- There was a crash when the table a shardid belonged to changed during
a session. Instead of crashing (a failed assert) we now throw an error
- Update the isolation test which was crashing to no longer exercise
that code path
- Add a regression test to check that the error is thrown
* Enabling physical planner for subquery pushdown changes
This commit applies the logic that exists in INSERT .. SELECT
planning to the subquery pushdown changes.
The main algorithm is followed as :
- pick an anchor relation (i.e., target relation)
- per each target shard interval
- add the target shard interval's shard range
as a restriction to the relations (if all relations
joined on the partition keys)
- Check whether the query is router plannable per
target shard interval.
- If router plannable, create a task
* Add union support within the JOINS
This commit adds support for UNION/UNION ALL subqueries that are
in the following form:
.... (Q1 UNION Q2 UNION ...) as union_query JOIN (QN) ...
In other words, we currently do NOT support the queries that are
in the following form where union query is not JOINed with
other relations/subqueries :
.... (Q1 UNION Q2 UNION ...) as union_query ....
* Subquery pushdown planner uses original query
With this commit, we change the input to the logical planner for
subquery pushdown. Before this commit, the planner was relying
on the query tree that is transformed by the postgresql planner.
After this commit, the planner uses the original query. The main
motivation behind this change is the simplify deparsing of
subqueries.
* Enable top level subquery join queries
This work enables
- Top level subquery joins
- Joins between subqueries and relations
- Joins involving more than 2 range table entries
A new regression test file is added to reflect enabled test cases
* Add top level union support
This commit adds support for UNION/UNION ALL subqueries that are
in the following form:
.... (Q1 UNION Q2 UNION ...) as union_query ....
In other words, Citus supports allow top level
unions being wrapped into aggregations queries
and/or simple projection queries that only selects
some fields from the lower level queries.
* Disallow subqueries without a relation in the range table list for subquery pushdown
This commit disallows subqueries without relation in the range table
list. This commit is only applied for subquery pushdown. In other words,
we do not add this limitation for single table re-partition subqueries.
The reasoning behind this limitation is that if we allow pushing down
such queries, the result would include (shardCount * expectedResults)
where in a non distributed world the result would be (expectedResult)
only.
* Disallow subqueries without a relation in the range table list for INSERT .. SELECT
This commit disallows subqueries without relation in the range table
list. This commit is only applied for INSERT.. SELECT queries.
The reasoning behind this limitation is that if we allow pushing down
such queries, the result would include (shardCount * expectedResults)
where in a non distributed world the result would be (expectedResult)
only.
* Change behaviour of subquery pushdown flag (#1315)
This commit changes the behaviour of the citus.subquery_pushdown flag.
Before this commit, the flag is used to enable subquery pushdown logic. But,
with this commit, that behaviour is enabled by default. In other words, the
flag is now useless. We prefer to keep the flag since we don't want to break
the backward compatibility. Also, we may consider using that flag for other
purposes in the next commits.
* Require subquery_pushdown when limit is used in subquery
Using limit in subqueries may cause returning incorrect
results. Therefore we allow limits in subqueries only
if user explicitly set subquery_pushdown flag.
* Evaluate expressions on the LIMIT clause (#1333)
Subquery pushdown uses orignal query, the LIMIT and OFFSET clauses
are not evaluated. However, logical optimizer expects these expressions
are already evaluated by the standard planner. This commit manually
evaluates the functions on the logical planner for subquery pushdown.
* Better format subquery regression tests (#1340)
* Style fix for subquery pushdown regression tests
With this commit we intented a more consistent style for the
regression tests we've added in the
- multi_subquery_union.sql
- multi_subquery_complex_queries.sql
- multi_subquery_behavioral_analytics.sql
* Enable the tests that are temporarily commented
This commit enables some of the regression tests that were commented
out until all the development is done.
* Fix merge conflicts (#1347)
- Update regression tests to meet the changes in the regression
test output.
- Replace Ifs with Asserts given that the check is already done
- Update shard pruning outputs
* Add view regression tests for increased subquery coverage (#1348)
- joins between views and tables
- joins between views
- union/union all queries involving views
- views with limit
- explain queries with view
* Improve btree operators for the subquery tests
This commit adds the missing comprasion for subquery composite key
btree comparator.
