Before this commit, we required the user to be owner of the shard/table
in order to call lock_shard_resources.
However, that is too restrictive. We can have users with GRANTS
to the table who are not owners of the tables/shards.
With this commit, we allow such patterns.
This change creates a slightly higher abstraction of the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` where it decouples the partitioning from writing it to a file. This allows for easier reuse for other `DestReceiver`'s that would like to route different tuples to different `DestReceiver`'s.
Originally there was a lot of state kept in `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` to be able to lazily create `FileDestReceivers` when the first tuple arrived for that target. This convoluted the implementation of the processing of tuples with where they should go.
This refactor changes that where it makes the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` completely agnostic of what kind of Receivers it is writing to. When constructed you pass it a list of `DestReceiver` compatible pointers with the length of `partitionCount`. Internally the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` keeps track of which `DestReceiver`'s have been started or not, and start them when they first receive a tuple.
Alternatively, if the instantiating code of the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` wants, the startup can be turned from lazily to eagerly. When the startup is eager (not lazy) all `rStartup` functions on the list of `DestReceiver`'s are called during the startup of the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` and marked as such.
A downside of this approach is the following. On highly partitioned destinations we now need to allocate a `FileDestReceiver` for every target, _always_. When the data passed into the `PartitionedResultDestReceiver` is highly skewed to a small set of `FileDestReceiver`'s this will waste some memory. Given the small size of a `FileDestReceiver`, and the fact that actual file handles are only created during the processing of the startup of the `FileDestReceiver` I think this memory waste is not a problem. If this would become a problem we could refactor the source list into some kind of generator object which can generate the `DestReceiver`'s on the fly.
* Refactor some checks in citus local tables
* all existing citus local tables are auto converted after upgrade
* Update warning messages in CreateCitusLocalTable
* Hide notice msg for auto converting local tables
* Hide hint msg
Co-authored-by: Ahmet Gedemenli <afgedemenli@gmail.com>
This PR is fixing 2 separate issues related to the local run of citus upgrade tests.
d3e7c825ab fixes the issue that, with our new testing infrastructure, we moved/renamed some of existing folders. This created a problem for local runs of citus upgrade tests since some paths were sensitive to such changes. This commit tries to make it more generic so that this issue is less likely to happen in the future, while also fixing the current issue.
93de6b60c3 we are fixing an issue that a new environment variable was added for citus upgrade tests, which is defined in the CI. 0cb51f8c37/.circleci/config.yml (L294)
This environment variable wasn't set in our local runs hence it would create problems. Instead of defining this environment variable in the local run, we change the citus_upgrade run command to use an existing env variable, which is now also set in the CI.
We fixed some crashes a while back that would only occur in cases where
the value of a distribution column would have result in a high or a very
low hash value. This adds a regression test for those crashes.
This test starts passing because of PR #4508, to be precise commit:
24e60b44a1
When I undo that commit this newly added test starts failing. This adds
this test to make sure we don't regress on this again.
Clang 13 complains about a suspicious string concatenation. It thinks we
might have missed a comma. This adds parentheses to make it clear that
concatenation is indeed what we meant.
There is a vulnerability in mitmproxy with the version we are using.
It would be hard to exploit anything with regards to the artifacts we ship as its only used in our test suite. Still its good hygiene to _not_ use software with known vulnerabilities.
This PR updates the version of python, mitmproxy and the crypto libraries used.
The latest version of mitmproxy for python 3.6 is not patched, hence the upgrade of python.
For our CI images this cascades into upgrading debian as well :)
For CI we bake these versions in our images so we need to update them as well.
Changes to the CI images: https://github.com/citusdata/the-process/pull/65
It seems like the decision for 2PC is more complicated than
it should be.
With this change, we do one behavioral change. In essense,
before this commit, when a SELECT task with replication factor > 1
is executed, the executor was triggering 2PC. And, in fact,
the transaction manager (`ConnectionModifiedPlacement()`) was
able to understand not to trigger 2PC when no modification happens.
However, for transaction blocks like:
BEGIN;
-- a command that triggers 2PC
-- A SELECT command on replication > 1
..
COMMIT;
The SELECT was used to be qualified as required 2PC. And, as a side-effect
the executor was setting `xactProperties.errorOnAnyFailure = true;`
So, the commands was failing at the time of execution. Now, they fail at
the end of the transaction.
Önder Kalacı
Hanefi Onaldi
Onder Kalaci
Marco Slot
naisila
Marco Slot
Nils Dijk
Sait Talha Nisanci
Halil Ozan Akgül
Ahmet Gedemenli
Onur Tirtir
Jelte Fennema
Philip Dubé
Philip Dubé