Commit Graph

20 Commits (35d1160ace75b44b0942bc29b7c8678ca84fe728)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Emel Şimşek 3fda2c3254
Change test files in multi and multi-1 schedules to accommodate coordinator in the metadata. (#6939)
Changes test files in multi and multi-1 schedules such that they
accomodate coordinator in metadata.

Changes fall into the following buckets:

1. When coordinator is in metadata, reference table shards are present
in coordinator too.
This changes test outputs checking the table size, shard numbers etc.
for reference tables.

2. When coordinator is in metadata, postgres tables are converted to
citus local tables whenever a foreign key relationship to them is
created. This changes some test cases which tests it should not be
possible to create foreign keys to postgres tables.

3. Remove lines that add/remove coordinator for testing purposes.
2023-06-05 10:37:48 +03:00
Marco Slot b97e5081c7 Disable co-located joins for append-distributed tables 2021-10-18 21:11:16 +02:00
Marco Slot 386d2567d4 Reduce reliance on append tables in regression tests 2021-10-08 21:27:14 +02:00
Sait Talha Nisanci 4308d867d9 remove task-tracker in comments, documentation 2020-07-21 16:21:01 +03:00
SaitTalhaNisanci b3af63c8ce
Remove task tracker executor (#3850)
* use adaptive executor even if task-tracker is set

* Update check-multi-mx tests for adaptive executor

Basically repartition joins are enabled where necessary. For parallel
tests max adaptive executor pool size is decresed to 2, otherwise we
would get too many clients error.

* Update limit_intermediate_size test

It seems that when we use adaptive executor instead of task tracker, we
exceed the intermediate result size less in the test. Therefore updated
the tests accordingly.

* Update multi_router_planner

It seems that there is one problem with multi_router_planner when we use
adaptive executor, we should fix the following error:
+ERROR:  relation "authors_range_840010" does not exist
+CONTEXT:  while executing command on localhost:57637

* update repartition join tests for check-multi

* update isolation tests for repartitioning

* Error out if shard_replication_factor > 1 with repartitioning

As we are removing the task tracker, we cannot switch to it if
shard_replication_factor > 1. In that case, we simply error out.

* Remove MULTI_EXECUTOR_TASK_TRACKER

* Remove multi_task_tracker_executor

Some utility methods are moved to task_execution_utils.c.

* Remove task tracker protocol methods

* Remove task_tracker.c methods

* remove unused methods from multi_server_executor

* fix style

* remove task tracker specific tests from worker_schedule

* comment out task tracker udf calls in tests

We were using task tracker udfs to test permissions in
multi_multiuser.sql. We should find some other way to test them, then we
should remove the commented out task tracker calls.

* remove task tracker test from follower schedule

* remove task tracker tests from multi mx schedule

* Remove task-tracker specific functions from worker functions

* remove multi task tracker extra schedule

* Remove unused methods from multi physical planner

* remove task_executor_type related things in tests

* remove LoadTuplesIntoTupleStore

* Do initial cleanup for repartition leftovers

During startup, task tracker would call TrackerCleanupJobDirectories and
TrackerCleanupJobSchemas to clean up leftover directories and job
schemas. With adaptive executor, while doing repartitions it is possible
to leak these things as well. We don't retry cleanups, so it is possible
to have leftover in case of errors.

TrackerCleanupJobDirectories is renamed as
RepartitionCleanupJobDirectories since it is repartition specific now,
however TrackerCleanupJobSchemas cannot be used currently because it is
task tracker specific. The thing is that this function is a no-op
currently.

We should add cleaning up intermediate schemas to DoInitialCleanup
method when that problem is solved(We might want to solve it in this PR
as well)

* Revert "remove task tracker tests from multi mx schedule"

This reverts commit 03ecc0a681.

* update multi mx repartition parallel tests

* not error with task_tracker_conninfo_cache_invalidate

* not run 4 repartition queries in parallel

It seems that when we run 4 repartition queries in parallel we get too
many clients error on CI even though we don't get it locally. Our guess
is that, it is because we open/close many connections without doing some
work and postgres has some delay to close the connections. Hence even
though connections are removed from the pg_stat_activity, they might
still not be closed. If the above assumption is correct, it is unlikely
for it to happen in practice because:
- There is some network latency in clusters, so this leaves some times
for connections to be able to close
- Repartition joins return some data and that also leaves some time for
connections to be fully closed.

As we don't get this error in our local, we currently assume that it is
not a bug. Ideally this wouldn't happen when we get rid of the
task-tracker repartition methods because they don't do any pruning and
might be opening more connections than necessary.

If this still gives us "too many clients" error, we can try to increase
the max_connections in our test suite(which is 100 by default).

Also there are different places where this error is given in postgres,
but adding some backtrace it seems that we get this from
ProcessStartupPacket. The backtraces can be found in this link:
https://circleci.com/gh/citusdata/citus/138702

* Set distributePlan->relationIdList when it is needed

It seems that we were setting the distributedPlan->relationIdList after
JobExecutorType is called, which would choose task-tracker if
replication factor > 1 and there is a repartition query. However, it
uses relationIdList to decide if the query has a repartition query, and
since it was not set yet, it would always think it is not a repartition
query and would choose adaptive executor when it should choose
task-tracker.

