Support for ARRAY[] expressions is limited to having a consistent shape,
eg ARRAY[(int,text),(int,text)] as opposed to ARRAY[(int,text),(float,text)] or ARRAY[(int,text),(int,text,float)]
Initialization of queryWindowClause and queryOrderByLimit "memset" underflow these variables.
It's possible due to the invalid usage sizeof this part of the program cause buffer overflow and function return data corruption in future changes.
* Improve extension command propagation tests
* patch for hardcoded citus extension name
(cherry picked from commit 0bb3dbac0afabda10e8928f9c17eda048dc4361a)
In plain words, each distributed plan pulls the necessary intermediate
results to the worker nodes that the plan hits. This is primarily useful
in three ways.
(i) If the distributed plan that uses intermediate
result(s) is a router query, then the intermediate results are only
broadcasted to a single node.
(ii) If a distributed plan consists of only intermediate results, which
is not uncommon, the intermediate results are broadcasted to a single
node only.
(iii) If a distributed query hits a sub-set of the shards in multiple
workers, the intermediate results will be broadcasted to the relevant
node(s).
The final item (iii) becomes crucial for append/range distributed
tables where typically the distributed queries hit a small subset of
shards/workers.
To do this, for each query that Citus creates a distributed plan, we keep
track of the subPlans used in the queryTree, and save it in the distributed
plan. Just before Citus executes each subPlan, Citus first keeps track of
every worker node that the distributed plan hits, and marks every subPlan
should be broadcasted to these nodes. Later, for each subPlan which is a
distributed plan, Citus does this operation recursively since these
distributed plans may access to different subPlans, and those have to be
recorded as well.
Prevent Citus extension being distributed
Because that could prevent doing rolling upgrades, where users may
prefer to upgrade the version on the coordinator but not the workers.
There could be some other edge cases, so I'd prefer to keep Citus
extension outside the picture for now.
DESCRIPTION: Expression in reference join
Fixed: #2582
This patch allows arbitrary expressions in the join clause when joining to a reference table. An example of such joins could be found in CHbenCHmark queries 7, 8, 9 and 11; `mod((s_w_id * s_i_id),10000) = su_suppkey` and `ascii(substr(c_state,1,1)) = n2.n_nationkey`. Since the join is on a reference table these queries are able to be pushed down to the workers.
To implement these queries we will widen the `IsJoinClause` predicate to not check if the expressions are a type `Var` after stripping the implicit coerciens. Instead we define a join clause when the `Var`'s in a clause come from more than 1 table.
This allows more clauses to pass into the logical planner's `MultiNodeTree(...)` planning function. To compensate for this we tighten down the `LocalJoin`, `SinglePartitionJoin` and `DualPartitionJoin` to check for direct column references when planning. This allows the planner to work with arbitrary join expressions on reference tables.
With this commit, we're slightly changing the dependency traversal
logic to enable extension propagation.
The main idea is to "follow" the extension dependencies, but do not
"apply" them.
Since some extension dependencies are base types, and base types
could have circular dependencies, we implement a logic to prevent
revisiting an already visited object.
When the user picks "round-robin" policy, the aim is that the load
is distributed across nodes. However, for reference tables on the
coordinator, since local execution kicks in immediately, round-robin
is ignored.
With this change, we're excluding the placement on the coordinator.
Although the approach seems a little bit invasive because of
modifications in the placement list, that sounds acceptable.
We could have done this in some other ways such as:
1) Add a field to "Task->roundRobinPlacement" (or such), which is
updated as the first element after RoundRobinPolicy is applied.
During the execution, if that placement is local to the coordinator,
skip it and try the other remote placements.
2) On TaskAccessesLocalNode()@local_execution.c, check
task_assignment_policy, if round-robin selected and there is local
placement on the coordinator, skip it. However, task assignment is done
on planning, but this decision is happening on the execution, which
could create weird edge cases.
This change was actually already intended in #3124. However, the
postgres Makefile manually enables this warning too. This way we undo
that.
To confirm that it works two functions were changed to make use of not
having the warning anymore.
Phase 1 seeks to implement minimal infrastructure, so does not include:
- dynamic generation of support aggregates to handle multiple arguments
- configuration methods to direct aggregation strategy,
or mark an aggregate's serialize/deserialize as safe to operate across nodes
Aggregates can be distributed when:
- they have a single argument
- they have a combinefunc
- their transition type is not a pseudotype
This is necassery to support Q20 of the CHbenCHmark: #2582.