We previously dismissed this as unimportant, but it turns out to be
very useful for the upcoming subquery pushdown, where a user might
specify an equality constraint in a subquery, and the subquery
pushdown machinery adds >= and <= restrictions on the shard boundary.
Previously the latter restriction was ignored.
It semms that GEQO optimizations, when it is set to on, create their own memory context
and free it after when it is no longer necessary. In join multi_join_restriction_hook
we allocate our variables in the CurrentMemoryContext, which is GEQO's memory context
if it is active. To prevent deallocation of our variables when GEQO's memory context is
freed, we started to allocate memory fo these variables in separate MemoryContext.
So far citus used postgres' predicate proofing logic for shard
pruning, except for INSERT and COPY which were already optimized for
speed. That turns out to be too slow:
* Shard pruning for SELECTs is currently O(#shards), because
PruneShardList calls predicate_refuted_by() for every
shard. Obviously using an O(N) type algorithm for general pruning
isn't good.
* predicate_refuted_by() is quite expensive on its own right. That's
primarily because it's optimized for doing a single refutation
proof, rather than performing the same proof over and over.
* predicate_refuted_by() does not keep persistent state (see 2.) for
function calls, which means that a lot of syscache lookups will be
performed. That's particularly bad if the partitioning key is a
composite key, because without a persistent FunctionCallInfo
record_cmp() has to repeatedly look-up the type definition of the
composite key. That's quite expensive.
Thus replace this with custom-code that works in two phases:
1) Search restrictions for constraints that can be pruned upon
2) Use those restrictions to search for matching shards in the most
efficient manner available:
a) Binary search / Hash Lookup in case of hash partitioned tables
b) Binary search for equal clauses in case of range or append
tables without overlapping shards.
c) Binary search for inequality clauses, searching for both lower
and upper boundaries, again in case of range or append
tables without overlapping shards.
d) exhaustive search testing each ShardInterval
My measurements suggest that we are considerably, often orders of
magnitude, faster than the previous solution, even if we have to fall
back to exhaustive pruning.
This determines whether it's possible to perform binary search on
sortedShardIntervalArray or not. If e.g. two shards have overlapping
ranges, that'd be prohibitive.
That'll be useful in later commit introducing faster shard pruning.
That's useful when comparing values a hash-partitioned table is
filtered by. The existing shardIntervalCompareFunction is about
comparing hashed values, not unhashed ones.
The added btree opclass function is so we can get a comparator
back. This should be changed much more widely, but is not necessary so
far.
Previously we, unnecessarily, used a the first shard's type
information to to look up the comparison function. But that
information is already available, so use it. That's helpful because
we sometimes want to access the comparator function even if there's no
shards.
With this commit, we started to send explain queries within a savepoint. After
running explain query, we rollback to savepoint. This saves us from side effects
of EXPLAIN ANALYZE on DML queries.
All callers fetch a cache entry and extract/compute arguments for the
eventual FindShardInterval call, so it makes more sense to refactor
into that function itself; this solves the use-after-free bug, too.
Soon shard pruning will be optimized not to generally work linearly
anymore. Thus we can't print the pruned shard intervals as currently
done anymore.
The current printing of shard ids also prevents us from running tests
in parallel, as otherwise shard ids aren't linearly numbered.
1) Generated files reside in the build directory, not the source
directory.
2) As a generated file is now included in the build, add it to the
include path (-I)
Pretty straightforward. Had some concerns about locking, but due to the
fact that all distributed operations use either some level of deparsing
or need to enumerate column names, they all block during any concurrent
column renames (due to the AccessExclusive lock).
In addition, I had some misgivings about permitting renames of the dis-
tribution column, but nothing bad comes from just allowing them.
Finally, I tried to trigger any sort of error using prepared statements
and could not trigger any errors not also exhibited by plain PostgreSQL
tables.
Brian Cloutier
Önder Kalacı
Andres Freund
Marco Slot
Marco Slot
Burak Yucesoy
Metin Döşlü
Metin Doslu
Jason Petersen
Jason Petersen
Eren Basak
Burak Velioglu
velioglu