In short, add wrappers around Postgres' AddWaitEventToSet() and
ModifyWaitEvent().
AddWaitEventToSet()/ModifyWaitEvent*() may throw hard errors. For
example, when the underlying socket for a connection is closed by
the remote server and already reflected by the OS, however
Citus hasn't had a chance to get this information. In that case,
if replication factor is >1, Citus can failover to other nodes
for executing the query. Even if replication factor = 1, Citus
can give much nicer errors.
So CitusAddWaitEventSetToSet()/CitusModifyWaitEvent() simply puts
AddWaitEventToSet()/ModifyWaitEvent() into a PG_TRY/PG_CATCH block
in order to catch any hard errors, and returns this information to
the caller.
- Drop PRIMARY KEY for Citus 10 compatibility
- Drop columnar for PG 12
- Do not start/stop metadata sync as stop is not implemented in 10.1
- PG 11 parallel query changes explain outputs
Before this commit, creating a partition after a DROP column
on the parent (position before dist. key) was leading to
partition to have the wrong distribution column.
* Columnar: use clause Vars for chunk group filtering.
This solves #4780 and also provides a cleaner separation between chunk
group filtering and projection pushdown.
* Columnar: sort and deduplicate Vars pulled from clauses.
* Columnar: cleanup variable names.
* Columnar: remove alternate test output.
* Columnar: do not recurse when looking for whereClauseVars.
Co-authored-by: Jeff Davis <jefdavi@microsoft.com>
(cherry picked from commit 063e673038)
ConnParams(AuthInfo and PoolInfo) gets a snapshot, which will block the
remote connectinos to localhost. And the release of snapshot will be
blocked by the snapshot. This leads to a deadlock.
We warm up the conn params hash before starting a new transaction so
that the entries will already be there when we start a new transaction.
Hence GetConnParams will not get a snapshot.
(cherry picked from commit b453563e88)
This commit adds support for long partition names for distributed tables:
- ALTER TABLE dist_table ATTACH PARTITION ..
- CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF dist_table ..
Note: create_distributed_table UDF does not support long table and
partition names, and is not covered in this commit
(cherry picked from commit 9919fbe3f8)
* Fix problews with concurrent calls of DropMarkedShards
When trying to enable `citus.defer_drop_after_shard_move` by default it
turned out that DropMarkedShards was not safe to call concurrently.
This could especially cause big problems when also moving shards at the
same time. During tests it was possible to trigger a state where a shard
that was moved would not be available on any of the nodes anymore after
the move.
Currently DropMarkedShards is only called in production by the
maintenaince deamon. Since this is only a single process triggering such
a race is currently impossible in production settings. In future changes
we will want to call DropMarkedShards from other places too though.
* Add some isolation tests
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
(cherry picked from commit 93c2dcf3d2)
This happens only when we have a "<" or "<=" filter on distribution
column of a range distributed table and that filter falls in between
two shards.
When the filter falls in between two shards:
If the filter is ">" or ">=", then UpperShardBoundary was
returning "upperBoundIndex - 1", where upperBoundIndex is
exclusive shard index used during binary seach.
This is expected since upperBoundIndex is an exclusive
index.
If the filter is "<" or "<=", then LowerShardBoundary was
returning "lowerBoundIndex + 1", where lowerBoundIndex is
inclusive shard index used during binary seach.
On the other hand, since lowerBoundIndex is an inclusive
index, we should just return lowerBoundIndex instead of
doing "+ 1". Before this commit, we were missing leftmost
shard in such queries.
* Remove useless conditional branches
The branch that we delete from UpperShardBoundary was obviously useless.
The other one in LowerShardBoundary became useless after we remove "+ 1"
from there.
This indeed is another proof of what & how we are fixing with this pr.
* Improve comments and add more
* Add some tests for upper bound calculation too
(cherry picked from commit b118d4188e)
The first and main issue was that we were putting absolute pointers into
shared memory for the `steps` field of the `ProgressMonitorData`. This
pointer was being overwritten every time a process requested the monitor
steps, which is the only reason why this even worked in the first place.
To quote a part of a relevant stack overflow answer:
> First of all, putting absolute pointers in shared memory segments is
> terrible terible idea - those pointers would only be valid in the
> process that filled in their values. Shared memory segments are not
> guaranteed to attach at the same virtual address in every process.
> On the contrary - they attach where the system deems it possible when
> `shmaddr == NULL` is specified on call to `shmat()`
Source: https://stackoverflow.com/a/10781921/2570866
In this case a race condition occurred when a second process overwrote
the pointer in between the first process its write and read of the steps
field.
This issue is fixed by not storing the pointer in shared memory anymore.
Instead we now calculate it's position every time we need it.
The second race condition I have not been able to trigger, but I found
it while investigating this. This issue was that we published the handle
of the shared memory segment, before we initialized the data in the
steps. This means that during initialization of the data, a call to
`get_rebalance_progress()` could read partial data in an unsynchronized
manner.
(cherry picked from commit ca00b63272)
DESCRIPTION: introduce `citus.local_hostname` GUC for connections to the current node
Citus once in a while needs to connect to itself for some systems operations. This used to be hardcoded to `localhost`. The hardcoded hostname causes some issues, for example in environments where `sslmode=verify-full` is required. It is not always desirable or even feasible to get `localhost` as an alt name on the certificate.
By introducing a GUC to use when connecting to the current instance the user has more control what network path is used and what hostname is required to be present in the server certificate.
With https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/4806 we enabled
2PC for any non-read-only local task. However, if the execution
is a single task, enabling 2PC (CoordinatedTransactionShouldUse2PC)
hits an assertion as we are not in a coordinated transaction.
There is no downside of using a coordinated transaction for single
task local queries.
Because setting the flag doesn't necessarily mean that we'll
use 2PC. If connections are read-only, we will not use 2PC.
In other words, we'll use 2PC only for connections that modified
any placements.
(cherry picked from commit e65e72130d)
Before this commit, Citus used 2PC no matter what kind of
local query execution happens.
For example, if the coordinator has shards (and the workers as well),
even a simple SELECT query could start 2PC:
```SQL
WITH cte_1 AS (SELECT * FROM test LIMIT 10) SELECT count(*) FROM cte_1;
```
In this query, the local execution of the shards (and also intermediate
result reads) triggers the 2PC.
To prevent that, Citus now distinguishes local reads and local writes.
And, Citus switches to 2PC only if a modification happens. This may
still lead to unnecessary 2PCs when there is a local modification
and remote SELECTs only. Though, we handle that separately
via #4587.
(cherry picked from commit 6a7ed7b309)
Marco Slot
Onur Tirtir
Hanefi Onaldi
Onder Kalaci
naisila
jeff-davis
SaitTalhaNisanci
Ahmet Gedemenli
Nils Dijk
Jelte Fennema
Önder Kalacı
Naisila Puka
Hadi Moshayedi