To summarize the fix: The subquery is converted into an INNER JOIN on a
table. This fixes the issue, since an INNER JOIN on a table is already
supported by the repartion planner.
The way this replacement is happening.:
1. Postgres replaces `col in (subquery)` with a SEMI JOIN (subquery) on col = subquery_result
2. If this subquery is simple enough Postgres will replace it with a
regular read from a table
3. If the subquery returns unique results (e.g. a primary key) Postgres
will convert the SEMI JOIN into an INNER JOIN during the planning. It
will not change this in the rewritten query though.
4. We check if Postgres sends us any SEMI JOINs during its join order
planning, if it doesn't we replace all SEMI JOINs in the rewritten
query with INNER JOIN (which we already support).
Postgres doesn't require you to add all columns that are in the target list to
the GROUP BY when you group by a unique column (or columns). It even actively
removes these group by clauses when you do.
This is normally fine, but for repartition joins it is not. The reason for this
is that the temporary tables don't have these primary key columns. So when the
worker executes the query it will complain that it is missing columns in the
group by.
This PR fixes that by adding an ANY_VALUE aggregate around each variable in
the target list that does is not contained in the group by or in an aggregate.
This is done only for repartition joins.
The ANY_VALUE aggregate chooses the value from an undefined row in the
group.
It looks like the logic to prevent RETURNING in reference tables to
have duplicate entries that comes from local and remote executions
leads to missing some tuples for distributed tables.
With this PR, we're ensuring to kick in the logic for reference tables
only.
* Remove unused executor codes
All of the codes of real-time executor. Some functions
in router executor still remains there because there
are common functions. We'll move them to accurate places
in the follow-up commits.
* Move GUCs to transaction mngnt and remove unused struct
* Update test output
* Get rid of references of real-time executor from code
* Warn if real-time executor is picked
* Remove lots of unused connection codes
* Removed unused code for connection restrictions
Real-time and router executors cannot handle re-using of the existing
connections within a transaction block.
Adaptive executor and COPY can re-use the connections. So, there is no
reason to keep the code around for applying the restrictions in the
placement connection logic.
We've changed the logic for pulling RTE_RELATIONs in #3109 and
non-colocated subquery joins and partitioned tables.
@onurctirtir found this steps where I traced back and found the issues.
While looking into it in more detail, we decided to expand the list in a
way that the callers get all the relevant RTE_RELATIONs RELKIND_RELATION,
RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE, RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE and RELKIND_MATVIEW.
These are all relation kinds that Citus planner is aware of.
When citus.enable_repartition_joins guc is set to on, and we have
adaptive executor, there was a typo in the debug message, which was
saying realtime executor no adaptive executor.
See #3125 for details on each item.
* Remove real-time/router executor tests-1
These are the ones which doesn't have '_%d' in the test
output files.
* Remove real-time/router executor tests-2
These are the ones which has in the test
output files.
* Move the tests outputs to correct place
* Make sure that single shard commits use 2PC on adaptive executor
It looks like we've messed the tests in #2891. Fixing back.
* Use adaptive executor for all router queries
This becomes important because when task-tracker is picked, we
used to pick router executor, which doesn't make sense.
* Remove explicit references to real-time/router executors in the tests
* JobExecutorType never picks real-time/router executors
* Make sure to go incremental in test output numbers
* Even users cannot pick real-time anymore
* Do not use real-time/router custom scans
* Get rid of unnecessary normalizations
* Reflect unneeded normalizations
* Get rid of unnecessary test output file
This completely hides `ListCell` to the user of the loop
Example usage:
```c
WorkerNode *workerNode = NULL;
foreach_ptr(workerNode, workerNodeList) {
// Do stuff with workerNode
}
```
Instead of:
```c
ListCell *workerNodeCell = NULL;
foreach(cell, workerNodeList) {
WorkerNode *workerNode = lfirst(workerNodeCell);
// Do stuff with workerNode
}
```
It turns out that TupleDescGetAttInMetadata() allocates quite a lot
of memory. And, if the target list is long and there are too many rows
returning, the leak becomes appereant.
