The low-level StoreAllActiveTransactions() function filters out
backends that exited.
Before this commit, if you run a pgbench, after that you'd still
see the backends show up:
```SQL
select count(*) from get_global_active_transactions();
┌───────┐
│ count │
├───────┤
│ 538 │
└───────┘
```
After this patch, only active backends show-up:
```SQL
select count(*) from get_global_active_transactions();
┌───────┐
│ count │
├───────┤
│ 72 │
└───────┘
```
DESCRIPTION: Prevent Citus table functions from being called on shards
The operations that guard against using shards are:
* Create Local Table
* Create distributed table (which affects reference table creation as well).
* I used a `ErrorIfRaltionIsKnownShard` instead of `ErrorIfIllegallyChangingKnownShard`.
`ErrorIfIllegallyChangingKnownShard` allows the operation if `citus.enable_manual_changes_to_shards`,
but I am not sure if it ever makes sense to create a distributed, reference, or citus local table out of a shard.
I tried to go over the code to identify other UDF-s where shards could be illegaly changed, but I could not find any other.
My knowledge of the codebase is not solid enough for me to say for sure.
Fixes#5610
* Adds installation of `mitmproxy`. I was getting this error from running regression tests:
```
Can't exec "mitmdump": No such file or directory at /home/glediszeneli/citus/src/test/regress/pg_regress_multi.pl line 215.
```
* Add a comment to alternatively use `install-all` in the setup. Without `install-all` the `mutli-extension` regression test fails.
This commit introduces several test cases for concurrent operations that
change metadata, and a concurrent metadata sync operation.
The overall structure is as follows:
- Session#1 starts metadata syncing in a transaction block
- Session#2 does an operation that change metadata
- Both sessions are committed
- Another session checks whether the metadata are the same accross all
nodes in the cluster.
* Break the dependency to CitusInitiatedBackend infrastructure
With this change, we start to show non-distributed backends as well
in citus_dist_stat_activity. I think that
(a) it is essential for making citus_lock_waits to work for blocked
on DDL commands.
(b) it is more expected from the user's perspective. The name of
the view is a little inconsistent now (e.g., citus_dist_stat_activity)
but we are already planning to improve the names with followup
PRs.
Also, we have global pids assigned, the CitusInitiatedBackend
becomes obsolete.