es_result_relation_info is removed from Estate. In this commit we make some changes to handle that.
resultRelationInfo filed is added to ModifyState to support the removed field.
Relevant PG commits:
1375422c7826a2bf387be29895e961614f69de4b
a04daa97a4339c38e304cd6164d37da540d665a8
GetOldestXmin function is removed so we use GetOldestNonRemovableTransactionId functions instead
GetOldestNonRemovableTransactionId_compat picks the appropriate one
Relevant PG commit:
dc7420c2c9274a283779ec19718d2d16323640c0
New macros: standard_ProcessUtility_compat, ProcessUtility_compat, ColumnarProcessUtility_compat, PrevProcessUtilityHook_compat
The functions now have a new bool parameter: readOnlyTree
These new macros give us the ability to use this new parameter for PG14 and it doesn't give the parameter for previous versions
In multi_ProcessUtility and ColumnarProcessUtility, before doing anything else, we check if readOnlyTree parameter is true and create a copy of pstmt
Existing readOnlyTree parameters are set to false since we already handle the read only case at multi_ProcessUtility and ColumnarProcessUtility
Relevant PG commit:
7c337b6b527b7052e6a751f966d5734c56f668b5
VacOptTernaryValue enum is renamed to VacOptValue.
In the enum there were three values, VACOPT_TERNARY_DEFAULT, VACOPT_TERNARY_DISABLED, and VACOPT_TERNARY_ENABLED
Now there are four values VACOPTVALUE_UNSPECIFIED, VACOPTVALUE_AUTO, VACOPTVALUE_DISABLED, and VACOPTVALUE_ENABLED
New macros are VacOptValue_compat, VACOPTVALUE_UNSPECIFIED_COMPAT, VACOPTVALUE_DISABLED_COMPAT, and VACOPTVALUE_ENABLED_COMPAT
The VACOPTVALUE_UNSPECIFIED_COMPAT matches VACOPT_TERNARY_DEFAULT and VACOPTVALUE_UNSPECIFIED. And there are no macro for VACOPTVALUE_AUTO.
Relevant PG commit:
3499df0dee8c4ea51d264a674df5b5e31991319a
stats function now have a new bool print_to_stderr parameter
This new macro gives us the ability to use this new parameter for PG14 and it doesn't give the parameter for previous versions
Existing print_to_stderr parameter is set to true to keep current behavior
Relevant PG commit:
43620e328617c1f41a2a54c8cee01723064e3ffa
Allow ColumnarScans to push down join quals by generating
parameterized paths. This significantly expands the utility of chunk
group filtering, making a ColumnarScan behave similar to an index when
on the inner of a nested loop join.
Also, evaluate all parameters on beginscan/rescan, which also works
for external parameters.
Fixes#4488.
Previously, we were doing `first_row_number` reservation for the first
row written to current `WriteState` but were doing `stripe_id`
reservation when flushing the `WriteState` and were inserting the
related record to `columnar.stripe` at that time as well.
However, inserting `columnar.stripe` record at flush-time is
problematic. This is because, as told in #5160, if relation has
any index-based constraints and if there are two concurrent
writes that are inserting conflicting key values for that constraint,
then postgres relies on `tableAM->fetch_index_tuple`
(=`columnar_fetch_index_tuple`) callback to return `true` when
indexAM is checking against possible constraint violations.
However, pending writes of other backends are not visible to concurrent
sessions in columnar since we were not inserting the stripe metadata
record until flushing the stripe.
With this commit, we split stripe reservation into two phases:
i) Reserve `stripe_id` and insert a "dummy" record to `columnar.stripe`
at the very same time we reserve `first_row_number`, i.e. when writing
the first row to the current `WriteState`.
ii) At flush time, do the storage level allocation and complete the
missing fields of the dummy record inserted into `columnar.stripe`
during i).
That way, any concurrent writes would be able to check against possible
constraint violations by using `SnapshotDirty` when scanning
`columnar.stripe`.
Note that `columnar_fetch_index_tuple` still wouldn't be able to fill
the output tupleslot for the requested tid but it would at least return
`true` for such index look-up's and we believe this should be sufficient
for the caller indexAM callback to make the concurrent writer block on
prior one.
That is how we fix#5160.
