We do not use comments starting with # in spec files because it creates
errors from C preprocessor that expects directives after this character.
Instead use C style comments, i.e:
// single line comment
You can also use multiline comments as well
/*
* multi line comment
*/
We re-define the meaning of active shard placement. It used
to only be defined via shardstate == SHARD_STATE_ACTIVE.
Now, we also add one more check. The worker node that the
placement is on should be active as well.
This is a preparation for supporting citus_disable_node()
for MX with multiple failures at the same time.
With this change, the maintanince daemon only needs to
sync the "node metadata" (e.g., pg_dist_node), not the
shard metadata.
Before this commit, we acquire the metadata locks on the reference
tables while removing/disabling a node on all the MX nodes.
Although it has some marginal benefits, such as a concurrent
modification during remove/disable node blocks, instead of erroring
out, the drawbacks seems worse. Both citus_remove_node and citus_disable_node
are not tolerant to multiple node failures.
With this commit, we relax the locks. The implication is that while
a node is removed/disabled, users might see query errors. On the
other hand, this change becomes removing/disabling nodes more
tolerant to multiple node failures.
When refactoring storage layer in #4907, we deleted the code that allows
overwriting a disk page previously written but not known by metadata.
Readers can see the change that introduced the code allows doing so in
commit a8da9acc63.
The reasoning was that; as of 10.2, we started aligning page
reservations (`AlignReservation`) for subsequent writes right after
allocating pages from disk. That means, even if writer transaction
fails, subsequent writes are guaranteed to allocate a new page and write
to there. For this reason, attempting to write to a page allocated
before is not possible for a columnar table that user created when using
v10.2.x.
However, since the older versions of columnar doesn't do that, following
example scenario can still result in writing to such disk page, even if
user now upgraded to v10.2.x. This is because, when upgrading storage to
2.0 (`ColumnarStorageUpdateIfNeeded`), we calculate `reservedOffset` of
the metapage based on the highest used address known by stripe
metadata (`GetHighestUsedAddressAndId`). However, stripe metadata
doesn't have entries for aborted writes. As a result, highest used
address would be computed by ignoring pages that are allocated but not
used.
- User attempts writing to columnar table on Citus v10.0x/v10.1x.
- Write operation fails for some reason.
- User upgrades Citus to v10.2.x.
- When attempting to write to same columnar table, they hit to "attempt
to write columnar data .." error since write operation done in the
older version of columnar already allocated that page, and now we are
overwriting it.
For this reason, with this commit, we re-do the change done in
a8da9acc63.
And for the reasons given above, it wasn't possible to add a test for
this commit via usual code-paths. For this reason, added a UDF only for
testing purposes so that we can reproduce the exact scenario in our
regression test suite.
During pg upgrades, we have seen that it is not guaranteed that a
columnar table will be created after metadata objects got created.
Prior to changes done in this commit, we had such a dependency
relationship in `pg_depend`:
```
columnar_table ----> columnarAM ----> citus extension
^ ^
| |
columnar.storage_id_seq -------------------- |
|
columnar.stripe -------------------------------
```
Since `pg_upgrade` just knows to follow topological sort of the objects
when creating database dump, above dependency graph doesn't imply that
`columnar_table` should be created before metadata objects such as
`columnar.storage_id_seq` and `columnar.stripe` are created.
For this reason, with this commit we add new records to `pg_depend` to
make columnarAM depending on all rel objects living in `columnar`
schema. That way, `pg_upgrade` will know it needs to create those before
creating `columnarAM`, and similarly, before creating any tables using
`columnarAM`.
Note that in addition to inserting those records via installation script,
we also do the same in `citus_finish_pg_upgrade()`. This is because,
`pg_upgrade` rebuilds catalog tables in the new cluster and that means,
we must insert them in the new cluster too.
- [x] Add some more regression test coverage
- [x] Make sure returning works fine in case of
local execution + remote execution
(task->partiallyLocalOrRemote works as expected, already added tests)
- [x] Implement locking properly (and add isolation tests)
- [x] We do #shardcount round-trips on `SerializeNonCommutativeWrites`.
We made it a single round-trip.
- [x] Acquire locks for subselects on the workers & add isolation tests
- [x] Add a GUC to prevent modification from the workers, hence increase the
coordinator-only throughput
- The performance slightly drops (~%15), unless
`citus.allow_modifications_from_workers_to_replicated_tables`
is set to false
Drop extension might cascade to columnar.options before dropping a
columnar table. In that case, we were getting below error when opening
columnar.options to delete records for the columnar table that we are
about to drop.: "ERROR: could not open relation with OID 0".
I somehow reproduced this bug easily when upgrading pg, that is why
adding added the test to after_pg_upgrade_schedule.
We recently introduced a set of patches to 10.2, and introduced 10.2-4
migration version. This migration version only resides on `release-10.2`
branch, and is missing on our default branch. This creates a problem
because we do not have a valid migration path from 10.2 to latest 11.0.
To remedy this issue, I copied the relevant migration files from
`release-10.2` branch, and renamed some of our migration files on
default branch to make sure we have a linear upgrade path.
Before this commit, we required the user to be owner of the shard/table
in order to call lock_shard_resources.
However, that is too restrictive. We can have users with GRANTS
to the table who are not owners of the tables/shards.
With this commit, we allow such patterns.
Hanefi Onaldi
Halil Ozan Akgül
Önder Kalacı
Onder Kalaci
Onur Tirtir
Burak Velioglu
Burak Velioglu
Marco Slot
Marco Slot
Ahmet Gedemenli
naisila