states that the execution might end,
otherwise warn.

* Remove MULTI_CONNECTION_WAIT_RETRY which is not used at all

* Add more ORDER BYs to multi_mx_partitioning
2019-06-28 14:04:40 +02:00
Nils Dijk 5df1b49bed
Feature: optionally force master_update_node during failover (#2773)
When `master_update_node` is called to update a node's location it waits for appropriate locks to become available. This is useful during normal operation as new operations will be blocked till after the metadata update while running operations have time to finish.

When `master_update_node` is called after a node failure it is less useful to wait for running operations to finish as they can't. The lock being held indicates an operation that once attempted to commit will fail as the machine already failed. Now the downside is the failover is postponed till the termination point of the operation. This has been observed by users to take a significant amount of time causing the rest of the system to be observed unavailable.

With this patch it is possible in such situations to invoke `master_update_node` with 2 optional arguments:
 - `force` (bool defaults to `false`): When called with true the update of the metadata will be forced to proceed by terminating conflicting backends. A cancel is not enough as the backend might be in idle time (eg. an interactive session, or going back and forth between an appliaction), therefore a more intrusive solution of termination is used here.
 - `lock_cooldown` (int defaults to `10000`): This is the time in milliseconds before conflicting backends are terminated. This is to allow the backends to finish cleanly before terminating them. This allows the user to set an upperbound to the expected time to complete the metadata update, eg. performing the failover.

The functionality is implemented by spawning a background worker that has the task of helping a certain backend in acquiring its locks. The backend is either terminated on successful execution of the metadata update, or once the memory context of the expression gets reset, eg. on a cancel of the statement.
2019-06-21 12:03:15 +02:00
Marco Slot 3ff2b47366 Restrict visibility of get_*_active_transactions functions to pg_monitor 2018-12-19 18:32:42 +01:00
Marco Slot 8893cc141d Support INSERT...SELECT with ON CONFLICT or RETURNING via coordinator
Before this commit, Citus supported INSERT...SELECT queries with
ON CONFLICT or RETURNING clauses only for pushdownable ones, since
queries supported via coordinator were utilizing COPY infrastructure
of PG to send selected tuples to the target worker nodes.

After this PR, INSERT...SELECT queries with ON CONFLICT or RETURNING
clauses will be performed in two phases via coordinator. In the first
phase selected tuples will be saved to the intermediate table which
is colocated with target table of the INSERT...SELECT query. Note that,
a utility function to save results to the colocated intermediate result
also implemented as a part of this commit. In the second phase, INSERT..
SELECT query is directly run on the worker node using the intermediate
table as the source table.
2018-11-30 15:29:12 +03:00
Hanefi Onaldi 448b241ab4 validate query isolation tests 2018-11-26 14:04:51 +03:00
velioglu d7f75e5b48 Add citus_lock_waits to show locked distributed queries 2018-09-20 14:13:51 +03:00
velioglu d1f005daac Adds UDFs for testing MX functionalities with isolation tests 2018-09-12 07:04:16 +03:00
Onder Kalaci d657759c97 Views to Provide some insight about the distributed transactions on Citus MX
With this commit, we implement two views that are very similar
to pg_stat_activity, but showing queries that are involved in
distributed queries:

    - citus_dist_stat_activity: Shows all the distributed queries
    - citus_worker_stat_activity: Shows all the queries on the shards
                                  that are initiated by distributed queries.

Both views have the same columns in the outputs. In very basic terms, both of the views
are meant to provide some useful insights about the distributed
transactions within the cluster. As the names reveal, both views are similar to pg_stat_activity.
Also note that these views can be pretty useful on Citus MX clusters.

Note that when the views are queried from the worker nodes, they'd not show the distributed
transactions that are initiated from the coordinator node. The reason is that the worker
nodes do not know the host/port of the coordinator. Thus, it is advisable to query the
views from the coordinator.

If we bucket the columns that the views returns, we'd end up with the following:

- Hostnames and ports:
   - query_hostname, query_hostport: The node that the query is running
   - master_query_host_name, master_query_host_port: The node in the cluster
                                                   initiated the query.
    Note that for citus_dist_stat_activity view, the query_hostname-query_hostport
    is always the same with master_query_host_name-master_query_host_port. The
    distinction is mostly relevant for citus_worker_stat_activity. For example,
    on Citus MX, a users starts a transaction on Node-A, which starts worker
    transactions on Node-B and Node-C. In that case, the query hostnames would be
    Node-B and Node-C whereas the master_query_host_name would Node-A.

- Distributed transaction related things:
    This is mostly the process_id, distributed transactionId and distributed transaction
    number.

- pg_stat_activity columns:
    These two views get all the columns from pg_stat_activity. We're basically joining
    pg_stat_activity with get_all_active_transactions on process_id.
2018-09-10 21:33:27 +03:00
velioglu 53b2e81d01 Adds SELECT ... FOR UPDATE support for router plannable queries 2018-06-18 13:55:17 +03:00
Dimitri Fontaine 8b258cbdb0 Lock reads and writes only to the node being updated in master_update_node
Rather than locking out all the writes in the cluster, the function now only
locks out writes that target shards hosted by the node we're updating.
2018-05-09 15:14:20 +02:00
velioglu 32bcd610c1 Support modify queries with multiple tables
With this commit we begin to support modify queries with multiple
tables if these queries are pushdownable.
2018-05-02 16:22:26 +03:00
mehmet furkan şahin 8d55754b4d the tests are separated and some more added 2017-11-20 11:45:48 +03:00
mehmet furkan şahin 636faadc47 create_distributed_table vs create_distributed_table, master_append_table_to_shard vs master_apply_delete_command, master_apply_delete_command vs master_apply_delete_command are added 2017-11-20 11:45:48 +03:00
mehmet furkan şahin 0722334e50 concurrent master_append_table test is added 2017-11-20 11:45:48 +03:00