In this commit, we're introducing a way to prevent CTE inlining via a GUC.
The GUC is used in all the tests where PG 11 and PG 12 tests would diverge
otherwise.
Note that, in PG 12, the restriction information for CTEs are generated. It
means that for some queries involving CTEs, Citus planner (router planner/
pushdown planner) may behave differently. So, via the GUC, we prevent
tests to diverge on PG 11 vs PG 12.
When we drop PG 11 support, we should get rid of the GUC, and mark
relevant ctes as MATERIALIZED, which does the same thing.
These set of tests has changed in both PG 11 and PG 12.
The changes are only about CTE inlining kicking in both
versions, and yielding the exact same distributed planning.
The idea is simple: Inline CTEs(if any), try distributed planning.
If the planning yields a successful distributed plan, simply return
it.
If the planning fails, fallback to distributed planning on the query
tree where CTEs are not inlined. In that case, if the planning failed
just because of the CTE inlining, via recursive planning, the same
query would yield a successful plan.
A very basic set of examples:
WITH cte_1 AS (SELECT * FROM test_table)
SELECT
*, row_number() OVER ()
FROM
cte_1;
or
WITH a AS (SELECT * FROM test_table),
b AS (SELECT * FROM test_table)
SELECT * FROM a JOIN b ON (a.value> b.value);
With this commit we add the necessary Citus function to inline CTEs
in a queryTree.
You might ask, why do we need to inline CTEs if Postgres is already
going to do it?
Few reasons behind this decision:
- One techinal node here is that Citus does the recursive CTE planning
by checking the originalQuery which is the query that has not gone
through the standard_planner().
CTEs in Citus is super powerful. It is practically key for full SQL
coverage for multi-shard queries. With CTEs, you can always reduce
any query multi-shard query into a router query via recursive
planning (thus full SQL coverage).
We cannot let CTE inlining break that. The main idea is Citus should
be able to retry planning if anything goes after CTE inlining.
So, by taking ownership of CTE inlining on the originalQuery, Citus
can fallback to recursive planning of CTEs if the planning with the
inlined query fails. It could have been a lot harder if we had relied
on standard_planner() to have the inlined CTEs on the original query.
- We want to have this feature in PostgreSQL 11 as well, but Postgres
only inlines in version 12
All the code in this commit is direct copy & paste from Postgres
source code.
We can classify the copy&paste code into two:
- Copy paste from CTE inline patch from postgres
(https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=608b167f9f9c4553c35bb1ec0eab9ddae643989b)
These include the functions inline_cte(), inline_cte_walker(),
contain_dml(), contain_dml_walker().
It also include the code in function PostgreSQLCTEInlineCondition().
We prefer to extract that code into a seperate function, because
(a) we'll re-use the logic later (b) we added one check for PG_11
Finally, the struct "inline_cte_walker_context" is also copied from
the same Postgres commit.
- Copy paste from the other parts of the Postgres code
In order to implement CTE inlining in Postgres 12, the hackers
modified the query_tree_walker()/range_table_walker() with the
18c0da88a5
Since Citus needs to support the same logic in PG 11, we copy & pasted
that functions (and related flags) with the names pg_12_query_tree_walker()
and pg_12_range_table_walker()
In two places I've made code more straight forward by using ROUTINE in our own codegen
Two changes which may seem extraneous:
AppendFunctionName was updated to not use pg_get_function_identity_arguments.
This is because that function includes ORDER BY when printing an aggregate like my_rank.
While ALTER AGGREGATE my_rank(x "any" ORDER BY y "any") is accepted by postgres,
ALTER ROUTINE my_rank(x "any" ORDER BY y "any") is not.
Tests were updated to use macaddr over integer. Using integer is flaky, our logic
could sometimes end up on tables like users_table. I originally wanted to use money,
but money isn't hashable.
We might need to send commands from workers to other workers. In
these cases we shouldn't override the xact id assigned by coordinator,
or otherwise we won't read the consistent set of result files
accross the nodes.
We need to know which placement succeeded in executing the worker_partition_query_result() call. Otherwise we wouldn't know which node to fetch from. This change allows that by introducing Task::perPlacementQueryStrings.
Fixes#3331
In #2389, we've implemented support for partitioned tables with rep > 1.
The implementation is limiting the use of modification queries on the
partitions. In fact, we error out when any partition is modified via
EnsurePartitionTableNotReplicated().
However, we seem to forgot an important case, where the parent table's
partition is marked as INVALID. In that case, at least one of the partition
becomes INVALID. However, we do not mark partitions as INVALID ever.
If the user queries the partition table directly, Citus could happily send
the query to INVALID placements -- which are not marked as INVALID.
This PR fixes it by marking the placements of the partitions as INVALID
as well.
The shard placement repair logic already re-creates all the partitions,
so should be fine in that front.
Different versions of reindent tool reformatted citus_custom_scan.c
and citus_copyfuncs.c differently. So some developers spent some
extra attention not to commit these two files after reindent.
This PR tries to address this.
* WIP
* wip
* add basic logic to run a single job with repartioning joins with adaptive executor
* fix some warnings and return in ExecuteDependedTasks if there is none
* Add the logic to run depended jobs in adaptive executor
The execution of depended tasks logic is changed. With the current
logic:
- All tasks are created from the top level task list.
- At one iteration:
- CurTasks whose dependencies are executed are found.
- CurTasks are executed in parallel with adapter executor main
logic.
- The iteration is repeated until all tasks are completed.
