Rename TargetWorkerSet enums to make them more explicit about what they
mean. Ideally it would be good to treat everything as a node without the
'worker' concept because it makes things complicated. Another
improvement could be to rename TargetWorkerSet as TargetNodeSet but it
goes to renaming many occurrences of Worker, which is probably too big
for this PR.
Static analysis found some issues where we used the result from
ExtractResultRelationRTE, without checking that it wasn't NULL. It seems
like in all these cases it can never actually be NULL, since we have checked
before that it isn't a SELECT query. So, this PR is mostly to make static
analysis happy (and protect a bit against future changes of the code).
Static analysis found an issue where we could dereference `NULL`, because
`CreateDummyPlacement` could return `NULL` when there were no workers. This
PR changes it so that it never returns `NULL`, which was intended by
@marcocitus when doing this change: https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/3887/files#r438136433
While adding tests for citus on a single node I also added some more basic
tests and it turns out we error out on repartition joins. This has been
present since `shouldhaveshards` was introduced and is not trivial to fix.
So I created a separate issue for this: https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/3996
I recently forgot to add tests to a schedule in two of my PRs. One of
these was caught by review, but the other one was not. This adds a
script to causes CI to ensure that each test in the repo is included in
at least one schedule.
Three tests were found that were currently not part of a schedule. This PR
adds those three tests to a schedule as well and it also fixes some small
issues with these tests.
We keep accumulating more and more scripts to flag issues in CI. This is
good, but we are currently missing consistent documentation for them.
This commit moves all these scripts to the `ci` directory and adds some
documentation for all of them in the README. It also makes sure that the
last line of output of a failed script points to this documentation.
#3866 removed the shard ID hash in metadata_cache.c to simplify cache management,
but we observed a significant performance regression that was being masked by the
performance improvement provided by #3654 in our benchmarks, but #3654 only
applies to specific workloads.
This PR brings back the shard ID cache as it existed before #3866 with some extra
measures to handle invalidation. When we load a table entry, we overwrite
ShardIdCacheEntry->tableEntry pointers for all the shards in that table, though
it's possible that the table no longer contains the old shard ID or the table
entry is never reloaded, which would leave a dangling pointer once the table
entry is freed. To handle that case, we remove all shard ID cache entries that
point exactly to that table entry when a table is freed (at the end of the
transaction or any call to CitusTableCacheFlushInvalidatedEntries).
Co-authored-by: SaitTalhaNisanci <s.talhanisanci@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
It was possible to get an assertion error, if a DML command was
cancelled that opened a connection and then "ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT" was
used to continue the transaction. The reason for this was that canceling
the transaction might leave the `claimedExclusively` flag on for (some
of) it's connections.
This caused an assertion failure because `CanUseExistingConnection`
would return false and a new connection would be opened, and then there
would be two connections doing DML for the same placement. Which is
disallowed. That this situation caused an assertion failure instead of
an error, means that without asserts this could possibly result in some
visibility bugs, similar to the ones described
https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/3867
This is so we don't need to calculate it twice in
insert_select_executor.c and multi_explain.c, which can
cause discrepancy if an update in one of them is not
reflected in the other site.
* Not set TaskExecution with adaptive executor
Adaptive executor is using a utility method from task tracker for
repartition joins, however adaptive executor doesn't need taskExecution.
It is only used by task tracker. This causes a problem when explain
analyze is used because what taskExecution is pointing to might be
random.
We solve this by not setting taskExecution from adaptive executor. So it
will stay NULL as set by CreateTask.
* use same memory context as task for taskExecution
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
As suggested by @marcocitus in https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/3911#issuecomment-643978531, there was
a regression in #3893. If another backend would write a file during deletion of
the intermediate results directory, this file would not necessarily be deleted.
The approach used in `CitusRemoveDirectory` is to try recursive removal of the
directory again if it has failed. This does not work here, since when a file
can not be removed for other reasons (e.g. `EPERM`) it will not throw an error
anymore. So then we would get into an infinite removal loop. Instead I now
`rename` the directory before removing it. That way other backends will not
write files to it anymore.
