Comes with a few changes:
- Change the signature of some functions to accept groupid
- InsertShardPlacementRow
- DeleteShardPlacementRow
- UpdateShardPlacementState
- NodeHasActiveShardPlacements returns true if the group the node is a
part of has any active shard placements
- TupleToShardPlacement now returns ShardPlacements which have NULL
nodeName and nodePort.
- Populate (nodeName, nodePort) when creating ShardPlacements
- Disallow removing a node if it contains any shard placements
- DeleteAllReferenceTablePlacementsFromNode matches based on group. This
doesn't change behavior for now (while there is only one node per
group), but means in the future callers should be careful about
calling it on a secondary node, it'll delete placements on the primary.
- Create concept of a GroupShardPlacement, which represents an actual
tuple in pg_dist_placement and is distinct from a ShardPlacement,
which has been resolved to a specific node. In the future
ShardPlacement should be renamed to NodeShardPlacement.
- Create some triggers which allow existing code to continue to insert
into and update pg_dist_shard_placement as if it still existed.
Before this change, we used ShareLock to acquire lock on distributed tables while
running VACUUM. This makes VACUUM and INSERT block each other. With this change we
changed lock mode from ShareLock to ShareUpdateExclusiveLock, which does not conflict
with the locks INSERT acquire.
Adds support for PostgreSQL 10 by copying in the requisite ruleutils
and updating all API usages to conform with changes in PostgreSQL 10.
Most changes are fairly minor but they are numerous. One particular
obstacle was the change in \d behavior in PostgreSQL 10's psql; I had
to add SQL implementations (views, mostly) to mimic the pre-10 output.
Add a second implementation of INSERT INTO distributed_table SELECT ... that is used if
the query cannot be pushed down. The basic idea is to execute the SELECT query separately
and pass the results into the distributed table using a CopyDestReceiver, which is also
used for COPY and create_distributed_table. When planning the SELECT, we go through
planner hooks again, which means the SELECT can also be a distributed query.
EXPLAIN is supported, but EXPLAIN ANALYZE is not because preventing double execution was
a lot more complicated in this case.
During version update, we indirectly calld CheckInstalledVersion via
ChackCitusVersions. This obviously fails because during version update it is
expected to have version mismatch between installed version and binary version.
Thus, we remove that ChackCitusVersions. We now only call ChackAvailableVersion.
Before this commit, we were erroring out at almost all queries if there is a
version mismatch. With this commit, we started to error out only requested
operation touches distributed tables.
Normally we would need to use distributed cache to understand whether a table
is distributed or not. However, it is not safe to read our metadata tables when
there is a version mismatch, thus it is not safe to create distributed cache.
Therefore for this specific occasion, we directly read from pg_dist_partition
table. However; reading from catalog is costly and we should not use this
method in other places as much as possible.
Pretty straightforward. Had some concerns about locking, but due to the
fact that all distributed operations use either some level of deparsing
or need to enumerate column names, they all block during any concurrent
column renames (due to the AccessExclusive lock).
In addition, I had some misgivings about permitting renames of the dis-
tribution column, but nothing bad comes from just allowing them.
Finally, I tried to trigger any sort of error using prepared statements
and could not trigger any errors not also exhibited by plain PostgreSQL
tables.
With this change we add an option to add a node without replicating all reference
tables to that node. If a node is added with this option, we mark the node as
inactive and no queries will sent to that node.
We also added two new UDFs;
- master_activate_node(host, port):
- marks node as active and replicates all reference tables to that node
- master_add_inactive_node(host, port):
- only adds node to pg_dist_node
This was getting pretty long and complex in the context of the main
utility hook. Moved out the checks for what should skip Citus process-
ing and what should have version checks performed.
With this change, we start to error out if loaded citus binaries does not match
the available major version or installed citus extension version. In this case
we force user to restart the server or run ALTER EXTENSION depending on the
situation
Thought this looked slightly nicer than the default behavior.
Changed preventTransaction to concurrent to be clearer that this code
path presently affects CONCURRENTLY code only.
Coordinator code marks index as invalid as a base, set it as valid in a
transactional layer atop that base, then proceeds with worker commands.
If a worker command has problems, the rollback results in an index with
isvalid = false. If everything succeeds, the user sees a valid index.
Some tests relied on worker errors though local commands were invalid.
Fixed those by ensuring preconditions were met to have command work
correctly. Otherwise most test changes are related to slight changes
in local/remote error ordering.
Custom Scan is a node in the planned statement which helps external providers
to abstract data scan not just for foreign data wrappers but also for regular
relations so you can benefit your version of caching or hardware optimizations.
This sounds like only an abstraction on the data scan layer, but we can use it
as an abstraction for our distributed queries. The only thing we need to do is
to find distributable parts of the query, plan for them and replace them with
a Citus Custom Scan. Then, whenever PostgreSQL hits this custom scan node in
its Vulcano style execution, it will call our callback functions which run
distributed plan and provides tuples to the upper node as it scans a regular
relation. This means fewer code changes, fewer bugs and more supported features
for us!
First, in the distributed query planner phase, we create a Custom Scan which
wraps the distributed plan. For real-time and task-tracker executors, we add
this custom plan under the master query plan. For router executor, we directly
pass the custom plan because there is not any master query. Then, we simply let
the PostgreSQL executor run this plan. When it hits the custom scan node, we
call the related executor parts for distributed plan, fill the tuple store in
the custom scan and return results to PostgreSQL executor in Vulcano style,
a tuple per XXX_ExecScan() call.
* Modify planner to utilize Custom Scan node.
* Create different scan methods for different executors.
* Use native PostgreSQL Explain for master part of queries.
Brian Cloutier
Marco Slot
Burak Yucesoy
Andres Freund
Jason Petersen
Murat Tuncer
Jason Petersen
velioglu
Metin Doslu
Onder Kalaci
Brian Cloutier