* use adaptive executor even with shard_replication_factor > 1

It seems that we were already using adaptive executor when
replication_factor > 1. So this commit removes the check.

* remove multi_resowner.c and deprecate some settings

* remove TaskExecution related leftovers

* change deprecated API error message

* not recursively plan single relatition repartition subquery

* recursively plan single relation repartition subquery

* test depreceated task tracker functions

* fix overlapping shard intervals in range-distributed test

* fix error message for citus_metadata_container

* drop task-tracker deprecated functions

* put the implemantation back to worker_cleanup_job_schema_cachesince citus cloud uses it

* drop some functions, add downgrade script

Some deprecated functions are dropped.
Downgrade script is added.
Some gucs are deprecated.
A new guc for repartition joins bucket size is added.

* order by a test to fix flappiness
2020-07-18 13:11:36 +03:00
Marco Slot 2a3234ca26 Rename masterQuery to combineQuery 2020-06-17 14:14:37 +02:00
Hadi Moshayedi 1b3e58f0c3 Merge branch 'improve-shard-pruning' of https://github.com/MarkusSintonen/citus into MarkusSintonen-improve-shard-pruning 2020-02-26 07:13:33 -08:00
Nils Dijk a77ed9cd23
Refactor master query to be planned by postgres' planner (#3326)
DESCRIPTION: Replace the query planner for the coordinator part with the postgres planner

Closes #2761 

Citus had a simple rule based planner for the query executed on the query coordinator. This planner grew over time with the addigion of SQL support till it was getting close to the functionality of the postgres planner. Except the code was brittle and its complexity rose which made it hard to add new SQL support.

Given its resemblance with the postgres planner it was a long outstanding wish to replace our hand crafted planner with the well supported postgres planner. This patch replaces our planner with a call to postgres' planner.

Due to the functionality of the postgres planner we needed to support both projections and filters/quals on the citus custom scan node. When a sort operation is planned above the custom scan it might require fields to be reordered in the custom scan before returning the tuple (projection). The postgres planner assumes every custom scan node implements projections. Because we controlled the plan that was created we prevented reordering in the custom scan and never had implemented it before.

A same optimisation applies to having clauses that could have been where clauses. Instead of applying the filter as a having on the aggregate it will push it down into the plan which could reach a custom scan node.

For both filters and projections we have implemented them when tuples are read from the tuple store. If no projections or filters are required it will directly return the tuple from the tuple store. Otherwise it will loop tuples from the tuple store through the filter and projection until a tuple is found and returned.

Besides filters being pushed down a side effect of having quals that could have been a where clause is that a call to read intermediate result could be called before the first tuple is fetched from the custom scan. This failed because the intermediate result would only be pulled to the coordinator on the first tuple fetch. To overcome this problem we do run the distributed subplans now before we run the postgres executor. This ensures the intermediate result is present on the coordinator in time. We do account for total time instrumentation by removing the instrumentation before handing control to the psotgres executor and update the timings our self.

For future SQL support it is enough to create a valid query structure for the part of the query to be executed on the query coordinating node. As a utility we do serialise and print the query at debug level4 for engineers to inspect what kind of query is being planned on the query coordinator.
2020-02-25 14:39:56 +01:00
Markus Sintonen cdedb98c54 Improve shard pruning logic to understand OR-conditions.
Previously a limitation in the shard pruning logic caused multi distribution value queries to always go into all the shards/workers whenever query also used OR conditions in WHERE clause.

Related to https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/2593 and https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/1537
There was no good workaround for this limitation. The limitation caused quite a bit of overhead with simple queries being sent to all workers/shards (especially with setups having lot of workers/shards).

An example of a previous plan which was inadequately pruned:
```
EXPLAIN SELECT count(*) FROM orders_hash_partitioned
	WHERE (o_orderkey IN (1,2)) AND (o_custkey = 11 OR o_custkey = 22);
                                                          QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Aggregate  (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
   ->  Custom Scan (Citus Adaptive)  (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
         Task Count: 4
         Tasks Shown: One of 4
         ->  Task
               Node: host=localhost port=xxxxx dbname=regression
               ->  Aggregate  (cost=13.68..13.69 rows=1 width=8)
                     ->  Seq Scan on orders_hash_partitioned_630000 orders_hash_partitioned  (cost=0.00..13.68 rows=1 width=0)
                           Filter: ((o_orderkey = ANY ('{1,2}'::integer[])) AND ((o_custkey = 11) OR (o_custkey = 22)))
(9 rows)
```