You can reproduce the issue wout the fix with the following commands:
```SQL
CREATE TABLE users_table (user_id int, time timestamp, value_1 int, value_2 int, value_3 float, value_4 bigint);
SELECT create_distributed_table('users_table', 'user_id');
insert into users_table SELECT i, now(), i, i, i, i FROM generate_series(0,99999)i;
-- load faster
-- 200,000
INSERT INTO users_table SELECT * FROM users_table;
-- 400,000
INSERT INTO users_table SELECT * FROM users_table;
-- 800,000
INSERT INTO users_table SELECT * FROM users_table;
-- 1,600,000
INSERT INTO users_table SELECT * FROM users_table;
-- 3,200,000
INSERT INTO users_table SELECT * FROM users_table;
-- 6,400,000
INSERT INTO users_table SELECT * FROM users_table;
-- 12,800,000
INSERT INTO users_table SELECT * FROM users_table;
-- making the target list entry wider speeds up the leak to show up
select *,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,*,* FROM users_table ;
```
This is an improvement over #2512.
This adds the boolean shouldhaveshards column to pg_dist_node. When it's false, create_distributed_table for new collocation groups will not create shards on that node. Reference tables will still be created on nodes where it is false.
Areas for further optimization:
- Don't save subquery results to a local file on the coordinator when the subquery is not in the having clause
- Push the the HAVING with subquery to the workers if there's a group by on the distribution column
- Don't push down the results to the workers when we don't push down the HAVING clause, only the coordinator needs it
Fixes#520Fixes#756Closes#2047
DESCRIPTION: Fix order for enum values and correctly support pg12
PG 12 introduces `ALTER TYPE ... ADD VALUE ...` during transactions. Earlier versions would error out when called in a transaction, hence we connect to workers outside of the transaction which could cause inconsistencies on pg12 now that postgres doesn't error with this syntax anymore.
During the implementation of this fix it became apparent there was an error with the ordering of enum labels when the type was recreated. A patch and test have been included.
Objectives:
(a) both super user and regular user should have the correct owner for the function on the worker
(b) The transactional semantics would work fine for both super user and regular user
(c) non-super-user and non-function owner would get a reasonable error message if tries to distribute the function
Co-authored-by: @serprex
DESCRIPTION: Disallow distributed functions for functions depending on an extension
Functions depending on an extension cannot (yet) be distributed by citus. If we would allow this it would cause issues with our dependency following mechanism as we stop following objects depending on an extension.
By not allowing functions to be distributed when they depend on an extension as well as not allowing to make distributed functions depend on an extension we won't break the ability to add new nodes. Allowing functions depending on extensions to be distributed at the moment could cause problems in that area.
DESCRIPTION: Propagate CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
Distributed functions could be replaced, which should be propagated to the workers to keep the function in sync between all nodes.
Due to the complexity of deparsing the `CreateFunctionStmt` we actually produce the plan during the processing phase of our utilityhook. Since the changes have already been made in the catalog tables we can reuse `pg_get_functiondef` to get us the generated `CREATE OR REPLACE` sql.
DESCRIPTION: Propagate ALTER FUNCTION statements for distributed functions
Using the implemented deparser for function statements to propagate changes to both functions and procedures that are previously distributed.
This PR aims to add all the necessary logic to qualify and deparse all possible `{ALTER|DROP} .. {FUNCTION|PROCEDURE}` queries.
As Procedures are introduced in PG11, the code contains many PG version checks. I tried my best to make it easy to clean up once we drop PG10 support.
Here are some caveats:
- I assumed that the parse tree is a valid one. There are some queries that are not allowed, but still are parsed successfully by postgres planner. Such queries will result in errors in execution time. (e.g. `ALTER PROCEDURE p STRICT` -> `STRICT` action is valid for functions but not procedures. Postgres decides to parse them nevertheless.)
When a function is marked as colocated with a distributed table,
we try delegating queries of kind "SELECT func(...)" to workers.
We currently only support this simple form, and don't delegate
forms like "SELECT f1(...), f2(...)", "SELECT f1(...) FROM ...",
or function calls inside transactions.
As a side effect, we also fix the transactional semantics of DO blocks.
Previously we didn't consider a DO block a multi-statement transaction.
Now we do.
Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco@citusdata.com>
Co-authored-by: serprex <serprex@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: pykello <hadi.moshayedi@microsoft.com>
SaitTalhaNisanci
Philip Dubé
Hadi Moshayedi
Önder Kalacı
Marco Slot
Khashayar Fereidani
Onur TIRTIR
Philip Dubé
Jelte Fennema
Hanefi Onaldi
Halil Ozan Akgul
Nils Dijk
Hadi Moshayedi
Marco Slot