Only downside of reserving `stripe_id` at the same time we reserve
`first_row_number` is that now any aborted writes would also waste
some amount of `stripe_id` as in the case of `first_row_number` but
we are just wasting them one-by-one.
Considering the fact that we waste `first_row_number` by the amount
stripe row limit (=150k by default) in such cases, this shouldn't be
important at all.
Before starting to scan a columnar table, we always flush the pending
writes to disk.
However, we increment command counter after modifying metadata tables.
On the other hand, now that we _don't always use_ xact snapshot to scan
a columnar table, writes that we just flushed might not be visible to
the query that just flushed pending writes to disk since curcid of
provided snapshot would become smaller than the command id being used
when modifying metadata tables.
To give an example, before this change, below was a possible scenario
due to the changes that we made to use the correct snapshot.
```sql
CREATE TABLE t(a int, b int) USING columnar;
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO t VALUES (5, 10);
SELECT * FROM t;
┌───┬───┐
│ a │ b │
├───┼───┤
└───┴───┘
(0 rows)
SELECT * FROM t;
┌───┬────┐
│ a │ b │
├───┼────┤
│ 5 │ 10 │
└───┴────┘
(1 row)
```
In next commit, we will adjust curcid of the snapshot being used when
scanning the columnar table.
However, for index scan, snapshot is provided not when beginning scan
but within fetch-tuple call.
For this reason, start flushing pending writes in init_columnar_read_state
since this seem to be a prerequisite step that needs to be done before
scanning a columnar table regardless of the scan method being used.
Seems that we always increment the command counter right after
finishing metadata table modification.
For this reason, it makes sense to call CommandCounterIncrement
within FinishModifyRelation.
All the callers except columnar_relation_copy_for_cluster were already
switching to right memory context when creating ColumnarReadState.
With this commit, we embed that logic into init_columnar_read_state
to avoid further such bugs.
That way, we start using the right memory context for
columnar_relation_copy_for_cluster too.
Instead of setting stripeReadState to NULL, call ColumnarResetRead
before re-scanning a columnar table since this function is already
designed for doing the necessary clean up when finishing a stripe
read.
Note that this change shouldn't have a great effect on memory usage
since AdvanceStripe was already doing the clean-up for all the
stripes except the last one.
Previously, we were only using chunk group reader for sequential scan.
However, to support index scans on columnar tables, now we use very
same low level functions for index scan too.
Since those low-level functions were only used for sequential scan, it
was guaranteed that we would never read the same chunk group more than
once, so we were freeing chunk buffers after deserializing them into a
separate buffer.
Now that we use those low level functions for index scan, we cannot
free chunk buffers since it's possible to read the same chunk group
again, such that:
- read chunk group 1 of stripe 5
- read chunk group 2 of stripe 5
- read chunk group 1 of stripe 5 again
Here, when we decide to read chunk group 1 for a second time,
chunk group 1 is not cached. Plus, before this commit, we were
freeing the chunk buffers for chunk group 1 after the first
read and then we were getting segfault or errors from low-level
de-compression APIs.
With this commit, we add (`CREATE INDEX` / `REINDEX`) `CONCURRENTLY` support for columnar tables.
For that, we implement `columnar_index_validate_scan` callback.
The reasoning behind the implementation is as follows:
* Postgres function `validate_index` provides all the TIDs that are currently in the
index to `columnar_index_validate_scan` callback via a `tupleSort` object..
* We start scanning the table by using `columnar_getnextslot` as usual.
Before moving forward, note that `columnar_getnextslot` guarantees
to return tuples in the order of their TIDs.
* For us to use during table scan, postgres provides a snapshot guaranteeing
that any tuples that are valid according to that snapshot but are not in the
index must be added to the index.
* Then for each tuple that we read from our table, we continue iterating
given `tupleSort` to find the first TID that is greater than or equal to our
tuple's TID.
If both TID's are equal to each other, then we skip the tuple since it's already
indexed.
If the TID that we read from tupleSort is greater then our tuple's TID, then
we decide to insert this tuple into index.
systable_getnext already uses ForwardScanDirection if relation has any
open indexes, but let's be more explicit doing ordered scan on columnar
catalog tables.
Halil Ozan Akgul
jeff-davis
Onur Tirtir