We should not omit to free PGResult when we receive single tuple result
from an internal backend.
Single tuple results are normally freed by our ReceiveResults for
`tupleDescriptor != NULL` flow but not for those with `tupleDescriptor
== NULL`. See PR #6722 for details.
DESCRIPTION: Fixes memory leak issue with query results that returns
single row.
(cherry picked from commit 9e69dd0e7f)
pg_dist_node and pg_dist_colocation have a primary key index, not a replica identity index.
Citus catalog tables are created in public schema, which has replica identity index by default
as primary key index. Later the citus catalog tables are moved to pg_catalog schema.
During pg_upgrade, all tables are recreated, and given that pg_dist_colocation is found in
pg_catalog schema, it is recreated in that schema, and when it is recreated it doesn't
have a replica identity index, because catalog tables have no replica identity.
Further action:
Do we even need to acquire this lock on the primary key index?
Postgres doesn't acquire such locks on indexes before deleting catalog tuples.
Also, catalog tuples don't have replica identities by definition.
Previously, we were wrapping targetlist nodes with Vars that reference
to the result of the worker query, if the node itself is not `Const` or
not a `Param`. Indeed, we should not do that unless the node itself is
a `Var` node or contains a `Var` within it (e.g.: `OpExpr(Var(column_a) > 2)`).
Otherwise, when worker query returns empty result set, then combine
query exec would crash since the `Var` would be pointing to an empty
tuple slot, which is not desirable for the node-executor methods.
(cherry picked from commit 79442df1b7)
Citus heavily relies on application_name, see
`IsCitusInitiatedRemoteBackend()`.
But if the user set the application name, such as export PGAPPNAME=test_name,
Citus uses that name while connecting to the remote node.
With this commit, we ensure that Citus always connects with
the "citus" user name to the remote nodes.
(cherry picked from commit b26eeaecd3)
Drop extension might cascade to columnar.options before dropping a
columnar table. In that case, we were getting below error when opening
columnar.options to delete records for the columnar table that we are
about to drop.: "ERROR: could not open relation with OID 0".
I somehow reproduced this bug easily when upgrading pg, that is why
adding added the test to after_pg_upgrade_schedule.
(cherry picked from commit 25024b776e)
Conflicts:
src/test/regress/after_pg_upgrade_schedule
src/test/regress/expected/upgrade_columnar_after.out
src/test/regress/sql/upgrade_columnar_after.sql
Considering all code-paths that we might interact with a columnar table,
add `CheckCitusVersion` calls to tableAM callbacks:
- initializing table scan (`columnar_beginscan` & `columnar_index_fetch_begin`)
- setting a new filenode for a relation (storage initializiation or a table rewrite)
- truncating the storage
- inserting tuple (single and multi)
Also add `CheckCitusVersion` call to:
- drop hook (`ColumnarTableDropHook`)
- `alter_columnar_table_set` & `alter_columnar_table_reset` UDFs
(cherry picked from commit f8b1ff7214)
Conflicts:
src/backend/columnar/columnar_tableam.c
The logging of the amount of ignored moves crashed when no distributed
tables existed in a cluster. This also fixes in passing that the logging
of ignored moves logs the correct number of ignored moves if there
exist multiple colocation groups and all are rebalanced at the same time.
(cherry picked from commit 481f8be084)
In short, add wrappers around Postgres' AddWaitEventToSet() and
ModifyWaitEvent().
AddWaitEventToSet()/ModifyWaitEvent*() may throw hard errors. For
example, when the underlying socket for a connection is closed by
the remote server and already reflected by the OS, however
Citus hasn't had a chance to get this information. In that case,
if replication factor is >1, Citus can failover to other nodes
for executing the query. Even if replication factor = 1, Citus
can give much nicer errors.
So CitusAddWaitEventSetToSet()/CitusModifyWaitEvent() simply puts
AddWaitEventToSet()/ModifyWaitEvent() into a PG_TRY/PG_CATCH block
in order to catch any hard errors, and returns this information to
the caller.
Before this commit, creating a partition after a DROP column
on the parent (position before dist. key) was leading to
partition to have the wrong distribution column.
The progress monitor wouldn't actually update the size of the shard on
the target node when using "block_writes" as the `shard_transfer_mode`.
