Running a query from a Citus non-main database that inserts to
pg_dist_object requires a new connection to the main database itself.
This PR adds that connection to the main database.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
When there are multiple localhost entries in /etc/hosts like following
/etc/hosts:
```
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdomain4
::1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost6 localhost6.localdomain6
127.0.0.1 localhost
```
multi_cluster_management check will failed:
```
@@ -857,20 +857,21 @@
ERROR: group 14 already has a primary node
-- check that you can add secondaries and unavailable nodes to a group
SELECT groupid AS worker_2_group FROM pg_dist_node WHERE nodeport = :worker_2_port \gset
SELECT 1 FROM master_add_node('localhost', 9998, groupid => :worker_1_group, noderole => 'secondary');
?column?
----------
1
(1 row)
SELECT 1 FROM master_add_node('localhost', 9997, groupid => :worker_1_group, noderole => 'unavailable');
+WARNING: could not establish connection after 5000 ms
?column?
----------
1
(1 row)
```
This actually isn't just a problem in test environments, but could occur
as well during actual usage when a hostname in pg_dist_node
resolves to multiple IPs and one of those IPs is unreachable.
Postgres will then automatically continue with the next IP, but
Citus should listen for events on the new socket. Not on the
old one.
Co-authored-by: chuhx43211 <chuhx43211@hundsun.com>
LoadShardList is called twice, which is not neccessary, and there is no
need to sort the shard placement list since we only want to know the list
length.
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for issuing `CREATE`/`DROP` DATABASE commands
from worker nodes
With this commit, we allow issuing CREATE / DROP DATABASE commands from
worker nodes too.
As in #7278, this is not allowed when the coordinator is not added to
metadata because we don't ever sync metadata changes to coordinator
when adding coordinator to the metadata via
`SELECT citus_set_coordinator_host('<hostname>')`, or equivalently, via
`SELECT citus_add_node(<coordinator_node_name>, <coordinator_node_port>, 0)`.
We serialize database management commands by acquiring a Citus specific
advisory lock on the first primary worker node if there are any workers in the
cluster. As opposed to what we've done in https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/7278
for role management commands, we try to avoid from running into distributed deadlocks
as much as possible. This is because, while distributed deadlocks that can happen around
role management commands can be detected by Citus, this is not the case for database
management commands because most of them cannot be run inside in a transaction block.
In that case, Citus cannot even detect the distributed deadlock because the command is not
part of a distributed transaction at all, then the command execution might not return the
control back to the user for an indefinite amount of time.
This fixes#7230.
First of all, using HeapTupleHeaderGetDatumLength(heapTuple) is
definetly wrong, it gives a number that's 4 times less than the correct
tuple size (heapTuple.t_len). See
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_16_0/src/include/access/htup_details.h#L455-L456https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_16_0/src/include/varatt.h#L279https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_16_0/src/include/varatt.h#L225-L226
When I fixed it, the limit_intermediate_size test failed, so I tried to
understand what's going on there. In original commit fd546cf these
queries were supposed to fail. Then in b3af63c three of the queries that
were supposed to fail suddenly worked and tests were changed to pass
without understanding why the output had changed or how to keep test
testing what it had to test. Even comments saying that these queries
should fail were left untouched. Commit message gives no clue about why
exactly test has changed:
> It seems that when we use adaptive executor instead of task tracker,
we
> exceed the intermediate result size less in the test. Therefore
updated
> the tests accordingly.
Then 3fda2c3 also blindly raised the limit for one of the queries to
keep it working:
3fda2c3254 (diff-a9b7b617f9dfd345318cb8987d5897143ca1b723c87b81049bbadd94dcc86570R19)
When in fe3caf3 that HeapTupleHeaderGetDatumLength(heapTuple) call was
finally added, one of those test queries became failing again.
The other two of them now also failing after the fix. I don't understand
how exactly the calculation of "intermediate result size" that is
limited by citus.max_intermediate_result_size had changed through
b3af63c and fe3caf3, but these numbers are now closer to what
they originally were when this limitation was added in
fd546cf. So these queries should fail, like in the original
version of the limit_intermediate_size test.
Co-authored-by: Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina@gmail.com>
DESCRIPTION: Adds REASSIGN OWNED BY propagation
This pull request introduces the propagation of the "Reassign owned by"
statement. It accommodates both local and distributed roles for both the
old and new assignments. However, when the old role is a local role, it
undergoes filtering and is not propagated. On the other hand, if the new
role is a local role, the process involves first creating the role on
worker nodes before propagating the "Reassign owned" statement.