* Separate adaptive executor repartioning logic
* Remove duplicate parts
* cleanup directories and schemas
* add basic repartion tests for adaptive executor
* Use the first placement to fetch data
In task tracker, when there are replicas, we try to fetch from a replica
for which a map task is succeeded. TaskExecution is used for this,
however TaskExecution is not used in adaptive executor. So we cannot use
the same thing as task tracker.
Since adaptive executor fails when a map task fails (There is no retry
logic yet). We know that if we try to execute a fetch task, all of its
map tasks already succeeded, so we can just use the first one to fetch
from.
* fix clean directories logic
* do not change the search path while creating a udf
* Enable repartition joins with adaptive executor with only enable_reparitition_joins guc
* Add comments to adaptive_executor_repartition
* dont run adaptive executor repartition test in paralle with other tests
* execute cleanup only in the top level execution
* do cleanup only in the top level ezecution
* not begin a transaction if repartition query is used
* use new connections for repartititon specific queries
New connections are opened to send repartition specific queries. The
opened connections will be closed at the FinishDistributedExecution.
While sending repartition queries no transaction is begun so that
we can see all changes.
* error if a modification was done prior to repartition execution
* not start a transaction if a repartition query and sql task, and clean temporary files and schemas at each subplan level
* fix cleanup logic
* update tests
* add missing function comments
* add test for transaction with DDL before repartition query
* do not close repartition connections in adaptive executor
* rollback instead of commit in repartition join test
* use close connection instead of shutdown connection
* remove unnecesary connection list, ensure schema owner before removing directory
* rename ExecuteTaskListRepartition
* put fetch query string in planner not executor as we currently support only replication factor = 1 with adaptive executor and repartition query and we know the query string in the planner phase in that case
* split adaptive executor repartition to DAG execution logic and repartition logic
* apply review items
* apply review items
* use an enum for remote transaction state and fix cleanup for repartition
* add outside transaction flag to find connections that are unclaimed instead of always opening a new transaction
* fix style
* wip
* rename removejobdir to partition cleanup
* do not close connections at the end of repartition queries
* do repartition cleanup in pg catch
* apply review items
* decide whether to use transaction or not at execution creation
* rename isOutsideTransaction and add missing comment
* not error in pg catch while doing cleanup
* use replication factor of the creation time, not current time to decide if task tracker should be chosen
* apply review items
* apply review items
* apply review item
DESCRIPTION: Fix counter that keeps track of internal depth in executor
While reviewing #3302 I ran into the `ExecutorLevel` variable which used a variable to keep the original value to restore on successful exit. I haven't explored the full space and if it is possible to get into an inconsistent state. However using `PG_TRY`/`PG_CATCH` seems generally more correct.
Given very bad things will happen if this level is not reset, I kept the failsafe of setting the variiable back to 0 on the `XactCallback` but I did add an assert to treat it as a developer bug.
Use partition column's collation for range distributed tables
Don't allow non deterministic collations for hash distributed tables
CoPartitionedTables: don't compare unequal types
Test ALTER ROLE doesn't deadlock when coordinator added, or propagate from mx workers
Consolidate wait_until_metadata_sync & verify_metadata to multi_test_helpers
Previously,
- we'd push down ORDER BY, but this doesn't order intermediate results between workers
- we'd keep FILTER on master aggregate, which would raise an error about unexpected cstrings
DESCRIPTION: add gitref to the output of citus_version
During debugging of custom builds it is hard to know the exact version of the citus build you are using. This patch will add a human readable/understandable git reference to the build of citus which can be retrieved by calling `citus_version();`.
Support for ARRAY[] expressions is limited to having a consistent shape,
eg ARRAY[(int,text),(int,text)] as opposed to ARRAY[(int,text),(float,text)] or ARRAY[(int,text),(int,text,float)]
Initialization of queryWindowClause and queryOrderByLimit "memset" underflow these variables.
It's possible due to the invalid usage sizeof this part of the program cause buffer overflow and function return data corruption in future changes.
* Improve extension command propagation tests
* patch for hardcoded citus extension name
(cherry picked from commit 0bb3dbac0afabda10e8928f9c17eda048dc4361a)
In plain words, each distributed plan pulls the necessary intermediate
results to the worker nodes that the plan hits. This is primarily useful
in three ways.
(i) If the distributed plan that uses intermediate
result(s) is a router query, then the intermediate results are only
broadcasted to a single node.
(ii) If a distributed plan consists of only intermediate results, which
is not uncommon, the intermediate results are broadcasted to a single
node only.
(iii) If a distributed query hits a sub-set of the shards in multiple
workers, the intermediate results will be broadcasted to the relevant
node(s).
The final item (iii) becomes crucial for append/range distributed
tables where typically the distributed queries hit a small subset of
shards/workers.
To do this, for each query that Citus creates a distributed plan, we keep
track of the subPlans used in the queryTree, and save it in the distributed
plan. Just before Citus executes each subPlan, Citus first keeps track of
every worker node that the distributed plan hits, and marks every subPlan
should be broadcasted to these nodes. Later, for each subPlan which is a
distributed plan, Citus does this operation recursively since these
distributed plans may access to different subPlans, and those have to be
recorded as well.
Onder Kalaci
Philip Dubé
Marco Slot
Hadi Moshayedi
Jelte Fennema
SaitTalhaNisanci
Nils Dijk
Alexander Pyhalov
Hadi Moshayedi
Khashayar Fereidani
Onur TIRTIR
Philip Dubé
Hanefi Onaldi