The reason for this is that the CREATE TABLE part of the shard creation
would only be committed once all data was moved as well. This caused
our size calculation to always return 0, since the table did not exist
yet in the session that the progress monitor used.
This is fixed by first committing creation of the table, and only then
starting the actual data copy.
The test output changes slightly. Apparently splitting this up in two
transactions instead of one, increases the table size after the copy by
about 40kB. The additional size used doesn't increase when with the
amount of data in the table is larger (it stays ~40kB per shard). So
this small change in test output is not considered an actual problem.
(cherry picked from commit 2aa67421a7)
Ignore orphaned shards in more places
Only use active shard placements in RouterInsertTaskList
Use IncludingOrphanedPlacements in some more places
Fix comment
Add tests
(cherry picked from commit e7ed16c296)
Conflicts:
src/backend/distributed/planner/multi_router_planner.c
Quite trivial conflict that was easy to resolve
With the previous version of this check we would disallow distributed
tables that did not have a colocationid, to have a foreign key to a
reference table. This fixes that, since there's no reason to disallow
that.
(cherry picked from commit e9bfb8eddd)
Moving shards of reference tables was possible in at least one case:
```sql
select citus_disable_node('localhost', 9702);
create table r(x int);
select create_reference_table('r');
set citus.replicate_reference_tables_on_activate = off;
select citus_activate_node('localhost', 9702);
select citus_move_shard_placement(102008, 'localhost', 9701, 'localhost', 9702);
```
This would then remove the reference table shard on the source, causing
all kinds of issues. This fixes that by disallowing all shard moves
except for shards of distributed tables.
Co-authored-by: Onur Tirtir <onurcantirtir@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit d1d386a904)
The first and main issue was that we were putting absolute pointers into
shared memory for the `steps` field of the `ProgressMonitorData`. This
pointer was being overwritten every time a process requested the monitor
steps, which is the only reason why this even worked in the first place.
To quote a part of a relevant stack overflow answer:
> First of all, putting absolute pointers in shared memory segments is
> terrible terible idea - those pointers would only be valid in the
> process that filled in their values. Shared memory segments are not
> guaranteed to attach at the same virtual address in every process.
> On the contrary - they attach where the system deems it possible when
> `shmaddr == NULL` is specified on call to `shmat()`
Source: https://stackoverflow.com/a/10781921/2570866
In this case a race condition occurred when a second process overwrote
the pointer in between the first process its write and read of the steps
field.
This issue is fixed by not storing the pointer in shared memory anymore.
Instead we now calculate it's position every time we need it.
The second race condition I have not been able to trigger, but I found
it while investigating this. This issue was that we published the handle
of the shared memory segment, before we initialized the data in the
steps. This means that during initialization of the data, a call to
`get_rebalance_progress()` could read partial data in an unsynchronized
manner.
(cherry picked from commit ca00b63272)
This happens only when we have a "<" or "<=" filter on distribution
column of a range distributed table and that filter falls in between
two shards.
When the filter falls in between two shards:
If the filter is ">" or ">=", then UpperShardBoundary was
returning "upperBoundIndex - 1", where upperBoundIndex is
exclusive shard index used during binary seach.
This is expected since upperBoundIndex is an exclusive
index.
If the filter is "<" or "<=", then LowerShardBoundary was
returning "lowerBoundIndex + 1", where lowerBoundIndex is
inclusive shard index used during binary seach.
On the other hand, since lowerBoundIndex is an inclusive
index, we should just return lowerBoundIndex instead of
doing "+ 1". Before this commit, we were missing leftmost
shard in such queries.
* Remove useless conditional branches
The branch that we delete from UpperShardBoundary was obviously useless.
The other one in LowerShardBoundary became useless after we remove "+ 1"
from there.
This indeed is another proof of what & how we are fixing with this pr.
* Improve comments and add more
* Add some tests for upper bound calculation too
(cherry picked from commit b118d4188e)
Hanefi Onaldi
aykut-bozkurt
Naisila Puka
Halil Ozan Akgul
jeff-davis
Onur Tirtir
Onder Kalaci
Sait Talha Nisanci
Nils Dijk
Gürkan İndibay
Marco Slot
Jelte Fennema
naisila
Önder Kalacı