DESCRIPTION: Adds database connection limit, rename and set tablespace
propagation
In this PR, below statement propagations are added
alter database <database_name> with allow_connections = <boolean_value>;
alter database <database_name> rename to <database_name2>;
alter database <database_name> set TABLESPACE <table_space_name>
---------
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <jelte.fennema@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for 2PC from non-Citus main databases
This PR only adds support for `CREATE USER` queries, other queries need
to be added. But it should be simple because this PR creates the
underlying structure.
Citus main database is the database where the Citus extension is
created. A non-main database is all the other databases that are in the
same node with a Citus main database.
When a `CREATE USER` query is run on a non-main database we:
1. Run `start_management_transaction` on the main database. This
function saves the outer transaction's xid (the non-main database
query's transaction id) and marks the current query as main db command.
2. Run `execute_command_on_remote_nodes_as_user("CREATE USER
<username>", <username to run the command>)` on the main database. This
function creates the users in the rest of the cluster by running the
query on the other nodes. The user on the current node is created by the
query on the outer, non-main db, query to make sure consequent commands
in the same transaction can see this user.
3. Run `mark_object_distributed` on the main database. This function
adds the user to `pg_dist_object` in all of the nodes, including the
current one.
This PR also implements transaction recovery for the queries from
non-main databases.
Allowing GRANT ADMIN to now also be INHERIT or SET in support of psql16
GRANT role_name [, ...] TO role_specification [, ...] [ WITH { ADMIN |
INHERIT | SET } { OPTION | TRUE | FALSE } ] [ GRANTED BY
role_specification ]
Fixes: #7148
Related: #7138
See review changes from https://github.com/citusdata/citus/pull/7164
This change adds a script to programatically group all includes in a
specific order. The script was used as a one time invocation to group
and sort all includes throught our formatted code. The grouping is as
follows:
- System includes (eg. `#include<...>`)
- Postgres.h (eg. `#include "postgres.h"`)
- Toplevel imports from postgres, not contained in a directory (eg.
`#include "miscadmin.h"`)
- General postgres includes (eg . `#include "nodes/..."`)
- Toplevel citus includes, not contained in a directory (eg. `#include
"citus_verion.h"`)
- Columnar includes (eg. `#include "columnar/..."`)
- Distributed includes (eg. `#include "distributed/..."`)
Because it is quite hard to understand the difference between toplevel
citus includes and toplevel postgres includes it hardcodes the list of
toplevel citus includes. In the same manner it assumes anything not
prefixed with `columnar/` or `distributed/` as a postgres include.
The sorting/grouping is enforced by CI. Since we do so with our own
script there are not changes required in our uncrustify configuration.
DESCRIPTION: Adds support for propagating `CREATE`/`DROP` database
In this PR, create and drop database support is added.
For CREATE DATABASE:
* "oid" option is not supported
* specifying "strategy" to be different than "wal_log" is not supported
* specifying "template" to be different than "template1" is not
supported
The last two are because those are not saved in `pg_database` and when
activating a node, we cannot assume what parameters were provided when
creating the database.
And "oid" is not supported because whether user specified an arbitrary
oid when creating the database is not saved in pg_database and we want
to avoid from oid collisions that might arise from attempting to use an
auto-assigned oid on workers.
Finally, in case of node activation, GRANTs for the database are also
propagated.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <github-tech@jeltef.nl>
Co-authored-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio <jelte.fennema@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
We propagate `SECURITY LABEL [for provider] ON ROLE rolename IS
labelname` to the worker nodes.
We also make sure to run the relevant `SecLabelStmt` commands on a
newly added node by looking at roles found in `pg_shseclabel`.
See official docs for explanation on how this command works:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-security-label.html
This command stores the role label in the `pg_shseclabel` catalog table.
This commit also fixes the regex string in
`check_gucs_are_alphabetically_sorted.sh` script such that it escapes
the dot. Previously it was looking for all strings starting with "citus"
instead of "citus." as it should.
To test this feature, I currently make use of a special GUC to control
label provider registration in PG_init when creating the Citus extension.
DESCRIPTION: Adds support from issuing role management commands from worker nodes
It's unlikely to get into a distributed deadlock with role commands, we
don't care much about them at the moment.
There were several attempts to reduce the chances of a deadlock but we
didn't any of them merged into main branch yet, see:
#7325#7016#7009
Gürkan İndibay
Valery
zhjwpku
Halil Ozan Akgül
Teja Mupparti
LightDB Enterprise Postgres
Onur Tirtir
Karina
Jodi-Ann Francis
Nils Dijk
Naisila Puka
cvbhjkl