We sort the workerList because adaptive connection management
(e.g., OPTIONAL_CONNECTION) requires any concurrent executions
to wait for the connections in the same order to prevent any
starvation. If we don't sort, we might end up with:
Execution 1: Get connection for worker 1, wait for worker 2
Execution 2: Get connection for worker 2, wait for worker 1
and, none could proceed. Instead, we enforce every execution establish
the required connections to workers in the same order.
We've had two issues with merge conflicts to enterprise in the last week, that
suddenly happened. Because of this CI check this actually blocks all community
PRs from being merged.
This PR tries to improve on the previous script we had, by putting tougher
constraints on when a merge is allowed.
Previously the check would pass in two cases:
1. This PR be merged without conflicts into `enterprise-master`
2. A branch exists with the same name as this PR on enterprise and that can be
merged into `enterprise-master`.
The first case stays the same, but I've changed the second case to require the
following instead:
1. A branch exists on enterprise with the same name as this PR
2. **NEW: This branch contains the the last commit of the community PR branch**
3. This branch can be merged into enterprise-master
This makes sure the enterprise branch is actually up to date and not forgotten about.
If we still get problems with this change, future improvements could be:
1. Check that the PR on enterprise passes CI
2. Check that the PR on enterprise has been approved
3. Require the enterprise PR branch to be merged before merging community.
When we are using hammerdb jobs, the job creates a branch on test
automation, since that branch should be deleted, it would have
`delete_me` prefix, however since the result branch on
release-test-results will have the test automation branch as prefix, it
will also have `delete_me` prefix, which seems a bit confusing.
This PR updates it as citus_github_push
In #3901 the "Data received from worker(s)" sections were added to EXPLAIN
ANALYZE. After merging @pykello posted some review comments. This addresses
those comments as well as fixing a other issues that I found while addressing
them. The things this does:
1. Fix `EXPLAIN ANALYZE EXECUTE p1` to not increase received data on every
execution
2. Fix `EXPLAIN ANALYZE EXECUTE p1(1)` to not return 0 bytes as received data
allways.
3. Move `EXPLAIN ANALYZE` specific logic to `multi_explain.c` from
`adaptive_executor.c`
4. Change naming of new explain sections to `Tuple data received from node(s)`.
Firstly because a task can reference the coordinator too, so "worker(s)" was
incorrect. Secondly to indicate that this is tuple data and not all network
traffic that was performed.
5. Rename `totalReceivedData` in our codebase to `totalReceivedTupleData` to
make it clearer that it's a tuple data counter, not all network traffic.
6. Actually add `binary_protocol` test to `multi_schedule` (woops)
7. Fix a randomly failing test in `local_shard_execution.sql`.
Sometimes isolation tests get stuck in CI and we cannot see why, because
the job is killed by the CI runner. This will instead fail inside make
the testsuite continue, but mark it as a failure like this in the diff
output:
```diff
+isolationtester: canceling step s2-ddl-create-index-concurrently after 5 seconds
step s2-ddl-create-index-concurrently: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY select_append_index ON select_append(id);
+ERROR: CONCURRENTLY-enabled index command failed
```
We should detect blockages very quickly and the queries we run are also
very fast, so 5 seconds should be more than enough to catch any random
slowness. The default from Postgres is 5 minutes, which is waaay to much
for us.
Shard id to index mapping stored in cache entry as there may now be multiple entries alive for a given relation
insert_select_executor: revert copying cache entry, which was a hack added to avoid memory safety issues
Sadly this does not actually work yet for binary protocol data, because
when doing EXPLAIN ANALYZE we send two commands at the same time. This
means we cannot use `SendRemoteCommandParams`, and thus cannot use the
binary protocol. This can still be useful though when using the text
protocol, to find out that a lot of data is being sent.
SaitTalhaNisanci
Hadi Moshayedi
Jelte Fennema
Onur Tirtir
Philip Dubé
citus bot
Marco Slot
Onder Kalaci
Hanefi Önaldı
Marco Slot