After this commit the task count is what one would expect from the query defining multiple distinct values for the distribution column:
```
EXPLAIN SELECT count(*) FROM orders_hash_partitioned
	WHERE (o_orderkey IN (1,2)) AND (o_custkey = 11 OR o_custkey = 22);
                                                          QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Aggregate  (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
   ->  Custom Scan (Citus Adaptive)  (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0)
         Task Count: 2
         Tasks Shown: One of 2
         ->  Task
               Node: host=localhost port=xxxxx dbname=regression
               ->  Aggregate  (cost=13.68..13.69 rows=1 width=8)
                     ->  Seq Scan on orders_hash_partitioned_630000 orders_hash_partitioned  (cost=0.00..13.68 rows=1 width=0)
                           Filter: ((o_orderkey = ANY ('{1,2}'::integer[])) AND ((o_custkey = 11) OR (o_custkey = 22)))
(9 rows)
```

"Core" of the pruning logic works as previously where it uses `PrunableInstances` to queue ORable valid constraints for shard pruning.
The difference is that now we build a compact internal representation of the query expression tree with PruningTreeNodes before actual shard pruning is run.

Pruning tree nodes represent boolean operators and the associated constraints of it. This internal format allows us to have compact representation of the query WHERE clauses which allows "core" pruning logic to work with OR-clauses correctly.

For example query having
`WHERE (o_orderkey IN (1,2)) AND (o_custkey=11 OR (o_shippriority > 1 AND o_shippriority < 10))`
gets transformed into:
1. AND(o_orderkey IN (1,2), OR(X, AND(X, X)))
2. AND(o_orderkey IN (1,2), OR(X, X))
3. AND(o_orderkey IN (1,2), X)
Here X is any set of unknown condition(s) for shard pruning.

This allow the final shard pruning to correctly recognize that shard pruning is done with the valid condition of `o_orderkey IN (1,2)`.

Another example with unprunable condition in query
`WHERE (o_orderkey IN (1,2)) OR (o_custkey=11 AND o_custkey=22)`
gets transformed into:
1. OR(o_orderkey IN (1,2), AND(X, X))
2. OR(o_orderkey IN (1,2), X)

Which is recognized as unprunable due to the OR condition between distribution column and unknown constraint -> goes to all shards.

Issue https://github.com/citusdata/citus/issues/1537 originally suggested transforming the query conditions into a full disjunctive normal form (DNF),
but this process of transforming into DNF is quite a heavy operation. It may "blow up" into a really large DNF form with complex queries having non trivial `WHERE` clauses.

I think the logic for shard pruning could be simplified further but I decided to leave the "core" of the shard pruning untouched.
2020-02-14 17:58:13 +00:00
Jelte Fennema 7730bd449c Normalize tests: Remove trailing whitespace 2020-01-06 09:32:03 +01:00
Jelte Fennema 7f3de68b0d Normalize tests: header separator length 2020-01-06 09:32:03 +01:00
Jelte Fennema 96434e898f Normalize tests: s/assigned task [0-9]+ to node/assigned task to node/ 2020-01-03 11:45:22 +01:00
Jelte Fennema 8c5c0dd74c Normalize tests: s/localhost:[0-9]+/localhost:xxxxx/g 2020-01-03 11:40:50 +01:00
Marco Slot b21b6905ae Do not repeat GROUP BY distribution_column on coordinator
Allow arbitrary aggregates to be pushed down in these scenarios
2019-12-25 01:33:41 +00:00
Jelte Fennema 9fb897a074
Fix queries with repartition joins and group by unique column (#3157)
Postgres doesn't require you to add all columns that are in the target list to
the GROUP BY when you group by a unique column (or columns). It even actively
removes these group by clauses when you do.

This is normally fine, but for repartition joins it is not. The reason for this
is that the temporary tables don't have these primary key columns. So when the
worker executes the query it will complain that it is missing columns in the
group by.

This PR fixes that by adding an ANY_VALUE aggregate around each variable in
the target list that does is not contained in the group by or in an aggregate.
This is done only for repartition joins.

The ANY_VALUE aggregate chooses the value from an undefined row in the
group.
2019-11-08 15:36:18 +01:00
Philip Dubé 74cb168205 Remove Postgres 10 support 2019-10-11 21:56:56 +00:00
Philip Dubé 77efec04a0 Router Planner: accept SELECT_CMD ctes in modification queries 2019-06-26 10:32:01 +02:00
Philip Dubé 84fe626378 multi_router_planner: refactor error propagation 2019-06-26 10:32:01 +02:00
Hadi Moshayedi 86b12bc2d0
Always prefix operators with their namespace. (#2147)
Previously we checked if an operator is in pg_catalog, and if it wasn't we prefixed it with namespace in worker queries. This can have a huge impact on performance of physical planner when using custom data types.

This happened regardless of current search_path config, because Citus overrides the search path in get_query_def_extended(). When we do so, the check for existence of the operator in current search path in generate_operator_name() fails for any operators outside pg_catalog. This means that nothing gets cached, and in the following calls we will again recheck the system tables for existence of the operators, which took an additional 40-50ms for some of the usecases we were seeing.

In this change we skip the pg_catalog check, and always prefix the operator with its namespace.
2018-05-05 13:27:26 -04:00
velioglu 121ff39b26 Removes large_table_shard_count GUC 2018-04-29 10:34:50 +02:00