Clang 13 complains about a suspicious string concatenation. It thinks we
might have missed a comma. This adds parentheses to make it clear that
concatenation is indeed what we meant.
There is a vulnerability in mitmproxy with the version we are using.
It would be hard to exploit anything with regards to the artifacts we ship as its only used in our test suite. Still its good hygiene to _not_ use software with known vulnerabilities.
This PR updates the version of python, mitmproxy and the crypto libraries used.
The latest version of mitmproxy for python 3.6 is not patched, hence the upgrade of python.
For our CI images this cascades into upgrading debian as well :)
For CI we bake these versions in our images so we need to update them as well.
Changes to the CI images: https://github.com/citusdata/the-process/pull/65
It seems like the decision for 2PC is more complicated than
it should be.
With this change, we do one behavioral change. In essense,
before this commit, when a SELECT task with replication factor > 1
is executed, the executor was triggering 2PC. And, in fact,
the transaction manager (`ConnectionModifiedPlacement()`) was
able to understand not to trigger 2PC when no modification happens.
However, for transaction blocks like:
BEGIN;
-- a command that triggers 2PC
-- A SELECT command on replication > 1
..
COMMIT;
The SELECT was used to be qualified as required 2PC. And, as a side-effect
the executor was setting `xactProperties.errorOnAnyFailure = true;`
So, the commands was failing at the time of execution. Now, they fail at
the end of the transaction.
In the past, we allowed users to manually switch to 1PC
(e.g., one phase commit). However, with this commit, we
don't. All multi-shard modifications are done via 2PC.
With Citus 9.0, we introduced `citus.single_shard_commit_protocol` which
defaults to 2PC.
With this commit, we prevent any user to set it to 1PC and drop support
for `citus.single_shard_commit_protocol`.
Although this might add some overhead for users, it is already the default
behaviour (so less likely) and marking placements as INVALID is much
worse.
- citus_get_all_dependencies_for_object: emulate what Citus
would qualify as
dependency when adding
a new node
- citus_get_dependencies_for_object: emulate what Citus would qualify
as dependency when creating an
object
Example use:
```SQL
-- find all the depedencies of table test
SELECT
pg_identify_object(t.classid, t.objid, t.objsubid)
FROM
(SELECT * FROM pg_get_object_address('table', '{test}', '{}')) as addr
JOIN LATERAL
citus_get_all_dependencies_for_object(addr.classid, addr.objid, addr.objsubid) as t(classid oid, objid oid, objsubid int)
ON TRUE
ORDER BY 1;
```
To run tests in parallel use:
```bash
make check-arbitrary-configs parallel=4
```
To run tests sequentially use:
```bash
make check-arbitrary-configs parallel=1
```
To run only some configs:
```bash
make check-arbitrary-base CONFIGS=CitusSingleNodeClusterConfig,CitusSmallSharedPoolSizeConfig
```
To run only some test files with some config:
```bash
make check-arbitrary-base CONFIGS=CitusSingleNodeClusterConfig EXTRA_TESTS=dropped_columns_1
```
To get a deterministic run, you can give the random's seed:
```bash
make check-arbitrary-configs parallel=4 seed=12312
```
The `seed` will be in the output of the run.
In our regular regression tests, we can see all the details about either planning or execution but this means
we need to run the same query under different configs/cluster setups again and again, which is not really maintanable.
When we don't care about the internals of how planning/execution is done but the correctness, especially with different configs
this infrastructure can be used.
With `check-arbitrary-configs` target, the following happens:
- a bunch of configs are loaded, which are defined in `config.py`. These configs have different settings such as different shard count, different citus settings, postgres settings, worker amount, or different metadata.
- For each config, a separate data directory is created for tests in `tmp_citus_test` with the config's name.
- For each config, `create_schedule` is run on the coordinator to setup the necessary tables.
- For each config, `sql_schedule` is run. `sql_schedule` is run on the coordinator if it is a non-mx cluster. And if it is mx, it is either run on the coordinator or a random worker.
- Tests results are checked if they match with the expected.
When tests results don't match, you can see the regression diffs in a config's datadir, such as `tmp_citus_tests/dataCitusSingleNodeClusterConfig`.
We also have a PostgresConfig which runs all the test suite with Postgres.
By default configs use regular user, but we have a config to run as a superuser as well.
So the infrastructure tests:
- Postgres vs Citus
- Mx vs Non-Mx
- Superuser vs regular user
- Arbitrary Citus configs
When you want to add a new test, you can add the create statements to `create_schedule` and add the sql queries to `sql_schedule`.
If you are adding Citus UDFs that should be a NO-OP for Postgres, make sure to override the UDFs in `postgres.sql`.
You can add your new config to `config.py`. Make sure to extend either `CitusDefaultClusterConfig` or `CitusMXBaseClusterConfig`.
On the CI, upon a failure, all logfiles will be uploaded as artifacts, so you can check the artifacts tab.
All the regressions will be shown as part of the job on CI.
In your local, you can check the regression diffs in config's datadirs as in `tmp_citus_tests/dataCitusSingleNodeClusterConfig`.
Halil Ozan Akgul
Jelte Fennema
Marco Slot
naisila
Ahmet Gedemenli
Nils Dijk
Philip Dubé
Philip Dubé
Önder Kalacı
Onder Kalaci
Marco Slot
Sait Talha Nisanci
Onur Tirtir
Hanefi Onaldi